search
Back to results

Effect of Immersive Virtual Reality-based Cognitive Remediation in Patients With Mood - or Psychosis Spectrum Disorders

Primary Purpose

Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Psychotic Disorders

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Virtual reality Based Cognitive Remediation
Virtual reality control training
Sponsored by
Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bipolar Disorder focused on measuring Cognition, Cognitive Impairment, Cognitive Remediation, Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Schizotypal Disorder, Psychotic Disorders, Virtual Reality

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 55 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Fluent Danish skills Meet the International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) diagnosis of unipolar disorder, bipolar disorder (types I and II) or a psychosis spectrum disorder (i.e. F20-F29) confirmed using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) interview Patients must have objective and subjective cognitive impairment at the time of inclusion. Objective cognitive impairment is defined a total score on the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry - Danish version (SCIP-D) ≥ 0.5 standard deviations (SD) below the expected total score based on age, education, and gender or as a score ≥ 0.5 SD below the expected score on a minimum of two out of the five subtests (verbal learning test - immediate, working memory test, verbal fluency test, verbal learning, test - delayed, and processing speed test). Subjective cognitive impairment is defined as a score ≥ 14 on the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Scale (COBRA). Exclusion Criteria: Current drug or substance abuse A daily use of benzodiazepines >22.5 mg oxazepam or >7.5 mg diazepam (cutoffs for doses with limited cognitive side effects) Comorbid neurological disorder Previous serious head trauma Dyslexia Pregnancy Claustrophobia (fMRI scan) Having a pacemaker or other metal implants inside the body (fMRI scan) Having had electroconvulsive therapy in the 3 months prior to inclusion

Sites / Locations

  • Neurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg hospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Virtual reality Based Cognitive Remediation

Virtual reality control treatment

Arm Description

The cognitive remediation program has a duration of four weeks and involves two weekly 1,5-hour virtual reality-based cognitive training sessions with a therapist accompanied by additional between-session virtual reality training at home and homework assignments consisting of cognitively challenging daily life tasks.

The control treatment program also has a duration of four weeks and involves one weekly 2-hour session with a therapist.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Cognition Assessement in Virtual Reality (CAVIR) test: cognitive composite score
The primary outcome measure is a broad cognitive composite score spanning all five subtasks on a novel virtual reality test of daily-life cognitive functions, the Cognition Assessement in Virtual Reality (CAVIR) test. The CAVIR test is a self-administered 360º immersive VR test in a kitchen, where the participant's abilities to plan and prepare a meal are assessed. The test has a duration of 15 minutes and involves five subtasks probing verbal memory, executive functions, processing speed, working memory and sustained attention, respectively. The cognitive composite score is calculated by averaging the z-transformed scores on the five CAVIR subtasks. No score range. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT): verbal learning and memory domain composite score
A domain composite of 'verbal learning and memory' comprising the following subtests on the Rays Verbal Learning (RAVLT) Test: RAVLT total recall lists I-V, RAVLT immediate recall, RAVLT delayed recall. Score range 0-120. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Assessement of Motor and Process skills (AMPS)
A recommended measure of functioning (i.e. Activity of Daily Living) in individuals with psychiatric illness and cognitive impairment conducted by an AMPS-certificated occupational therapist a standardized test apartment. During an AMPS-evaluation, two domains of performance are evaluated: ADL motor skills (16 items) and ADL process skills (20 items). Scoring of the AMPS assessment is conducted using t available software Occupational Therapy Assessment Package (OTAP) reporting software. OTAP is based on a many-faceted Rasch measurement model making it possible to convert ordinal raw scores into overall linear ADL motor and process ability measures adjusted for severity of the task, skill item difficulty, and rater severity (determined based on rater calibration). A clinically relevant difference has been determined as ≥0.3 logit on the ADL motor or process ability scales. Higher scores mean a better outcome.

Full Information

First Posted
September 8, 2023
Last Updated
September 19, 2023
Sponsor
Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark
Collaborators
TrygFonden, Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06038955
Brief Title
Effect of Immersive Virtual Reality-based Cognitive Remediation in Patients With Mood - or Psychosis Spectrum Disorders
Official Title
Effect of Immersive Virtual Reality-based Cognitive Remediation in Patients With Mood Disorders or Psychosis Spectrum Disorders: a Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 1, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 1, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark
Collaborators
TrygFonden, Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the effect of a four-weeks, intensive virtual reality (VR)-based cognitive remediation (training) programme involving simulated daily-life challenges on cognition and functional capacity in symptomatically stable patients with mood disorders (depression or bipolar disorder) or psychosis spectrum disorders (F20-F29; e.g. schizophrenia or schizotypal disorder). The investigators hypothesize that VR-based cognitive remediation vs. a VR control treatment has a beneficial effect on cognition after four-weeks treatment completion (primary outcome assessement time) measured with a novel ecologically valid VR test of daily-life cognitive functions (The CAVIR test; primary outcome measure), a verbal learning and memory composite score based on a traditional neuropsychological test and a performance-based measure of daily functioning (secondary outcome measures). Finally, for exploratory purposes, the study will examine neuronal underpinnings of treatment effects, and effects on additional measures of cognition, functioning and self-ratings scales (tertiary outcomes).
Detailed Description
The current study will include outpatients with a mood disorders (unipolar - or bipolar disorder) in full or partial remission at the time of inclusion (score ≤ 14 on the Hamilton Depression or a psychosis spectrum disorders (F20-F29) that have been assessed to be relatively symptom stable by their treating clinician upon referral to the study. To accommodate for an approximately 15% drop-out rate from baseline to treatment completion (the primary outcome assessement time point), the investigators will recruit up to 100 participants (50 participants per intervention arm) to obtain complete data for minimum 86 participants (43 participants per arm). Recruitment will be carried out through the outpatient Copenhagen Affective Disorder Clinic, the outpatient, early intervention clinics for psychotic disorders (OPUS), other mental health centres in the Capital Region of Denmark, and through advertisements on relevant websites. After inclusion, the baseline assessements are scheduled and completed over two days, one to five days apart. On day 1, the participant is assessed with the virtual cognition test (the CAVIR test) and a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery. Participants also complete questionnaires concerning subjective cognitive complaints, quality of life and general acceptance of virtual reality technology. Functional capacity is assessed using a clinician-rated interview and a performance-based assessment. For participants with mood disorders, mood symptoms are rated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). For participants with psychosis spectrum disorders, positive and negative symptoms are rated with the Scale for the Assessement of Positive symptoms (SAPS) and Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS), respectively. Finally, sleep quantity and quality in the past 3 days is recorded. Later the same day an fMRI scan is carried out encompassing a spatial working memory N-back task, a word encoding paradigm in which participants must encode and subsequently recognize words of typical household items, a resting state, and a structural scan. On day 2, participants' daily life functional capacity is assessed with The Assessement of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) by an AMPS-certified occupational therapist in a standardized test kitchen. The virtual reality cognition test, neuropsychological assessments, questionnaires, clinical symptom ratings, assessements of functional capacity (including AMPS) and fMRI scan are repeated within 2 weeks of treatment completion (primary outcome assessement time). All assessments except for the fMRI scan are repeated again 3 months after treatment completion to assess durability. Participants are randomized upon full completion of the baseline assessement with allocation being carried out using the automated randomization module in the online Research Electronic Data Capture (REDcap) system based on an uploaded blocked randomization list stratified by age (< or ≥ 35 years) and diagnosis (mood disorders v. psychosis spectrum disorder)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Psychotic Disorders, Cognitive Impairment, Schizophrenia, Schizotypal Disorder
Keywords
Cognition, Cognitive Impairment, Cognitive Remediation, Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Schizotypal Disorder, Psychotic Disorders, Virtual Reality

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized, controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group design
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The study has a double-blinded design. Neither the participant nor the outcome-assessors will know whether the participant is receiving VR-based cognitive remediation or VR control treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Virtual reality Based Cognitive Remediation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The cognitive remediation program has a duration of four weeks and involves two weekly 1,5-hour virtual reality-based cognitive training sessions with a therapist accompanied by additional between-session virtual reality training at home and homework assignments consisting of cognitively challenging daily life tasks.
Arm Title
Virtual reality control treatment
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
The control treatment program also has a duration of four weeks and involves one weekly 2-hour session with a therapist.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Virtual reality Based Cognitive Remediation
Intervention Description
The main component of the intervention is a virtual reality training platform in 360° Oculus Quest 2-software in which participants train their cognitive abilities guided by the therapist. The platform includes four immersive daily-life scenarios in which patients have consistently reported that they often experience cognitive difficulties: (1) a kitchen scenario focusing on planning and cooking a meal, (2) a supermarket scenario focusing on grocery shopping, (3) a restaurant scenario focusing on remembering names and personal information and (4) an office scenario focusing on planning, initiating, and completing work assignments. The virtual reality training is supported by a psychoeducation program that focuses on application of learned cognitive strategies in daily life.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Virtual reality control training
Intervention Description
The virtual reality control training involves completing different virtual reality games that are available through the Oculus Quest games store.The chosen games involve no direct training of cognitive abilities such as planning skills og strategic learning, but merely involves simple reaction time and interaction with an entertaining environment that is meaningful to the participant and gives the impression of training cognitive skills.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cognition Assessement in Virtual Reality (CAVIR) test: cognitive composite score
Description
The primary outcome measure is a broad cognitive composite score spanning all five subtasks on a novel virtual reality test of daily-life cognitive functions, the Cognition Assessement in Virtual Reality (CAVIR) test. The CAVIR test is a self-administered 360º immersive VR test in a kitchen, where the participant's abilities to plan and prepare a meal are assessed. The test has a duration of 15 minutes and involves five subtasks probing verbal memory, executive functions, processing speed, working memory and sustained attention, respectively. The cognitive composite score is calculated by averaging the z-transformed scores on the five CAVIR subtasks. No score range. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion (primary outcome assessement time point) and 3-months follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT): verbal learning and memory domain composite score
Description
A domain composite of 'verbal learning and memory' comprising the following subtests on the Rays Verbal Learning (RAVLT) Test: RAVLT total recall lists I-V, RAVLT immediate recall, RAVLT delayed recall. Score range 0-120. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Assessement of Motor and Process skills (AMPS)
Description
A recommended measure of functioning (i.e. Activity of Daily Living) in individuals with psychiatric illness and cognitive impairment conducted by an AMPS-certificated occupational therapist a standardized test apartment. During an AMPS-evaluation, two domains of performance are evaluated: ADL motor skills (16 items) and ADL process skills (20 items). Scoring of the AMPS assessment is conducted using t available software Occupational Therapy Assessment Package (OTAP) reporting software. OTAP is based on a many-faceted Rasch measurement model making it possible to convert ordinal raw scores into overall linear ADL motor and process ability measures adjusted for severity of the task, skill item difficulty, and rater severity (determined based on rater calibration). A clinically relevant difference has been determined as ≥0.3 logit on the ADL motor or process ability scales. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
One Touch Stocking of Cambridge
Description
A computerised neuropsychological test assessing executive function. Score range 0-15. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Spatial Working Memory test
Description
A computerised neuropsychological test assessing spatial working memory. Score range 2-14. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Rapid Visual Information Processing
Description
A computerised neuropsychological test assessing sustained attention. Score range 0-1. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Third edition (WAIS-III) letter-number sequencing
Description
Neuropsychological test assessing executive function. Score range 0-21. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Repeatable Battery of the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Digit Span
Description
Neuropsychological test assessing attention. Score range 0-16. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Repeatable Battery of the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) Coding
Description
Neuropsychological test assessing processing speed. Score range 0-89. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Verbal Fluency with the letter "D" and "S"
Description
Neuropsychological test assessing executive function. No score range. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Trail Making Test A
Description
Neuropsychological test assessing attention. Scored as time to complete. A higher time means a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Trail Making Test B
Description
Neuropsychological test assessing executive function. Scored as time to complete. A higher time means a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Brief University of California, San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment-B (UPSA-B)
Description
Objective assessment of level of functioning. Score range 0-100. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Wisconsin Card Sorting Task
Description
Computerized neuropsychological test assessing executive function. No score range. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Functional Assessment Short Test
Description
Observer-based rating of level of functioning. Score range 0-72. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Assessement (COBRA)
Description
Questionnaire on subjective cognitive complaints. Score range 0-48. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF)
Description
Questionnaire on quality of life. Score range 26-130. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Cognitive Difficulties in Everyday Life (CODEL)
Description
Questionnaire on subjective cognitive complaints. Score range 0-48. Higher scores mean a worse outcome
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up
Title
Perceived Competence Scale (PCS)
Description
Questionnaire on self-efficacy. Score range 0-49. Higher scores mean a better outcome
Time Frame
Baseline, treatment completion and 3-months follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Fluent Danish skills Meet the International Classification of Diseases 10th edition (ICD-10) diagnosis of unipolar disorder, bipolar disorder (types I and II) or a psychosis spectrum disorder (i.e. F20-F29) confirmed using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) interview Patients must have objective and subjective cognitive impairment at the time of inclusion. Objective cognitive impairment is defined a total score on the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry - Danish version (SCIP-D) ≥ 0.5 standard deviations (SD) below the expected total score based on age, education, and gender or as a score ≥ 0.5 SD below the expected score on a minimum of two out of the five subtests (verbal learning test - immediate, working memory test, verbal fluency test, verbal learning, test - delayed, and processing speed test). Subjective cognitive impairment is defined as a score ≥ 14 on the Cognitive Complaints in Bipolar Disorder Rating Scale (COBRA). Exclusion Criteria: Current drug or substance abuse A daily use of benzodiazepines >22.5 mg oxazepam or >7.5 mg diazepam (cutoffs for doses with limited cognitive side effects) Comorbid neurological disorder Previous serious head trauma Dyslexia Pregnancy Claustrophobia (fMRI scan) Having a pacemaker or other metal implants inside the body (fMRI scan) Having had electroconvulsive therapy in the 3 months prior to inclusion
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Andreas Elleby Jespersen, PhD-student
Phone
+4528587815
Email
andreas.elleby.jespersen@regionh.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak, DMSc, DPhil
Phone
+4522771617
Email
kamilla.woznica.miskowiak@regionh.dk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak, DMSc, DPhil
Organizational Affiliation
Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Neurocognition and Emotion in Affective Disorders (NEAD) Centre, Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Psychiatric Centre Copenhagen, Frederiksberg hospital
City
Frederiksberg
State/Province
Capital Region Of Copenhagen
ZIP/Postal Code
2000
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34923359
Citation
Miskowiak KW, Jespersen AE, Kessing LV, Aggestrup AS, Glenthoj LB, Nordentoft M, Ott CV, Lumbye A. Cognition Assessment in Virtual Reality: Validity and feasibility of a novel virtual reality test for real-life cognitive functions in mood disorders and psychosis spectrum disorders. J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec 12;145:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.12.002. Online ahead of print.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Effect of Immersive Virtual Reality-based Cognitive Remediation in Patients With Mood - or Psychosis Spectrum Disorders

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs