search
Back to results

Augmentation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy With High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adolescent Depression

Primary Purpose

Depressive Disorder

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
IPT plus HD-tDCS
IPT plus sham HD-tDCS
Sponsored by
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depressive Disorder

Eligibility Criteria

12 Years - 18 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Sign a written informed consent form, willing to participate in the study and accept treatment (patients under 18 years of age need to obtain the consent of their parents or legal guardians); Age between 12 and 18 years; Right-handed; Han ethnicity; Meet the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for depression; HAMD-24≥20; Understand written language and able to complete questionnaires; First-episode depression patients who have never received any treatment or relapse depression patients, have not taken any psychotropic drugs in the past 2 weeks, have not received systematic psychological or physical therapy. Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion criteria for tDCS: (1) Patients with metal implants in the body; those with metal implants such as titanium or magnetic devices (including aneurysm clips); (2) Patients with implanted devices such as cardiac pacemakers, deep brain stimulators (DBS); (3) Patients with intracranial hypertension, skull defects, or tumors; (4) Patients with unstable vital signs such as severe cardiac or somatic diseases; (5) Patients in the acute phase of cerebrovascular diseases; (6) Patients with adverse reactions to electrical stimulation; (7) Patients with pain sensitivity, injury, or inflammation in the stimulation area. Exclusion criteria for MRI; Patients with severe neurological, cardiac, liver, kidney, endocrine, and blood system diseases, or any other condition that may interfere with the study evaluation; Patients with organic mental disorders and mental retardation; Patients with alcohol or drug dependence; Patients with a high risk of suicide.

Sites / Locations

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

IPT plus HD-tDCS

IPT plus sham HD-tDCS

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.

Secondary Outcome Measures

17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
IL-6 level
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
IL-6 level
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
MRI data
Reflecting brain structure and function
MRI data
Reflecting brain structure and function
EEG data
Reflecting brain function. It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
EEG data
Reflecting brain function. It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)
Reflecting cortical excitability. N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1). Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)
Reflecting cortical excitability. N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1). Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)
THINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers. The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function. The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function. The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)
THINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers. The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function. The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function. The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
Perceptual judgment test
Assess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
Perceptual judgment test
Assess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
Distance memory test
Assessment of Working memory.
Distance memory test
Assessment of Working memory.
ERP experiment
The participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded. Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.
ERP experiment
The participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded. Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.

Full Information

First Posted
August 8, 2023
Last Updated
September 25, 2023
Sponsor
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06061653
Brief Title
Augmentation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy With High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adolescent Depression
Official Title
Effects of Augmentation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy With High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adolescent Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
October 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Depression is among the most prevalent psychiatric disorders, with an upward trend in its manifestation in younger individuals. In contrast to adult depression, adolescent depression often presents with longer attack durations, higher recurrence rates, chronicity, and elevated disability rates. At present, treatment options for adolescent depression encompass pharmacological, physical, and psychological therapies. However, current evidence suggests that no antidepressant medication is entirely safe for youths, with only fluoxetine and escitalopram being FDA-approved for treating adolescent depression. Given the weight of interpersonal stressors faced by teenagers, the NICE guidelines recommend interpersonal therapy(IPT) as a first-line treatment. A 2020 meta-analysis in the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry reported that interpersonal therapy exhibited significantly greater improvements in depression symptoms than cognitive behavioral therapy(CBT), although psychotherapeutic effects were modest, achieving a remission rate of 60%. These results underscore the need for further research to enhance interpersonal therapy's effectiveness in treating adolescent depression. High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS)is a highly secure non-invasive brain stimulation technique that produces sustained effects even after stimulation has discontinued, rendering it particularly valuable for therapeutic interventions. The proposed study aims to augment a single IPT treatment with HD-tDCS stimulation for adolescent depression. By enhancing the excitability of the cerebral cortex, HD-tDCS could potentially enhance IPT's therapeutic efficacy in treating adolescent depression while facilitating further investigation of its underlying neural circuit mechanisms.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depressive Disorder

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
IPT plus HD-tDCS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
IPT plus sham HD-tDCS
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
IPT plus HD-tDCS
Intervention Description
psychotherapy plus device
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
IPT plus sham HD-tDCS
Intervention Description
psychotherapy plus sham device
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Description
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Description
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
Time Frame
1-month
Title
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Description
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Description
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<8: normal; >20: mild or moderate depression; >35: severe depression.
Time Frame
3-month
Title
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Description
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Description
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
Time Frame
1-month
Title
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Description
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
Child Depression Rating Scale-Revised
Description
Assessment of depressive symptoms. Score<40: normal; 40~60: mild or moderate depression; >60: severe depression.
Time Frame
3-month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Description
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Description
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
Time Frame
1-month
Title
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Description
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
17-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale
Description
Score<7:No anxiety; Score≥7:Possibly anxious; Score≥14:Definitely anxious; Score≥21:Definitely significantly anxious; Score≥29:Possibly severely anxious.
Time Frame
3-month
Title
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Description
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Description
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Time Frame
1-month
Title
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Description
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation
Description
Assessment of suicidal ideation. The test taker first completes the initial five questions. If the responses to both the fourth and fifth items are "no," it is considered that there is no suicidal ideation, and the questionnaire concludes. Suicidal risk is evaluated based on items six to nineteen of the scale, which assess the likelihood of actual suicidal behavior among individuals with suicidal ideation. The calculation formula for the total score is [(sum of scores for items six to nineteen) - 9) / 33] * 100, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater risk of suicide.
Time Frame
3-month
Title
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Description
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Description
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
Time Frame
1-month
Title
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Description
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
Time Frame
2-month
Title
the Chinese version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale
Description
A total of 14 items, each with a score of 1 to 4, will be used to calculate the total score. The higher the score The higher the score, the more severe the pleasure deficit
Time Frame
3-month
Title
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Description
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Description
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Time Frame
1-month
Title
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Description
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
Interpersonal Relationship Scale
Description
A score of 0-8 indicates that interpersonal relationship is good, a score of 9-14 indicates that there is a certain degree of interpersonal relationship distress, and a score of 15-28 indicates that interpersonal relationship distress is more serious, that is, the lower the score of the comprehensive diagnostic scale of interpersonal relationship, the better the interpersonal relationship.
Time Frame
3-month
Title
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Description
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Description
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Time Frame
1-month
Title
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Description
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
Emotion Regulation Questionnaire
Description
A total of 10 items were scored at 7 points. The higher the score, the higher the frequency of using emotion regulation strategies.
Time Frame
3-month
Title
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Description
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Description
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Time Frame
1-month
Title
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Description
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20
Description
It consists of 3 factors, difficulty identifying feelings (DIF), difficulty describing feelings (DDF), and externally oriented thinking (EOT), which are called F1, F2, and F3 factors, containing 20 items, each scored within a 5-point scale (1: completely disagree to 5: completely agree), 20-100 points, the higher the score, the more pronounced the dysfunction in describing feelings.
Time Frame
3-month
Title
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Description
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Description
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
Time Frame
1-month
Title
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Description
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
The Reflective Function Questionnaire for Youths
Description
Assesses the degree of agreement or disagreement with narratives about reflective functioning, with higher scores representing higher levels of reflective functioning.
Time Frame
3-month
Title
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Description
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Description
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Time Frame
1-month
Title
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Description
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
Comfort Rating Questionnaire
Description
Evaluating adverse reactions of tdcs.
Time Frame
3-month
Title
IL-6 level
Description
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
IL-6 level
Description
Detection of serum IL-6 levels using flow cytometry. The normal value is 0-5.30 pg/ml. There is a goodcorrelation between depression and elevated serum IL-6 levels.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
MRI data
Description
Reflecting brain structure and function
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
MRI data
Description
Reflecting brain structure and function
Time Frame
2-month
Title
EEG data
Description
Reflecting brain function. It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
EEG data
Description
Reflecting brain function. It will be used for analysing Left-right asymmetry of forehead Alpha wave energy,mapping the brainnetworks.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)
Description
Reflecting cortical excitability. N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1). Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
TMS-evoked potentials(TEPs)
Description
Reflecting cortical excitability. N15, P30, N45, P55, N100, P180 and N280 components were evoked during single-pulse TMS stimulation of motor cortex (M1). Early components of TEPs (N15-P30) reflect cortical excitatory activity, while other components (N45-N100) are associated with cortical inhibitory activity.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)
Description
THINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers. The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function. The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function. The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Thinc-integrated Tools(THINC-it)
Description
THINC-it(https://progress.im/en/)is the first tool to assess cognitive functioning in MDD using both subjective and objective tests and is available as a free download for use on tablets, smartphones or computers. The tool's four objective test sections use recognized cognitive paradigms to assess subjects' performance in the key cognitive domains of attention, working memory, and executive function. The Choice Reaction Time (CRT) focuses on attention and executive function, the 1-Back Memory Task (1-Back) examines memory, attention/concentration, and executive function, the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) examines processing speed, attention, and executive function, and the Test of Connectivity B (TMT-B) assesses executive function. The 5-item Cognitive Impairment Questionnaire (PDQ⁃5⁃D) is the subjective component of the instrument and can be used to assess patients' performance in attention/concentration, planning/organization, retrospection, and prospective memory.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
Perceptual judgment test
Description
Assess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Perceptual judgment test
Description
Assess subjects' perception of interpersonal information.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
Distance memory test
Description
Assessment of Working memory.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Distance memory test
Description
Assessment of Working memory.
Time Frame
2-month
Title
ERP experiment
Description
The participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded. Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
ERP experiment
Description
The participants are instructed to watch the animations,while EEG data is recorded. Event-related Mu-wave will be used for evaluating social interaction ability.
Time Frame
2-month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Sign a written informed consent form, willing to participate in the study and accept treatment (patients under 18 years of age need to obtain the consent of their parents or legal guardians); Age between 12 and 18 years; Right-handed; Han ethnicity; Meet the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for depression; HAMD-24≥20; Understand written language and able to complete questionnaires; First-episode depression patients who have never received any treatment or relapse depression patients, have not taken any psychotropic drugs in the past 2 weeks, have not received systematic psychological or physical therapy. Exclusion Criteria: Exclusion criteria for tDCS: (1) Patients with metal implants in the body; those with metal implants such as titanium or magnetic devices (including aneurysm clips); (2) Patients with implanted devices such as cardiac pacemakers, deep brain stimulators (DBS); (3) Patients with intracranial hypertension, skull defects, or tumors; (4) Patients with unstable vital signs such as severe cardiac or somatic diseases; (5) Patients in the acute phase of cerebrovascular diseases; (6) Patients with adverse reactions to electrical stimulation; (7) Patients with pain sensitivity, injury, or inflammation in the stimulation area. Exclusion criteria for MRI; Patients with severe neurological, cardiac, liver, kidney, endocrine, and blood system diseases, or any other condition that may interfere with the study evaluation; Patients with organic mental disorders and mental retardation; Patients with alcohol or drug dependence; Patients with a high risk of suicide.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Manli Huang, M.D
Phone
13957162975
Ext
86
Email
huangmanli@zju.edu.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Xiaoyi Zhou
Phone
15158866089
Ext
86
Email
zhouxiaoyi@zju.edu.cn
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University
City
Hangzhou
State/Province
Zhejiang
ZIP/Postal Code
310009
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Huang Manli
Phone
13957162975
Email
huangmanli@zju.edu.cn

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Augmentation of Interpersonal Psychotherapy With High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Adolescent Depression

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs