search
Back to results

Axillary Management After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms, Breast Cancer Female

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Axillary sentinal lymph node biopsy
Sponsored by
Medipol University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring locally advanced breast cancer, axillary involvement, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, axillary biopsy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: 18-65 years-old female patients Clinical stage T1-3 and biopsy-proven N1 breast cancer Axillary nodal involvement Volunteer to participate in to study Exclusion Criteria: A history of axillary surgery or SLNB, prior axillary excisional lymph node surgery, N2-3 disease with a decision for initial axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), Diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer, Presence of distant metastasis Incomplete chemotherapy, pregnancy, and lactation T4 tumors Refusal to participate in to study

Sites / Locations

  • Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
  • Istanbul Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group 1 = Fine needle aspiration biopsy

Group 2 = Core biopsy

Arm Description

In Group A, patients with axillary metastasis identified by FNAB were subjected to repeat ultrasound-guided FNAB after completion of neoadjuvant treatment, The obtained biopsies were sent for histopathological evaluation without revealing patient names to avoid influencing the research results, and the surgical team was not informed of the biopsy results. During surgery, both dyed lymph nodes and clipped lymph nodes were excised for SLNB and assessed by frozen section evaluation.

in Group B, patients with axillary metastasis identified by CNB underwent repeat biopsy using the same method after completing neoadjuvant treatment.The obtained biopsies were sent for histopathological evaluation without revealing patient names to avoid influencing the research results, and the surgical team was not informed of the biopsy results. During surgery, both dyed lymph nodes and clipped lymph nodes were excised for SLNB and assessed by frozen section evaluation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Prediction of axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy without SLNB
In this study, the investigators sought a new method to evaluate the axilla after NAC in patients with known axillary involvement previously. For this purpose, the investigators performed an ultrasound-guided needle biopsy on the clipped axillary lymph node with known metastasis before the planned surgery, aiming to assess the axilla without performing SLNB after treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The investigators investigated which patient group might benefit more from this prediction based on molecular subtypes and the clinical-pathological features
Therefore, patient age, ultrasonographic parameters, maximum SUV of the breast and axillary lymph node on PET-CT, histopathological subtypes of breast cancer, largest tumor diameter, histopathological diagnosis, histological grade, estrogen, progesterone, Ki-67 and Her-2 receptor status will be evaluated and the effectiveness of these parameters in order to accurately assess the axillary lymph node without SLNB will be investigated.

Full Information

First Posted
July 18, 2023
Last Updated
October 22, 2023
Sponsor
Medipol University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT06096545
Brief Title
Axillary Management After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Official Title
Axillary Management After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: May Axillary Biopsy Replace Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy?
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
October 20, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 30, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 15, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Medipol University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The standard treatment for locally advanced and node-positive breast cancer is surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Using NAC in advanced-stage tumors and biologically aggressive subtypes can lead to de-escalation in surgical treatment for the breast and axilla. Previously, NAC was believed to alter lymphatic drainage due to fibrosis and tumor emboli in lymphatic channels. However, the theAmerican College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1071 and Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA) trials investigated the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after NAC in patients with proven axillary lymph node involvement at the initial biopsy. In contemporary breast cancer management, particularly in the axillary approach, less invasive techniques are becoming increasingly common. This raises the question of whether there might be a patient group where SLNB could be avoided. In this study, the investigators sought a new method to evaluate the axilla after NAC in patients with known axillary involvement previously. For this purpose, the investigators performed an ultrasound-guided needle biopsy on the clipped axillary lymph node with known metastasis before the planned surgery, aiming to assess the axilla without performing SLNB after treatment. Additionally, the investigators investigated which patient group might benefit more from this predictability based on molecular subtypes and clinical-pathological features.
Detailed Description
The current study was designed as a prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at two participating centers to evaluate the predictability of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using axillary ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in patients with histologically proven axillary lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The study was initiated after obtaining approval from the local ethics committee (Dated:06.03.3023/decision no:E-10840098-772.02-1685). Patients: Female patients aged 18 years and above with clinical stage T1-3 and biopsy-proven N1 breast cancer who received NAC were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were a history of axillary surgery or SLNB, prior axillary excisional lymph node surgery, N2-3 disease with a decision for initial axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer, presence of distant metastasis, incomplete chemotherapy, pregnancy, and lactation. All participants underwent breast ultrasonography, mammography, and magnetic resonance imaging for imaging before NAC. Clipped lymph nodes that were histopathologically proven to be metastatic at the time of diagnosis underwent ultrasonography-guided CNB or FNAB seven days before surgery. Histopathological results after biopsy were grouped as negative, positive, and non-diagnostic for metastasis. Patients were randomized into two groups based on the initial biopsy method. In Group A, patients with axillary metastasis identified by FNAB were subjected to repeat ultrasound-guided FNAB after completion of neoadjuvant treatment, while in Group B, patients with axillary metastasis identified by CNB underwent repeat biopsy using the same method after completing neoadjuvant treatment. Surgical Technique and Nodal Evaluation: SLNB technique using isosulfan blue dye was performed for axillary evaluation, and all patients had the clipped lymph node excised under ultrasound guidance with a guide wire placed preoperatively. Inter-group Comparison: Sensitivity, specificity, false-negative rate (FNR), false-positive rate (FPR), and accuracy values were compared between the two groups based on the needle biopsy and SLNB performed after NAC. In patients re-evaluated with FNAB and CNB after NAC, the effects of patient age, tumor size, radiological features of breast cancer and axillary lymph node, tumor and lymph node size, histopathological type and grade of tumor, receptor characteristics, maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) of the breast and axillary lymph node on Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography (PET-CT), and differences in ER, PR, Her-2, and Ki 67 receptors in the final pathology were investigated on sensitivity, specificity, FNR, FPR, and accuracy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer, Breast Neoplasms, Breast Cancer Female
Keywords
locally advanced breast cancer, axillary involvement, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, axillary biopsy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients were randomized into two groups based on the initial biopsy method. In Group A, patients with axillary metastasis identified by FNAB were subjected to repeat ultrasound-guided FNAB after completion of neoadjuvant treatment, while in Group B, patients with axillary metastasis identified by CNB underwent repeat biopsy using the same method after completing neoadjuvant treatment. The obtained biopsies were sent for histopathological evaluation without revealing patient names to avoid influencing the research results, and the surgical team was not informed of the biopsy results. During surgery, both dyed lymph nodes and clipped lymph nodes were excised for SLNB and assessed by frozen section evaluation. Thus, the predictability of axillary metastasis by preoperative FNAB/CNB was tested.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1 = Fine needle aspiration biopsy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
In Group A, patients with axillary metastasis identified by FNAB were subjected to repeat ultrasound-guided FNAB after completion of neoadjuvant treatment, The obtained biopsies were sent for histopathological evaluation without revealing patient names to avoid influencing the research results, and the surgical team was not informed of the biopsy results. During surgery, both dyed lymph nodes and clipped lymph nodes were excised for SLNB and assessed by frozen section evaluation.
Arm Title
Group 2 = Core biopsy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
in Group B, patients with axillary metastasis identified by CNB underwent repeat biopsy using the same method after completing neoadjuvant treatment.The obtained biopsies were sent for histopathological evaluation without revealing patient names to avoid influencing the research results, and the surgical team was not informed of the biopsy results. During surgery, both dyed lymph nodes and clipped lymph nodes were excised for SLNB and assessed by frozen section evaluation.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Axillary sentinal lymph node biopsy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Axillary dissection
Intervention Description
For SLNB evaluation, multiple sections of the excised lymph node were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) at a thickness greater than 2 mm. Lymph nodes with metastasis greater than 2 mm were defined as positive SLNB. Macroscopic metastasis was considered positive in the evaluation for the axilla, while benign histological characteristics were considered negative. The presence of micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells was also noted. The size and diameter of the metastatic lymph node were considered in the evaluation. SLNB technique using isosulfan blue dye was performed for axillary evaluation, and all patients had the clipped lymph node excised under ultrasound guidance with a guide wire placed preoperatively.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prediction of axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy without SLNB
Description
In this study, the investigators sought a new method to evaluate the axilla after NAC in patients with known axillary involvement previously. For this purpose, the investigators performed an ultrasound-guided needle biopsy on the clipped axillary lymph node with known metastasis before the planned surgery, aiming to assess the axilla without performing SLNB after treatment.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 6 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The investigators investigated which patient group might benefit more from this prediction based on molecular subtypes and the clinical-pathological features
Description
Therefore, patient age, ultrasonographic parameters, maximum SUV of the breast and axillary lymph node on PET-CT, histopathological subtypes of breast cancer, largest tumor diameter, histopathological diagnosis, histological grade, estrogen, progesterone, Ki-67 and Her-2 receptor status will be evaluated and the effectiveness of these parameters in order to accurately assess the axillary lymph node without SLNB will be investigated.
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 6 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Female breast cancer patients
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 18-65 years-old female patients Clinical stage T1-3 and biopsy-proven N1 breast cancer Axillary nodal involvement Volunteer to participate in to study Exclusion Criteria: A history of axillary surgery or SLNB, prior axillary excisional lymph node surgery, N2-3 disease with a decision for initial axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), Diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer, Presence of distant metastasis Incomplete chemotherapy, pregnancy, and lactation T4 tumors Refusal to participate in to study
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Pelin Basim, As. prof, MD
Phone
+905337186679
Email
pelinakbaba@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Emine YILDIRIM, As. prof, MD
Phone
+905056234825
Email
opdreyildirim@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pelin Basim, As. prof, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Medipol University / General Surgery Department
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emine YILDIRIM, As. prof, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital / General Surgery Department
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
City
İstanbul
State/Province
Bagcilar
ZIP/Postal Code
34083
Country
Turkey
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pelin Basim, As. Prof, MD
Phone
05337186679
Facility Name
Istanbul Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital
City
İstanbul
ZIP/Postal Code
34083
Country
Turkey
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emine Yildirim, As. Prof, MD
Phone
05056234825
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emine YILDIRIM, As. Prof.,MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
We will not share individual participant data
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26110204
Citation
You S, Kang DK, Jung YS, An YS, Jeon GS, Kim TH. Evaluation of lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: comparison of diagnostic performance of ultrasound, MRI and (1)(8)F-FDG PET/CT. Br J Radiol. 2015 Aug;88(1052):20150143. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150143.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28350255
Citation
Ha SM, Cha JH, Kim HH, Shin HJ, Chae EY, Choi WJ. Diagnostic performance of breast ultrasonography and MRI in the prediction of lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Acta Radiol. 2017 Oct;58(10):1198-1205. doi: 10.1177/0284185117690421. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Axillary Management After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs