Comparison Of The Analgesic Efficacy Of IPACK (Interspace Between The Popliteal Artery And Capsule Of The Posterior Knee) Block Alone And IPACK Block Combined With Genicular Block In Patients Planned For Total Knee Arthroplasty
Pain, Joint, Knee Arthropathy, Anesthesia
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain, Joint focused on measuring IPACK Block, Genicular Nerve Block, Total Knee Arthroplasty
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Unilateral total knee arthroplasty Between the ages of 18 and 80, Classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III Exclusion Criteria: Patients under 18 years old or over 80 ASA scores IV and above, pregnant or suspected of being pregnant, allergic to local anesthetics, coagulopathy, injection site infection, significant neurological or psychiatric disorders, severe cardiovascular diseases, chronic opioid use
Sites / Locations
- Bursa Uludag University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
No Intervention
Active Comparator
IPACK block
IPACK + Genicular Nerve Block
In the IPACK block group, a 20 mL solution containing 50 mg of 0.25% bupivacaine (Buvicaine®, Polifarma, Tekirdağ, Turkey) and 8 mg of dexamethasone (Dekort®, Deva, Istanbul, Turkey) was infiltrated between the popliteal artery and femur, starting 2 cm distal to the popliteal artery and being withdrawn while infiltrating proximally.
In the IPACK+GNB group, 12 mL of the same solution was used for the IPACK block infiltration. Then, the patient was positioned supine, and an ultrasound (Logiq e®, GE, Boston, USA) linear probe was placed approximately 2-3 cm above the patella, in the midline of the femur, with a sagittal plane angle of 45 degrees to visualize the femur and genicular artery . The visible needle was advanced in-plane towards the genicular artery, and 4 mL of local anesthetic solution was injected on the surface of the femur. The same procedure was repeated for the superior lateral genicular nerve block, creating a mirror image on the lateral side of the femur.