search
Back to results

Radiotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Responding to PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy

Primary Purpose

Esophageal Neoplasm Metastatic, Esophageal Cancer Stage IVb

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TP (Paclitaxel with cisplatin or carboplatin) or PF (Fluoropyrimidine with cisplatin or carboplatin) regimen depended on investigator's choice.
PD-1 inhibitor
Consolidation Radiation
Salvage Radiation
Sponsored by
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Esophageal Neoplasm Metastatic

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: 1. ≥18 years, any gender 2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of esophageal cancer. The initial clinical stage is IVb (2018 AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition) or recurrent patients with recurrence after radical treatment (radical treatment includes surgery and radiotherapy, but the recurrence site cannot be located in the previous radiotherapy field). 3. ECOG performance status <= 1. Patients aged 65 years and over need to complete G8 screening or Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, and the final evaluation is good; 4.There was no significant abnormality in laboratory routine indicators such as blood routine and liver and kidney function; 5.No prior history of thoracic radiation; 6.Expected survival is more than 12 weeks; 7.Informed consent provided; 8.With response to 2-4 cycles of the first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Exclusion Criteria: 1.Patients with other cancer history except hypopharyngeal carcinoma in situ, non-malignant skin cancer and cervical carcinoma in situ. 2.Received surgery (except ostomy), chemotherapy or other anti-tumor treatment before enrollment; 3. Active infection currently exists . The following conditions occurred within 6 months before randomization: myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or received gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiopulmonary surgery; 4. History of allergy to chemotherapy drugs or autoimmune disease; 5. Participate in other clinical trials at present or within 4 weeks before enrollment; 6.There are factors such as high risk of fistula that radiotherapy cannot be safely carried out as assessed by the radiation oncologist.

Sites / Locations

  • Cancer hospital, CAMSRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Consolidation radiotherapy

Salvage radiotherapy

Arm Description

This treatment group will be receive radiotherapy on the basis of standard first-line treatment, after all planned cycles of chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor completed.

This treatment group will be receive salvage radiotherapy on the basis of standard first-line treatment, when disease progressed and salvage radiotherapy is recommended by multidisciplinary team.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

EFFICACY:1-year overall survival probability
Overall survival was defined as the time from first dose to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. OS is reported for all participants of the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculated the 1-year survival probability.

Secondary Outcome Measures

EFFICACY: Median progression-free survival (PFS)
Median progression-free survival (PFS), was defined as the time from first dose to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
SAFETY: Acute toxicity rate
Acute toxicity Rate, was defined as the frequency of toxicities related to the treatment, which arises within one month after administration, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,Version 5.0 (CTC AE5.0).
SAFETY: Late toxicity rate
Late toxicity rate, was defined as the frequency of toxicities related to the treatment, which arises after one month after administration, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,Version 5.0 (CTC AE5.0).
QUALITY OF LIFE: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Subscale Scores in Participants
The score of the participants evaluated by The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to100.A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning.
QUALITY OF LIFE: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-OES18 Subscale Scores in Participants
The score of the participants evaluated by The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Oesophageal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OES18). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to100.A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning.

Full Information

First Posted
September 19, 2023
Last Updated
October 19, 2023
Sponsor
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Collaborators
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06084897
Brief Title
Radiotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Responding to PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy
Official Title
Radiotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Responding to PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy: a Patient Preference Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 16, 2023 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 26, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 26, 2028 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Collaborators
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The treatment efficacy for stage IVb esophageal cancer has been improved through chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy recently. On this basis, the investigators intend to conduct a prospective, multicenter phase II clinical trial to assess whether radiotherapy could further improve the survival of patients with metastatic esophageal cancer responding to PD-1 Inhibitor plus chemotherapy. Accompanied tissue samples, blood samples and urine samples will be analyzed by molecular biological detection (Including Whole Exome Sequencing and proteomics) to explore potential biomarkers for predicting outcomes, efficacy and toxicity.
Detailed Description
Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common carcinomas with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. More than 30% of the patients were stage IV when diagnosed. Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum-based chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic EC for approximately four decades, however, only minimal improvement has been reached in overall survival (OS). Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown effective antitumor activity in patients with unresectable, advanced or metastatic EC. Several randomized trials have demonstrated the PD-1 inhibitor could further improve the OS in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) on the basis of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has become one of the the standard treatment modality for metastatic EC. As reported, for the patients with metastatic lung cancer or EC, locoregional radiotherapy could improve survival, especially in those who responding to systemic therapy. However, high-level evidence is still needed to assess whether these patients can benefit from local radiotherapy. The efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy is obviously better than that of chemotherapy alone. On this basis, locoregional radiotherapy may help those patients with metastatic EC responding to systemic therapy improve local control, relieve the local symptoms, and even improve survival. Therefore, the investigators intend to conduct a prospective, multicenter phase II trial to assess the efficiency and safety of radiotherapy with chemotherapy and immunotherapy for patients with metastatic EC. Accompanied tissue samples, blood samples and urine samples will be analyzed by molecular biological detection to explore potential biomarkers for predicting outcomes, efficacy and toxicity.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Esophageal Neoplasm Metastatic, Esophageal Cancer Stage IVb

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Consolidation radiotherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This treatment group will be receive radiotherapy on the basis of standard first-line treatment, after all planned cycles of chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor completed.
Arm Title
Salvage radiotherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This treatment group will be receive salvage radiotherapy on the basis of standard first-line treatment, when disease progressed and salvage radiotherapy is recommended by multidisciplinary team.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
TP (Paclitaxel with cisplatin or carboplatin) or PF (Fluoropyrimidine with cisplatin or carboplatin) regimen depended on investigator's choice.
Other Intervention Name(s)
Chemotherapy
Intervention Description
A maximum of six cycles was recommended for chemotherapy. Fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil or capecitabine) with carboplatin or cisplatin; Paclitaxel (or Albumin-bound paclitaxel) with carboplatin or cisplatin.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
PD-1 inhibitor
Other Intervention Name(s)
Immunotherapy
Intervention Description
Nivolumab or Pebolizumab or Tislelizumab or Serplulimab or Toripalimab or Sintilimab or Camrelizumab
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Consolidation Radiation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Planned Radiotherapy
Intervention Description
IMRT/VMAT technique. Patients receive radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week for an average of 5 weeks. Radiotherapy is delivered to achieve a dosage of 49.22Gy/23f or 50Gy/25f to PGTV for lymphnode metastasis only patients and 40.66Gy/19f or 40Gy/20f for organ metastasis patients. Radiation treatment is planned after chemotherapy completed.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Salvage Radiation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Radiotherapy when needed
Intervention Description
IMRT/VMAT technique. Patients receive radiotherapy once daily, 5 days a week for an average of 5 weeks. Radiotherapy is delivered to achieve a dosage of 49.22Gy/23f or 50Gy/25f to PGTV for lymphnode metastasis only patients and 40.66Gy/19f or 40Gy/20f for organ metastasis patients. Radiation treatment is planned after disease progression when recommended by multidisciplinary team.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EFFICACY:1-year overall survival probability
Description
Overall survival was defined as the time from first dose to death due to any cause. Participants without documented death at the time of the final analysis were censored at the date of the last follow-up. OS is reported for all participants of the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculated the 1-year survival probability.
Time Frame
12 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
EFFICACY: Median progression-free survival (PFS)
Description
Median progression-free survival (PFS), was defined as the time from first dose to the first documented progressive disease (PD) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the investigator, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first.
Time Frame
12 month
Title
SAFETY: Acute toxicity rate
Description
Acute toxicity Rate, was defined as the frequency of toxicities related to the treatment, which arises within one month after administration, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,Version 5.0 (CTC AE5.0).
Time Frame
One month within the end of one specific treatment
Title
SAFETY: Late toxicity rate
Description
Late toxicity rate, was defined as the frequency of toxicities related to the treatment, which arises after one month after administration, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event,Version 5.0 (CTC AE5.0).
Time Frame
One month after the end of one specific treatment.
Title
QUALITY OF LIFE: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-C30 Subscale Scores in Participants
Description
The score of the participants evaluated by The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to100.A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning.
Time Frame
24 month
Title
QUALITY OF LIFE: Change From Baseline in the EORTC QLQ-OES18 Subscale Scores in Participants
Description
The score of the participants evaluated by The EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Oesophageal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-OES18). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to100.A high scale score represents a higher response level. Thus a high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning.
Time Frame
24 month
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Biomarkers for the predicting of efficacy
Description
To explore the dynamic changes of circulating tumor DNA (the frequency of specific mutations by Next-generation sequencing Methodology) from baseline, before and after radiotherapy.
Time Frame
24 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
gender identity.
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. ≥18 years, any gender 2. Histologically or cytologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of esophageal cancer. The initial clinical stage is IVb (2018 AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition) or recurrent patients with recurrence after radical treatment (radical treatment includes surgery and radiotherapy, but the recurrence site cannot be located in the previous radiotherapy field). 3. ECOG performance status <= 1. Patients aged 65 years and over need to complete G8 screening or Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, and the final evaluation is good; 4.There was no significant abnormality in laboratory routine indicators such as blood routine and liver and kidney function; 5.No prior history of thoracic radiation; 6.Expected survival is more than 12 weeks; 7.Informed consent provided; 8.With response to 2-4 cycles of the first-line chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy. Exclusion Criteria: 1.Patients with other cancer history except hypopharyngeal carcinoma in situ, non-malignant skin cancer and cervical carcinoma in situ. 2.Received surgery (except ostomy), chemotherapy or other anti-tumor treatment before enrollment; 3. Active infection currently exists . The following conditions occurred within 6 months before randomization: myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, or received gastrointestinal, neurological, cardiopulmonary surgery; 4. History of allergy to chemotherapy drugs or autoimmune disease; 5. Participate in other clinical trials at present or within 4 weeks before enrollment; 6.There are factors such as high risk of fistula that radiotherapy cannot be safely carried out as assessed by the radiation oncologist.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Wen-Yang Liu, MD
Phone
8601087787625
Email
liuwenyang@cicams.ac.cn
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wen-Yang Liu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zhi-Hao Lu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cancer hospital, CAMS
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100021
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wen-Yang Liu, MD
Email
liuwenyang@cicams.ac.cn
Ext
Liu
Email
liuwenyang@cicams.ac.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wen-Yang Liu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers with academic interest in esophageal cancer. Data or samples shared will be coded, with no PHI included. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements (i.e. a material transfer agreement) are prerequisites to the sharing of data with the requesting party.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data requests can be submitted starting 12 months after article publication and the data will be made accessible for up to 24 months. Extensions will be considered on a case-by-case basis
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). For more information or to submit a request, please contact liuwenyang@cicams.ac.cn
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34454674
Citation
Sun JM, Shen L, Shah MA, Enzinger P, Adenis A, Doi T, Kojima T, Metges JP, Li Z, Kim SB, Cho BC, Mansoor W, Li SH, Sunpaweravong P, Maqueda MA, Goekkurt E, Hara H, Antunes L, Fountzilas C, Tsuji A, Oliden VC, Liu Q, Shah S, Bhagia P, Kato K; KEYNOTE-590 Investigators. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2021 Aug 28;398(10302):759-771. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01234-4. Erratum In: Lancet. 2021 Nov 20;398(10314):1874.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34519801
Citation
Luo H, Lu J, Bai Y, Mao T, Wang J, Fan Q, Zhang Y, Zhao K, Chen Z, Gao S, Li J, Fu Z, Gu K, Liu Z, Wu L, Zhang X, Feng J, Niu Z, Ba Y, Zhang H, Liu Y, Zhang L, Min X, Huang J, Cheng Y, Wang D, Shen Y, Yang Q, Zou J, Xu RH; ESCORT-1st Investigators. Effect of Camrelizumab vs Placebo Added to Chemotherapy on Survival and Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The ESCORT-1st Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 14;326(10):916-925. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12836.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28461255
Citation
Guttmann DM, Mitra N, Bekelman J, Metz JM, Plastaras J, Feng W, Swisher-McClure S. Improved Overall Survival with Aggressive Primary Tumor Radiotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017 Jul;12(7):1131-1142. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.03.026. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Radiotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer Responding to PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs