search
Back to results

The Efficacy of a Probiotic for Functional Constipation (FC) (SLOG)

Primary Purpose

Functional Constipation

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Probiotic
Placebo
Sponsored by
The Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Functional Constipation focused on measuring Probiotic, GI microbiome, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Males (at least 30% of total number of subjects) and females ≥ 18 years and ≤65 years old Body Mass Index (BMI) 18.5 - 30.0 kg/m2 Fulfilment of the Rome IV FC diagnostic criteria at V1 and V2 Self-reported average stool frequency of 3 or less bowel movements per week Self-reported average stool consistency of type 1-4 on the Bristol Stool Form Scale Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score > 8 at V1 Readiness not to use any treatment/supplementation for complaints related to constipation (e.g. prokinetics, laxatives, enemas) during the study; exception: glycerol suppository and if it provides no benefit, participants are allowed to take oral laxatives (see section 0) Readiness and ability to comply with and perform the procedures requested by the protocol If receiving proton pump inhibitors (PPI), anticipated to continue PPI therapy for the duration of the trial Readiness not to have any change in habitual diet or exercise patterns over the study period Women: If sexually active, commitment to use contraception methods negative pregnancy testing (beta human chorionic gonadotropin test in urine) at V1 Generally, in the opinion of investigator, healthy individuals (e.g. no heart failure, no malignancy) Participation is based upon written informed consent by the participant following written and oral information by the investigator regarding nature, purpose, consequences and possible risks of the clinical study. Exclusion Criteria: Clinically relevant (as per investigators judgement) self-reported chronic disease of the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. irritable bowel syndrome, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, diverticulitis, malabsorption disorder), neurological, cardiovascular, endocrine/reproductive, renal, or other chronic diseases likely to affect gut motility Prior abdominal surgery in the past 3 years (except for laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy and other minor laparoscopic surgeries, as per investigator judgement, that are allowed) Ongoing regular use of products that (in the investigator's opinion) are known to cause constipation or change gastric motility (e.g. iron; opioids; sucralfate; 5-HT3 antagonists (e.g. ondansetron); antacids with magnesium, calcium, or aluminum; anticholinergic agents; calcium supplements; trycyclic antidepressants; systemic steroids) Any subjects with use of PPI within the last 8 weeks prior to Visit 1 (exception: continuous use for ≥ 8 week before Visit 1 is allowed) Post-menopausal women, defined as >12 months after the last menstrual bleeding and not using hormonal contraception Women ≥ 50 years using hormonal contraception ALARM features in the past 3 months prior to study (e.g. fever, unintentional weight loss ≥5 kg, blood in stool, vomiting) and moderate or severe anorectal problems (e.g. rectal bleeding, pelvic organ prolapse, anal fissures) Previously diagnosed lactose intolerance, gluten intolerance, cow's milk allergy and/or soya-allergy Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any ingredients of the investigational product Consumption of biotic supplements (probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics or post-biotics) within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the study Regular consumption of fibre supplements and/or laxatives more than 1x a week Use of laxatives within 48 hrs prior to Visit 1 Use of antibiotic within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the study Ongoing alcohol, drug, or medication abuse Participation in other clinical trials within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the study Planning travel for >1 week during the study duration Anticipated major changes in diet or exercise during the study Pregnant or lactating or planned to become pregnant during the study period Smoking > 5 cigarettes per week An irregular diet, an abnormal sleep cycle, or other lifestyle abnormalities, as per investigator judgement Individuals who, in the opinion of the investigator, are considered to be incompliant clinical attendees or unlikely for any reason to be able to complete the trial as required Clinically relevant deviation of screening laboratory parameters at V1

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Placebo Comparator

    Arm Label

    Probiotic

    Placebo

    Arm Description

    Participants in this arm will receive a daily dose of 3x10^9 Colony Forming Units (CFU) of a live bacterium, corresponding to 1 capsules daily for 28 days

    Participants in this arm will receive an equivalent placebo for 28 days

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Difference in change in Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (total) from baseline (V2) to study end (V3)
    Difference in change in Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (CCCS) (total) from baseline (V2) to study end (V3) between verum and placebo groups. Higher scores in the CCCS indicate worse constipation symptoms. (Max score: 30)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Difference in change in Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (total) at 2 week(s) after V2, compared to V2
    Difference in change in Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (CCCS) (total) from 2 weeks after V2 to study end (V3) between verum and placebo groups. Higher scores in the CCCS indicate worse constipation symptoms (Max score: 30)
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life score (total) from V2 to V3
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score (total) from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL indicate worse constipation symptoms (Max Score: 112)
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life score (total) at 2 week(s) after V2, compared to V2
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score (total) from 2 weeks after V2 to V3. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL indicate worse constipation symptoms (Max Score: 112)
    Difference in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life domain score from V2 to V3
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) domain scores (total) from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL domain scores indicate worse constipation symptoms (varying questions in each domain, each question scored 0 - 4 on Likert scale)
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life domain scores at 2 week(s) after V2, compared to V2
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) domain scores (total) from 2 weeks after V2 to V2. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL domain indicate worse constipation symptoms (varying questions in each domain, each question scored 0 - 4 on Likert scale)
    Difference in change in total reflux symptoms score from V2 to V3
    Difference in (total) reflux questionnaire scores from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Max score 10.
    Difference in change in total reflux symptoms score at 2 weeks after V2, compared to V2
    Difference in (total) reflux questionnaire scores from 2 weeks after V2 to V2. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Max score 10.
    Difference in change in reflux symptoms sub-scale score (i.e. individual items) from V2 to V3
    Difference in (subscale) reflux questionnaire scores from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Each question is a Likert scale ranging from 1-5. Max score is 5.
    Difference in change in reflux symptoms sub-scale score (i.e. individual items) at 2 weeks after V2, compared to V2
    Difference in (subscale) reflux questionnaire scores from 2 weeks after V2 to V2. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Each question is a Likert scale ranging from 1-5. Max score is 5.
    Difference in proportion of stools in different Bristol Stool Form Scale categories (1-2, 3-4, 5-7) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Proportion of stool in each Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) category at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. BSFS categories range from 1 - 7, with 1 representing hard stool and 7 representing liquid stool.
    Difference in change in mean weekly stool frequency at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Difference in change in mean weekly number of bowel movements at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2.
    Difference in change in mean weekly number of spontaneous bowel movements (without assistance/ medication) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Difference in change in mean weekly number of spontaneous bowel movements (without assistance/ medication) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Difference in change of the weekly degree of straining (VAS) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Difference in change of the weekly average degree of straining (VAS) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. Straining calculated on a 5-point Likert Scale, where 1 is no straining and 5 is very severe straining
    Difference in change of the weekly defecation/ rectal pain (VAS) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Difference in change of the weekly average defecation/rectal pain at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. Defecation/Rectal pain calculated on a 5-point Likert Scale, where 1 is no painand 5 is very severe pain
    Difference in the weekly self-assessment of complete bowel emptying at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Difference in the weekly average self-assessment of complete bowel emptying at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. Self assessment of complete bowel emptying conducted with a 'yes' or 'no' question
    Difference in weekly average use of laxatives at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Difference in weekly average use of laxatives at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Difference in weekly need for digital assistance at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Difference in weekly average need for digital assistance at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Difference in short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
    Difference in short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3.
    Difference in findings of microbiome assessment using metagenomics techniques of stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
    Difference in findings of microbiome assessment using metagenomics techniques of stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
    Difference in findings of targeted metabolomic analysis of stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
    Difference in findings of targeted metabolomic analysis of stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
    Percentage of subjects with matching records of blinded assessment concern-ing the IP type they received (verum, placebo) and the actual IP assignment
    Percentage of subjects with matching records of blinded assessment concern-ing the IP type they received (verum, placebo) and the actual IP assignment
    Assessment of benefit by subject and investigator at V3 (4 point categorical scale)
    Assessment of benefit by subject and investigator at V3. 4 point scale, where 1 = poor and 4 = very good
    Assessment of the number of adverse events between the intervention and placebo
    Assessment of the number of adverse events between the intervention and placebo

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 9, 2023
    Last Updated
    October 9, 2023
    Sponsor
    The Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
    Collaborators
    Analyze & Realize
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT06083311
    Brief Title
    The Efficacy of a Probiotic for Functional Constipation (FC)
    Acronym
    SLOG
    Official Title
    A Randomised, Triple-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Pilot Study, to Assess the Effect of Probiotic on Functional Constipation and Gut Microbiology
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    October 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    October 15, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    September 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    September 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    The Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
    Collaborators
    Analyze & Realize

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Investigate the effect of a probiotic (live bacteria) in individuals with functional constipation.
    Detailed Description
    This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of live bacteria on defecation parameters in individuals with Functional Constipation. The trial will be run in Germany and will recruit adult men and women meeting the ROME-IV criteria for functional constipation.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Functional Constipation
    Keywords
    Probiotic, GI microbiome, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    Triple Blind Study
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    100 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Probiotic
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Participants in this arm will receive a daily dose of 3x10^9 Colony Forming Units (CFU) of a live bacterium, corresponding to 1 capsules daily for 28 days
    Arm Title
    Placebo
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    Participants in this arm will receive an equivalent placebo for 28 days
    Intervention Type
    Dietary Supplement
    Intervention Name(s)
    Probiotic
    Intervention Description
    Participants in this arm will receive a daily dose of 3x10^9 Colony Forming Units (CFU) of a live bacterium, corresponding to 1 capsules daily for 28 days
    Intervention Type
    Dietary Supplement
    Intervention Name(s)
    Placebo
    Intervention Description
    Participants in this arm will receive an equivalent placebo for 28 days
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Difference in change in Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (total) from baseline (V2) to study end (V3)
    Description
    Difference in change in Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (CCCS) (total) from baseline (V2) to study end (V3) between verum and placebo groups. Higher scores in the CCCS indicate worse constipation symptoms. (Max score: 30)
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Difference in change in Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (total) at 2 week(s) after V2, compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in change in Cleveland Clinic Constipation score (CCCS) (total) from 2 weeks after V2 to study end (V3) between verum and placebo groups. Higher scores in the CCCS indicate worse constipation symptoms (Max score: 30)
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 14
    Title
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life score (total) from V2 to V3
    Description
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score (total) from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL indicate worse constipation symptoms (Max Score: 112)
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
    Title
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life score (total) at 2 week(s) after V2, compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) score (total) from 2 weeks after V2 to V3. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL indicate worse constipation symptoms (Max Score: 112)
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 14
    Title
    Difference in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life domain score from V2 to V3
    Description
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) domain scores (total) from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL domain scores indicate worse constipation symptoms (varying questions in each domain, each question scored 0 - 4 on Likert scale)
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
    Title
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life domain scores at 2 week(s) after V2, compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in change in Patient Assessment of Constipation - Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) domain scores (total) from 2 weeks after V2 to V2. Higher scores in the PAC-QOL domain indicate worse constipation symptoms (varying questions in each domain, each question scored 0 - 4 on Likert scale)
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 14
    Title
    Difference in change in total reflux symptoms score from V2 to V3
    Description
    Difference in (total) reflux questionnaire scores from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Max score 10.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
    Title
    Difference in change in total reflux symptoms score at 2 weeks after V2, compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in (total) reflux questionnaire scores from 2 weeks after V2 to V2. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Max score 10.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 14
    Title
    Difference in change in reflux symptoms sub-scale score (i.e. individual items) from V2 to V3
    Description
    Difference in (subscale) reflux questionnaire scores from V2 to V3. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Each question is a Likert scale ranging from 1-5. Max score is 5.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
    Title
    Difference in change in reflux symptoms sub-scale score (i.e. individual items) at 2 weeks after V2, compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in (subscale) reflux questionnaire scores from 2 weeks after V2 to V2. Higher scores in the reflux questions indicate worse reflux symptoms. Each question is a Likert scale ranging from 1-5. Max score is 5.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 14
    Title
    Difference in proportion of stools in different Bristol Stool Form Scale categories (1-2, 3-4, 5-7) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Description
    Proportion of stool in each Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) category at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. BSFS categories range from 1 - 7, with 1 representing hard stool and 7 representing liquid stool.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
    Title
    Difference in change in mean weekly stool frequency at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in change in mean weekly number of bowel movements at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
    Title
    Difference in change in mean weekly number of spontaneous bowel movements (without assistance/ medication) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in change in mean weekly number of spontaneous bowel movements (without assistance/ medication) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
    Title
    Difference in change of the weekly degree of straining (VAS) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in change of the weekly average degree of straining (VAS) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. Straining calculated on a 5-point Likert Scale, where 1 is no straining and 5 is very severe straining
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
    Title
    Difference in change of the weekly defecation/ rectal pain (VAS) at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in change of the weekly average defecation/rectal pain at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. Defecation/Rectal pain calculated on a 5-point Likert Scale, where 1 is no painand 5 is very severe pain
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
    Title
    Difference in the weekly self-assessment of complete bowel emptying at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in the weekly average self-assessment of complete bowel emptying at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2. Self assessment of complete bowel emptying conducted with a 'yes' or 'no' question
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
    Title
    Difference in weekly average use of laxatives at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in weekly average use of laxatives at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
    Title
    Difference in weekly need for digital assistance at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Description
    Difference in weekly average need for digital assistance at 1, 2, 3 week(s) after V2 and at V3, each compared to V2
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 7, Day 14, Day 21 and Day 28
    Title
    Difference in short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
    Description
    Difference in short chain fatty acids (SCFA) in stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3.
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
    Title
    Difference in findings of microbiome assessment using metagenomics techniques of stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
    Description
    Difference in findings of microbiome assessment using metagenomics techniques of stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
    Title
    Difference in findings of targeted metabolomic analysis of stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
    Description
    Difference in findings of targeted metabolomic analysis of stool samples collected prior to V2 and prior to V3
    Time Frame
    Baseline (V2), Day 28 (V3)
    Title
    Percentage of subjects with matching records of blinded assessment concern-ing the IP type they received (verum, placebo) and the actual IP assignment
    Description
    Percentage of subjects with matching records of blinded assessment concern-ing the IP type they received (verum, placebo) and the actual IP assignment
    Time Frame
    Day 28 (V3)
    Title
    Assessment of benefit by subject and investigator at V3 (4 point categorical scale)
    Description
    Assessment of benefit by subject and investigator at V3. 4 point scale, where 1 = poor and 4 = very good
    Time Frame
    Day 28 (V3)
    Title
    Assessment of the number of adverse events between the intervention and placebo
    Description
    Assessment of the number of adverse events between the intervention and placebo
    Time Frame
    Day 28 (V3)

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    65 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Males (at least 30% of total number of subjects) and females ≥ 18 years and ≤65 years old Body Mass Index (BMI) 18.5 - 30.0 kg/m2 Fulfilment of the Rome IV FC diagnostic criteria at V1 and V2 Self-reported average stool frequency of 3 or less bowel movements per week Self-reported average stool consistency of type 1-4 on the Bristol Stool Form Scale Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score > 8 at V1 Readiness not to use any treatment/supplementation for complaints related to constipation (e.g. prokinetics, laxatives, enemas) during the study; exception: glycerol suppository and if it provides no benefit, participants are allowed to take oral laxatives (see section 0) Readiness and ability to comply with and perform the procedures requested by the protocol If receiving proton pump inhibitors (PPI), anticipated to continue PPI therapy for the duration of the trial Readiness not to have any change in habitual diet or exercise patterns over the study period Women: If sexually active, commitment to use contraception methods negative pregnancy testing (beta human chorionic gonadotropin test in urine) at V1 Generally, in the opinion of investigator, healthy individuals (e.g. no heart failure, no malignancy) Participation is based upon written informed consent by the participant following written and oral information by the investigator regarding nature, purpose, consequences and possible risks of the clinical study. Exclusion Criteria: Clinically relevant (as per investigators judgement) self-reported chronic disease of the gastrointestinal tract (e.g. irritable bowel syndrome, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, diverticulitis, malabsorption disorder), neurological, cardiovascular, endocrine/reproductive, renal, or other chronic diseases likely to affect gut motility Prior abdominal surgery in the past 3 years (except for laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy and other minor laparoscopic surgeries, as per investigator judgement, that are allowed) Ongoing regular use of products that (in the investigator's opinion) are known to cause constipation or change gastric motility (e.g. iron; opioids; sucralfate; 5-HT3 antagonists (e.g. ondansetron); antacids with magnesium, calcium, or aluminum; anticholinergic agents; calcium supplements; trycyclic antidepressants; systemic steroids) Any subjects with use of PPI within the last 8 weeks prior to Visit 1 (exception: continuous use for ≥ 8 week before Visit 1 is allowed) Post-menopausal women, defined as >12 months after the last menstrual bleeding and not using hormonal contraception Women ≥ 50 years using hormonal contraception ALARM features in the past 3 months prior to study (e.g. fever, unintentional weight loss ≥5 kg, blood in stool, vomiting) and moderate or severe anorectal problems (e.g. rectal bleeding, pelvic organ prolapse, anal fissures) Previously diagnosed lactose intolerance, gluten intolerance, cow's milk allergy and/or soya-allergy Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any ingredients of the investigational product Consumption of biotic supplements (probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics or post-biotics) within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the study Regular consumption of fibre supplements and/or laxatives more than 1x a week Use of laxatives within 48 hrs prior to Visit 1 Use of antibiotic within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the study Ongoing alcohol, drug, or medication abuse Participation in other clinical trials within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the study Planning travel for >1 week during the study duration Anticipated major changes in diet or exercise during the study Pregnant or lactating or planned to become pregnant during the study period Smoking > 5 cigarettes per week An irregular diet, an abnormal sleep cycle, or other lifestyle abnormalities, as per investigator judgement Individuals who, in the opinion of the investigator, are considered to be incompliant clinical attendees or unlikely for any reason to be able to complete the trial as required Clinically relevant deviation of screening laboratory parameters at V1
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    ADM Medical Team
    Phone
    +44 1460 243 230
    Email
    medical@protexin.com

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    The Efficacy of a Probiotic for Functional Constipation (FC)

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs