search
Back to results

A Feasibility Study Assessing the Effectiveness of rTMS in Tinnitus

Primary Purpose

Tinnitus

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
rTMS
Sponsored by
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tinnitus focused on measuring Tinnitus, rTMS

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Age over 18 years

• Persistent unilateral or bilateral subjective tinnitus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Epilepsy

    • Severe or profound hearing loss
    • Patients taking vestibular sedatives, antipsychotic, anxiolytic, antiepileptic and ototoxic medications.
    • Ear infections or discharge
    • History of ear surgery
    • History of noise trauma
    • Excess alcohol consumption
    • Meniere's disease
    • VIII nerve tumour
    • Bells palsy
    • Ramsay-Hunt Syndrome
    • Post-meningitis hearing loss and tinnitus
    • Active psychiatric conditions
    • Congenital or syndromal associations

Sites / Locations

  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

theta-burst rTMS

Control arm

Arm Description

Active treatment will consist of sessions of continuous theta-burst rTMS on consecutive days for 5 days. This will be delivered with a circular coil to the temporal scalp region overlying the auditory cortex, contralateral to the symptomatic side in unilateral tinnitus and to the left side in bilateral tinnitus. The treatment protocol will consist of treatment at 80% of individual motor threshold (established at the first treatment session) for 600 pulses of 40 seconds duration, which will be repeated after 15 minutes. Each patient will receive 1200 pulses per day.

The control (sham) stimulation will consist of stimulating with the rTMS coil held at right angles to the participants' head. This will result in no active stimulation of brain tissue but would feel similar to the patient. Each treatment session will therefore last approximately 20 minutes.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Improvement in tinnitus severity following treatment with rTMS
The primary outcome measure for the definitive trial is the improvement in tinnitus severity following treatment with theta burst rTMS compared to control as demonstrated by change in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) scores. Assessed on completion of treatment and at 1 week and 1 month following.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The number of patients willing to complete the trial
Feasibility outcome measures relevant to this feasibility study are those which will enable the investigators to successfully complete a full study in the future. One issue is whether sufficient participants could be recruited to run future trials. This will be assessed through measuring the recruitment and retention rate of this feasibility study.
Confirm acceptability of trial design to participants
To enable successful completion of future larger evaluation of patients views on the study design and interventions through simple feedback questionnaires will be performed.
Determine success of sham intervention
To confirm the use and suitability of the control intervention for future trials the investigators will be evaluating whether patients are aware if receiving sham or real rTMS
Success of assessment methods
To evaluate the chosen method and frequency of data collection to evaluate its use for future trials. Assessed by appropriate completion and return of questionnaires.
Sample size calculation
Determination of the number of participants required for a subsequent definitive trial aimed at demonstrating statistical significance.

Full Information

First Posted
June 27, 2014
Last Updated
November 1, 2016
Sponsor
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02269839
Brief Title
A Feasibility Study Assessing the Effectiveness of rTMS in Tinnitus
Official Title
A Feasibility Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Different Modalities of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Tinnitus
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Tinnitus is a common problem which can have a severe impact on quality of life and for which there is no truly successful treatment available. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a method of stimulating the brain through the application of a magnetic field in a series of rapid pulses and may be a valuable treatment for patients with tinnitus. The overall aim of this research is to see if patients with tinnitus benefit from treatment with rTMS, and in particular whether one type (continuous theta burst) is more effective than other variations of rTMS. Prior to developing a definitive study to address this area a feasibility study needs to be performed. The proposed feasibility study aims to determine outcomes necessary to enable development of a definitive study in the future. 40 patients suffering with idiopathic tinnitus will be randomised into 2 groups, a control group receiving a sham treatment, and an active treatment group receiving theta-burst rTMS on 5 consecutive days.
Detailed Description
Tinnitus is a common problem and can have a severe impact on quality of life. At present there is no truly successful treatment available. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a method of stimulating the brain through the application of a magnetic field in a series of rapid pulses. Applying it to the areas of the brain thought to be responsible for tinnitus may offer a valuable treatment for patients. The overall aim of this research is to see if patients with tinnitus benefit from treatment with rTMS, and in particular whether one type (continuous theta burst) is more effective than other variations of rTMS. Prior to developing a definitive study to address this area a feasibility study needs to be performed. The proposed feasibility study aims to determine outcomes necessary to enable development of a definitive study in the future. Particularly to ensure adequate recruitment will be possible and to confirm the acceptability of the study design to participants. We will assess the success of our chosen placebo intervention and blinding method. The variance in change in tinnitus level following treatment will enable a sample size calculation to be performed for use in future studies. 40 patients suffering with idiopathic tinnitus will be randomised into 2 groups, a control group receiving a sham treatment, and an active treatment group receiving theta-burst rTMS on 5 consecutive days. The effect of treatment will be assessed through the use of the Tinnitus Functional Index an existing validated tinnitus questionnaire. Feasibility outcomes will be assessed through monitoring retention and recruitment rates and the use of questionnaires related to feasibility outcomes

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tinnitus
Keywords
Tinnitus, rTMS

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
theta-burst rTMS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Active treatment will consist of sessions of continuous theta-burst rTMS on consecutive days for 5 days. This will be delivered with a circular coil to the temporal scalp region overlying the auditory cortex, contralateral to the symptomatic side in unilateral tinnitus and to the left side in bilateral tinnitus. The treatment protocol will consist of treatment at 80% of individual motor threshold (established at the first treatment session) for 600 pulses of 40 seconds duration, which will be repeated after 15 minutes. Each patient will receive 1200 pulses per day.
Arm Title
Control arm
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
The control (sham) stimulation will consist of stimulating with the rTMS coil held at right angles to the participants' head. This will result in no active stimulation of brain tissue but would feel similar to the patient. Each treatment session will therefore last approximately 20 minutes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
rTMS
Other Intervention Name(s)
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Intervention Description
Active treatment will consist of sessions of continuous theta-burst rTMS on consecutive days for 5 days. This will be delivered with a circular coil to the temporal scalp region overlying the auditory cortex, contralateral to the symptomatic side in unilateral tinnitus and to the left side in bilateral tinnitus. The treatment protocol will consist of treatment at 80% of individual motor threshold (established at the first treatment session) for 600 pulses of 40 seconds duration, which will be repeated after 15 minutes. Each patient will receive 1200 pulses per day.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement in tinnitus severity following treatment with rTMS
Description
The primary outcome measure for the definitive trial is the improvement in tinnitus severity following treatment with theta burst rTMS compared to control as demonstrated by change in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) scores. Assessed on completion of treatment and at 1 week and 1 month following.
Time Frame
3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The number of patients willing to complete the trial
Description
Feasibility outcome measures relevant to this feasibility study are those which will enable the investigators to successfully complete a full study in the future. One issue is whether sufficient participants could be recruited to run future trials. This will be assessed through measuring the recruitment and retention rate of this feasibility study.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Confirm acceptability of trial design to participants
Description
To enable successful completion of future larger evaluation of patients views on the study design and interventions through simple feedback questionnaires will be performed.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Determine success of sham intervention
Description
To confirm the use and suitability of the control intervention for future trials the investigators will be evaluating whether patients are aware if receiving sham or real rTMS
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Success of assessment methods
Description
To evaluate the chosen method and frequency of data collection to evaluate its use for future trials. Assessed by appropriate completion and return of questionnaires.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Sample size calculation
Description
Determination of the number of participants required for a subsequent definitive trial aimed at demonstrating statistical significance.
Time Frame
3 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age over 18 years • Persistent unilateral or bilateral subjective tinnitus Exclusion Criteria: Epilepsy Severe or profound hearing loss Patients taking vestibular sedatives, antipsychotic, anxiolytic, antiepileptic and ototoxic medications. Ear infections or discharge History of ear surgery History of noise trauma Excess alcohol consumption Meniere's disease VIII nerve tumour Bells palsy Ramsay-Hunt Syndrome Post-meningitis hearing loss and tinnitus Active psychiatric conditions Congenital or syndromal associations
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jaydip Ray, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Sheffield
State/Province
South Yorkshire
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Feasibility Study Assessing the Effectiveness of rTMS in Tinnitus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs