Knee Functionality Recovery Indicators in Athletes Submitted to Ligamentoplasty of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Knee Functionality Recovery Indicators in Athletes Submitted to Ligamentoplasty of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Knee Functionality Recovery Indicators in Athletes Submitted to Ligamentoplasty of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are recurrent, especially in sports. There is still no consensus on the characterization of functional indicators in this clinical condition, as well as their correlation with measuring instruments and clinical functional tests. It is intended to study the changes in functionality of users undergoing this surgery, aiming with functional assessment scales at different times of recovery. This will allow deciding on more adapted recovery strategies, which can meet the musculoskeletal requirements of the user.

It is proposed to carry by carrying out quasi-experimental, quantitative and analytical studies. The sample will consist of athletes who have started recovering from ACL surgery and who meet the previously established inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study will use and compare functional tests (Star Excursion Balance Test, Lateral Step Down Test and Weight-Bearing Lunge Test) with measurement instruments: Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lyshom Knee Scoring Scale, Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), Return to Sport After Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) and IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form. The intervention will be performed on individual athletes who have had anterior cruciate ligament injury for the first time or recurrence of this ligament in the same knee or injury in the contralateral knee.

Diagnostic test through functional tests and comparison of scales applied to participants in the pre-surgical and post-surgical period.

The protocol is based on the ligamentization stages, since the bibliography relates the ligamentization process with rehabilitation. These stages are necrosis, revascularization, cellular priorities and collagen formation, and different care is required for each stage. Taking these aspects into account, the authors developed recommendations to establish a protocol divided by the evaluation phases of the present work. Users should only move on to the next phase if they achieve the expected results, or that makes the total duration of each protocol vary from user to user. tests and scales will be evaluated before surgery, after 6 weeks of surgery and at the end of treatment.

Change from baseline in a functional test - Y Balance Test - The test should be performed in the following order: Right Anterior, Left Anterior, Right Posteromedial, Left Posteromedial, Right Posterolateral. Left Posterolateral

Hop test. In this test, the aim is to jump as far as possible with both legs, without losing balance and landing firmly. The distance is measured from the start line to the heel of the landing leg.

Single hop test. In this test, the aim is to jump as far as possible on a single leg, without losing balance and landing firmly. The distance is measured from the start line to the heel of the landing leg. The goal is to have a less than 10% difference in hop distance between the injured limb and uninjured limb.

The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was used to evaluate the knee health.The patients completed score by themselves. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 100.

The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was used to evaluate the knee health.The patients completed score by themselves. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 100.

The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was used to evaluate the knee health.The patients completed score by themselves. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 100.

The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was used to evaluate the knee health.The patients completed score by themselves. The lowest score is 0 and the highest score is 100.

The dimensions from this scale are divided into 5 items (Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sports and Leisure Activities and Quality of Life) on a positive orientation scale from 0 (extreme knee problems) to 100 (no knee problems).

The dimensions from this scale are divided into 5 items (Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sports and Leisure Activities and Quality of Life) on a positive orientation scale from 0 (extreme knee problems) to 100 (no knee problems).

The dimensions from this scale are divided into 5 items (Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sports and Leisure Activities and Quality of Life) on a positive orientation scale from 0 (extreme knee problems) to 100 (no knee problems).

The dimensions from this scale are divided into 5 items (Symptoms, Pain, Activities of Daily Living, Sports and Leisure Activities and Quality of Life) on a positive orientation scale from 0 (extreme knee problems) to 100 (no knee problems).

This scale consists of eight items. It is scored on a scale of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and higher levels of functioning.

This scale consists of eight items. It is scored on a scale of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and higher levels of functioning.

This scale consists of eight items. It is scored on a scale of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and higher levels of functioning.

This scale consists of eight items. It is scored on a scale of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and higher levels of functioning.

This measurement instrument consists of 20 items, each of which is scored on a scale five points, from zero to four. The total LEFS score, with a minimum value of zero - low functional level - and maximum of 80 - high functional level, which can be exposed in percentage terms.

This measurement instrument consists of 20 items, each of which is scored on a scale five points, from zero to four. The total LEFS score, with a minimum value of zero - low functional level - and maximum of 80 - high functional level, which can be exposed in percentage terms.

This measurement instrument consists of 20 items, each of which is scored on a scale five points, from zero to four. The total LEFS score, with a minimum value of zero - low functional level - and maximum of 80 - high functional level, which can be exposed in percentage terms.

This measurement instrument consists of 20 items, each of which is scored on a scale five points, from zero to four. The total LEFS score, with a minimum value of zero - low functional level - and maximum of 80 - high functional level, which can be exposed in percentage terms.

It is a specific 12-item questionnaire assessing the psychological impact (emotions, confidence in performance and evaluation of risk) of returning to sport after ACL reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, and high scores were related to a positive psychological response

It is a specific 12-item questionnaire assessing the psychological impact (emotions, confidence in performance and evaluation of risk) of returning to sport after ACL reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, and high scores were related to a positive psychological response

It is a specific 12-item questionnaire assessing the psychological impact (emotions, confidence in performance and evaluation of risk) of returning to sport after ACL reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, and high scores were related to a positive psychological response

It is a specific 12-item questionnaire assessing the psychological impact (emotions, confidence in performance and evaluation of risk) of returning to sport after ACL reconstruction. Scores range from 0 to 100, and high scores were related to a positive psychological response

Inclusion Criteria: Start of physiotherapy in the preoperative context and continuation of recovery up to 2 weeks after surgery; age equal to or greater than 18 years; With or without meniscal injury; Be able to correctly fill in the assessment instruments and complete the Informed Consent Form; Exclusion Criteria: Concomitant bilateral injury/history of surgery or contralateral dysfunction; meniscal suture; cartilaginous injury; injury to the internal lateral ligament, external lateral ligament and posterior cruciate ligament; concomitant intra and extra-articular plastic surgery; individuals with recent heart disease, intermittent claudication, neuropathies and cognitive alterations.