search
Back to results

Efficacy of Metacognitive Training in Older Adults With Depression

Primary Purpose

Depression in Old Age

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Metacognitive Training-Silver
Sponsored by
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depression in Old Age focused on measuring geriatric depression, psychotherapy, metacognitive training-silver, thought distortions

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Individuals aged 60 years and over, Diagnosis of depression by a psychiatrist according to DSM-V criteria, No change in psychopharmacological medications used within 3 months before the Metacognitive Training-Silver program, No psychiatric hospitalization in the last 3 months, No problems with vision, hearing, and understanding, Being literate, Exclusion Criteria: Individuals under 60 years of age, Comorbid with a diagnosis of depression to the extent that it interferes with the understanding of the Metacognitive Training-Silver program;

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    Intervention Group

    Control group

    Arm Description

    Participants in this group will have Metacognitive Training-Silver program. Metacognitive Training-Silver program is an eight-module training that focuses on common cognitive problems and dysfunctional attitudes, beliefs and prejudices in solving problems seen in depression. The purpose of the sessions is to convey information about false beliefs and cognitive distortions, and to help sick individuals think critically, convey their thoughts, and acquire new problem-solving strategies through exercises.

    All participants in the control group will continue the treatment process determined in the routine. In this process, the patient participates in counseling and/or psychotherapy, ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) sessions, and psychopharmacological drugs. The control group will not participate in the Metacognitive Training-Silver program, an interview consisting of one session is planned considering for the placebo effect. At the end of the study, the Metacognitive Training-Silver program will be carried out with the voluntary participants in the control group, taking into account the ethics.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): Time 1
    The purpose of the inventory, developed by Aaron T. Beck et al. in 1978, is to measure the severity and change of depressive symptoms in the individual. The Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Hisli Şahin. The scale provides a 4-point Likert-type measurement consisting of 21 items. In the scale, the individual is asked to indicate how he or she has felt in the last week. The high score obtained from the scale shows a high level of depression. (Hisli 1989a; Hisli 1989b). The BDI will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): Time 2
    The purpose of the inventory, developed by Aaron T. Beck et al. in 1978, is to measure the severity and change of depressive symptoms in the individual. The Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Hisli Şahin. The scale provides a 4-point Likert-type measurement consisting of 21 items. In the scale, the individual is asked to indicate how he or she has felt in the last week. The high score obtained from the scale shows a high level of depression. (Hisli 1989a; Hisli 1989b). The BDI will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): Time 3
    The purpose of the inventory, developed by Aaron T. Beck et al. in 1978, is to measure the severity and change of depressive symptoms in the individual. The Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Hisli Şahin. The scale provides a 4-point Likert-type measurement consisting of 21 items. In the scale, the individual is asked to indicate how he or she has felt in the last week. The high score obtained from the scale shows a high level of depression. (Hisli 1989a; Hisli 1989b). The BDI will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
    Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Revised and Abbreviated Turkish Version- DAS-R-TR): Time 1
    It was developed by Weissman and Beck (1987) as A and B forms, each consisting of 40 items, in order to detect intermediate beliefs that cause depression or anxiety in individuals and to learn their frequency (Weissman and Beck, 1978). However, the validity and reliability study of the revised and abbreviated version of the form was conducted by Batmaz and Özdel (2016) in order to be more useful for practitioners and those who filled out the scale. The scale, which consists of 13 items in the 7-Likert type, has two sub-dimensions as "Perfectionism/Achievement" (first 8 items) and "Need for Approval/Dependency" (last 5 items). If the total scores obtained are high, it indicates that individuals have more dysfunctional attitudes (Batmaz and Özdel, 2016). The DAS-R-TR will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Revised and Abbreviated Turkish Version- DAS-R-TR): Time 2
    It was developed by Weissman and Beck (1987) as A and B forms, each consisting of 40 items, in order to detect intermediate beliefs that cause depression or anxiety in individuals and to learn their frequency (Weissman and Beck, 1978). However, the validity and reliability study of the revised and abbreviated version of the form was conducted by Batmaz and Özdel (2016) in order to be more useful for practitioners and those who filled out the scale. The scale, which consists of 13 items in the 7-Likert type, has two sub-dimensions as "Perfectionism/Achievement" (first 8 items) and "Need for Approval/Dependency" (last 5 items). If the total scores obtained are high, it indicates that individuals have more dysfunctional attitudes (Batmaz and Özdel, 2016). The DAS-R-TR will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Revised and Abbreviated Turkish Version- DAS-R-TR): Time 3
    It was developed by Weissman and Beck (1987) as A and B forms, each consisting of 40 items, in order to detect intermediate beliefs that cause depression or anxiety in individuals and to learn their frequency (Weissman and Beck, 1978). However, the validity and reliability study of the revised and abbreviated version of the form was conducted by Batmaz and Özdel (2016) in order to be more useful for practitioners and those who filled out the scale. The scale, which consists of 13 items in the 7-Likert type, has two sub-dimensions as "Perfectionism/Achievement" (first 8 items) and "Need for Approval/Dependency" (last 5 items). If the total scores obtained are high, it indicates that individuals have more dysfunctional attitudes (Batmaz and Özdel, 2016). The DAS-R-TR will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
    Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30): Time 1
    The MCQ-30 assesses individual differences in unhelpful metacognitions which may contribute to obsessive and compulsive symptoms, pathological worry, and underpin trait anxiety. The scale was developed based on the metacognitive model by Cartwright-Hatton & Wells (65 items, 1997) and was shortened by Wells & Cartwright-Hatton (30 items, 2004). The Turkish study was carried out by Yılmaz et al. and Tosun & Irak in 2008 (Yılmaz et al., 2008; Tosun and Irak, 2008). According to the study of Tosun & Irak (2008), a 4-point Likert-type scale consists five sub-dimensions: (Lack of) Cognitive Confidence, Positive Beliefs about Worry, Cognitive Self-Consciousness, Negative Beliefs about Uncontrollability and Danger, and Need to Control Thoughts. An increase in the score indicates an increase in pathological metacognitive activity (Tosun & Irak, 2008). The MCQ-30 will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30): Time 2
    The MCQ-30 assesses individual differences in unhelpful metacognitions which may contribute to obsessive and compulsive symptoms, pathological worry, and underpin trait anxiety. The scale was developed based on the metacognitive model by Cartwright-Hatton & Wells (65 items, 1997) and was shortened by Wells & Cartwright-Hatton (30 items, 2004). The Turkish study was carried out by Yılmaz et al. and Tosun & Irak in 2008 (Yılmaz et al., 2008; Tosun and Irak, 2008). According to the study of Tosun & Irak (2008), a 4-point Likert-type scale consists five sub-dimensions: (Lack of) Cognitive Confidence, Positive Beliefs about Worry, Cognitive Self-Consciousness, Negative Beliefs about Uncontrollability and Danger, and Need to Control Thoughts. An increase in the score indicates an increase in pathological metacognitive activity (Tosun & Irak, 2008). The MCQ-30 will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30): Time 3
    The MCQ-30 assesses individual differences in unhelpful metacognitions which may contribute to obsessive and compulsive symptoms, pathological worry, and underpin trait anxiety. The scale was developed based on the metacognitive model by Cartwright-Hatton & Wells (65 items, 1997) and was shortened by Wells & Cartwright-Hatton (30 items, 2004). The Turkish study was carried out by Yılmaz et al. and Tosun & Irak in 2008 (Yılmaz et al., 2008; Tosun and Irak, 2008). According to the study of Tosun & Irak (2008), a 4-point Likert-type scale consists five sub-dimensions: (Lack of) Cognitive Confidence, Positive Beliefs about Worry, Cognitive Self-Consciousness, Negative Beliefs about Uncontrollability and Danger, and Need to Control Thoughts. An increase in the score indicates an increase in pathological metacognitive activity (Tosun & Irak, 2008). The MCQ-30 will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
    The WHO-Europe Attitudes of Aging Questionnaire (EAAQ): Time 1
    The attitudes to ageing questionnaire was developed to provide a standard way of measuring attitudes to ageing from the perspective of older people. The scale was developed within the scope of a multi-center project supported by the EU 5th Framework Program to determine the perception level to aging of elderly. The Turkish adaptation and psychometric properties of the scale were studied by Eser et al. in 2011. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of three sub-dimensions (Psychosocial Loss; Physical Change and Psychological Growth) and a total of 24 items. As the total score of the scale increases, the attitude towards the related dimension also increases positively. (Eser et al. 2011). The EAAQ will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    The WHO-Europe Attitudes of Aging Questionnaire (EAAQ): Time 2
    The attitudes to ageing questionnaire was developed to provide a standard way of measuring attitudes to ageing from the perspective of older people. The scale was developed within the scope of a multi-center project supported by the EU 5th Framework Program to determine the perception level to aging of elderly. The Turkish adaptation and psychometric properties of the scale were studied by Eser et al. in 2011. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of three sub-dimensions (Psychosocial Loss; Physical Change and Psychological Growth) and a total of 24 items. As the total score of the scale increases, the attitude towards the related dimension also increases positively. (Eser et al. 2011). The EAAQ will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    The WHO-Europe Attitudes of Aging Questionnaire (EAAQ): Time 3
    The attitudes to ageing questionnaire was developed to provide a standard way of measuring attitudes to ageing from the perspective of older people. The scale was developed within the scope of a multi-center project supported by the EU 5th Framework Program to determine the perception level to aging of elderly. The Turkish adaptation and psychometric properties of the scale were studied by Eser et al. in 2011. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of three sub-dimensions (Psychosocial Loss; Physical Change and Psychological Growth) and a total of 24 items. As the total score of the scale increases, the attitude towards the related dimension also increases positively. (Eser et al. 2011). The EAAQ will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Personal Information Form (Sociodemographic Characteristics and Clinical Data)
    The personal information form prepared by the researchers is a 16-question form containing sociodemographic characteristics such as age, gender, marital status, educational status, and depression-related clinical data such as diagnosis time, and treatment method (pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy) etc. This form will be applied on the first day of the program to all participants and will be collected once.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 15, 2023
    Last Updated
    September 19, 2023
    Sponsor
    Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT06042283
    Brief Title
    Efficacy of Metacognitive Training in Older Adults With Depression
    Official Title
    Assessing the Efficacy of Metacognitive Training on Depressive Symptoms, Dysfunctional Attitudes and Metacognition in Older Adults Diagnosed With Depression
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    September 15, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 30, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    March 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Effective pharmacological and psychological treatments for depression are available. However, treatment modalities are not accessible to all patients diagnosed with depression. Furthermore, some individuals who access treatment drop out and relapse after treatment. Improving treatment modalities for depression is important given the rates of individuals diagnosed worldwide, and rather than developing new treatments, there is a need to explore how existing treatment modalities can be improved and implemented in a simpler and more cost-effective way. To address this need, Metacognitive Training for Depression (DMCT) was developed as a low-cost, easy-to-implement, cognitive behavioral therapy-based group intervention. The aim of Metacognitive Training is to reduce depressive symptoms by working with the patient's cognitive biases from a metacognitive perspective. The effectiveness of this method, which has been proven effective by studies in the literature, is presented with a pilot study on older adults in 2018. Since the studies evaluating the effectiveness of the Metacognitive Training-Silver program are limited and it has not yet been adapted to Turkish culture, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Metacognitive Training-Silver program in older adults diagnosed with depression.
    Detailed Description
    According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD-2019) report, mental disorders have been at the top of the global burden of disease list between 1990 and 2019. Depression ranks first among mental disorders with disability and psychosocial dependence. The worldwide prevalence rate of depression is 3.8% and it is a common disorder. The prevalence rate in adults is 5%, and the prevalence rate in adults aged 60 and over is 5.7%. According to the 2021 data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, compared to the general population, the rate of depression is 13.5% higher in older adults who need home healthcare services and 11.5% higher in hospitalized older adults. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) found that the global prevalence rate of depression in older adults was 28.4% and that the prevalence of depression in older adults is high, although there are variations by geographical location, diagnostic/screening tools, sample size, representativeness, and study quality. The isolation measures taken to prevent the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic have negative psychological effects on the protection of vulnerable groups, including older adults. Therefore, the pandemic is reported to have led to a significant increase in major depression cases globally, with an estimated 28.1% increase. With the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an increase in the demand for mental health services due to the increase in the incidence of depression and anxiety. Depression is more than a short-term emotional response to mood swings and psychological difficulties experienced in daily life. Especially recurrent and moderate or severe depression is an important health problem. The individual's daily life is negatively affected, functionality decreases and/or suicide may occur. Depression is a serious mental disorder characterized by symptoms such as depressed mood or loss of interest/desire. In addition to these important symptoms, DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) criteria include sleep problems, changes in appetite/weight, psychomotor restlessness/agitation, loss of energy, concentration problems, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, and recurrent suicidal thoughts. Over time, this illness leads to cognitive and social dysfunction. In the treatment of depression, multimodal treatment options need to be carried out simultaneously. Although there are known effective treatments for mental disorders, more than 75% of people in low- and middle-income countries do not receive treatment. Barriers to effective care include a lack of financial resources, lack of legal regulations, lack of trained health professionals, and stigma. Therefore, psychotherapeutic interventions in inpatient/outpatient mental health facilities for psychosocial rehabilitation are insufficient, and effective care management is needed to address this problem. In the treatment of depression, only medication can be used due to various factors such as patient preference and economic reasons. However, despite medication, the disability and decreased functionality seen in patients are not sufficient for the rehabilitation of the patient. Insight into the disease and low compliance with treatment emphasizes the need for psychotherapies and psychosocial interventions. In this sense, cognitive-behavioral therapy approaches and family interventions are an essential complement to psychopharmacology. Metacognitive Training (MCT) was created by Steffen Moritz (2007) focusing on psychosis. Studies conducted using MCT show that MCT is beneficial in patients with schizophrenia and psychosis, reduces the severity of delusions, and shows a positive effect even after 6 months of follow-up. Following these results, Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT), which focuses on cognitive biases specific to depression, was developed based on the Metacognitive Training for Psychosis program. Metacognitive Training for Depression is a new treatment option for depression and is a variant of cognitive behavioral therapy that adopts a metacognitive perspective by focusing on changing cognitive biases and dysfunctional attitudes. In the first pilot study conducted by Jelinek et al. (2013), it was proven that there was a significant decrease in depressive symptoms, cognitive distortions, and rumination and an increase in self-esteem. In other randomized controlled studies conducted by Jelinek and colleagues, at the end of Metacognitive Training for Depression and at 6-month follow-up, it was determined that there was more improvement in depressive symptoms and a decrease in dysfunctional metacognitive beliefs. In secondary analyses conducted 3.5 years later, it was found that positive effects were still seen in the groups where Metacognitive Training for Depression was applied. The adaptation study of the Metacognitive Training for Depression program to Turkish culture was conducted by Okyay and Taş (2017) and the results of the study show that there is a significant difference in the data of Rumi Positive & Negative Scales, Ruminative Reactions Scale and Self-Efficacy Scale in depression patients who were administered this program. In another study (2022), after Metacognitive Training for Depression, there was a decrease in the Beck Depression Scale and Cognitive Distortions Scale scores, depression and cognitive distortion levels of patients. The presentation of the positive effects of Metacognitive Training for Depression with high level of evidence has contributed to the development of the Metacognitive Training for Older Adults (MCT-Silver) program for depression in older adults. Metacognitive Training-Silver focuses on helping individuals move away from thought patterns that feed/support depression and focuses on physical changes that occur during the aging process, coping with loss and adapting to new social roles. Metacognitive Training-Silver addresses how to identify and reinterpret values in life for individuals aged 60 and over and how to move towards accepting situations that cannot be prevented/changed. In the first pilot study (2018) of the Metacognitive Training-Silver program, a significant reduction in depressive symptoms and dysfunctional attitudes was found. Therefore, more studies are needed to prove the effectiveness of the Metacognitive Training-Silver program. The Metacognitive Training-Silver program has not yet been adapted to Turkish culture and studies are needed to prove its effectiveness in Turkey. In this direction, a randomized controlled trial is planned to evaluate the effectiveness of the Metacognitive Training-Silver program in older adults diagnosed with depression.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Depression in Old Age
    Keywords
    geriatric depression, psychotherapy, metacognitive training-silver, thought distortions

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    64 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Intervention Group
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Participants in this group will have Metacognitive Training-Silver program. Metacognitive Training-Silver program is an eight-module training that focuses on common cognitive problems and dysfunctional attitudes, beliefs and prejudices in solving problems seen in depression. The purpose of the sessions is to convey information about false beliefs and cognitive distortions, and to help sick individuals think critically, convey their thoughts, and acquire new problem-solving strategies through exercises.
    Arm Title
    Control group
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    All participants in the control group will continue the treatment process determined in the routine. In this process, the patient participates in counseling and/or psychotherapy, ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) sessions, and psychopharmacological drugs. The control group will not participate in the Metacognitive Training-Silver program, an interview consisting of one session is planned considering for the placebo effect. At the end of the study, the Metacognitive Training-Silver program will be carried out with the voluntary participants in the control group, taking into account the ethics.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Metacognitive Training-Silver
    Intervention Description
    The Metacognitive Training-Silver program includes the following topics: Thinking and Reasoning 1 (module 1), Memory (module 2), Thinking and Reasoning 2 (module 3), Self-Esteem (module 4), Thinking and Reasoning 3 (module 5), Behaviors and Strategies (module 6), Thinking and Reasoning 4 (module 7) and Perception of Feelings (module 8). Each session is planned to last 45-60 minutes. Materials will be used in the Metacognitive Training-Silver program are PPT (Power Point Presentations) slides, videos, homework exercises, and yellow-red cards. Metacognitive Training-Silver is planned to be applied face-to-face in 3 groups (12, 10, and 10 people) at scheduled times in a quiet room suitable for the group. In order to increase compliance with the Metacognitive Training-Silver program, the sessions will be applied during the routine treatment period.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): Time 1
    Description
    The purpose of the inventory, developed by Aaron T. Beck et al. in 1978, is to measure the severity and change of depressive symptoms in the individual. The Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Hisli Şahin. The scale provides a 4-point Likert-type measurement consisting of 21 items. In the scale, the individual is asked to indicate how he or she has felt in the last week. The high score obtained from the scale shows a high level of depression. (Hisli 1989a; Hisli 1989b). The BDI will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Time Frame
    BDI will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
    Title
    Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): Time 2
    Description
    The purpose of the inventory, developed by Aaron T. Beck et al. in 1978, is to measure the severity and change of depressive symptoms in the individual. The Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Hisli Şahin. The scale provides a 4-point Likert-type measurement consisting of 21 items. In the scale, the individual is asked to indicate how he or she has felt in the last week. The high score obtained from the scale shows a high level of depression. (Hisli 1989a; Hisli 1989b). The BDI will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Time Frame
    BDI will be applied after the 8 sessions of Metacognitive Training-Silver completed to both groups. The training will be completed in 8 weeks.
    Title
    Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): Time 3
    Description
    The purpose of the inventory, developed by Aaron T. Beck et al. in 1978, is to measure the severity and change of depressive symptoms in the individual. The Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Hisli Şahin. The scale provides a 4-point Likert-type measurement consisting of 21 items. In the scale, the individual is asked to indicate how he or she has felt in the last week. The high score obtained from the scale shows a high level of depression. (Hisli 1989a; Hisli 1989b). The BDI will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
    Time Frame
    BDI will be reapplied for a follow up evaluation, up to 3 months after the final program, in both groups.
    Title
    Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Revised and Abbreviated Turkish Version- DAS-R-TR): Time 1
    Description
    It was developed by Weissman and Beck (1987) as A and B forms, each consisting of 40 items, in order to detect intermediate beliefs that cause depression or anxiety in individuals and to learn their frequency (Weissman and Beck, 1978). However, the validity and reliability study of the revised and abbreviated version of the form was conducted by Batmaz and Özdel (2016) in order to be more useful for practitioners and those who filled out the scale. The scale, which consists of 13 items in the 7-Likert type, has two sub-dimensions as "Perfectionism/Achievement" (first 8 items) and "Need for Approval/Dependency" (last 5 items). If the total scores obtained are high, it indicates that individuals have more dysfunctional attitudes (Batmaz and Özdel, 2016). The DAS-R-TR will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Time Frame
    DAS-R-TR will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
    Title
    Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Revised and Abbreviated Turkish Version- DAS-R-TR): Time 2
    Description
    It was developed by Weissman and Beck (1987) as A and B forms, each consisting of 40 items, in order to detect intermediate beliefs that cause depression or anxiety in individuals and to learn their frequency (Weissman and Beck, 1978). However, the validity and reliability study of the revised and abbreviated version of the form was conducted by Batmaz and Özdel (2016) in order to be more useful for practitioners and those who filled out the scale. The scale, which consists of 13 items in the 7-Likert type, has two sub-dimensions as "Perfectionism/Achievement" (first 8 items) and "Need for Approval/Dependency" (last 5 items). If the total scores obtained are high, it indicates that individuals have more dysfunctional attitudes (Batmaz and Özdel, 2016). The DAS-R-TR will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Time Frame
    DAS-R-TR will be applied after the 8 sessions of Metacognitive Training-Silver completed to both groups. The training will be completed in 8 weeks.
    Title
    Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Revised and Abbreviated Turkish Version- DAS-R-TR): Time 3
    Description
    It was developed by Weissman and Beck (1987) as A and B forms, each consisting of 40 items, in order to detect intermediate beliefs that cause depression or anxiety in individuals and to learn their frequency (Weissman and Beck, 1978). However, the validity and reliability study of the revised and abbreviated version of the form was conducted by Batmaz and Özdel (2016) in order to be more useful for practitioners and those who filled out the scale. The scale, which consists of 13 items in the 7-Likert type, has two sub-dimensions as "Perfectionism/Achievement" (first 8 items) and "Need for Approval/Dependency" (last 5 items). If the total scores obtained are high, it indicates that individuals have more dysfunctional attitudes (Batmaz and Özdel, 2016). The DAS-R-TR will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
    Time Frame
    DAS-R-TR will be reapplied for a follow up evaluation, up to 3 months after the final program, in both groups.
    Title
    Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30): Time 1
    Description
    The MCQ-30 assesses individual differences in unhelpful metacognitions which may contribute to obsessive and compulsive symptoms, pathological worry, and underpin trait anxiety. The scale was developed based on the metacognitive model by Cartwright-Hatton & Wells (65 items, 1997) and was shortened by Wells & Cartwright-Hatton (30 items, 2004). The Turkish study was carried out by Yılmaz et al. and Tosun & Irak in 2008 (Yılmaz et al., 2008; Tosun and Irak, 2008). According to the study of Tosun & Irak (2008), a 4-point Likert-type scale consists five sub-dimensions: (Lack of) Cognitive Confidence, Positive Beliefs about Worry, Cognitive Self-Consciousness, Negative Beliefs about Uncontrollability and Danger, and Need to Control Thoughts. An increase in the score indicates an increase in pathological metacognitive activity (Tosun & Irak, 2008). The MCQ-30 will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Time Frame
    MCQ-30 will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
    Title
    Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30): Time 2
    Description
    The MCQ-30 assesses individual differences in unhelpful metacognitions which may contribute to obsessive and compulsive symptoms, pathological worry, and underpin trait anxiety. The scale was developed based on the metacognitive model by Cartwright-Hatton & Wells (65 items, 1997) and was shortened by Wells & Cartwright-Hatton (30 items, 2004). The Turkish study was carried out by Yılmaz et al. and Tosun & Irak in 2008 (Yılmaz et al., 2008; Tosun and Irak, 2008). According to the study of Tosun & Irak (2008), a 4-point Likert-type scale consists five sub-dimensions: (Lack of) Cognitive Confidence, Positive Beliefs about Worry, Cognitive Self-Consciousness, Negative Beliefs about Uncontrollability and Danger, and Need to Control Thoughts. An increase in the score indicates an increase in pathological metacognitive activity (Tosun & Irak, 2008). The MCQ-30 will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Time Frame
    MCQ-30 will be applied after the 8 sessions of Metacognitive Training-Silver completed to both groups. The training will be completed in 8 weeks.
    Title
    Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30): Time 3
    Description
    The MCQ-30 assesses individual differences in unhelpful metacognitions which may contribute to obsessive and compulsive symptoms, pathological worry, and underpin trait anxiety. The scale was developed based on the metacognitive model by Cartwright-Hatton & Wells (65 items, 1997) and was shortened by Wells & Cartwright-Hatton (30 items, 2004). The Turkish study was carried out by Yılmaz et al. and Tosun & Irak in 2008 (Yılmaz et al., 2008; Tosun and Irak, 2008). According to the study of Tosun & Irak (2008), a 4-point Likert-type scale consists five sub-dimensions: (Lack of) Cognitive Confidence, Positive Beliefs about Worry, Cognitive Self-Consciousness, Negative Beliefs about Uncontrollability and Danger, and Need to Control Thoughts. An increase in the score indicates an increase in pathological metacognitive activity (Tosun & Irak, 2008). The MCQ-30 will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
    Time Frame
    MCQ-30 will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
    Title
    The WHO-Europe Attitudes of Aging Questionnaire (EAAQ): Time 1
    Description
    The attitudes to ageing questionnaire was developed to provide a standard way of measuring attitudes to ageing from the perspective of older people. The scale was developed within the scope of a multi-center project supported by the EU 5th Framework Program to determine the perception level to aging of elderly. The Turkish adaptation and psychometric properties of the scale were studied by Eser et al. in 2011. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of three sub-dimensions (Psychosocial Loss; Physical Change and Psychological Growth) and a total of 24 items. As the total score of the scale increases, the attitude towards the related dimension also increases positively. (Eser et al. 2011). The EAAQ will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Time Frame
    EAAQ will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
    Title
    The WHO-Europe Attitudes of Aging Questionnaire (EAAQ): Time 2
    Description
    The attitudes to ageing questionnaire was developed to provide a standard way of measuring attitudes to ageing from the perspective of older people. The scale was developed within the scope of a multi-center project supported by the EU 5th Framework Program to determine the perception level to aging of elderly. The Turkish adaptation and psychometric properties of the scale were studied by Eser et al. in 2011. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of three sub-dimensions (Psychosocial Loss; Physical Change and Psychological Growth) and a total of 24 items. As the total score of the scale increases, the attitude towards the related dimension also increases positively. (Eser et al. 2011). The EAAQ will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
    Time Frame
    EAAQ will be applied after the 8 sessions of Metacognitive Training-Silver completed to both groups. The training will be completed in 8 weeks.
    Title
    The WHO-Europe Attitudes of Aging Questionnaire (EAAQ): Time 3
    Description
    The attitudes to ageing questionnaire was developed to provide a standard way of measuring attitudes to ageing from the perspective of older people. The scale was developed within the scope of a multi-center project supported by the EU 5th Framework Program to determine the perception level to aging of elderly. The Turkish adaptation and psychometric properties of the scale were studied by Eser et al. in 2011. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of three sub-dimensions (Psychosocial Loss; Physical Change and Psychological Growth) and a total of 24 items. As the total score of the scale increases, the attitude towards the related dimension also increases positively. (Eser et al. 2011). The EAAQ will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
    Time Frame
    EAAQ will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Personal Information Form (Sociodemographic Characteristics and Clinical Data)
    Description
    The personal information form prepared by the researchers is a 16-question form containing sociodemographic characteristics such as age, gender, marital status, educational status, and depression-related clinical data such as diagnosis time, and treatment method (pharmacotherapy and/or psychotherapy) etc. This form will be applied on the first day of the program to all participants and will be collected once.
    Time Frame
    Personal Information Form will be applied on the first day of the first session of Metacognitive Training-Silver on both groups.

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    60 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Individuals aged 60 years and over, Diagnosis of depression by a psychiatrist according to DSM-V criteria, No change in psychopharmacological medications used within 3 months before the Metacognitive Training-Silver program, No psychiatric hospitalization in the last 3 months, No problems with vision, hearing, and understanding, Being literate, Exclusion Criteria: Individuals under 60 years of age, Comorbid with a diagnosis of depression to the extent that it interferes with the understanding of the Metacognitive Training-Silver program;
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Merve Murat, MSN,RN
    Phone
    +905074424196
    Email
    merve.murat@ogr.iuc.edu.tr
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Sevim Buzlu, Prof,PhD,RN
    Phone
    +905327934366
    Email
    sevim.buzlu@iuc.edu.tr
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Merve Murat, MSN,RN
    Organizational Affiliation
    Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Sevim Buzlu, Prof,PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)
    Official's Role
    Study Chair
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Lara Guedes de Pinho, AsstProf,PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Évora
    Official's Role
    Study Chair

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    There is not a plan to make IPD (Individual Participant Data) available. After the study is completed, the publication which includes the data results will be available.
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    29693528
    Citation
    Batmaz S, Ozdel K. Psychometric Properties of the Revised and Abbreviated form of the Turkish Version of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale. Psychol Rep. 2016 Feb;118(1):180-198. doi: 10.1177/0033294116628349.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    34634250
    Citation
    COVID-19 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021 Nov 6;398(10312):1700-1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24497254
    Citation
    Cuijpers P, Sijbrandij M, Koole SL, Andersson G, Beekman AT, Reynolds CF 3rd. Adding psychotherapy to antidepressant medication in depression and anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):56-67. doi: 10.1002/wps.20089.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29173244
    Citation
    Evans-Lacko S, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Al-Hamzawi A, Alonso J, Benjet C, Bruffaerts R, Chiu WT, Florescu S, de Girolamo G, Gureje O, Haro JM, He Y, Hu C, Karam EG, Kawakami N, Lee S, Lund C, Kovess-Masfety V, Levinson D, Navarro-Mateu F, Pennell BE, Sampson NA, Scott KM, Tachimori H, Ten Have M, Viana MC, Williams DR, Wojtyniak BJ, Zarkov Z, Kessler RC, Chatterji S, Thornicroft G. Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Psychol Med. 2018 Jul;48(9):1560-1571. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003336. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    35026139
    Citation
    GBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):137-150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    35316691
    Citation
    Hu T, Zhao X, Wu M, Li Z, Luo L, Yang C, Yang F. Prevalence of depression in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2022 May;311:114511. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114511. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32669358
    Citation
    Islam N, Sharp SJ, Chowell G, Shabnam S, Kawachi I, Lacey B, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB Sr, White M. Physical distancing interventions and incidence of coronavirus disease 2019: natural experiment in 149 countries. BMJ. 2020 Jul 15;370:m2743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2743.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27230865
    Citation
    Jelinek L, Hauschildt M, Wittekind CE, Schneider BC, Kriston L, Moritz S. Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(4):231-4. doi: 10.1159/000443699. Epub 2016 May 27. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28615651
    Citation
    Jelinek L, Van Quaquebeke N, Moritz S. Cognitive and Metacognitive Mechanisms of Change in Metacognitive Training for Depression. Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 14;7(1):3449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03626-8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    30556583
    Citation
    Jelinek L, Faissner M, Moritz S, Kriston L. Long-term efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT): A randomized controlled trial. Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;58(3):245-259. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12213. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    29489070
    Citation
    Liu YC, Tang CC, Hung TT, Tsai PC, Lin MF. The Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Delusions in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Informs Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2018 Apr;15(2):130-139. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12282. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17921766
    Citation
    Moritz S, Woodward TS. Metacognitive training in schizophrenia: from basic research to knowledge translation and intervention. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;20(6):619-25. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3282f0b8ed.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    31190831
    Citation
    Perini G, Cotta Ramusino M, Sinforiani E, Bernini S, Petrachi R, Costa A. Cognitive impairment in depression: recent advances and novel treatments. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 May 10;15:1249-1258. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S199746. eCollection 2019.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    32635950
    Citation
    Skoog I. COVID-19 and mental health among older people in Sweden. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Oct;32(10):1173-1175. doi: 10.1017/S104161022000143X. Epub 2020 Jul 8. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26190517
    Citation
    van Oosterhout B, Smit F, Krabbendam L, Castelein S, Staring AB, van der Gaag M. Metacognitive training for schizophrenia spectrum patients: a meta-analysis on outcome studies. Psychol Med. 2016 Jan;46(1):47-57. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001105. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    19115461
    Citation
    Yilmaz AE, Gencoz T, Wells A. Psychometric characteristics of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 and metacognitive predictors of worry and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in a Turkish sample. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):424-39. doi: 10.1002/cpp.589.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Dietrichkeit M, Moritz S, Jelinek L. Die Behandlung psychischer Störungen mittels metakognitiver Interventionen am Beispiel des Metakognitiven Trainings für Depression (D-MKT). [The treatment of mental disorders using metacognitive interventions using the example of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MKT)]. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie. 2020; 68: 160-170.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. 1996; 28(1): 1-11.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Eser E, Gerçeklioğlu Saatli G, Eser S, Fidaner C, Baysan P, Pala T, Dündar P. Dünya sağlık örgütü - Avrupa "yaşlanma tutumu anketi (AAQ)" Türkçe sürümünün (AYTA-TR) psikometrik özellikleri. Türk Geriatri Dergisi. 2011; 14(2): 101 - 110.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26154451
    Citation
    Falci SG, Marques LS. CONSORT: when and how to use it. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):13-5. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.013-015.ebo. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27203537
    Citation
    Fansi A, Jehanno C, Lapalme M, Drapeau M, Bouchard S. [Effectiveness of psychotherapy compared to pharmacotherapy for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in adults: A literature review]. Sante Ment Que. 2015 Winter;40(4):141-73. French.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Hisli N. Beck Depresyon Envanterinin Üniversite Öğrencileri İçin Geçerliği Güvenirliği, Psikoloji Dergisi. 1989; 23: 3-13.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Hisli N. Beck Depresyon Envanterinin Geçerliği Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Psikoloji Dergisi. 1989; 22: 118-126.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Jelinek L, Otte C, Arlt S, Hauschildt M. Denkverzerrungen erkennen und korrigieren: Eine Machbarkeitsstudie zum Metakognitiven Training bei Depressionen (D-MKT). [Identifying and correcting cognitive biases: a pilot study on the Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT)]. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie. 2013; 61: 1-8.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Kamber O. Depresyon tedavisinde metakognisyon eğitimi grup terapisinin (D-MKT) Türk Kültüründeki etkinliği [master's thesis]. [İstanbul (TR)]: Üsküdar Üniversitesi; 2017.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Özgüç S, Tanriverdi D. Effects of Metacognitive Training (D-MCT) on Metacognition and Ruminative Thought Levels of Major Depression Patients. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2023; 21, 2017-2028.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Schneider BC, Bücker L, Riker S, Jelinek L. A pilot study of Metacognitive Training for Depression in older adults. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie. 2018; 29: 7-19.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18330745
    Citation
    Tosun A, Irak M. [Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 for the Turkish population, and its relationship to anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008 Spring;19(1):67-80. Turkish.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Jelinek L, Hauschildt M, Moritz S. Metakognitives Training bei Depression. Weinheim: Beltz; 2015.
    Results Reference
    background
    Citation
    Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği, 2015. Ruhsal bozuklukların tanısal ve sayımsal el kitabı (E. Köroğlu.). Hekimler Yayın Birliği, 2013. ISBN-10: 9753001983, ISBN-13: 978-9753001984
    Results Reference
    background
    Links:
    URL
    http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool?params=gbd-api-2019-permalink/d780dffbe8a381b25e1416884959e88b
    Description
    Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2022, Global health data exchange results
    URL
    https://www.who.int/news/item/20-05-2022-world-health-statistics-2022
    Description
    World Health Organization, 2022, World Health Statistics 2022
    URL
    https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression
    Description
    World Health Organization, 2021, Depression
    URL
    https://www.cdc.gov/aging/depression/index.html#:~:text=The%20good%20news%20is%20that,11.5%25%20in%20older%20hospitalized%20patients
    Description
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2021, Depression is not a normal part of growing older

    Learn more about this trial

    Efficacy of Metacognitive Training in Older Adults With Depression

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs