search
Back to results

Evaluation of a Brief Computerized and Smart Phone-based Intervention for Stress in Regular Cannabis Users (DISC)

Primary Purpose

Cannabis Use Disorder

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Emotional Engagement Distress Tolerance Intervention
Health Education Intervention
Sponsored by
Auburn University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cannabis Use Disorder

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 30 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Cannabis is the primary substance of abuse. Clinical-level Distress intolerance Index score. Current Cannabis Use Disorder diagnosis. Near-daily to daily cannabis use in past-month and past 3 months. Positive urine screen for THC Detectable skin conductance level Owns a smart phone Primary delta-9 THC user Exclusion Criteria: Presence of acute/major psychiatric disturbance Current pregnancy Change in psychotropic medication within the past month Concurrently receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy for cannabis use or emotional disorders Planning to immediately quit using cannabis EEG contraindications Kidney disease

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Placebo Comparator

    Arm Label

    Emotional Engagement Distress Tolerance Intervention

    Health Education Intervention

    Arm Description

    The experimental intervention (single 2.5 hour session) is comprised of video-delivered psychoeducation, adaptive skill practice, and emotional exposure. During exposure, a sequence of percussive sounds accompanied by a visual depiction of the participant's skin conductance level during exposure will be presented at the moment the participant's skin conductance returns to the relaxation baseline value. These images/sound will be intermittently sent to the participant's smart phone during the smart phone portion of the intervention.

    The health education control intervention is a single 2.5 hour computerized session. It is comprised of audio-narrated videos on healthy habits and self-care in the domains of sleep, nutrition, hygiene, and physical exercise. The same sequence of percussive sounds used in the Emotional Engagement Distress Tolerance Intervention is presented alongside summary slides presenting key points on healthy habits and self-care. These images/sound will be intermittently sent to the participant's smart phone during the smart phone portion of the intervention.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Therapy Evaluation Questionnaire
    acceptability/feasibility (credibility subscale range 3-27; expectancy item range 0%-100%; higher scores indicate better outcome)
    Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
    acceptability/feasibility (range 0-84; higher scores indicate better outcome)
    Change in perceived distress intolerance from baseline through follow-up
    Distress Intolerance Index (range 0-40; higher scores indicate worse outcome) to assess perceived distress intolerance via self-report
    Change in behavioral distress intolerance from baseline through follow-up
    Mirror-Tracing Persistence Task to assess behavioral distress intolerance via computerized task
    Change in laboratory stress-induced cannabis craving from baseline through post-intervention
    Change in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (range 11-77; higher scores indicate worse outcome) after Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test at post-intervention compared to baseline
    Change in laboratory stress-induced neural reactivity to cannabis cues (assessed via the electroencephalography [EEG]-recorded late positive potential) from baseline through post-intervention
    Change in Late Positive Potential to Cannabis Cues after Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test at post-intervention compared to baseline
    Change in real-world stress-elicited cannabis use from baseline to post-intervention
    Change in stress->cannabis use slopes derived from ecological momentary assessment from baseline through post-intervention
    Change in cannabis use frequency from baseline through follow-up
    Change in cannabis use frequency (measured via timeline follow-back) from baseline through four-month follow-up
    Change in urine tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] metabolite concentration from baseline through follow-up
    Change in urinary THC metabolite concentration (measured via ultra high performance liquid chromatography [UHPLC]) from baseline through four-month follow-up
    Change in self-reported cannabis use problems from baseline through follow-up
    Change in Marijuana Problems Scale (range 0-38; higher scores indicate worse outcome) from baseline through follow-up
    Change in Cannabis Use Disorder symptoms from baseline through follow-up
    Change in interviewer-assessed Cannabis Use Disorder criteria (range 0-11; higher scores indicate worse outcome) from baseline to four-month follow-up

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Change in quality of life from baseline through follow-up
    Change in self-reported quality of life (measured via Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form; range 16-80; lower scores indicate worse outcome) from baseline through follow-up
    Change in depression and anxiety from baseline through follow-up
    Change in self-reported depression and anxiety (measured via Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [range 0-21 for each subscale; higher scores indicate worse outcomes) from baseline through follow-up

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 9, 2023
    Last Updated
    October 22, 2023
    Sponsor
    Auburn University
    Collaborators
    Northwestern University, Duke University, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT06085222
    Brief Title
    Evaluation of a Brief Computerized and Smart Phone-based Intervention for Stress in Regular Cannabis Users
    Acronym
    DISC
    Official Title
    Refinement and Testing of a Brief Computerized and Smart Phone-based Intervention for Stress in Regular Cannabis Users
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    October 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    March 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    April 1, 2026 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    April 1, 2026 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Auburn University
    Collaborators
    Northwestern University, Duke University, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The prevalence of daily cannabis use and Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) has increased in the United States over the past two decades. Brief, computerized harm reduction interventions that target specific high-risk CUD populations could be an efficient approach to reducing CUD. Distress intolerance , which refers to the tendency to negatively appraise and escape aversive emotional states, is a risk factor associated with stress-related cannabis use motivation and CUD severity/chronicity. Thus, a brief, accessible, low-cost intervention that reduces distress intolerance in those with CUD and elevated distress intolerance could have a significant public health impact. This proposed project aims to optimize an existing two-session computerized distress tolerance intervention and test its impact on distress intolerance and cannabis use outcomes in a randomized controlled trial. Specifically, the intervention will be condensed to one-session, its active ingredient bolstered, and augmented with smart phone-delivered therapy reminders. After obtaining feedback on the modified Emotional Engagement Distress Tolerance Intervention in a small sample, the intervention's efficacy compared to a stringent, credible, time-matched health education control intervention will be tested in a randomized controlled trial in 80 cannabis users with CUD and high distress intolerance. Distress intolerance, cannabis use, and psychosocial functioning outcomes will be evaluated. As an exploratory aim, a wristworn device will be used to measure objective stress responding in the real-world during the intervention period. Our central hypothesis is that, compared to a control intervention, the Emotional Engagement Distress Tolerance Intervention will produce superior reductions distress intolerance, stress-related cannabis use motivation, disordered cannabis use, and psychosocial functioning.
    Detailed Description
    The prevalence of daily cannabis use and Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) has increased in the United States over the past two decades. Brief, computerized harm reduction interventions that target specific high-risk CUD populations could be an efficient approach to reducing CUD. Distress intolerance, which refers to the tendency to negatively appraise and escape aversive emotional states, is a risk factor associated with stress-related cannabis use motivation and CUD severity/chronicity. Thus, a brief, accessible, low-cost intervention that reduces distress intolerance in those with CUD and elevated distress intolerance could have a significant public health impact. This proposed Stage I project aims to modify an existing two-session computerized distress tolerance intervention to optimize emotion regulation learning/generalization and test its impact on distress intolerance and cannabis use outcomes in a randomized controlled trial. Specifically, the intervention will be condensed to one-session and its imaginal exposure module will be modified to shape emotional engagement with the aim of maximizing within-session habituation, which will be signaled with a novel audio/visual cue (habituation cue). Habituation cues will then be delivered in just-in-time text message reminders triggered by naturalistic distress reported via ecological momentary assessment. After obtaining feedback on the modified Emotional Engagement Distress Tolerance Intervention in a small sample, the intervention's efficacy compared to a stringent, credible, time-matched health education control intervention will be tested in a randomized controlled trial in 80 cannabis users with CUD and high distress intolerance. To measure the intervention's mechanistic target engagement, multi-method distress intolerance assessments will be administered through four-month follow-up. To measure the intervention's impact on cannabis use, stress-related cannabis use motivation (lab stress- elicited craving and neurophysiological drug cue reactivity, ecological momentary assessment of stress-elicited cannabis use) will be assessed through the intervention period. Interviewer-assessed cannabis use frequency, CUD severity, and urinary THC metabolite concentration will be measured through 4-month follow-up. Quality of life and anxiety/depression symptoms will also be measured as secondary outcomes through 4-month follow-up. As an exploratory aim, a wristworn device will be used to measure ambulatory physiology during a portion of the intervention period to evaluate the feasibility of detecting heightened real- world distress based on objective indicators. Our central hypothesis is that, compared to a control intervention, the Emotional Engagement Distress Tolerance Intervention will produce superior reductions in multi-method assessments of distress intolerance, stress-related cannabis use motivation, disordered cannabis use, and psychosocial functioning. Successful completion of the proposed aims will (1) justify a subsequent Stage II trial, and (2) inform efforts to integrate the just-in-time habituation reminders with wearable technology in order to increase emotion regulation generalization opportunities and decrease participant report burden.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Cannabis Use Disorder

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 1
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    80 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Emotional Engagement Distress Tolerance Intervention
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    The experimental intervention (single 2.5 hour session) is comprised of video-delivered psychoeducation, adaptive skill practice, and emotional exposure. During exposure, a sequence of percussive sounds accompanied by a visual depiction of the participant's skin conductance level during exposure will be presented at the moment the participant's skin conductance returns to the relaxation baseline value. These images/sound will be intermittently sent to the participant's smart phone during the smart phone portion of the intervention.
    Arm Title
    Health Education Intervention
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    The health education control intervention is a single 2.5 hour computerized session. It is comprised of audio-narrated videos on healthy habits and self-care in the domains of sleep, nutrition, hygiene, and physical exercise. The same sequence of percussive sounds used in the Emotional Engagement Distress Tolerance Intervention is presented alongside summary slides presenting key points on healthy habits and self-care. These images/sound will be intermittently sent to the participant's smart phone during the smart phone portion of the intervention.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Emotional Engagement Distress Tolerance Intervention
    Intervention Description
    2.5 hour computerized intervention with smart phone support focused on building tolerance of emotional distress
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Health Education Intervention
    Intervention Description
    2.5 hour computerized intervention with smart phone support focused on building healthy habits that support stress management
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Therapy Evaluation Questionnaire
    Description
    acceptability/feasibility (credibility subscale range 3-27; expectancy item range 0%-100%; higher scores indicate better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Immediately after intervention session
    Title
    Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
    Description
    acceptability/feasibility (range 0-84; higher scores indicate better outcome)
    Time Frame
    Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session)
    Title
    Change in perceived distress intolerance from baseline through follow-up
    Description
    Distress Intolerance Index (range 0-40; higher scores indicate worse outcome) to assess perceived distress intolerance via self-report
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Mid-Intervention (10 days after intervention session), Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session), One-Month Follow-up, Four-Month Follow-up
    Title
    Change in behavioral distress intolerance from baseline through follow-up
    Description
    Mirror-Tracing Persistence Task to assess behavioral distress intolerance via computerized task
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Mid-Intervention (10 days after intervention session), Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session), One-Month Follow-up, Four-Month Follow-up
    Title
    Change in laboratory stress-induced cannabis craving from baseline through post-intervention
    Description
    Change in Marijuana Craving Questionnaire (range 11-77; higher scores indicate worse outcome) after Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test at post-intervention compared to baseline
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session)
    Title
    Change in laboratory stress-induced neural reactivity to cannabis cues (assessed via the electroencephalography [EEG]-recorded late positive potential) from baseline through post-intervention
    Description
    Change in Late Positive Potential to Cannabis Cues after Mannheim Multicomponent Stress Test at post-intervention compared to baseline
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session)
    Title
    Change in real-world stress-elicited cannabis use from baseline to post-intervention
    Description
    Change in stress->cannabis use slopes derived from ecological momentary assessment from baseline through post-intervention
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Mid-Intervention (10 days after intervention session), Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session)
    Title
    Change in cannabis use frequency from baseline through follow-up
    Description
    Change in cannabis use frequency (measured via timeline follow-back) from baseline through four-month follow-up
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session), One-Month Follow-up, Four-Month Follow-up
    Title
    Change in urine tetrahydrocannabinol [THC] metabolite concentration from baseline through follow-up
    Description
    Change in urinary THC metabolite concentration (measured via ultra high performance liquid chromatography [UHPLC]) from baseline through four-month follow-up
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Mid-Intervention (10 days after intervention session), Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session), One-Month Follow-up, Four-Month Follow-up
    Title
    Change in self-reported cannabis use problems from baseline through follow-up
    Description
    Change in Marijuana Problems Scale (range 0-38; higher scores indicate worse outcome) from baseline through follow-up
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session), One-Month Follow-up, Four-Month Follow-up
    Title
    Change in Cannabis Use Disorder symptoms from baseline through follow-up
    Description
    Change in interviewer-assessed Cannabis Use Disorder criteria (range 0-11; higher scores indicate worse outcome) from baseline to four-month follow-up
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Four-Month Follow-up
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in quality of life from baseline through follow-up
    Description
    Change in self-reported quality of life (measured via Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form; range 16-80; lower scores indicate worse outcome) from baseline through follow-up
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session), One-Month Follow-up, Four-Month Follow-up
    Title
    Change in depression and anxiety from baseline through follow-up
    Description
    Change in self-reported depression and anxiety (measured via Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [range 0-21 for each subscale; higher scores indicate worse outcomes) from baseline through follow-up
    Time Frame
    Baseline, Post-Intervention (20 days after intervention session), One-Month Follow-up, Four-Month Follow-up

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    30 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Cannabis is the primary substance of abuse. Clinical-level Distress intolerance Index score. Current Cannabis Use Disorder diagnosis. Near-daily to daily cannabis use in past-month and past 3 months. Positive urine screen for THC Detectable skin conductance level Owns a smart phone Primary delta-9 THC user Exclusion Criteria: Presence of acute/major psychiatric disturbance Current pregnancy Change in psychotropic medication within the past month Concurrently receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy for cannabis use or emotional disorders Planning to immediately quit using cannabis EEG contraindications Kidney disease
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Project Coordinator
    Phone
    3348446642
    Email
    brains@auburn.edu
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Richard J Macatee, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Auburn University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Evaluation of a Brief Computerized and Smart Phone-based Intervention for Stress in Regular Cannabis Users

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs