search
Back to results

A Dose-Escalation to Rash Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Primary Purpose

Pancreatic Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Erlotinib, escalating dose
Erlotinib, standard dose
Gemcitabine
Sponsored by
Hoffmann-La Roche
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pancreatic Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients, >=18 years of age;
  • histologically or cytologically confirmed pancreatic cancer with measurable or non-measurable metastatic disease;
  • ECOG performance status of 0-1.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • local, or locally advanced, pancreatic cancer;
  • prior systemic treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer;
  • <=6 months since last adjuvant chemotherapy;
  • other malignancies within last 5 years, except for adequately treated cancer in situ of the cervix, or basal or squamous cell skin cancer.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Gemcitabine, Erlotinib Standard Dose

Gemcitabine, Erlotinib Escalating Dose

Arm Description

Participants received erlotinib, 100 milligrams (mg), orally (PO), once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants also received gemcitabine, 1000 mg per (/) square meter (m^2), intravenously (IV), on Days 1, 8, and 15 of consecutive 4 week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Participants received erlotinib, beginning at 150 mg/day, PO, once daily, and increasing in increments of 50 mg every 2 weeks up to a maximum of 250 mg/day, until development of a grade 2 rash, or occurrence of other, non-rash, dose-limiting toxicity; treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death or withdrawal. Participants also received gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m^2, IV, on Days 1, 8, and 15 of consecutive 4 week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Died Assessed From Point of Randomization
Overall survival (OS) assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive.
OS Assessed From Point of Randomization
OS assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the median time, in months, from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. The 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death as Assessed From Point of Randomization
Progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progressive disease (PD) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or death due to any cause. For target lesions (TLs), PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For non-target lesions (NTLs), PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment.
PFS Assessed From Point of Randomization
PFS assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the median time, in weeks, from randomization to disease progression or death due to any cause. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. The 95% CI was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST
BOR was defined as a confirmed CR or PR for at least 4 weeks. CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline (BL) SLD. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was determined using Pearson-Clopper method.
Percentage of Participants With a CR, PR, Stable Disease (SD), or PD According to RECIST
CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL SLD SD was defined as neither sufficient decrease in SLD to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase in SLD to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Percentage of Participants With SD (Maintained for at Least 8 Weeks) or CR or PR (Maintained for at Least 4 Weeks) According to RECIST
Disease control was defined as a participant with a response of CR or PR for at least 4 weeks at any time during treatment, or SD that was maintained for at least 8 weeks after the start of treatment. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Percentage of Participants Who Died as Assessed From Start of 4-Week Run-In
OS assessed from the start of the 4-week run in period was defined as the time from BL to the date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive.
OS Assessed From Start of 4-Week Run-In
OS assessed from the start of the 4-week run in period was defined as the median time, in months, from BL to the date of death, due to any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. The 95% CI was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death as Assessed From the Start of 4-Week Run-In
PFS as assessed from the start of 4-week run-in was defined as the time from BL to the first occurrence of PD according to RECIST or death due to any cause. For TLs, PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For NTLs, PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment.
PFS Assessed From the Start of 4-Week Run-In
PFS assessed from the start of 4-week run-in was defined as the median time, in weeks, from BL to disease progression or death due to any cause. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. The 95% CI was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Full Information

First Posted
April 1, 2008
Last Updated
January 27, 2015
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00652366
Brief Title
A Dose-Escalation to Rash Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Official Title
A Randomized, Open-label, Dose-escalation to Rash Study to Assess the Effect of Tarceva in Combination With Gemcitabine on Overall Survival in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will compare the efficacy and safety of escalating versus standard doses to rash of Tarceva, in combination with gemcitabine, in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. During a 4 week run-in period, all patients will receive Tarceva 100mg/day po plus gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv on days 1, 8,15 and 22. After 4 weeks, patients who have not developed rash, or only develop grade 1 rash, will be randomized to one of 2 groups. Group 1 will receive a starting dose of Tarceva 150mg po daily, increased in steps of 50mg every 2 weeks up to a maximum of 250mg/day po, until development of grade 2 rash or other dose-limiting toxicity. Group 2 will continue to receive Tarceva 100mg/day po. All patients will continue to receive gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pancreatic Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
467 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Gemcitabine, Erlotinib Standard Dose
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received erlotinib, 100 milligrams (mg), orally (PO), once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants also received gemcitabine, 1000 mg per (/) square meter (m^2), intravenously (IV), on Days 1, 8, and 15 of consecutive 4 week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Arm Title
Gemcitabine, Erlotinib Escalating Dose
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received erlotinib, beginning at 150 mg/day, PO, once daily, and increasing in increments of 50 mg every 2 weeks up to a maximum of 250 mg/day, until development of a grade 2 rash, or occurrence of other, non-rash, dose-limiting toxicity; treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death or withdrawal. Participants also received gemcitabine, 1000 mg/m^2, IV, on Days 1, 8, and 15 of consecutive 4 week cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Erlotinib, escalating dose
Other Intervention Name(s)
Tarceva
Intervention Description
100mg, PO, once daily, escalating to a maximum of 250mg, PO, once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Erlotinib, standard dose
Other Intervention Name(s)
Tarceva
Intervention Description
100mg, PO, once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Gemcitabine
Intervention Description
1000 mg/m2, IV, on days 1,8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Died Assessed From Point of Randomization
Description
Overall survival (OS) assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive.
Time Frame
Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.
Title
OS Assessed From Point of Randomization
Description
OS assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the median time, in months, from randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. The 95 percent (%) confidence interval (CI) was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time Frame
Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death as Assessed From Point of Randomization
Description
Progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of progressive disease (PD) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or death due to any cause. For target lesions (TLs), PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For non-target lesions (NTLs), PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment.
Time Frame
Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.
Title
PFS Assessed From Point of Randomization
Description
PFS assessed from the point of randomization was defined as the median time, in weeks, from randomization to disease progression or death due to any cause. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. The 95% CI was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time Frame
Randomization [Day 1 of Cycle 2 (4-week cycles)] and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response (BOR) of Confirmed Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST
Description
BOR was defined as a confirmed CR or PR for at least 4 weeks. CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline (BL) SLD. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was determined using Pearson-Clopper method.
Time Frame
BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression for up to 46 months.
Title
Percentage of Participants With a CR, PR, Stable Disease (SD), or PD According to RECIST
Description
CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL SLD SD was defined as neither sufficient decrease in SLD to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase in SLD to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Time Frame
BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression for up to 46 months.
Title
Percentage of Participants With SD (Maintained for at Least 8 Weeks) or CR or PR (Maintained for at Least 4 Weeks) According to RECIST
Description
Disease control was defined as a participant with a response of CR or PR for at least 4 weeks at any time during treatment, or SD that was maintained for at least 8 weeks after the start of treatment. The 95% CI for one sample binomial was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Time Frame
BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression for up to 46 months.
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Died as Assessed From Start of 4-Week Run-In
Description
OS assessed from the start of the 4-week run in period was defined as the time from BL to the date of death due to any cause. Participants still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive.
Time Frame
BL and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.
Title
OS Assessed From Start of 4-Week Run-In
Description
OS assessed from the start of the 4-week run in period was defined as the median time, in months, from BL to the date of death, due to any cause. Participants who were still alive at the time of analysis were censored at the date they were last known to be alive. The 95% CI was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time Frame
BL and weekly thereafter for up to 46 months.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression or Death as Assessed From the Start of 4-Week Run-In
Description
PFS as assessed from the start of 4-week run-in was defined as the time from BL to the first occurrence of PD according to RECIST or death due to any cause. For TLs, PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started. For NTLs, PD was defined as unequivocal progression of existing NTLs. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment.
Time Frame
BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death for up to 46 months.
Title
PFS Assessed From the Start of 4-Week Run-In
Description
PFS assessed from the start of 4-week run-in was defined as the median time, in weeks, from BL to disease progression or death due to any cause. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at time of analysis were censored at the date of last tumor assessment. The 95% CI was determined using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
Time Frame
BL, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death for up to 46 months.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: adult patients, >=18 years of age; histologically or cytologically confirmed pancreatic cancer with measurable or non-measurable metastatic disease; ECOG performance status of 0-1. Exclusion Criteria: local, or locally advanced, pancreatic cancer; prior systemic treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer; <=6 months since last adjuvant chemotherapy; other malignancies within last 5 years, except for adequately treated cancer in situ of the cervix, or basal or squamous cell skin cancer.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1264AAA
Country
Argentina
City
Florencio Varela
ZIP/Postal Code
B1878DVB
Country
Argentina
City
Rosario
ZIP/Postal Code
S2000PBJ
Country
Argentina
City
Santa Fe
ZIP/Postal Code
03000
Country
Argentina
City
Canberra
State/Province
Australian Capital Territory
ZIP/Postal Code
2606
Country
Australia
City
Liverpool
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2170
Country
Australia
City
St. Leonards
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2065
Country
Australia
City
Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2076
Country
Australia
City
Brisbane
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4101
Country
Australia
City
Adelaide
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Australia
City
Ballarat
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
03350
Country
Australia
City
Frankston
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3199
Country
Australia
City
Salzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
5020
Country
Austria
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria
City
Antwerpen
ZIP/Postal Code
2020
Country
Belgium
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1070
Country
Belgium
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
City
Liege
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium
City
Salvador
State/Province
BA
ZIP/Postal Code
40170-110
Country
Brazil
City
Belo Horizonte
State/Province
MG
ZIP/Postal Code
30110-0090
Country
Brazil
City
Ijui
State/Province
RS
ZIP/Postal Code
98700-000
Country
Brazil
City
Santo Andre
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
09060-650
Country
Brazil
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
01246-000
Country
Brazil
City
Mississauga
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L5M 2N1
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
City
Herlev
ZIP/Postal Code
2730
Country
Denmark
City
Hillerod
ZIP/Postal Code
3400
Country
Denmark
City
København
ZIP/Postal Code
2100
Country
Denmark
City
Angers
ZIP/Postal Code
49933
Country
France
City
Besancon
ZIP/Postal Code
25030
Country
France
City
Brest
ZIP/Postal Code
29609
Country
France
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75679
Country
France
City
St-Priest-En-Jarez
ZIP/Postal Code
42271
Country
France
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13353
Country
Germany
City
Bochum
ZIP/Postal Code
44791
Country
Germany
City
Bonn
ZIP/Postal Code
53127
Country
Germany
City
Esslingen
ZIP/Postal Code
73730
Country
Germany
City
Halle
ZIP/Postal Code
06120
Country
Germany
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
22081
Country
Germany
City
Hamm
ZIP/Postal Code
59071
Country
Germany
City
Kaiserslautern
ZIP/Postal Code
67655
Country
Germany
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
City
Marburg
ZIP/Postal Code
35043
Country
Germany
City
Muenchen
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany
City
Mönchengladbach
ZIP/Postal Code
41063
Country
Germany
City
Saarbruecken
ZIP/Postal Code
66113
Country
Germany
City
Trier
ZIP/Postal Code
54290
Country
Germany
City
Ulm
ZIP/Postal Code
89081
Country
Germany
City
Heraklion
ZIP/Postal Code
71110
Country
Greece
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
56439
Country
Greece
City
Hong Kong
ZIP/Postal Code
852
Country
Hong Kong
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
City
Haifa
ZIP/Postal Code
34354
Country
Israel
City
Jerusalem
ZIP/Postal Code
91120-01
Country
Israel
City
Petach Tikva
ZIP/Postal Code
49100
Country
Israel
City
Tel Aviv
ZIP/Postal Code
64239-06
Country
Israel
City
Zerifin
ZIP/Postal Code
70300
Country
Israel
City
Chieti
State/Province
Abruzzo
ZIP/Postal Code
66100
Country
Italy
City
Napoli
State/Province
Campania
ZIP/Postal Code
80131
Country
Italy
City
Pordenone
State/Province
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
ZIP/Postal Code
33170
Country
Italy
City
Udine
State/Province
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
ZIP/Postal Code
33100
Country
Italy
City
Orbassano
State/Province
Piemonte
ZIP/Postal Code
10043
Country
Italy
City
San Giovanni Rotondo
State/Province
Puglia
ZIP/Postal Code
71013
Country
Italy
City
Firenze
State/Province
Toscana
ZIP/Postal Code
50139
Country
Italy
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
08660
Country
Lithuania
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
08661
Country
Lithuania
City
Distrito Federal
ZIP/Postal Code
14080
Country
Mexico
City
Gliwice
ZIP/Postal Code
44-101
Country
Poland
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-081
Country
Poland
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60-569
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-781
Country
Poland
City
Brasov
ZIP/Postal Code
2200
Country
Romania
City
Bucuresti
ZIP/Postal Code
022328
Country
Romania
City
Cluj Napoca
ZIP/Postal Code
400015
Country
Romania
City
Sibiu
ZIP/Postal Code
550245
Country
Romania
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
City
Sremska Kamenica
ZIP/Postal Code
21204
Country
Serbia
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
119228
Country
Singapore
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
169610
Country
Singapore
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28033
Country
Spain
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28034
Country
Spain
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28050
Country
Spain
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28223
Country
Spain
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
00112
Country
Taiwan
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
100
Country
Taiwan
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE1 9RT
Country
United Kingdom
City
Salisbury
ZIP/Postal Code
SP2 8BJ
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Dose-Escalation to Rash Study of Tarceva (Erlotinib) Plus Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs