search
Back to results

Neural Plasticity and Motor Recovery After Early and Intensive Upper Extremity Motor Training in People With c-SCI (REPAIR-SCI)

Primary Purpose

Spinal Cord Injuries

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
experimental group: intensive motor training
usual care
Sponsored by
Annemie Spooren
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Spinal Cord Injuries focused on measuring spinal cord rehabilitation, therapy dose, neural plasticity, motor recovery, upper limb training

Eligibility Criteria

16 Years - 90 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Traumatic or non-traumatic C-SCI below C4 in the preceding 10 weeks; age over 16 years; have an incomplete SCI or an AIS A SCI with zones of partial motor paralysis (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCI) and medically stable. Exclusion Criteria: SCI with ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A without zones of partial preservation (decided based on former studies [58]) and expertise of the team; SCI with any significant medical condition that could prevent the person from participating. In order to ensure TMS measurement can be performed, patients will only be included for this measure if they have a positive response to motor evoked potential measurement (MEP+) [59] and will be excluded in the presence of contraindications for TMS application such as epilepsy, metal implants in the brain,defibrillator, pacemaker and pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • UZGent
  • UZLeuven Campus Pellenberg
  • Zorggroep Adelante

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

intensive upper limb training

usual care

Arm Description

The intervention group receives 12 hours of motor training each week upon usual care during 10 weeks. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities.

The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

changes in single pulse TMS: mapping
to evaluate changes in cortical reorganisation
changes in single pulse TMS: resting motor threshold
to asses changes in cortical reactivity

Secondary Outcome Measures

changes SICI
to evaluatie changes in Short interval intracortical inhibition
changes SICF
short-interval intracortical facilitation
changes in LICI
long-interval intracortical inhibition
changes in MscanFit MUNE
Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans will be recorded
changes in NET (Nerve excitability testing)
Strength duration time constant (SDTC), threshold electrotonus (TE), I/V relationship (I/V) and recovery cycles (RC) will be measured.
changes in behavioral measures: Upper extremity motor score
score on 50
changes in Spinal Cord independence Measures
questionaire: self-care score
changes in Van Lieshout Test
basis upper extremity skills
changes in GRASSP
Grades redefined assessment of strength sensibility and Prehension
changes in hand held dynamometry
strength in hand

Full Information

First Posted
June 14, 2023
Last Updated
October 2, 2023
Sponsor
Annemie Spooren
Collaborators
Research Foundation Flanders, University of Aarhus, University of Sydney, University Hospital, Ghent, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven, Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06065384
Brief Title
Neural Plasticity and Motor Recovery After Early and Intensive Upper Extremity Motor Training in People With c-SCI
Acronym
REPAIR-SCI
Official Title
Neural Plasticity and Motor Recovery After Early and Intensive Upper Extremity Motor Training in People With Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
October 5, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
August 28, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Annemie Spooren
Collaborators
Research Foundation Flanders, University of Aarhus, University of Sydney, University Hospital, Ghent, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven, Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
After spinal cord injury (SCI), there is a disruption in neural circuits resulting in paralysis. There is not yet a cure for paralysis. In persons with Cervical SCI (pwC-SCI) recovery of arm-hand function is very important as it has a significant impact on the patients' level of independence and quality of life. Recovery is assumed to involve alterations in both central and peripheral motor systems. Motor training at an intensive dosage potentially provides a powerful stimulus for neurological recovery. This project exploits the peripheral and central neuroplastic effect of an early (<10 weeks after injury) and intensive (10 weeks of 12 hours in addition to usual care) upper limb motor training program (EIUMT) directed at recovery below the level of the injury in pwC-SCI within an international multi-center randomized controlled trial including 40 pwC-SCI. It has 4 objectives: to investigate 1)central neural plasticity by identifying alterations in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2)peripheral neural plasticity by identifying alteration in axonal excitability and number of motor units; 3)behavioral motor recovery of upper limb and 4)relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and behavioral and neurophysiological outcome measures aer EIUMT. Cutting-edge neurophysiological measures are used to provide insight in the mechanism of neuroplasticity after EIUMT and will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6 months follow-up.
Detailed Description
Background of the study: Paralysis or paralysis is the most common effect of spinal cord injury (SCI) on individuals. Paralysis affects the ability to walk, perform self-care, live independently and participate in work and leisure activities. In individuals with cervical spinal cord injury, arm and hand function is very important. The most promising and easily implemented intervention that could promote neurological recovery and make a lasting difference in the lives of people with spinal cord injury is early and intensive motor training aimed at recovery below the injury level. This intervention takes advantage of the early plasticity of the nervous system. By maximizing muscle activation in the first few days after injury, we can target the nervous system's unique capacity for neural plasticity where changes can occur in central and peripheral motor systems. Objective of the study: This project aims to investigate peripheral and central neuroplasticity following an early (<10 weeks after injury) and intensive (10weeks of 12 hours of additional therapy) upper extremity motor training program (EIUMT) aimed at recovery below the lesion level.This project has 4 objectives: to investigate 1) central neural plasticity (identify changes in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2) peripheral neural plasticity (identify change in axonal excitability and number of motor units); 3) clinical motor recovery of the upper limbs and 4) relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and clinical and neurophysiological outcome measures after EIUMT. Advanced neurophysiological measurements and clinical measurements will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6-month follow-up. Study design: a multicenter pragmatic randomised controlled study in 2 countries Study population: 40 persons with cervical spinal cord injury (20 participants in the control and intervention groups) Inclusion criteria: Individuals are eligible to participate if they have suffered a traumatic or non-traumatic cervical spinal cord injury(with neurological level C4 or below) within the previous 10 weeks, have AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) A lesion with motor function more than three levels below motor level (on one or both sides) or have AIS C or AIS D lesion (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of spinal cord injury), are older than 16 years of age, have received permission to begin rehabilitation and are likely to remain an inpatient for the next 10 weeks. Exclusion criteria: Participants will be excluded if they have a significant medical or physical condition or psychiatric illness that could prevent the person from participating in the study, or would place the person at unacceptable risk if they were to participate. Intervention: The intervention group receives 12 hours of motor training each week. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities. The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care. Primary study parameters/outcome of the study: Central plasticity via: Single pulse TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) (cortical mapping and rest motor threshold) 10 weeks after randomisation Secundary study parameters/outcome of the study: Clinical Measures: Upper Extremity Motor Score, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SClM-zelfzorg); Van Lieshout Test (VLT);Grades redefined assessment of strength sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP); Hand-Held Dynamometry; accelerometry (session density: active therapy time/session length); perceived difficulty and exertion) Central plasticity: Paired pulse TMS: (SICI (short interval intracortical inhibition); LICI (long interval intracortical inhibition); SICF (short interval intracortical inhibition); peripheral plasticity: NET (Nerve excitability testing) en MScanFit MUNE(Compound muscle action potential (CMAP).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Cord Injuries
Keywords
spinal cord rehabilitation, therapy dose, neural plasticity, motor recovery, upper limb training

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
intensive upper limb training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention group receives 12 hours of motor training each week upon usual care during 10 weeks. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities.
Arm Title
usual care
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
experimental group: intensive motor training
Intervention Description
Intervention group: receive an extra 12 hours of motor training each week (distributed over the week) for 10 weeks. It will involve active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles of the upper limb below the level of the injury within the context of practice of functional activities. Interventions will be goal directed and individualized to the needs of each participant with a focus on training that addresses each person's specific motor problem, promoting motor learning as well as stimulating neural plasticity. All patients will continue to receive usual physiotherapy and usual rehabilitation.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
usual care
Intervention Description
usual rehabilitation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
changes in single pulse TMS: mapping
Description
to evaluate changes in cortical reorganisation
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Title
changes in single pulse TMS: resting motor threshold
Description
to asses changes in cortical reactivity
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
changes SICI
Description
to evaluatie changes in Short interval intracortical inhibition
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Title
changes SICF
Description
short-interval intracortical facilitation
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Title
changes in LICI
Description
long-interval intracortical inhibition
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Title
changes in MscanFit MUNE
Description
Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scans will be recorded
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Title
changes in NET (Nerve excitability testing)
Description
Strength duration time constant (SDTC), threshold electrotonus (TE), I/V relationship (I/V) and recovery cycles (RC) will be measured.
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Title
changes in behavioral measures: Upper extremity motor score
Description
score on 50
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Title
changes in Spinal Cord independence Measures
Description
questionaire: self-care score
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Title
changes in Van Lieshout Test
Description
basis upper extremity skills
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Title
changes in GRASSP
Description
Grades redefined assessment of strength sensibility and Prehension
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Title
changes in hand held dynamometry
Description
strength in hand
Time Frame
before intervention; at 10 weeks (after intervention) and at 6 months follow-up
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
therapy difficulty
Description
VAS
Time Frame
before session; after completion of session an average of 60 minutes
Title
session density
Description
accelerometry
Time Frame
start intervention up to 10 weeks
Title
therapy perceived exertion
Description
VAS
Time Frame
before session; after completion of session an average of 60 minutes

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
16 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Traumatic or non-traumatic C-SCI below C4 in the preceding 10 weeks; age over 16 years; have an incomplete SCI or an AIS A SCI with zones of partial motor paralysis (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCI) and medically stable. Exclusion Criteria: SCI with ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A without zones of partial preservation (decided based on former studies [58]) and expertise of the team; SCI with any significant medical condition that could prevent the person from participating. In order to ensure TMS measurement can be performed, patients will only be included for this measure if they have a positive response to motor evoked potential measurement (MEP+) [59] and will be excluded in the presence of contraindications for TMS application such as epilepsy, metal implants in the brain,defibrillator, pacemaker and pregnancy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Annemie Spooren, Prof. Dr.
Phone
11269332
Email
annemie.spooren@uhasselt.be
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lisa Tedesco Triccas, Prof. Dr.
Email
lisa.tedescotriccas@uhasselt.be
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Annemie Spooren, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Hasselt University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UZGent
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristine Oostra, Prof. Dr.
Facility Name
UZLeuven Campus Pellenberg
City
Leuven
Country
Belgium
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Koen Peers, Prof. Dr.
Facility Name
Zorggroep Adelante
City
Hoensbroek
Country
Netherlands
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Charlotte Van Laake, dr.

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
pseudomised data will be shared with the Aarhys university because they will assist in data-analyses. the protocol will be shared with the partners (Aarhus University, Sydney University, UZGent, UZLeuven and Adelante Zorggroep)
IPD Sharing Time Frame
during and after datagathering
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
only for collaborating partners

Learn more about this trial

Neural Plasticity and Motor Recovery After Early and Intensive Upper Extremity Motor Training in People With c-SCI

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs