17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
IL-6 level
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
IL-6 level
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
MRI data
Reflecting brain structure and function
MRI data
Reflecting brain structure and function
EEG data
Reflecting brain function. It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
EEG data
Reflecting brain function. It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)
Reflecting cortical excitability. N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1). Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)
Reflecting cortical excitability. N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1). Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)
THINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers. The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function. The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function. The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)
THINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers. The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function. The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function. The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
Perceptual judgment test
Assess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
Perceptual judgment test
Assess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
Distance memory test
Assessment of Working memory.
Distance memory test
Assessment of Working memory.
ERP experiment
The participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded. Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.
ERP experiment
The participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded. Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.