A Comparison of INSORB Staples With Metal Staples in Total Hip Replacement

The purpose of this study is to compare the use of INSORB absorbable staples with metal staples on surgical incision healing after total hip replacement. The study evaluates wound healing, complications, and patient satisfaction regarding wound comfort and appearance after surgery.

Subcuticular closure of wounds can provide superior results to percutaneous suture closure due to the elimination of suture or staple tracts. These tracts can lead to infection and migration of epithelial cells adding to scarring, and cross-hatching scars which remain after healing. Absorbable staples can provide a rapid, secure, subcuticular closure of skin as an alternative to the traditional, manual staple or suture closure. This study will compare INSORB absorbable staples to externally applied standard metal staples with respect to effectiveness of incision closure, acute healing, subject comfort level, security and appearance after total hip replacement.

Incisional drainage, swelling, gaps of incision. Drainage and swelling will be objectively determined by investigator. Gaps will be measured in millimeters.

Assessment of wound for complications, especially hematomas at 6 weeks post surgery. Participants will be scored based on presence of a hematoma or not.

Inclusion Criteria: Patient is 18 years or older Patient or legal representative is able to understand and provide signed consent for the procedure Patient is willing and able to return for required follow-up visits Patient needs a total hip arthroplasty surgical procedure Exclusion Criteria: Patient has an active infection Patient is enrolled in another similar study Patient has a known history of hepatitis Patient has a known history of HIV Patient has a known history of AIDs Patient has a known history of IV drug abuse