search
Back to results

A 12-Week Study to Assess the Efficacy Safety and Tolerability of Gemcabene in Subjects With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia (INDIGO-1)

Primary Purpose

Severe Hypertriglyceridemia, Mixed Dyslipidaemia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Gemcabene
Placebo
Sponsored by
NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Severe Hypertriglyceridemia focused on measuring Hypertriglycerides

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects who meet all of the following criteria will be eligible to participate in the study:

  1. Provision of written and signed informed consent (by subject or legal guardian) prior to any study-specific procedure;
  2. Male or female (neither pregnant or lactating) ≥18 years of age at time of consent;

    1. Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the Screening Visit and negative urine dipstick on Study Day 1 prior to dosing in order to qualify for the study. Women who are surgically sterile or are clinically confirmed to be post-menopausal (i.e., documented amenorrhea for ≥ 1 year in the absence of other biological or physiological causes) are not considered to be of child-bearing potential;
    2. Women of child-bearing potential must agree to use acceptable methods of contraception throughout the duration of the study and for 30 days after the last dose of study drug. For this study, double-barrier contraception is required.
  3. Currently on a self-reported, stable, low-fat, low-cholesterol diet in combination with stable statins with or without ezetimibe (10 mg QD) for at least 12 weeks prior to the Screening Visit;
  4. Mean fasting TG value ≥ 500 mg/dL to < 1500 mg/dL (with the higher value no more than 50% greater than the lower value) from the S1 and S2 Visits (or alternatively S2 and S3);
  5. Physical examination, including vital signs, that is within normal limits or clinically acceptable to the Investigator;
  6. Weight ≥ 50 kg; with a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 45 kg/m²; and
  7. Subjects with Type 2 diabetes who take anti-diabetes pharmacologic therapy must be on a stable a regimen for at least 3 months, with no planned changes in medications for the study duration.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in the study:

  1. Known and previously documented homozygous genetic deficiencies (LPL, ApoC-II, ApoC-III, ApoA-V, GPIHBP1, or LMF1);
  2. History of pancreatitis within the last 6 months prior to screening (Visit S1);
  3. History of bariatric surgery; symptomatic gallstone disease, unless treated with cholecystectomy;
  4. Abnormal liver function test at the Pre-Screening Visit or any of the Screening Visits (aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase > 2 × the upper limit of normal [ULN], total bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN, or alkaline phosphatase > 2 × ULN based on appropriate age and gender normal values). Subjects with bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN and history of Gilbert's syndrome may be included; reflexive direct bilirubin testing will be used to confirm Gilbert's syndrome;
  5. Active liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis B [HBV], hepatitis C [HCV], autoimmune hepatitis, liver failure, liver cancer), history of liver transplant, known diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or acquired immune deficiency virus;
  6. Moderate to severe renal insufficiency defined as an estimated GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (calculated using The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) at the Pre-Screening Visit or at any of the Screening Visits;
  7. Abnormal urinalysis (proteinuria greater than trace or any male or non-menstruating female with greater than trace hematuria), confirmed by reflexive urine protein:creatinine ratio testing;
  8. Uncontrolled thyroid disease: hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism as defined by thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) below the lower limit of normal or > 1.5 × ULN, respectively, based on results from the Pre-Screening Visit or the Screening Visit. If controlled, treatment should be stable for at least 3 months prior to the Screening Visit;
  9. Type 1 diabetes mellitus or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus HbA1c value ≥8.5% based on results from the Pre-Screening Visit or the Screening Visit), or any diabetic subject taking a thiazolidinedione (e.g., pioglitazone, rosiglitazone);
  10. New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure (see Appendix C);
  11. Myocardial infarction, severe or unstable angina pectoris, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft, or other major cardiovascular events resulting in hospitalization within 3 months of the Screening Visit (S1). Subjects with adequately treated stable angina, per Investigator assessment, may be included;
  12. Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia or prolonged QT on the Screening Visit or Study Day 1 prior to dosing ECG (QTcF > 450 msec for men and >470 msec for women) or known family history of prolonged QT or unexplained sudden cardiac death;
  13. Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as sitting systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg, and confirmed by repeat measurement;
  14. Currently receiving cancer treatment(s) or, in the Investigator's opinion, at risk of relapse for recent cancer;
  15. Inadequate washout of a PCSK9 inhibitor (8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit S1), a fibrate lipid lowering agent (6 weeks prior to the Screening Visit S1), niacin > 200 mg/day, OMG-3, bile acid sequestrants or other lipid lowering therapies (4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit S1);
  16. Use of any excluded medications or supplements within 3 months prior to S1 (e.g., potent cytochrome P450 [CYP] 3A4 inhibitors, see Appendix D);
  17. Hypersensitivity to or a history of significant adverse reactions to any fibrate lipid regulating agent;
  18. History of drug or alcohol abuse within the past year or inability to comply with protocol requirements, including subject alcohol restrictions (see Section 5.6.3);
  19. Previously treated with gemcabene (i.e., CI-1027); participation in another clinical study of an investigational agent or device concurrently or within 1 month prior to the Screening Visit, or use of an investigational agent within 1 month or 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, prior to the Screening Visit; or
  20. Any other finding which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the subject's safety or participation in the study.

Sites / Locations

  • Appalachian Research Associates
  • Del Sol Research Mangagement, LLC
  • Westside Medical Associates of Los Angeles
  • Hope Clinical Research
  • SC Clinical Research
  • National Research Institute
  • National Research Institute
  • Paradigm Clinical Research
  • Paradigm Research
  • Excel Medical Research
  • Meridien Research
  • Direct Helpers Research Center
  • Indago Research and Health Center
  • Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
  • Sunrise Medical Research
  • AR Developoment Solutions
  • San Marcus Research Clinic, Inc.
  • Millenium Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Medcare Research
  • Soma Medical Research
  • Evanston Premier Clinical Research
  • Midwest Institute for Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Richard Lochamy, M.D.
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
  • L-MARC Research Center
  • Clinical Trials Management, LLC
  • Clinical Trials Management, LLC
  • University of Maryland Medical Center
  • University of Michigan Health Systems
  • Elite Clinical Research
  • Clinical Research of South Nevada
  • CHEAR Center, LLC
  • Advantage Clinical Trials
  • Eastern Carolina Medical Clinic
  • Physicians East, NA
  • Physicians East, NA
  • Cary Medical Clinic
  • Optimed Research
  • PriMed Clinical Research
  • Green and Seidner Family Practice Associates
  • BTC of Lincoln
  • Carolinas Research Partners, LLC
  • Airline Complete Healthcare
  • Sante Clinical Research
  • FMC Science
  • Clinical Investigations of Texas
  • Sun Research Institute
  • Clinical Investigation Specialists
  • Ecogene-21

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Gemcabene 300 mg

Gemcabene 600 mg

Placebo

Arm Description

Participants received 300 mg Gemcabene orally, once daily for 12 weeks.

Participants received 600 mg Gemcabene orally, once daily for 12 weeks.

Participants received matching placebo orally, once daily for 12 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percent Change From Baseline to End of Study (EOS) in Fasting Serum Triglycerides (TG)
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum TG
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum TG
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in TC
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in TC
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in VLDL-C
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in HDL-C
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-I
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-I
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-II
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-II
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-II
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-II
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein E
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein E
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in LDL-C
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-TG
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in LDL-TG
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-TG
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in VLDL-TG
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-TG
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in HDL-TG
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein Size
Percent change from baseline in Particle size for VLDL, HDL and LDL were reported.
Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein Size
Change from baseline in Particle size for VLDL, HDL and LDL were reported.
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein Particle Number
Percent change from baseline in particle number for VLDL & chylomicron, LDL and IDL were reported.
Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein Particle Number
Change from baseline in particle number for VLDL & chylomicron, LDL and IDL were reported.
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL Particle Number
Change From Baseline in HDL Particle Number
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Amyloid A
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Serum Amyloid A
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Angiopoietin 4
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Angiopoietin 4
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percent Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a TG Value < 500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L)
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.

Full Information

First Posted
October 24, 2016
Last Updated
June 3, 2020
Sponsor
NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02944383
Brief Title
A 12-Week Study to Assess the Efficacy Safety and Tolerability of Gemcabene in Subjects With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia
Acronym
INDIGO-1
Official Title
A 12-Week, Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy Safety and Tolerability of Gemcabene in Subjects With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia (INDIGO-1)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 11, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 9, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A 12-Week, Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy Safety and Tolerability of Gemcabene in Subjects with Severe Hypertriglyceridemia (INDIGO-1)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Severe Hypertriglyceridemia, Mixed Dyslipidaemia
Keywords
Hypertriglycerides

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
91 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Gemcabene 300 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received 300 mg Gemcabene orally, once daily for 12 weeks.
Arm Title
Gemcabene 600 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received 600 mg Gemcabene orally, once daily for 12 weeks.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received matching placebo orally, once daily for 12 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Gemcabene
Intervention Description
Gemcabene tablets administered orally once daily, for 12 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo tablets administered orally once daily, for 12 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline to End of Study (EOS) in Fasting Serum Triglycerides (TG)
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Time Frame
Baseline, EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum TG
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 10 and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum TG
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in TC
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in TC
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-C
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in VLDL-C
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in HDL-C
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 6, 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-I
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-I
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-II
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-II
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-II
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-II
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein C-III
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein E
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein E
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in LDL-C
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-TG
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in LDL-TG
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in VLDL-TG
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in VLDL-TG
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-TG
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in HDL-TG
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein Size
Description
Percent change from baseline in Particle size for VLDL, HDL and LDL were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein Size
Description
Change from baseline in Particle size for VLDL, HDL and LDL were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein Particle Number
Description
Percent change from baseline in particle number for VLDL & chylomicron, LDL and IDL were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein Particle Number
Description
Change from baseline in particle number for VLDL & chylomicron, LDL and IDL were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL Particle Number
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in HDL Particle Number
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Amyloid A
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Serum Amyloid A
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Adiponectin
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Angiopoietin 4
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Angiopoietin 4
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Change From Baseline in Interleukin-6
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a TG Value < 500 mg/dL (5.65 mmol/L)
Description
EOS was defined as the average of the week 10 and week 12 values. If either the week 10 or week 12 value was missing, then the single value (week 10 or week 12) was used. Completely missing values (both week 10 and week 12) were imputed using LOCF.
Time Frame
Weeks 10, 12 and EOS (average of week 10 and 12)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects who meet all of the following criteria will be eligible to participate in the study: Provision of written and signed informed consent (by subject or legal guardian) prior to any study-specific procedure; Male or female (neither pregnant or lactating) ≥18 years of age at time of consent; Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at the Screening Visit and negative urine dipstick on Study Day 1 prior to dosing in order to qualify for the study. Women who are surgically sterile or are clinically confirmed to be post-menopausal (i.e., documented amenorrhea for ≥ 1 year in the absence of other biological or physiological causes) are not considered to be of child-bearing potential; Women of child-bearing potential must agree to use acceptable methods of contraception throughout the duration of the study and for 30 days after the last dose of study drug. For this study, double-barrier contraception is required. Currently on a self-reported, stable, low-fat, low-cholesterol diet in combination with stable statins with or without ezetimibe (10 mg QD) for at least 12 weeks prior to the Screening Visit; Mean fasting TG value ≥ 500 mg/dL to < 1500 mg/dL (with the higher value no more than 50% greater than the lower value) from the S1 and S2 Visits (or alternatively S2 and S3); Physical examination, including vital signs, that is within normal limits or clinically acceptable to the Investigator; Weight ≥ 50 kg; with a body mass index (BMI) ≤ 45 kg/m²; and Subjects with Type 2 diabetes who take anti-diabetes pharmacologic therapy must be on a stable a regimen for at least 3 months, with no planned changes in medications for the study duration. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in the study: Known and previously documented homozygous genetic deficiencies (LPL, ApoC-II, ApoC-III, ApoA-V, GPIHBP1, or LMF1); History of pancreatitis within the last 6 months prior to screening (Visit S1); History of bariatric surgery; symptomatic gallstone disease, unless treated with cholecystectomy; Abnormal liver function test at the Pre-Screening Visit or any of the Screening Visits (aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase > 2 × the upper limit of normal [ULN], total bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN, or alkaline phosphatase > 2 × ULN based on appropriate age and gender normal values). Subjects with bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN and history of Gilbert's syndrome may be included; reflexive direct bilirubin testing will be used to confirm Gilbert's syndrome; Active liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis B [HBV], hepatitis C [HCV], autoimmune hepatitis, liver failure, liver cancer), history of liver transplant, known diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or acquired immune deficiency virus; Moderate to severe renal insufficiency defined as an estimated GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (calculated using The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) at the Pre-Screening Visit or at any of the Screening Visits; Abnormal urinalysis (proteinuria greater than trace or any male or non-menstruating female with greater than trace hematuria), confirmed by reflexive urine protein:creatinine ratio testing; Uncontrolled thyroid disease: hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism as defined by thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) below the lower limit of normal or > 1.5 × ULN, respectively, based on results from the Pre-Screening Visit or the Screening Visit. If controlled, treatment should be stable for at least 3 months prior to the Screening Visit; Type 1 diabetes mellitus or uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus HbA1c value ≥8.5% based on results from the Pre-Screening Visit or the Screening Visit), or any diabetic subject taking a thiazolidinedione (e.g., pioglitazone, rosiglitazone); New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure (see Appendix C); Myocardial infarction, severe or unstable angina pectoris, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft, or other major cardiovascular events resulting in hospitalization within 3 months of the Screening Visit (S1). Subjects with adequately treated stable angina, per Investigator assessment, may be included; Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia or prolonged QT on the Screening Visit or Study Day 1 prior to dosing ECG (QTcF > 450 msec for men and >470 msec for women) or known family history of prolonged QT or unexplained sudden cardiac death; Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as sitting systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg, and confirmed by repeat measurement; Currently receiving cancer treatment(s) or, in the Investigator's opinion, at risk of relapse for recent cancer; Inadequate washout of a PCSK9 inhibitor (8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit S1), a fibrate lipid lowering agent (6 weeks prior to the Screening Visit S1), niacin > 200 mg/day, OMG-3, bile acid sequestrants or other lipid lowering therapies (4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit S1); Use of any excluded medications or supplements within 3 months prior to S1 (e.g., potent cytochrome P450 [CYP] 3A4 inhibitors, see Appendix D); Hypersensitivity to or a history of significant adverse reactions to any fibrate lipid regulating agent; History of drug or alcohol abuse within the past year or inability to comply with protocol requirements, including subject alcohol restrictions (see Section 5.6.3); Previously treated with gemcabene (i.e., CI-1027); participation in another clinical study of an investigational agent or device concurrently or within 1 month prior to the Screening Visit, or use of an investigational agent within 1 month or 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, prior to the Screening Visit; or Any other finding which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the subject's safety or participation in the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lee Golden, MD
Organizational Affiliation
NeuroBo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Appalachian Research Associates
City
Fort Payne
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35967
Country
United States
Facility Name
Del Sol Research Mangagement, LLC
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Westside Medical Associates of Los Angeles
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hope Clinical Research
City
Canoga Park
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91303
Country
United States
Facility Name
SC Clinical Research
City
Garden Grove
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92844
Country
United States
Facility Name
National Research Institute
City
Huntington Park
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90255
Country
United States
Facility Name
National Research Institute
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90057
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paradigm Clinical Research
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92117
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paradigm Research
City
Wheat Ridge
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Excel Medical Research
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33434
Country
United States
Facility Name
Meridien Research
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Direct Helpers Research Center
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indago Research and Health Center
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jacksonville Center for Clinical Research
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sunrise Medical Research
City
Lauderdale Lakes
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33319
Country
United States
Facility Name
AR Developoment Solutions
City
Miami Lakes
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33014
Country
United States
Facility Name
San Marcus Research Clinic, Inc.
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Millenium Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33125
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medcare Research
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33165
Country
United States
Facility Name
Soma Medical Research
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Evanston Premier Clinical Research
City
Evanston
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Midwest Institute for Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46260
Country
United States
Facility Name
Richard Lochamy, M.D.
City
Junction City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66441
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas Medical Center
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
L-MARC Research Center
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials Management, LLC
City
Covington
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70433
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials Management, LLC
City
Metairie
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70006
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Maryland Medical Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Michigan Health Systems
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Elite Clinical Research
City
Jackson
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research of South Nevada
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89121
Country
United States
Facility Name
CHEAR Center, LLC
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10455
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advantage Clinical Trials
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10468
Country
United States
Facility Name
Eastern Carolina Medical Clinic
City
Benson
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27504
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physicians East, NA
City
Farmville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27828
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physicians East, NA
City
Greenville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27834
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cary Medical Clinic
City
Morrisville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27560
Country
United States
Facility Name
Optimed Research
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43235
Country
United States
Facility Name
PriMed Clinical Research
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45419
Country
United States
Facility Name
Green and Seidner Family Practice Associates
City
Lansdale
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19446
Country
United States
Facility Name
BTC of Lincoln
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02865
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolinas Research Partners, LLC
City
Rock Hill
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29732
Country
United States
Facility Name
Airline Complete Healthcare
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77091
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sante Clinical Research
City
Kerrville
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78028
Country
United States
Facility Name
FMC Science
City
Lampasas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76550
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Investigations of Texas
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75075
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sun Research Institute
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Investigation Specialists
City
Kenosha
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53142
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ecogene-21
City
Chicoutimi
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G7H 7K9
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A 12-Week Study to Assess the Efficacy Safety and Tolerability of Gemcabene in Subjects With Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs