search
Back to results

A Clinical Trial of Phacoemulsification Versus Phacoemulsification & the iStent Implantation in POAG Patients

Primary Purpose

Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
phacoemulsification alone
iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent
Sponsored by
University of Turin, Italy
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts focused on measuring POAG, Combination glaucoma & cataract procedure, trabecular micro-bypass stent, iStent

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a previous diagnosis of POAG
  • an IOP of > 18 mm Hg at three separate visits if on one medication, or subjects on at least two medications with uncontrolled IOP on three separate visits.
  • all patients were deemed likely to follow surgeon instructions and were able to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any glaucoma diagnosis other than POAG
  • the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS)
  • a cloudy cornea likely to inhibit gonioscopic view of the angle
  • any previous ocular surgery
  • history of trauma or ocular surface disease
  • the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS)
  • a cloudy cornea likely to inhibit gonioscopic view of the angle

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    1

    2

    Arm Description

    phacoemulsification alone

    phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Primary outcomes included IOP and reduction in medication use.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    February 18, 2009
    Last Updated
    February 18, 2009
    Sponsor
    University of Turin, Italy
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT00847158
    Brief Title
    A Clinical Trial of Phacoemulsification Versus Phacoemulsification & the iStent Implantation in POAG Patients
    Official Title
    A Randomized, Double-Masked Clinical Trial of Phacoemulsification Compared With Phacoemulsification and Micro-Bypass Stent Implantation in Patients With POAG
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    February 2009
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    December 2006 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    March 2008 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    March 2008 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Turin, Italy

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This was a prospective, double-masked, 15-month clinical trial comparing efficacy of phacoemulsification alone to combined phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Detailed Description
    This was a prospective, randomized open-label study of 36 patients with POAG scheduled to undergo phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation ("cataract surgery"). Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either cataract surgery alone (control group) or cataract surgery and iStent implantation (combined surgery group). Implantation of the study stent occurred after cataract extraction and IOL insertion using the same small, temporal, clear-corneal incision (approximately 3 mm) used to perform phacoemulsification and IOL placement. The study stent was guided into Schlemm's canal using ab-interno gonioscopy (using a Swan-Jacobs gonioscope). (Figure 1) If no complications occurred during phacoemulsification, acetylcholine was injected in the anterior chamber after the IOL implantation to constrict the pupil. The anterior chamber was then filled with a viscoelastic agent to reform the anterior chamber and provide more clearance in the angle. The anterior chamber was traversed with the applicator (the implant was on the tip of applicator) and the trabecular meshwork located. The leading edge of the device was gently slid through the trabecular meshwork and into Schlemm's canal at the nasal position (3 to 4 o'clock for the right eye; 9 to 8 o'clock for the left eye) with the tip of the implant directed inferiorly. If difficulty was encountered with the insertion at the primary location, we tried inserting about 0.5 clock hour inferiorly; and continued to move inferiorly as needed for subsequent attempts. Next, the device was released by pushing the button on the applicator, position of the stent was verified and the applicator was withdrawn. The patients were instructed to discontinue all glaucoma medications after surgery. Standard post cataract extraction antibiotic and anti-inflammatory drug regimen was prescribed. Target pressure for each patient was determined prior to study entry. Following the assigned procedure, any patient with an IOP (as measured between 8 and 10 AM) that was greater than 2 mm Hg over their target was instructed to return twice in the following three days for re-measurement of their IOP. If the patient's IOP was > 2 mm Hg over their target pressure, ocular hypotensive agents were added. The medications were added in a pre-set schedule, with beta-blockers first, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors second, and prostaglandins third. If, however, on the third consecutive visit the patient's IOP was within 2 mm Hg of target, patient re-entered the normal visit schedule. Investigators were masked to treatment assignment both when measuring IOP and when determining when or if to add medications.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Cataracts
    Keywords
    POAG, Combination glaucoma & cataract procedure, trabecular micro-bypass stent, iStent

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantInvestigator
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    36 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    1
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    phacoemulsification alone
    Arm Title
    2
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent
    Intervention Type
    Procedure
    Intervention Name(s)
    phacoemulsification alone
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    cataract surgery, Phaco
    Intervention Description
    phacoemulsification alone
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    iStent, Trabecular micro-bypass stent, GTS100L, GTS100R
    Intervention Description
    phacoemulsification and implantation of the iStent® trabecular micro-bypass stent
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Primary outcomes included IOP and reduction in medication use.
    Time Frame
    15 month

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: a previous diagnosis of POAG an IOP of > 18 mm Hg at three separate visits if on one medication, or subjects on at least two medications with uncontrolled IOP on three separate visits. all patients were deemed likely to follow surgeon instructions and were able to give informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: any glaucoma diagnosis other than POAG the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) a cloudy cornea likely to inhibit gonioscopic view of the angle any previous ocular surgery history of trauma or ocular surface disease the presence of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) a cloudy cornea likely to inhibit gonioscopic view of the angle
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Antonio Fea, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    University of Torino
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    26587282
    Citation
    Fea AM, Consolandi G, Zola M, Pignata G, Cannizzo P, Lavia C, Rolle T, Grignolo FM. Micro-Bypass Implantation for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Combined with Phacoemulsification: 4-Year Follow-Up. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:795357. doi: 10.1155/2015/795357. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    A Clinical Trial of Phacoemulsification Versus Phacoemulsification & the iStent Implantation in POAG Patients

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs