search
Back to results

A Dose Reduction Immunobridging and Safety Study of Two HPV Vaccines in Tanzanian Girls (DoRIS)

Primary Purpose

Human Papilloma Virus

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Tanzania
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
bivalent HPV vaccine
nonavalent HPV vaccine
Sponsored by
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Human Papilloma Virus focused on measuring HPV, cervical cancer, vaccines, HPV vaccine, dose reduction, Human papilloma virus vaccine schedules

Eligibility Criteria

9 Years - 14 Years (Child)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Born female;
  • Aged between 9 and 14 years inclusive;
  • Enrolled in a government primary or secondary day school in Mwanza city (or neighbouring district if included);
  • Living in Mwanza city (or neighbouring district if included) without plans to move away in the next 36 months;
  • Willing to participate in the study and sign the informed assent form;
  • Supported in this study participation by at least one of their parents (or LAR), who has signed the informed consent document;
  • In good health as determined by a medical history (a physical examination will be conducted if necessary according to the clinician's judgement); and
  • Able to pass a Test of Understanding (TOU) if aged 12 years or above, or if younger than 12 years old, a parent or LAR is able to pass a TOU

Exclusion Criteria:

  • They are diagnosed with chronic conditions, such as autoimmune conditions, degenerative diseases, neurologic or genetic diseases among others;

    • They are HIV positive, or immunocompromised;
    • They are pregnant, less than three months post-partum or currently breastfeeding;
    • They are allergic to one of the vaccine components or to latex;
    • They are sexually active and are not willing to use an effective birth control method from 28 days before the first dose until 60 days after the last vaccine dose;
    • The nurse or clinician determining the eligibility, in agreement with principal investigator, considers that there is a reason that precludes participation;
    • They have been previously vaccinated against HPV

Sites / Locations

  • Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit (MITU)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

3 doses 2valent

2 doses 2valent

1 dose 2valent

3 doses 9valent

2 doses 9valent

1 dose 9valent

Arm Description

3 doses of bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix) given at M0, M1 and M6

2 doses of bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix) given at M0 and M6

1 dose of bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix) given at M0

3 doses of nonavalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil9) given at M0, M2 and M6

2 doses of nonavalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil9) given at M0 and M6

1 dose of nonavalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil9) given at M0

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

non-inferiority of antibody seropositivity of 1 dose compared with 2 or 3 doses of the same vaccine
Proportion with HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity
non-inferiority of antibody geometric mean titre (GMT) of 1 dose of either vaccine compared with historical cohorts of women who received 1 dose in whom efficacy has been demonstrated
Geometric mean HPV 16/18 titre
non-inferiority of antibody seropositivity of 1 dose compared with 2 doses of the same vaccine
Proportion with HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity

Secondary Outcome Measures

non-inferiority of HPV 16/18 seropositivity after 1 dose compared with 2 or 3 doses of the same vaccine
Proportion with HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity
evaluate HPV 16/18 seropositivity and antibody GMT at all time points when comparing 2 doses with 3 doses of the same vaccine.
HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity and antibody GMT
equivalence of HPV 16/18 seropositivity and antibody GMT at all time points when comparing the same dose regimen between the 2 vaccine types
HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity and antibody GMT
evaluate HPV 16/18 antibody avidity and memory B cell responses at all time points, comparing different dose regimens of the same vaccine and the same dose regimen between the two vaccines
HPV 16/18-specific antibody avidity and memory B cell responses
stability of antibody responses when comparing within the same arm.
HPV 16/18-specific antibody GMT
evaluate HPV 16/18 seropositivity when comparing 1 dose of either vaccine with historical cohorts of women who received 1, 2 or 3 doses, in whom efficacy has been demonstrated
HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity
evaluate HPV 16/18 seropositivity when comparing the 2 dose regimen of either vaccine with historical cohorts of women who received 3 doses, in whom efficacy has been demonstrated
HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity
non-inferiority of HPV 16/18 antibody GMT when comparing the 2 dose regimen of either vaccine with historical cohorts of women who received 3 doses, in whom efficacy has been demonstrated
HPV 16/18-specific antibody GMT
evaluate HPV 6/11/31/33/45/52/58 antibody seropositivity with the 1 and 2 dose regimens of the 9-valent vaccine compared with the 3-dose regimen
HPV 6/11/31/33/45/52/58-specific antibody seropositivity
evaluate HPV 6/11/31/33/45/52/58 antibody GMT with the 1 and 2 dose regimens of the 9-valent vaccine compared with the 3-dose regimen
HPV 6/11/31/33/45/52/58-specific antibody GMT
unit cost of 1 dose regimens compared with 2 and 3 dose regimens
incremental financial and economic costs of vaccination, using WHO costing tool
cost-effectiveness of 1 dose regimens compared with 2 and 3 dose regimens, and of the 9-valent vaccine compared with the 2-valent vaccine
estimates of costs and effects of vaccination will be integrated into an existing HPV cost-effectiveness model (WHO CHOICE)
number of participants with treatment related solicited adverse events
solicited adverse events considered to have a reasonable possibility of having been contributed to by the vaccine
number of participants with treatment related unsolicited adverse events
unsolicited adverse events considered to have a reasonable possibility of having been contributed to by the vaccine

Full Information

First Posted
June 29, 2016
Last Updated
October 4, 2023
Sponsor
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Collaborators
University of York, Institut Català d'Oncologia, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Karolinska Institutet, Technische Universität Berlin, Tanzanian National Institute for Medical Research, University of Glasgow
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02834637
Brief Title
A Dose Reduction Immunobridging and Safety Study of Two HPV Vaccines in Tanzanian Girls
Acronym
DoRIS
Official Title
A Dose Reduction Immunobridging and Safety Study of Two HPV Vaccines in Tanzanian Girls
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
February 23, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 15, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Collaborators
University of York, Institut Català d'Oncologia, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Karolinska Institutet, Technische Universität Berlin, Tanzanian National Institute for Medical Research, University of Glasgow

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Cervical cancer is the most common cancer in women aged 15-44 years in East Africa, and mortality rates are very high. HPV vaccines are most effective if given to girls who have not yet acquired HPV infection. In Tanzania, HPV vaccine has been shown to be safe, acceptable and can be delivered with high coverage (~80%). However, the cost of delivering HPV vaccine is considerably higher than costs for traditional infant/child vaccinations. This is primarily because of costs to establish outreach programmes and associated personnel costs including nurses who must spend significant time away from their posts to deliver vaccine, especially if multiple doses are needed. There is global interest in simplifying HPV vaccine delivery by reducing the number of doses. If a single dose could be given, this could halve the costs of delivery, making it more accessible to the populations that need it most. Recently, the WHO recommended that 2 doses of HPV vaccine could be given to young girls, based on studies in high and upper middle-income countries. However in Africa high rates of infections like malaria and worms can affect immune responses to vaccines. It is essential to know that reducing the number of doses does not reduce the protective immune response of these vaccines. The investigators are conducting a trial in Tanzanian girls aged 9-14 years to establish whether a single dose of HPV vaccine produces immune responses that are likely to be effective in preventing cervical cancer. Two different HPV vaccines, the bivalent (2-v) vaccine that protects against HPV 16/18 (the cause of 70% of cancers) and the 9-valent (9-v) vaccine that protects against 9 HPV types, will be compared. The trial will randomise 900 girls to 6 arms and follow them for 36 months. Girls will receive the 2-v or the 9-v HPV vaccine, as 1, 2 or 3 doses. Girls receiving 1 or 2 doses will be compared with those receiving 3 doses of the same vaccine, to ensure that the reduced dose regimen produces an immune response that is not inferior to 3 doses. Girls in the 1 and 2 dose arms will be enrolled in an extension and followed for up to 9 years, to examine the stability of immune responses. The immune responses in this study will also be compared with results from other countries where the vaccine has been shown to be protective. This will provide information about whether a reduced number of doses is likely to be protective in Africa. This work will be extremely important in informing future HPV vaccination strategies and will be one of the first randomised trials of 1 and 2 doses of any HPV vaccine in Africa.
Detailed Description
Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the primary cause of cervical cancer, a major public health problem in Africa. Currently there are three vaccines (Cervarix, Gardasil® and Gardasil-9®) that offer excellent protection against HPV infection with vaccine-related HPV genotypes. The objective of this trial is to demonstrate non-inferiority of immune responses with 1 dose of HPV vaccine compared with the recommended 2 or 3 doses of the same vaccine by evaluating HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity, antibody avidity and memory B cell responses at M36. Specifically, the investigators will determine whether a single dose of the 2-valent HPV vaccine (Cervarix, that protects against HPV 16/18 genotypes) or of a new 9-valent HPV vaccine (Gardasil-9,that protects against HPV 6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58) produces immune responses that are non-inferior to those observed with 3 doses of vaccine when given to HIV-negative 9-14 years old girls in a malaria-endemic region of Tanzania. The trial will also determine whether the World Health Organization's (WHO) recently recommended 2 dose strategy for girls aged under 15 years produces similar immune responses in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) compared to the previously recommended 3 dose schedule. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of alternative dosing schedules and of the two vaccines will be explored. The trial will enrol 900 girls who are resident in Mwanza into an un-blinded, individually-randomised trial with 6 arms. Arm A will comprise participants randomised to receive 3 doses of the 2-valent vaccine, Arm B those randomised to receive 2 doses of the 2-valent vaccine and Arm C those randomised to receive 1 dose of the 2-valent vaccine. Arms D, E and F will be those participants randomised to receive 3, 2 or 1 dose of the 9-valent vaccine, respectively. The effect of different dose schedules and type of HPV vaccine on a range of immune responses will be measured up to 36 months after the first dose. In a trial extension that will extend follow-up, we will also determine whether the one dose schedule of these vaccines produces non-inferior immune responses to the recommended two dose schedule for up to 108 months, and examine the long-term stability of the immune responses to 9 years after the first dose. The protocol will be harmonised, and laboratory procedures and immunological endpoints will be cross-validated, with those of a large HPV vaccine dose-reduction efficacy trial being planned by the NIH in Costa Rica to examine the protective effect of the same vaccines given as 1 or 2 doses. This trial will allow the examination of quality and durability of antibody responses, and safety and cost-effectiveness of reduced dose schedules compared to the originally recommended 3 dose schedule in a population with high burden of malaria and other infections that may affect vaccine immune responses.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Human Papilloma Virus
Keywords
HPV, cervical cancer, vaccines, HPV vaccine, dose reduction, Human papilloma virus vaccine schedules

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
930 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
3 doses 2valent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
3 doses of bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix) given at M0, M1 and M6
Arm Title
2 doses 2valent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
2 doses of bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix) given at M0 and M6
Arm Title
1 dose 2valent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
1 dose of bivalent HPV vaccine (Cervarix) given at M0
Arm Title
3 doses 9valent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
3 doses of nonavalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil9) given at M0, M2 and M6
Arm Title
2 doses 9valent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
2 doses of nonavalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil9) given at M0 and M6
Arm Title
1 dose 9valent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
1 dose of nonavalent HPV vaccine (Gardasil9) given at M0
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
bivalent HPV vaccine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cervarix
Intervention Description
head to head comparisons of different dose schedules and HPV vaccine types
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
nonavalent HPV vaccine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Gardasil9
Intervention Description
head to head comparisons of different dose schedules and HPV vaccine types
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
non-inferiority of antibody seropositivity of 1 dose compared with 2 or 3 doses of the same vaccine
Description
Proportion with HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
non-inferiority of antibody geometric mean titre (GMT) of 1 dose of either vaccine compared with historical cohorts of women who received 1 dose in whom efficacy has been demonstrated
Description
Geometric mean HPV 16/18 titre
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
non-inferiority of antibody seropositivity of 1 dose compared with 2 doses of the same vaccine
Description
Proportion with HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity
Time Frame
Month 60 and Month 108
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
non-inferiority of HPV 16/18 seropositivity after 1 dose compared with 2 or 3 doses of the same vaccine
Description
Proportion with HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity
Time Frame
Month 12 and Month 36
Title
evaluate HPV 16/18 seropositivity and antibody GMT at all time points when comparing 2 doses with 3 doses of the same vaccine.
Description
HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity and antibody GMT
Time Frame
Month 7, Month 12, Month 24 and Month 36
Title
equivalence of HPV 16/18 seropositivity and antibody GMT at all time points when comparing the same dose regimen between the 2 vaccine types
Description
HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity and antibody GMT
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 60, Month 84 and Month 108
Title
evaluate HPV 16/18 antibody avidity and memory B cell responses at all time points, comparing different dose regimens of the same vaccine and the same dose regimen between the two vaccines
Description
HPV 16/18-specific antibody avidity and memory B cell responses
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24, Month 36, Month 84 and Month 108 (avidity); Month 12, Month 24 and Month 36 (memory B cells)
Title
stability of antibody responses when comparing within the same arm.
Description
HPV 16/18-specific antibody GMT
Time Frame
Month 36, Month 60 and M108
Title
evaluate HPV 16/18 seropositivity when comparing 1 dose of either vaccine with historical cohorts of women who received 1, 2 or 3 doses, in whom efficacy has been demonstrated
Description
HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
evaluate HPV 16/18 seropositivity when comparing the 2 dose regimen of either vaccine with historical cohorts of women who received 3 doses, in whom efficacy has been demonstrated
Description
HPV 16/18-specific seropositivity
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
non-inferiority of HPV 16/18 antibody GMT when comparing the 2 dose regimen of either vaccine with historical cohorts of women who received 3 doses, in whom efficacy has been demonstrated
Description
HPV 16/18-specific antibody GMT
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
evaluate HPV 6/11/31/33/45/52/58 antibody seropositivity with the 1 and 2 dose regimens of the 9-valent vaccine compared with the 3-dose regimen
Description
HPV 6/11/31/33/45/52/58-specific antibody seropositivity
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24 and Month 36
Title
evaluate HPV 6/11/31/33/45/52/58 antibody GMT with the 1 and 2 dose regimens of the 9-valent vaccine compared with the 3-dose regimen
Description
HPV 6/11/31/33/45/52/58-specific antibody GMT
Time Frame
Month 12, Month 24 and Month 36
Title
unit cost of 1 dose regimens compared with 2 and 3 dose regimens
Description
incremental financial and economic costs of vaccination, using WHO costing tool
Time Frame
up to Month 36
Title
cost-effectiveness of 1 dose regimens compared with 2 and 3 dose regimens, and of the 9-valent vaccine compared with the 2-valent vaccine
Description
estimates of costs and effects of vaccination will be integrated into an existing HPV cost-effectiveness model (WHO CHOICE)
Time Frame
up to Month 36
Title
number of participants with treatment related solicited adverse events
Description
solicited adverse events considered to have a reasonable possibility of having been contributed to by the vaccine
Time Frame
within 30 days after each dose
Title
number of participants with treatment related unsolicited adverse events
Description
unsolicited adverse events considered to have a reasonable possibility of having been contributed to by the vaccine
Time Frame
up to Month 36

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
9 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
14 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Born female; Aged between 9 and 14 years inclusive; Enrolled in a government primary or secondary day school in Mwanza city (or neighbouring district if included); Living in Mwanza city (or neighbouring district if included) without plans to move away in the next 36 months; Willing to participate in the study and sign the informed assent form; Supported in this study participation by at least one of their parents (or LAR), who has signed the informed consent document; In good health as determined by a medical history (a physical examination will be conducted if necessary according to the clinician's judgement); and Able to pass a Test of Understanding (TOU) if aged 12 years or above, or if younger than 12 years old, a parent or LAR is able to pass a TOU Exclusion Criteria: They are diagnosed with chronic conditions, such as autoimmune conditions, degenerative diseases, neurologic or genetic diseases among others; They are HIV positive, or immunocompromised; They are pregnant, less than three months post-partum or currently breastfeeding; They are allergic to one of the vaccine components or to latex; They are sexually active and are not willing to use an effective birth control method from 28 days before the first dose until 60 days after the last vaccine dose; The nurse or clinician determining the eligibility, in agreement with principal investigator, considers that there is a reason that precludes participation; They have been previously vaccinated against HPV
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deborah Watson-Jones, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit (MITU)
City
Mwanza
Country
Tanzania

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36113532
Citation
Baisley K, Kemp TJ, Kreimer AR, Basu P, Changalucha J, Hildesheim A, Porras C, Whitworth H, Herrero R, Lacey CJ, Schiller JT, Lucas E, Mutani P, Dillner J, Indangasi J, Muwonge R, Hayes RJ, Pinto LA, Watson-Jones D. Comparing one dose of HPV vaccine in girls aged 9-14 years in Tanzania (DoRIS) with one dose of HPV vaccine in historical cohorts: an immunobridging analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Oct;10(10):e1485-e1493. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00306-0.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
36113531
Citation
Watson-Jones D, Changalucha J, Whitworth H, Pinto L, Mutani P, Indangasi J, Kemp T, Hashim R, Kamala B, Wiggins R, Songoro T, Connor N, Mbwanji G, Pavon MA, Lowe B, Mmbando D, Kapiga S, Mayaud P, de SanJose S, Dillner J, Hayes RJ, Lacey CJ, Baisley K. Immunogenicity and safety of one-dose human papillomavirus vaccine compared with two or three doses in Tanzanian girls (DoRIS): an open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Oct;10(10):e1473-e1484. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00309-6.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Dose Reduction Immunobridging and Safety Study of Two HPV Vaccines in Tanzanian Girls

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs