search
Back to results

Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Feasibility in Youth With T2D (FREE_CGM)

Primary Purpose

Type 2 Diabetes

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
FreeStyle Libre Continuous Glucose Monitor System
Sponsored by
University of California, San Francisco
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Type 2 Diabetes focused on measuring freestyle libre, continuous glucose monitor, type 2 diabetes, T2D, pediatric

Eligibility Criteria

8 Years - 20 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Age 8- 20 years at the time of consent. Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Duration of type 2 diabetes at least 4 weeks. HbA1C ≥ 6.5% . Stable medication regimen (No medication changes and no change in basal insulin dose by more than 20% in the 2 weeks prior to enrollment). Naïve to CGM use. English or Spanish speakers. Willing to abide by recommendations and study procedures. Willing and able to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and/or has a parent or guardian willing and able to sign the ICF. Participant and parent(s)/guardian(s) willingness to participate in all training sessions as directed by study staff. Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study. Exclusion Criteria: Pancreatic autoantibody positivity (GAD-65, insulin, IA-2, ICA 512, Zn-T8). Plan for undergoing bariatric surgery during the study period. Known history of significant mental illness or developmental delay impacting the ability to complete study activities independently. Known history of adrenal insufficiency, or ongoing renal or hepatic disease. Pregnancy or lactation. Currently undergoing cancer treatment or systemic treatment with steroids. Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.

Sites / Locations

  • University of California San Francisco (UCSF)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Control

Intervention

Arm Description

Participants will not have access to view the data from the CGM sensor during the screening period, nor during the main part of the study.

Participants will wear the CGM sensor and have access to the data during the main part of the study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Ability to use CGM
Use of CGM measured by number of hours participants in the intervention arm wear the CGM device and view data on the mobile application.
Acceptability of CGM use measured with Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
The perception that CGM use is agreeable or satisfactory measured with the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Greater the score, higher the acceptability
Appropriateness of CGM use measured with Intervention Appropriateness Measure
The perceived fit of the CGM to improve diabetes related metrics measured with the 4-item Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Greater the score, higher the appropriateness of CGM use
Feasibility of CGM use measured with Feasibility of Intervention Measure.
The extent to which a CGM study can be successfully carried out measured with 4-item Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). The higher the score, the greater the feasibility of CGM use

Secondary Outcome Measures

Glycemic change
Change in HbA1C at 6 months adjusted for the baseline value youth with T2D.
Time in target glucose range
Time spent in target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL
Time above high glucose range
percent of readings and time >250 mg/dL
Time above glucose range
percent of readings and time 181-250 mg/dL
Time below glucose range
percent of readings and time 54-69 mg/dL
Time below low glucose range
percent of readings and time <54 mg/dl
Glucose management indicator
CGM metric that indicates average blood glucose
Co-efficient of variation of glucose
CGM metric that measures variability in CGM values
Change in BMI
Change in BMI SDS over the course of the study
Frequency of taking diabetes medications
Self-reported medication adherence in the past week before visit
Starting or stopping medications
Percentage of subjects with addition or removal of diabetes medications
Titration of insulin dosing by provider
Percentage of subjects who receive insulin dose titration
Dietary measures
Change in score on SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth food frequency questionnaire. This is a 85 question survey ( Mayer-Davis EJ, Nichols M, Liese AD et al. (2006) Dietary intake among youth with diabetes: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. J Am Diet Assoc.2006)
Physical activity measures
Number of minutes of physical activity in the past week before visit. The greater the value the better the score.
Quality of Life score on survey
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Diabetes Module score. 33 item score. The greater the value the better the score.
Problem Areas in Diabetes
Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) Scale. 20 question survey. Higher the score, the worse the outcome

Full Information

First Posted
October 12, 2023
Last Updated
October 19, 2023
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06089070
Brief Title
Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Feasibility in Youth With T2D
Acronym
FREE_CGM
Official Title
Feasibility of the FreeStyle Libre Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes (FREE_CGM)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
December 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2027 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 1, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary scientific question of this proposal is to investigate whether youth with T2D will wear and interact with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) system and whether this will influence behavior and management decisions. There will be 30 participants enrolled in the study. 20 in the treatment arm and 10 in the control. The length of study participation will be 6 months for each participant.
Detailed Description
At the beginning of the study, participants will be asked to complete surveys where demographic, clinical and behavioral data will be collected. We will ask participants to wear a glucose sensor that is "blinded" for 14-days so that we can gather baseline data about blood sugar levels. Participants must wear the CGM sensor for at least 10 days out of the 14 days of the blinding period to move on to the next part of the study. After wearing the blinded sensor, the study team will place participants in one of two groups: One group (intervention group) will be shown how to use the sensors along with the FreeStyle Libre App, and the other group (control group) will continue with their standard diabetes care without using the CGM system. Participants will be "randomized" into one of the study groups described below. Participants will have a 2 in 3 chance of being placed in the group who receives the glucose sensor and will have access to the data. Group 1 participants will receive the FreeStyle Libre 3 sensor and have access to the data on their smartphone during the study. Group 2 participants will be asked to continue standard blood glucose monitoring with a glucometer. Participants will be asked to perform 2 checks a day, fasting and 2 hours post dinner as is standard practice. If randomized to group 1, participants will receive the FreeStyle Libre 3 system with education from the study coordinator on how to insert sensors and view data on the connected mobile app. Standardized study education materials with suggestions on how to react to the data such as avoidance of sugary beverages or increased physical activity will also be provided. Participants will be asked to wear the sensor for the rest of the 6-month participation in the study. If randomized to group 2, participants will be asked to continue standard blood glucose monitoring with a glucometer. Participants will also receive standardized study education materials about reacting to glucose values. Participants will be asked to perform 2 glucose checks a day, fasting and 2 hours after a meal as is standard practice. As a part of usual care, participants will come to clinic 3 months after starting the study to meet with their usual diabetes provider and a diabetes educator. We will also have a phone check-in visit with participants at 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, and 5 months after starting the study. For month 3 and month 6 of the study, participants will already be in clinic to see their regular diabetes provider and we can combine their clinic and research visit. At the end of the study, participants will be invited to come to an optional online focus group to talk about the technology that you used with the study researchers. Participants will be able to share the things that they liked or did not like about the technology. The researchers will speak with approximately 5-7 participants at a time in a group. The conversation will be recorded via a secure videoconference so that the researchers can remember everything that was said. The audio files will be stored in secure locations and participants' full names will not be used in the sessions. Additional notes: If participants do not have the appropriate device to download the app, a reader will be provided by the study team. Diagnoses, medication history, medical history, and lab results will be collected from the medical record for research purposes. A Random number generator will be used for randomization. The study coordinators and/or the investigators will distribute the participant surveys. The study coordinators and the investigators will conduct the focus groups. There are no in patient procedures. For younger participants who may not be able to complete surveys by themselves, parents or guardians may assist younger participants to complete the surveys. Parents will be requested to complete the parent reports.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Type 2 Diabetes
Keywords
freestyle libre, continuous glucose monitor, type 2 diabetes, T2D, pediatric

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Feasibility study of the FreeStyle Libre Continuous Glucose Monitoring System in Youth with Type 2 Diabetes
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
N/A both study team and participants will know the randomization assignment as to which group they are in.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Participants will not have access to view the data from the CGM sensor during the screening period, nor during the main part of the study.
Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will wear the CGM sensor and have access to the data during the main part of the study.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
FreeStyle Libre Continuous Glucose Monitor System
Intervention Description
Continuous Glucose Monitor System for people with Type 2 Diabetes
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ability to use CGM
Description
Use of CGM measured by number of hours participants in the intervention arm wear the CGM device and view data on the mobile application.
Time Frame
Measured at 6 months
Title
Acceptability of CGM use measured with Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Description
The perception that CGM use is agreeable or satisfactory measured with the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Greater the score, higher the acceptability
Time Frame
Measured at 6 months
Title
Appropriateness of CGM use measured with Intervention Appropriateness Measure
Description
The perceived fit of the CGM to improve diabetes related metrics measured with the 4-item Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Greater the score, higher the appropriateness of CGM use
Time Frame
Measured at 6 months
Title
Feasibility of CGM use measured with Feasibility of Intervention Measure.
Description
The extent to which a CGM study can be successfully carried out measured with 4-item Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). The higher the score, the greater the feasibility of CGM use
Time Frame
Measured at 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Glycemic change
Description
Change in HbA1C at 6 months adjusted for the baseline value youth with T2D.
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Time in target glucose range
Description
Time spent in target glucose range of 70 to 180 mg/dL
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Time above high glucose range
Description
percent of readings and time >250 mg/dL
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Time above glucose range
Description
percent of readings and time 181-250 mg/dL
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Time below glucose range
Description
percent of readings and time 54-69 mg/dL
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Time below low glucose range
Description
percent of readings and time <54 mg/dl
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Glucose management indicator
Description
CGM metric that indicates average blood glucose
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Co-efficient of variation of glucose
Description
CGM metric that measures variability in CGM values
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Change in BMI
Description
Change in BMI SDS over the course of the study
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Frequency of taking diabetes medications
Description
Self-reported medication adherence in the past week before visit
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Starting or stopping medications
Description
Percentage of subjects with addition or removal of diabetes medications
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Titration of insulin dosing by provider
Description
Percentage of subjects who receive insulin dose titration
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Dietary measures
Description
Change in score on SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth food frequency questionnaire. This is a 85 question survey ( Mayer-Davis EJ, Nichols M, Liese AD et al. (2006) Dietary intake among youth with diabetes: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. J Am Diet Assoc.2006)
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Physical activity measures
Description
Number of minutes of physical activity in the past week before visit. The greater the value the better the score.
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Quality of Life score on survey
Description
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Diabetes Module score. 33 item score. The greater the value the better the score.
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months
Title
Problem Areas in Diabetes
Description
Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) Scale. 20 question survey. Higher the score, the worse the outcome
Time Frame
Baseline (0) to 6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
8 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 8- 20 years at the time of consent. Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Duration of type 2 diabetes at least 4 weeks. HbA1C ≥ 6.5% . Stable medication regimen (No medication changes and no change in basal insulin dose by more than 20% in the 2 weeks prior to enrollment). Naïve to CGM use. English or Spanish speakers. Willing to abide by recommendations and study procedures. Willing and able to sign the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and/or has a parent or guardian willing and able to sign the ICF. Participant and parent(s)/guardian(s) willingness to participate in all training sessions as directed by study staff. Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study. Exclusion Criteria: Pancreatic autoantibody positivity (GAD-65, insulin, IA-2, ICA 512, Zn-T8). Plan for undergoing bariatric surgery during the study period. Known history of significant mental illness or developmental delay impacting the ability to complete study activities independently. Known history of adrenal insufficiency, or ongoing renal or hepatic disease. Pregnancy or lactation. Currently undergoing cancer treatment or systemic treatment with steroids. Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Shylaja Srinivasan, MD, MAS
Phone
415-353-9084
Email
shylaja.srinivasan@ucsf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Laura Anne Dapkus Humphries, NCPT
Phone
628-224-8364
Email
laura.dapkus@ucsf.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shylaja Srinivasan, MD, MAS
Organizational Affiliation
University of California, San Francisco
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California San Francisco (UCSF)
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94158
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shylaja Srinivasan, MD, MAS
Phone
415-353-9084
Email
shylaja.srinivasan@ucsf.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shylaja Srinivasan, MD, MAS

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36868256
Citation
Wagenknecht LE, Lawrence JM, Isom S, Jensen ET, Dabelea D, Liese AD, Dolan LM, Shah AS, Bellatorre A, Sauder K, Marcovina S, Reynolds K, Pihoker C, Imperatore G, Divers J; SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Trends in incidence of youth-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the USA, 2002-18: results from the population-based SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023 Apr;11(4):242-250. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(23)00025-6. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
34320286
Citation
TODAY Study Group; Bjornstad P, Drews KL, Caprio S, Gubitosi-Klug R, Nathan DM, Tesfaldet B, Tryggestad J, White NH, Zeitler P. Long-Term Complications in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 29;385(5):416-426. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100165.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22540912
Citation
TODAY Study Group; Zeitler P, Hirst K, Pyle L, Linder B, Copeland K, Arslanian S, Cuttler L, Nathan DM, Tollefsen S, Wilfley D, Kaufman F. A clinical trial to maintain glycemic control in youth with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 14;366(24):2247-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109333. Epub 2012 Apr 29.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
7589820
Citation
U.K. prospective diabetes study 16. Overview of 6 years' therapy of type II diabetes: a progressive disease. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes. 1995 Nov;44(11):1249-58. Erratum In: Diabetes 1996 Nov;45(11):1655.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Feasibility in Youth With T2D

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs