search
Back to results

3D Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Finland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Radical prostatectomy
Sponsored by
Tampere University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic prostatectomy, robot assisted prostatectomy

Eligibility Criteria

34 Years - 74 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy
  • Patient has to understand and be able to write and read Finnish language
  • No prior head injury, dementia or Parkinson's disease
  • No concomitant malignant illness
  • Life expectancy of at least 10 years
  • 35-74 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Locally advanced prostate cancer (T4)
  • Suspicion or documented metastases (M1)
  • Serum PSA > 20 ng/ml
  • Prior laparoscopic hernia surgery employing non resorbable mesh
  • Prior pelvic irradiation or major surgery
  • Prior malignant disease within prior 5 years excluding skin cancer (non-melanoma).

Sites / Locations

  • Tampere University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Robot assisted prostatectomy.

3D laparoscopic prostatectomy

Arm Description

Intervention: radical prostatectomy

Intervention: radical prostatectomy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Urinary continence
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form (EPIC-26), urinary domain score is used to assess the return of continence post operatively. The percentage of patients with no protective pad use at 12 months post operatively is the main outcome measure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Erectile function
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire score is used to quantify the return of erectile function post operatively.
Prostate specific antigen
Post operative prostate specific antigen levels.
Evaluation of surgical margins at pathologic examination.
The oncological outcome is evaluated by the presence of cancerous tissue at the surgical margins of the specimen at pathologic examination.

Full Information

First Posted
May 14, 2018
Last Updated
May 2, 2022
Sponsor
Tampere University Hospital
Collaborators
Seinajoki Central Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03550040
Brief Title
3D Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.
Official Title
3D Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy. A Prospective Randomized Non-inferiority Study.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
May 31, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 30, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 30, 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Tampere University Hospital
Collaborators
Seinajoki Central Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A randomized, prospective study to compare the direct and indirect costs, functional and oncologic results of 3D laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy procedures.
Detailed Description
The direct and indirect costs, functional and oncologic results of robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) are compared to those of 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The hypothesis of the study is that the functional and oncologic results of the two operative methods are equal, but the direct costs of RAPL are significantly higher. A randomized, prospective non-inferiority study will will enroll 280 patients randomized 1:1 to both operative approaches to test this hypothesis. The primary functional outcome measure is the proportion of patients with complete urinary continence (no protective pad use) at 12 months post operatively. Secondary functional outcome measure is the preservation erectile function at 12 months post operatively. Oncologic outcome measures are the proportion of patients with undetectable post operative prostate specific antigen levels and positive surgical margins at pathological examination. The direct and indirect costs of both operative approaches are recorded.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic prostatectomy, robot assisted prostatectomy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Prospective randomized study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
155 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Robot assisted prostatectomy.
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intervention: radical prostatectomy
Arm Title
3D laparoscopic prostatectomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention: radical prostatectomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Radical prostatectomy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Total prostatectomy
Intervention Description
Surgical removal of the prostate
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Urinary continence
Description
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Short Form (EPIC-26), urinary domain score is used to assess the return of continence post operatively. The percentage of patients with no protective pad use at 12 months post operatively is the main outcome measure.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Erectile function
Description
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) Questionnaire score is used to quantify the return of erectile function post operatively.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Prostate specific antigen
Description
Post operative prostate specific antigen levels.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Evaluation of surgical margins at pathologic examination.
Description
The oncological outcome is evaluated by the presence of cancerous tissue at the surgical margins of the specimen at pathologic examination.
Time Frame
up to 12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
costs of treatment
Description
Direct and indirect treatment related costs.
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
34 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
74 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy Patient has to understand and be able to write and read Finnish language No prior head injury, dementia or Parkinson's disease No concomitant malignant illness Life expectancy of at least 10 years 35-74 years of age Exclusion Criteria: Locally advanced prostate cancer (T4) Suspicion or documented metastases (M1) Serum PSA > 20 ng/ml Prior laparoscopic hernia surgery employing non resorbable mesh Prior pelvic irradiation or major surgery Prior malignant disease within prior 5 years excluding skin cancer (non-melanoma).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Antti Kaipia, M.D., Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
chief, dept of urology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Tampere University Hospital
City
Tampere
ZIP/Postal Code
33521
Country
Finland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Patient demographic, primary and secondary outcome measures available upon request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
2020 onward for 5 years.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD will be made for relevant high quality reseach uopn request.

Learn more about this trial

3D Versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs