search
Back to results

GaslEss Macular Hole Surgery (GEM): a Feasibility Study (GEM)

Primary Purpose

Macular Holes

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Gasless Macular hole surgery
Standard Macular hole surgery
Sponsored by
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Macular Holes

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Requiring PPV to treat idiopathic (primary) FTMH. 18 years or older ETDRS BCVA letter score of 1 or better in the study eye Able to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: General: Hypersensitivity to hyaluronate or other components of Healon Pro® viscoelastic Any major illness or major surgical procedure within 4 weeks Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent the participant from granting informed consent or complying with the protocol Study eye Previous vitreoretinal surgery, retinopexy, open-globe injury, or endophthalmitis Presence of fibrotic retinal proliferation or central epiretinal membrane (within 1 disc diameter of the fovea) Aphakia Current or former myopia greater than 6 dioptres Current or previous posterior uveitis or choroiditis Presence of other ocular co-morbidity that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to impair BCVA postoperatively or affect FTMH closure Current ocular or periocular infection, other than mild or moderate blepharitis Lens or media opacity that preclude adequate retinal assessment and imaging

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Gasless Surgery

    Standard surgery with gas tamponade

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Feasibility: Screen failure
    Proportion of those screened who are randomised
    Feasibility: Recruitment rate
    Recruitment rate (participants per site per month)
    Feasibility: Participant retention
    Proportion reaching month 6 milestone visit
    Feasibility: Cross-over
    Proportion converting to standard vitrectomy with gas, due to inability to seal the FTMH, or detection of peripheral retinal breaks

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Efficacy Outcomes: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
    Mean change from baseline
    Efficacy Outcomes: Surgical success
    Proportion with FTMH closure within 3 months, without further FTMH surgery
    Efficacy Outcomes: Area under the BCVA versus time curve (ETDRS letter score)
    Safety outcomes: Adverse events
    Safety outcomes: Intra- and post-operative complications
    Safety outcomes: Development or progression of lens opacity
    Within 6 months of vitrectomy (proportion undergoing or listed for cataract surgery and mean change in Lens Opacities Classification System 2 [LOCS2] grading)
    Patient reported outcomes measures: Participant acceptability of the intervention
    Assessed by the Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ; composite score)
    Patient reported outcomes measures: National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ25; composite score)
    Patient reported outcomes measures: Qualitative analysis
    Analysis of participant feedback

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 6, 2023
    Last Updated
    October 6, 2023
    Sponsor
    King's College Hospital NHS Trust
    Collaborators
    National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT06079593
    Brief Title
    GaslEss Macular Hole Surgery (GEM): a Feasibility Study
    Acronym
    GEM
    Official Title
    GaslEss Macular Hole Surgery (GEM): a Feasibility Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    October 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    November 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    May 31, 2026 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    October 31, 2026 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    King's College Hospital NHS Trust
    Collaborators
    National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Macular holes are a hole in the centre of the retina, the light-sensing layer in the back of the eye. They cause a central 'blind spot' in the vision, which can be very disabling for patients. Standard surgery involves injecting a large gas bubble inside the eye. This takes 4-8 weeks to leave the eye. During this time vision is greatly reduced in the eye. This limits patients' ability to drive and work. Gas causes clouding of the natural lens in the eye (cataract). The gas can also raise pressure inside the eye, causing pain and sometimes loss of vision. Patients cannot fly or have certain medicines until the gas absorbs. Critically, most patients position face down for 50 minutes out of every hour for a week after surgery. This is to float the gas bubble onto the macula. Head positioning is particularly difficult. It very often causes pain in the neck, back, arms and legs. Rarely, blood clots can form in the legs and be life-threatening if they dislodge and travel to the lungs. Head positioning also places a large burden on those caring for the patient. The gases are 'greenhouse' gases and cause damage to the environment, for about 3,200 years. This study looks at a new surgical technique for treating macular holes. The new technique aims to make patients' recovery from surgery easier, and safer. The purpose of this study therefore is to compare two treatments: Standard macular hole surgery with gas tamponade Novel macular hole surgery without tamponade Gathering feasibility data to inform a future fully powered trial
    Detailed Description
    We are testing a new surgical technique, that does not use the gas bubble and face down positioning. Instead, a licensed surgical gel and thin flap of retinal tissue seal the macular hole. Early small studies suggest the new technique is safe and works as well as standard surgery. We will invite 60 people with macular hole to take part in the study. Half will be randomly allocated to the new technique and half to standard surgery. All participants will return at regular intervals after surgery for review. We will test their vision, examine their eyes, and ask them to complete questionnaires about their treatment and vision. We aim to examine if the technique appears safe and works well at closing macular holes. It will also inform us if a larger clinical trial is possible.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Macular Holes

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Other
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    Images will be graded in a masked fashion
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    60 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Gasless Surgery
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Title
    Standard surgery with gas tamponade
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Gasless Macular hole surgery
    Intervention Description
    Pars plana vitrectomy to treat full thickness macular hole, with internal limiting membrane flap and ophthalmic viscosurgical device covering
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    Standard Macular hole surgery
    Intervention Description
    Pars plana vitrectomy to treat full thickness macular hole, with internal limiting membrane peel, and C2F6 tamponade
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Feasibility: Screen failure
    Description
    Proportion of those screened who are randomised
    Time Frame
    36 months
    Title
    Feasibility: Recruitment rate
    Description
    Recruitment rate (participants per site per month)
    Time Frame
    36 months
    Title
    Feasibility: Participant retention
    Description
    Proportion reaching month 6 milestone visit
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Feasibility: Cross-over
    Description
    Proportion converting to standard vitrectomy with gas, due to inability to seal the FTMH, or detection of peripheral retinal breaks
    Time Frame
    36 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Efficacy Outcomes: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
    Description
    Mean change from baseline
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Efficacy Outcomes: Surgical success
    Description
    Proportion with FTMH closure within 3 months, without further FTMH surgery
    Time Frame
    3 months
    Title
    Efficacy Outcomes: Area under the BCVA versus time curve (ETDRS letter score)
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Safety outcomes: Adverse events
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Safety outcomes: Intra- and post-operative complications
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Safety outcomes: Development or progression of lens opacity
    Description
    Within 6 months of vitrectomy (proportion undergoing or listed for cataract surgery and mean change in Lens Opacities Classification System 2 [LOCS2] grading)
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Patient reported outcomes measures: Participant acceptability of the intervention
    Description
    Assessed by the Macular Disease Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MacTSQ; composite score)
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Patient reported outcomes measures: National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ25; composite score)
    Time Frame
    6 months
    Title
    Patient reported outcomes measures: Qualitative analysis
    Description
    Analysis of participant feedback
    Time Frame
    6 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    100 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Requiring PPV to treat idiopathic (primary) FTMH. 18 years or older ETDRS BCVA letter score of 1 or better in the study eye Able to provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: General: Hypersensitivity to hyaluronate or other components of Healon Pro® viscoelastic Any major illness or major surgical procedure within 4 weeks Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent the participant from granting informed consent or complying with the protocol Study eye Previous vitreoretinal surgery, retinopexy, open-globe injury, or endophthalmitis Presence of fibrotic retinal proliferation or central epiretinal membrane (within 1 disc diameter of the fovea) Aphakia Current or former myopia greater than 6 dioptres Current or previous posterior uveitis or choroiditis Presence of other ocular co-morbidity that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to impair BCVA postoperatively or affect FTMH closure Current ocular or periocular infection, other than mild or moderate blepharitis Lens or media opacity that preclude adequate retinal assessment and imaging
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    George Murphy, MB BCh BAO, FRCOphth
    Phone
    (+)44 2032991297 ext 31297
    Email
    george.murphy4@nhs.net
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Timothy Jackson, PhD, FRCOphth
    Organizational Affiliation
    King's College London & King's College Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    GaslEss Macular Hole Surgery (GEM): a Feasibility Study

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs