search
Back to results

Palonosetron vs Combination of Granisetron and Dexamethasone in Preventing PONV in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Primary Purpose

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Malaysia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dexamethasone, granisetron & palonosetron
Sponsored by
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: aged 18 to 65 years old American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia Exclusion Criteria: patients with heart diseases patients with prolonged QT syndrome patients with a family history of sudden death patients with known allergies to dexamethasone, granisetron & palonosetron patients with contraindications to dexamethasone, granisetron & palonosetron

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Group B

Group A

Arm Description

Group B received intravenous (IV) dexamethasone 4 mg after intubation & IV granisetron 1 mg at the end of surgery

Group A received 1 ml of intravenous (IV) 0.9% saline after intubation and IV palonosetron 0.075 mg at the end of operation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Complete response towards the study drugs
Number of patients who did not experience postoperative vomiting, did not experience postoperative nausea & did not require rescue antiemetics.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The side effects of the study drugs
Number of patients who developed side effects after receiving the study drugs

Full Information

First Posted
September 12, 2023
Last Updated
September 12, 2023
Sponsor
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06043336
Brief Title
Palonosetron vs Combination of Granisetron and Dexamethasone in Preventing PONV in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Official Title
A Comparative Study Between Palonosetron vs the Combination of Granisetron and Dexamethasone in Preventing Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 10, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 10, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 10, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study comparing the post-operative nausea vomiting (PONV) profile following administration of intraoperative palonosetron alone and the combination of granisetron and dexamethasone in moderate to high-risk patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients aged 18-65 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were randomized into two groups. Group A received 1 ml of intravenous (IV) 0.9% saline after intubation and IV palonosetron 0.075 mg at the end of operation. Group B received IV dexamethasone 4 mg after intubation and IV granisetron 1 mg at the end of surgery. The occurrence of PONV and the need for rescue antiemetics were assessed at 30 minutes, 4, 24 and 48 hours post-anesthesia. A complete response towards the study drugs was considered when patients did not experience PONV and did not require rescue antiemetics. The side effects of the study drugs were evaluated. Patient satisfaction with the anti-emetics administered was assessed. These parameters were compared between Group A and Group B: the occurrence of PONV, the need of rescue antiemetics, the side effects of the study drugs and patient satisfaction with the anti-emetics administered.
Detailed Description
This prospective double-blinded, randomized controlled study was conducted at Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). Patients aged 18 to 65 years old, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were recruited using convenient sampling. Patients with heart diseases, prolonged QT syndrome, a family history of sudden death, known allergies, or contraindications to the study drugs were excluded. No premedication was administered to the patients, and an intravenous (IV) drip was not started preoperatively. After obtaining written informed consent, patients were randomized to one of two groups using computer-generated random numbers. Group A received IV palonosetron 0.075 mg, and Group B received IV granisetron 1 mg and IV dexamethasone 4 mg as antiemetics. Patients were fasted for at least 6 hours prior to surgery. In the operating room, standard monitoring was applied to every patient, including continuous electrocardiography (ECG), non-invasive blood pressure monitoring (NIBP), pulse oximetry, capnography with multi-gas analyzer including minimum alveolar concentration (MAC), and monitoring of all gas levels. Patients were pre-oxygenated with oxygen. Induction of anesthesia was conducted using IV fentanyl 2 mcg/kg and IV propofol 2 mg/kg. Upon loss of consciousness, IV rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered to facilitate endotracheal intubation, following which patients were mechanically ventilated with a mixture of oxygen and air. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane at MAC of 1.0 to 1.2. Ventilation parameters were adjusted to maintain normocapnia (end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35-40 mmHg) and saturation of oxygen above 96%. Group A patients received 1 ml of IV 0.9% saline while Group B patients received IV dexamethasone 4 mg after intubation. The amount of IV morphine given to the patients intraoperatively was recorded and did not exceed 0.1 mg/kg. Rescue analgesia with IV fentanyl was administered if needed, not exceeding 100 mcg. The surgeon infiltrated 10 ml of levobupivacaine 0.5% into the incisions at the end of surgery. Patients were kept adequately hydrated throughout the surgery with an IV drip of 2 ml/kg/h as maintenance, any fluid deficit was replaced. Pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic procedure was achieved by carbon dioxide insufflation with intra-abdominal pressure of less than 14 mmHg. Thirty minutes prior to the end of the surgery, Group A received a slow bolus of IV palonosetron 0.075 mg, while Group B received a slow bolus of IV granisetron 1 mg. Intravenous neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg and IV atropine 0.02 mg/kg were administered as a reversal agent. The pneumoperitoneum was evacuated by the surgeon, and the nasogastric tube was suctioned and removed before extubation. The patients were transferred to the recovery bay after extubation. Rescue analgesia with IV fentanyl was administered in the recovery bay if needed, not exceeding 50 mcg. Patients were monitored by blinded anesthetists for nausea and vomiting in four time periods: 30 minutes, 4 hours, 24 hours, and 48 hours post-anesthesia. Nausea was defined as an unpleasant sensation associated with the urge to vomit and its severity was rated by patients on a scale of 0 (no nausea) to 10 (worst possible nausea). Vomiting was defined as the forceful expulsion of gastric contents from the mouth, and the frequency of vomiting was recorded. If a patient experienced severe nausea (nausea score of 4 and more) and vomiting, rescue antiemetic of IV metoclopramide 10 mg was administered. Regular IV metoclopramide was administered if the patient experienced a second episode of vomiting or more. A complete response (free from emesis) was defined as no nausea, no vomiting and no need for any rescue medication. Side effects of the study drugs (palonosetron, granisetron, and dexamethasone) such as headache, constipation, dizziness, bloatedness, and palpitation were recorded. At the end of the study, patients were asked if they were satisfied with the antiemetics given to them. Patient satisfaction was assessed by using a Likert scale, which included a five-point scale; very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied. Surgeries that lasted more than four hours, required conversion to open cholecystectomy or other procedures, and severe PONV that did not resolve with rescue anti-emetics were considered dropouts in this study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Care Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
134 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group B received intravenous (IV) dexamethasone 4 mg after intubation & IV granisetron 1 mg at the end of surgery
Arm Title
Group A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group A received 1 ml of intravenous (IV) 0.9% saline after intubation and IV palonosetron 0.075 mg at the end of operation.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexamethasone, granisetron & palonosetron
Intervention Description
. Group A received 1 ml of intravenous (IV) 0.9% saline after intubation and IV palonosetron 0.075 mg at the end of operation. Group B received IV dexamethasone 4 mg after intubation and IV granisetron 1 mg at the end of surgery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete response towards the study drugs
Description
Number of patients who did not experience postoperative vomiting, did not experience postoperative nausea & did not require rescue antiemetics.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The side effects of the study drugs
Description
Number of patients who developed side effects after receiving the study drugs
Time Frame
1 year
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Patient satisfaction with the anti-emetics administered
Description
Number of patients who satisfied with the anti-emetics administered
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: aged 18 to 65 years old American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia Exclusion Criteria: patients with heart diseases patients with prolonged QT syndrome patients with a family history of sudden death patients with known allergies to dexamethasone, granisetron & palonosetron patients with contraindications to dexamethasone, granisetron & palonosetron
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maryam Budiman, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
City
Cheras
State/Province
Kuala Lumpur
ZIP/Postal Code
56000
Country
Malaysia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Palonosetron vs Combination of Granisetron and Dexamethasone in Preventing PONV in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs