search
Back to results

POEM-F for Achalasia International Study

Primary Purpose

Achalasia

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
POEM-F
Conventional POEM
Sponsored by
Chinese University of Hong Kong
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Achalasia focused on measuring POEM, Fundoplication, GERD

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria: Adult patient (age ≥18 and ≤65 years-old) and with symptomatic achalasia type I or II. Capability of understanding and complying with the study requirements, including filling the Eckardt Score, GERD-HRQL and RSI questionnaire and signing the informed consent form. Patients with achalasia type I, II or III who are one of the following: Treatment naïve, or Failed prior through-the-scope balloon dilation, Savary or pneumatic dilation Exclusion criteria: Patients unable or unwilling to provide consent. Previous esophageal or gastric surgery. Prior achalasia treatment including Heller myotomy, POEM. Sigmoid achalasia, or significant esophageal dilatation >6cm in lower esophagus Disrupted mucosal integrity at the distal esophagus, eg. Ulcer, fibrotic scars etc Patients with large hiatal hernias (axial length > 2 cm and Hill grade >2). Patients with significant cardiorespiratory comorbidities which may limit their ability to undertake general anesthesia for the procedure, including ASA grade III or above. Patients with obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30). Pregnant women or those planning pregnancy or breastfeeding women. Uncorrectable coagulopathy defined by international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5 or platelet count < 50000/µl.

Sites / Locations

  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
  • Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
  • The Chinese University of Hong Kong
  • Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
  • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
  • Baldota Institute of Digestive Sciences
  • Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital & Research Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy with fundoplication

Conventional POEM

Arm Description

The detail of the procedure has been reported in the literature. After completion of myotomy as per conventional anterior POEM, a serosal incision would be made at the level of the GE junction below the diaphragmatic crus. The peritoneal cavity would then be entered and the anterior gastric wall could be identified. A detachable endoloop would be introduced alongside the endoscope with the guidance of endoscopic clip. Three to four clips would be applied to the anterior gastric fundus while additional 3-4 clips would be applied to the edge of the submucosal tunnel, all anchoring to the endoloop. Upon tightening of the endoloop the anterior fundus would be approximated to the esophagogastric junction and thus completing the partial anterior fundoplication. Abdominal paracentesis to treat capnoperitoneum would be performed as required based on patient's clinical condition.

Conventional per-oral endoscopic myotomy An anterior POEM would be performed per usual manner described in the literature. The procedure would be performed under general anaesthesia by expert endoscopists with at least 50 case experience of conventional POEM and 5 cases experience of POEM-F. The requirement of POEM experience is based on a recent multicenter study of learning curve by Fujiyoshi Y, et al. The procedure would follow the current recommendations from expert panel in reducing GER, including avoidance of excessive gastric myotomy and preservation of the sling fibers are the gastric cardia. The length of the esophageal and gastric myotomy is standardized at 5cm and 2cm respectively

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Post-procedure rate of gastroesophageal reflux
Defined by updated Lyon 2.0 consensus as fulfilling one or more of the criteria: Endoscopic erosive esophagitis, LA grade B or above Long segment Barrett's esophagus Peptic esophageal stricture 24-hour pH study with acid exposure time >6% Both endoscopy and pH study to be performed with proton pump inhibitor stopped for 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Clinical success rate of procedure
Post-treatment Eckhardt score <=3
Adverse event of procedure
frequency of severe adverse events with probable or definite attribution to the procedure based on the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon as well as Clavien Dindo classification
Technical success rate of procedure
Completing all steps of the intended procedure successfully in the same session
Procedure time
Procedure time of the intended procedure in minutes
Erosive esophagitis on post-procedure endoscopy
The presence of erosive esophagitis as well as the grading on post-procedure endoscopy
Fundoplication wrap integrity on post-procedure endoscopy
Endoscopic appearance of fundoplication wrap on retroflexion in the stomach. Intact - wrap is completely visualised Indistinct - wrap is visualised but appears to be loosened Absent - the wrap is completely not visible
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, premyotomy
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, post myotomy
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, post fundoplication
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, on follow-up
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP, at follow-up endoscopy
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, premyotomy
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, post-myotomy
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, post-fundoplication
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, on follow-up
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP, at follow-up endoscopy
GERD-HRQL score
Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score ranged from 0-50 with higher score signifying more severe GERD symptom / worse quality of life
GERD-RSI score
Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score ranged from 0-45 with higher score signifying more severe GERD symptom
GERD-Q score
Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score is ranged from 0-18 with the higher score signifying more symptom of GERD
Use of proton pump inhibitor post-procedure
Number of participants who are on regular / as required / not on PPI

Full Information

First Posted
September 6, 2023
Last Updated
September 20, 2023
Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Collaborators
Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Johns Hopkins University, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06042127
Brief Title
POEM-F for Achalasia International Study
Official Title
Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy With Fundoplication for Achalasia - an International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
November 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
October 31, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 31, 2026 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Collaborators
Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre, Johns Hopkins University, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as the endoscopic treatment of choice for achalasia, offering comparable symptom relief with laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy. The main concern with POEM is the higher incidence of post-procedure gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), occurring in up to 50-60% of patients. In order to reduce the risk of GERD, endoscopic fundoplication has been developed as a novel procedure mimicking surgical anterior partial fundoplication that can be performed in the same session as POEM (POEM-F). Case series of POEM-F in patients with achalasia reported encouraging outcomes of low GERD rate of ~12% at 1 year. Prospective comparative data between POEM-F and conventional POEM on post-procedure GERD is current lacking. The investigators therefore designed an international multicenter prospective randomized study to investigate the efficacy of POEM-F. The investigators postulate that POEM-F could reduce the incidence of post-procedure GERD when compared with conventional POEM. This is an international multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted between high volume expert centers from Hong Kong SAR, China, India and United States of America. Adult patients with manometry confirmed achalasia would be randomised to undergo POEM-F or POEM. The procedure would be performed by experts with vast experience in POEM. The primary outcome is the incidence of post-procedure GERD at 1 year, defined by the updated Lyon consensus. Secondary outcomes include technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, post-POEM endoscopic and manometry findings as well as patients' symptom scores. Sample size calculation Based on existing pilot comparative data on POEM-F and POEM, it is estimated that 84 patients would be required to demonstrate a difference in post-procedure GERD of 47.6% to 18.2%, with 80% power and false positive rate of 0.05, accounting for 10% loss to follow-up. Purpose and potential The current study proposal could demonstrate the superiority of POEM-F over POEM in reducing post-procedural GERD. It would also demonstrate the safety and reproducibility of the technique in expert centers across the globe. It could potentially replace conventional POEM as the preferred minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for achalasia.
Detailed Description
Achalasia is the most common esophageal motility disorder worldwide, with an annual incidence of 1.6 per 100'000 individual and prevalence of 10 per 100'000 population. The incidence of achalasia has been dramatically rising over the past decade. A study conducted in Chicago suggested that over the 10 years from 2004 to 2014, the incidence and prevalence of achalasia were two- to threefold greater than estimates would have predicted. The likely explanation to the rise in incidence is an increased awareness of this condition and widespread availability of accurate diagnostic test with high resolution manometry. The cardinal features of achalasia include failed relaxation of lower esophageal sphincter and absent esophageal peristalsis. Owing to the benign nature of the disease, patients suffering from it would experience longstanding debilitating symptoms of dysphagia, chest pain, regurgitation, resulting in poor quality of life. In the past, laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy with partial fundoplication and endoscopic pneumatic dilatation were considered as treatment options for achalasia. In the past 10 years, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has emerged as the incisionless minimally invasive endoscopic treatment of choice for achalasia. This Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical (NOTES) technique involves mucosal incision and creation of a submucosal tunnel in the distal esophagus down to gastric cardia, followed by esophageal and gastric myotomy. Since the procedure was first reported by Inoue H, et al in 2010, it has seen worldwide acceptance as first-line therapy. POEM has been associated with excellent relief of dysphagia and achalasia-related symptoms with a low and acceptable adverse event rate of 0.5%. In a previous randomised controlled trial, POEM had a higher treatment success rate than pneumatic dilatation. When compared with laparoscopic Heller's cardiomyotomy, POEM was associated with at least similar treatment efficacy and a trend towards reduced short term adverse event. POEM could perform even better than surgical myotomy in patients with type III achalasia. The main limitation of POEM is the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-POEM. Kumbhari et al. looked at rates of GERD after POEM on patients who underwent subsequent objective pH testing. A total of 282 patients were included in this analysis from multiple centers in America, Asia, and Europe. About 58% of patients had objective evidence of abnormal acid exposure, with 23% showing evidence of esophagitis. More concerning, however, was that 60% of the patients with GERD were completely asymptomatic. This highlights an important issue at hand that many patients, either related to the propensity of GERD to be silent or the nature of achalasia to develop and insensate esophagus, do not report symptoms while showing high rates of GERD. POEM has been found to be consistently associated with higher rate of GERD than conventional Heller's cardiomyotomy or pneumatic dilatation across multiple studies. Supported by evidence demonstrating the efficacy of partial fundoplication during Heller's operation, there has been a significant interest in performing fundoplication after POEM during the same session to prevent the development of post-POEM GERD. Inoue et al. pioneered the technique of POEM-F that mimics the surgical Dor (anterior partial fundoplication) procedure. In the pilot study, technical success was achieved in all 21 patients, and all but one had an intact fundoplication wrap on upper endoscopy at a 1-month follow-up. Four more studies conducted in Japan and India have reported good early outcomes with POEM-F (Technical success of 85-100%) for achalasia. No severe adverse event has been reported in these studies which reiterates the safety of this procedure. In the longest follow-up study on POEM-F, GERD diagnosed by an abnormal esophageal acid exposure was seen in 11.1% of the 21 cases at one-year follow-up: comparable (8.8%) to a large meta-analysis of 4871 Heller's cardiomyotomy with fundoplication procedures. To date, no prospective multicenter randomised study has been conducted to compare the efficacy of POEM-F with conventional POEM in reducing post-procedure GERD. Therefore, in this study, the investigators aim to evaluate the of POEM-F in patients with achalasia through an international multicenter randomized controlled trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Achalasia
Keywords
POEM, Fundoplication, GERD

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomised controlled trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
81 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy with fundoplication
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The detail of the procedure has been reported in the literature. After completion of myotomy as per conventional anterior POEM, a serosal incision would be made at the level of the GE junction below the diaphragmatic crus. The peritoneal cavity would then be entered and the anterior gastric wall could be identified. A detachable endoloop would be introduced alongside the endoscope with the guidance of endoscopic clip. Three to four clips would be applied to the anterior gastric fundus while additional 3-4 clips would be applied to the edge of the submucosal tunnel, all anchoring to the endoloop. Upon tightening of the endoloop the anterior fundus would be approximated to the esophagogastric junction and thus completing the partial anterior fundoplication. Abdominal paracentesis to treat capnoperitoneum would be performed as required based on patient's clinical condition.
Arm Title
Conventional POEM
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Conventional per-oral endoscopic myotomy An anterior POEM would be performed per usual manner described in the literature. The procedure would be performed under general anaesthesia by expert endoscopists with at least 50 case experience of conventional POEM and 5 cases experience of POEM-F. The requirement of POEM experience is based on a recent multicenter study of learning curve by Fujiyoshi Y, et al. The procedure would follow the current recommendations from expert panel in reducing GER, including avoidance of excessive gastric myotomy and preservation of the sling fibers are the gastric cardia. The length of the esophageal and gastric myotomy is standardized at 5cm and 2cm respectively
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
POEM-F
Intervention Description
POEM-F would be performed as described in the arms section
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional POEM
Intervention Description
Anterior POEM performed as described in the arms section
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Post-procedure rate of gastroesophageal reflux
Description
Defined by updated Lyon 2.0 consensus as fulfilling one or more of the criteria: Endoscopic erosive esophagitis, LA grade B or above Long segment Barrett's esophagus Peptic esophageal stricture 24-hour pH study with acid exposure time >6% Both endoscopy and pH study to be performed with proton pump inhibitor stopped for 4 weeks
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical success rate of procedure
Description
Post-treatment Eckhardt score <=3
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Adverse event of procedure
Description
frequency of severe adverse events with probable or definite attribution to the procedure based on the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon as well as Clavien Dindo classification
Time Frame
30 day
Title
Technical success rate of procedure
Description
Completing all steps of the intended procedure successfully in the same session
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Procedure time
Description
Procedure time of the intended procedure in minutes
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Erosive esophagitis on post-procedure endoscopy
Description
The presence of erosive esophagitis as well as the grading on post-procedure endoscopy
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Fundoplication wrap integrity on post-procedure endoscopy
Description
Endoscopic appearance of fundoplication wrap on retroflexion in the stomach. Intact - wrap is completely visualised Indistinct - wrap is visualised but appears to be loosened Absent - the wrap is completely not visible
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, premyotomy
Description
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP
Time Frame
During index procedure, before myotomy
Title
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, post myotomy
Description
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP
Time Frame
During index procedure, after myotomy
Title
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, post fundoplication
Description
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP
Time Frame
During index procedure, after fundoplication
Title
Distensibility index on EndoFLIP, on follow-up
Description
Distensibility index (mm2/mmHg) using EndoFLIP, at follow-up endoscopy
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, premyotomy
Description
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP
Time Frame
During index procedure, before myotomy
Title
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, post-myotomy
Description
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP
Time Frame
During index procedure, after myotomy
Title
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, post-fundoplication
Description
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP
Time Frame
During index procedure, after fundoplication
Title
Maximum diameter on EndoFLIP, on follow-up
Description
Maximum diameter (mm) on EndoFLIP, at follow-up endoscopy
Time Frame
1 year
Title
GERD-HRQL score
Description
Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score ranged from 0-50 with higher score signifying more severe GERD symptom / worse quality of life
Time Frame
1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year
Title
GERD-RSI score
Description
Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score ranged from 0-45 with higher score signifying more severe GERD symptom
Time Frame
1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year
Title
GERD-Q score
Description
Symptom and quality of life score relating to GERD The score is ranged from 0-18 with the higher score signifying more symptom of GERD
Time Frame
1 month, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year
Title
Use of proton pump inhibitor post-procedure
Description
Number of participants who are on regular / as required / not on PPI
Time Frame
1 month, 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Adult patient (age ≥18 and ≤65 years-old) and with symptomatic achalasia type I or II. Capability of understanding and complying with the study requirements, including filling the Eckardt Score, GERD-HRQL and RSI questionnaire and signing the informed consent form. Patients with achalasia type I, II or III who are one of the following: Treatment naïve, or Failed prior through-the-scope balloon dilation, Savary or pneumatic dilation Exclusion criteria: Patients unable or unwilling to provide consent. Previous esophageal or gastric surgery. Prior achalasia treatment including Heller myotomy, POEM. Sigmoid achalasia, or significant esophageal dilatation >6cm in lower esophagus Disrupted mucosal integrity at the distal esophagus, eg. Ulcer, fibrotic scars etc Patients with large hiatal hernias (axial length > 2 cm and Hill grade >2). Patients with significant cardiorespiratory comorbidities which may limit their ability to undertake general anesthesia for the procedure, including ASA grade III or above. Patients with obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30). Pregnant women or those planning pregnancy or breastfeeding women. Uncorrectable coagulopathy defined by international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5 or platelet count < 50000/µl.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Hon Chi Yip, FRCSEd
Phone
35052627
Email
hcyip@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hon Chi Yip, FRCSEd
Organizational Affiliation
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mouen Khashab
Email
mkhasha1@jhmi.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Farimah Fayyaz
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mouen Khashab
Facility Name
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
City
Guangzhou
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiaobei Luo
Email
luoxiaobei63@126.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiaobei Luo
Facility Name
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
City
Chandigarh
Country
India
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jayanta Samanta
Email
dj_samanta@yahoo.co.in
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jayanta Samanta
Facility Name
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
City
Hyderabad
Country
India
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohan Ramchandani
Email
ramchandanimohan@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mohan Ramchandani
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nabi Zaheer
Facility Name
Baldota Institute of Digestive Sciences
City
Mumbai
Country
India
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amit Maydeo
Email
amitmaydeo@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amit Maydeo
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gaurav Patil
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amat Nagesh
Facility Name
Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital & Research Center
City
Pune
Country
India
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amol Bapaye
Email
amolbapaye@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Amol Bapaye

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

POEM-F for Achalasia International Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs