A Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled X-Ray Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of SD-6010 in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee (ITIC)
Primary Purpose
Osteoarthritis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
SD-6010
SD-6010
Placebo
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis focused on measuring knee Osteoarthritis Disease Modifying Osteoarthritis Drug
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects aged >= 40 years with a BMI >= 25 and <= 40 kg/m2
- In the past, has been diagnosed with knee OA
- Radiographic evidence of OA in the study knee
Exclusion Criteria:
- A diagnosis of any other rheumatic disease
- Current conditions in the study knee that would confound efficacy
- Selected, traditional clinical safety and laboratory parameters
Sites / Locations
- Brookwood Internists, P.C.
- Greystone Medical Center
- Pivotal Research Centers
- Arizona Research Center
- Pivotal Research Centers
- University of Arizona
- Martin Bowen Hefley Orthopedics
- Teton Research, LLC
- Med Center
- College Hospital Costa Mesa
- NeuroNetwork Trials
- Med Investigations, Inc.
- Sierra Clinical Research
- University of California Davis Health System
- University of California Davis
- Scripps Clinic-Clinical Research
- Plaza Medical Imaging
- Denver Internal Medicine Group
- Mountain View Clinical Research, Inc.
- New West Physicians Clinical Research
- Advanced Radiology Consultants
- Advanced Radiology Consultants
- Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
- New England Research Associates, LLC
- Southeastern Arthritis Center
- Southeastern Imaging & Diagnostics
- Southeastern Integrated Medical, PL, d/b/a Florida Medical Research Institute
- Jacksonville Center for Clincal Research
- Memorial Hospital Jacksonville
- Gold Coast Research, LLC
- Marin E. Hale, M.D., P.A.
- Sabiha Khan, M.D.
- Kanner, Mendelson, Shteinman, LLC
- Radiant Research
- Rheumatology and Endocrinology Specialists of the Palm Beaches, P.A.
- North Georgia Clinical Research
- North Georgia Clinical Research
- East-West Medical Research Institute
- Preventive Medicine
- Rehabilitation Institue of Chicago
- NorthShore University HealthSystem
- NorthShore University HealthSystem
- Clinical Investigation Specialists, Inc.
- Illinois Bone and Joint Institute, LLC
- The Arthritis Center
- NorthShore University HealthSystem
- Ronald Keith Stegemoller, American Health Network
- Floyd Memorial Hospital
- Heartland Research Associates, LLC
- Family Medicine East, Chartered/Radiology
- Heartland Research Associates, LLC
- Office of Manoj Kohli, M.D.
- L-MARC Research Center
- Commonwealth Biomedical Research, LLC
- TFD Research, LLC
- Rheumatology Associates
- The Center for Rheumatology and Bone Research
- The Center for Rheumatology and Bone Research
- Miray Medical Center
- Phase III Clinical Research
- Fall River Clinical Research
- HCI Metromedic Walk-In
- MedVadis Research Corporation
- Fallon Clinic, Inc. (Drug Shipment)
- Fallon Clinic, Inc.
- Cadillac Clinical Research, LLC, located at Great Lakes Family Care
- Arthritis and Osteoporosis Treatment and Research Center
- Planters Clinic
- North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc.
- Mercy Medical Group/Woodlake Research
- Dynamic Clinical Research, Inc.
- Joan Prouty Moore, MD
- Orthopaedic and Occupational Medicine
- The Center for Pharmaceutical Research, P.C.
- Affiliated Clinical Research, Inc.
- Office of Michael Mall, M.D.
- Nevada Imaging Centers
- Nevada Imaging Centers
- Office of Danka Michaels, MD
- Office of Stephen H. Miller, MD
- Regional Clinical Research, Inc.
- NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases
- VirtualScopics, Inc.
- Crouse Medical Practice, PLLC d/b/a Internist Associates of Central New York
- Kernodle Clinic Inc.
- Southeastern Radiology
- PharmQuest
- Research Institute of the Carolinas, PLLC
- PMG Research of Salisbury
- Piedmont Healthcare/Research
- Carolina Arthritis Associates, PA
- PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC
- Internal Medicine Associates
- Lillestol Research, LLC
- Advantage Diagnostics
- Rapid Medical Research, Inc.
- Columbus Clinical Research, Inc.
- Optimed Research, LLC
- Lake Health Lyndhurst Clinic
- East Penn Rheumatology Associates, PC
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research
- BioImaging Technologies, Inc.
- Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island
- Rheumatology Associates
- Radiant Research, Inc.
- Parkway Medical Group
- Holston Medical Group
- D. Matthew Sellers MD PC
- Southwind Medical Specialists
- Baylor Research Institute
- Metroplex Clinical Research Center
- Radiant Research San Antonio Northeast
- South Texas Radiology Imaging Center
- Oakwell Clinical Research, LLC
- Pivotal Research Centers
- National Clinical Research - Norfolk, Inc.
- National Clinical Research, Incorporated
- Advanced Pain Management
- Tacoma Center for Arthritis Research, PS
- Clinical Investigation Specialists, Inc.
- OMI - Organización Médica de Investigación
- Saint Dennis Medical Group S.A.
- Investigaciones Reumatológicas y Osteológicas S.R.L.
- Instituto Médico Especializado (IME)
- IMAI Research
- Menzies Research Institute
- Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg / Rheumatology
- Rheumatology Research Associates Ltd.
- Nexus Clinic Research
- The Arthritis Program Research Group Inc.
- Centre de Rhumatologie St-Louis
- Revmacentrum MUDr. Mostera, s.r.o.
- Fakultni nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brne
- MEDIPONT Plus, s.r.o.
- MEDIPONT, s.r.o.
- ARTMEDI UPD s r.o.
- DC Mediscan
- MediCentrum Praha, a.s.
- Nemocnice Na Frantisku s poliklinikou
- Revmatologicky ustav
- Centrum pro zdravotnicke zabezpeceni sportovni reprezentace
- Ustredni vojenska nemocnice Praha
- MSI - Muskuloskeletalni institut
- Nemocnice Atlas, a.s.
- PV-Medical s.r.o.
- Praxis fuer Orthopaedie, Chirotherapie und Akupunktur
- Praxis fuer Orthopaedie
- Klinische Forschung Berlin-Buch
- Praxis Dr. Thomas Jung
- Klinische Forschung Schwerin
- Orszagos Gerincgyogyaszati Kozpont
- Synexus Magyarorszag Kft.
- Heves Megyei Onkormanyzat Markhot Ferenc Korhaz
- Bekes Megyei Kepviselo-testulet Pandy Kalman Korhaz, Reumatologia
- Selye Janos Korhaz, Reumatologiai Szakrendelo
- MAV Korhaz es Rendelointezet
- Veszprem Megyei Onkormanyzat Csolnoky Ferenc Korhaz-Rendelointezet
- Azienda Sanitaria Genovese, Ospedale La Colletta, Dipartimento Apparato Locomotore
- Presidio Ospedaliero Augusto Murri, Reparto di Reumatologia
- Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Azienda Ospedaliera Polo Universitario Unita' Operativa di Reumatologia
- Centro Empresarial - Altavista Polo 4
- Instituto de Ginecologia y Reproducción & Cirugia Minimamente Invasiva
- Hospital Nacional "Alberto Sabogal Sologuren" - Essalud
- Clínica San Felipe
- Hospital Nacional "Edgardo Rebagliati Martins" - Essalud
- Instituto Peruano del Hueso y la Articulación SAC.
- Hospital Maria Auxiliadora
- Centro Medico Corpac
- NSZOZ "MEDICUS II" S.C. Irena Klimczak, Malgorzata Klimczak, Jerzy Klimczak
- "SYNEXUS SCM" Sp. z o.o.
- Katedra i Klinika Ortopedii i Traumatologii Narzadu Ruchu
- Russian State Medical University, Moscow Faculty, City Clinical Hospital #4
- Institute of Rheumatology
- City Alexandrovskaya Hospital
- L.G. Sokolov Clinical Hospital #122 of Federal Medical-Biology Agency of Russia, Central Polyclinic
- Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedy Named After R. R. Vredena
- V. Interna klinika FN a LF UK
- Ivan Ujvari
- Narodny ustav reumatickych chorob
- Hospital Ntra. Sra. de La Esperanza
- Hospital General Universitario de Guadalajara
- Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
200 mg
50 mg
Placebo
Arm Description
High dose active comparator
Low dose active comparator
Placebo comparator to be used for control purposes
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing
Rate of progression of joint space narrowing (JSN) was defined as narrowing in joint space width (JSW) over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in millimeter per year (mm/year) over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. Negative values indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2
Rate of progression of JSN was defined as narrowing in joint space width over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in mm/year over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. KLG system was a method of classifying the severity of knee OA using five grades (0 [no severity] to 4 [maximum severity], higher grade indicating worse knee function). Negative values of slope indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Equal to (=) 3
Rate of progression of JSN was defined as narrowing in joint space width over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in mm/year over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. KLG system was a method of classifying the severity of knee OA using five grades (0 [no severity] to 4 [maximum severity], higher grade indicating worse knee function). Negative values of slope indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Composite Index Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
The WOMAC was a self-administered, disease-specific instrument which probed clinically important, participant relevant symptoms in the areas of pain, stiffness, and physical function in participants with OA of the knee. The WOMAC composite index was the sum of 24 individual questions regarding subscales of pain, stiffness and physical function (for each item score range: 0 [minimum] to 4 [maximum], higher score indicating worse knee condition). Total score was sum of the 3 subscale scores, giving a possible overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 96 (maximum). Higher score indicating the worse level of pain, stiffness and physical function.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
The WOMAC pain subscale was comprised of 5 questions regarding the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC pain subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse pain. An overall subscale score range of 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Stiffness Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease in which the participant moved the knee with OA. The WOMAC stiffness subscale was comprised of 2 questions regarding the degree of stiffness experienced in the study knee. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse stiffness. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
The WOMAC physical function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC physical function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritic Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Pain VAS was a self-administered instrument, a 100 millimeter (mm) line marked by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 (mm) =no pain to 100 (mm) =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using the scale ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), where 1 =very good, 2 =good, 3 =fair, 4 =poor and 5 =very poor. Higher scores indicating worse condition.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Physician assessed the overall impact of arthritis on the participant's daily life. Participant's condition was rated by the physician using the scale ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), where 1= very good, 2= good, 3= fair, 4= poor and 5= very poor. Higher scores indicating worse condition.
Change From Baseline in Pain After a 50-foot Walk Using Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
The pain VAS following a 50 foot walk was a single-item, self-administered instrument. Participants were asked to assess the pain due to OA in their study knee after a 50-foot walk. Participants responded on a VAS scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). Higher scores indicating more pain.
Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Total Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
The OA pain and assessment tool-knee joint is also known as the intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) scale. The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint was an 11-item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. The total score was calculated by adding the 11 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse health.
Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Constant Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint constant pain subscale was a 5 item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Overall subscale score was calculated by adding the 5 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse constant pain.
Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Intermittent Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint intermittent pain subscale score a 6 item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Overall subscale score was calculated by adding the 6 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse intermittent pain.
Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Knee Function Survey Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
The OARSI knee function survey was an 11-item scale with each item scored 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. The total score was the sum of the 11 items and ranged from 0 (minimum) to 44 (maximum), where higher scores indicating worse health condition.
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS) Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
The KOOS-PS was used to rate participant's opinions about the difficulties they experienced with activity due to problems with their knee. It was a 7-item scale, each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Total score was calculated by adding the responses to 7 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse health condition.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 16.18 (minimum) to 57.11 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better physical functioning.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Role - Physical Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 18.45 (minimum) to 56.62 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better role-physical.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 19.23 (minimum) to 60.88 (maximum), with higher scores indicating lower bodily pain.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 General Health Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 16.75 (minimum) to 63.72 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better general health.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Vitality Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 22.02 (minimum) to 69.92 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better vitality.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Social Functioning Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 13.38 (minimum) to 56.40 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better social functioning.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Role-Emotional Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 10.25 (minimum) to 55.68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better role-emotional.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Mental Health Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 8.02 (minimum) to 63.43 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better mental health.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Physical Health Component Score at Month 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 22.88 (minimum) to 58.69 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better physical health.
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Mental Health Component Score at Month 12 and 24
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 11.11 (minimum) to 61.67 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better mental health.
Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) Mobility Domain Score
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D mobility domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problem), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health (confined to bed). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D mobility domain score were reported in this measure.
Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Self-Care Domain Score
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D self-care domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problems with self-care), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health (unable to wash or dress). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D self-care domain score were reported in this measure.
Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Usual Activity Domain Score
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D usual activity domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problems), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health state (unable to perform usual activities). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D usual activity domain score were reported in this measure.
Number of Participants With EuroQo-5D Pain and Discomfort Domain Score
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D pain and discomfort domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no pain and discomfort), 2 =moderate health (moderate pain and discomfort) and 3 =worst health state (extreme pain and discomfort). Higher scores indicated worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D pain and discomfort domain score were reported in this measure.
Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Anxiety and Depression Domain Score
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. EQ-5D anxiety and depression domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (not anxious, depressed), 2 =moderate health (moderately anxious, depressed) and 3 =worst health (extremely anxious, depressed). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D anxiety and depression domain score were reported in this measure.
EuroQoL-5D Visual Analog Scale Score
The EQ-5D VAS score was a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. It was a visual analogue scale that ranged from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), with higher scores indicating a better health condition.
Number of Participants With Increase in Total Analgesic Medication Use
Increase in total analgesic medication use for OA in the study knee was a comparison back to baseline of an increased and sustained use of standard background and/or rescue medication for more than 28 days as measured at the Month 12 and 24 visits. Only medications for OA knee pain were considered.
Number of Participants With Decrease in Total Analgesic Medication Use
Decrease in total analgesic medication use for OA in the study knee was a comparison back to baseline of a decreased and irregular use of standard background and/or rescue medication for more than 28 days as measured at the Month 12 and 24 visits. Only medications for OA knee pain were considered.
Patient Global Impression of Change Score
Patient global impression of change was a participant-rated instrument that measured change in participant's overall status on a 7-point scale ranging from: 1 =very much improved, 2 =much improved, 3 =minimally improved, 4 =no change, 5 =minimally worse, 6 =much worse and 7 =very much worse. Higher scores indicating worse condition.
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index
The OMERACT-OARSI responder index was used to determine whether participants may be considered responders to treatment. An OMERACT-OARSI responder was a participant who had a better response on the WOMAC pain subscale score, a better response on the WOMAC physical function subscale score or improvement on at least two of the three domains: WOMAC pain subscale score (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 20 [maximum], higher scores indicating more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale score (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 68 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse physical function) and patient global assessment of arthritic condition score (overall score range of 1 [minimum] to 5 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse condition). Number of participants who were OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this measure.
Number of Participants With Joint Space Narrowing Progression
JSN progressor was defined as a participant with a decrease in joint space width that was greater in magnitude than the smallest detectable difference (0.199 mm).
Number of Participants Applicable for Virtual Joint Replacement
A virtual joint replacement candidate was defined as a participant whose last two WOMAC pain subscale scores (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 20 [maximum], higher scores indicating more pain) were at least 8, last two WOMAC physical function subscale scores (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 68 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse physical function) were at least 28 and was a joint space narrowing progressor (a participant with a decrease in JSW that was greater in magnitude than the smallest detectable difference =0.199 mm).
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00565812
Brief Title
A Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled X-Ray Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of SD-6010 in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Acronym
ITIC
Official Title
A Long-Term, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled, Radiographic Study To Investigate The Safety And Efficacy Of Orally Administered SD-6010 In Subjects With Symptomatic Osteoarthritis Of The Knee
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2011 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this 2-year study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and disease modifying efficacy of SD 6010, an inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), in overweight and obese subjects with knee osteoarthritis. The efficacy of SD-6010 will be evaluated by radiography using joint space narrowing in the medial tibiofemoral compartment of the study knee as the primary endpoint.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis
Keywords
knee Osteoarthritis Disease Modifying Osteoarthritis Drug
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1457 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
200 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
High dose active comparator
Arm Title
50 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Low dose active comparator
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo comparator to be used for control purposes
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
SD-6010
Intervention Description
200 mg tablets once a day for 2 years
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
SD-6010
Intervention Description
50 mg tablets once a day for 2 years
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo tablets once a day for 2 years
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing
Description
Rate of progression of joint space narrowing (JSN) was defined as narrowing in joint space width (JSW) over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in millimeter per year (mm/year) over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. Negative values indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Month 24
Title
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2
Description
Rate of progression of JSN was defined as narrowing in joint space width over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in mm/year over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. KLG system was a method of classifying the severity of knee OA using five grades (0 [no severity] to 4 [maximum severity], higher grade indicating worse knee function). Negative values of slope indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Month 24
Title
Rate of Progression of Joint Space Narrowing in Participants With Kellgren and Lawrence Grade Equal to (=) 3
Description
Rate of progression of JSN was defined as narrowing in joint space width over the course of the study. It was measured radiographically in the medial tibiofemoral of knee of participants with OA. The slope reported in mm/year over a 2 year period was used to assess the rate of progression of JSN. KLG system was a method of classifying the severity of knee OA using five grades (0 [no severity] to 4 [maximum severity], higher grade indicating worse knee function). Negative values of slope indicating a worsening of osteoarthritis.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Month 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Composite Index Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The WOMAC was a self-administered, disease-specific instrument which probed clinically important, participant relevant symptoms in the areas of pain, stiffness, and physical function in participants with OA of the knee. The WOMAC composite index was the sum of 24 individual questions regarding subscales of pain, stiffness and physical function (for each item score range: 0 [minimum] to 4 [maximum], higher score indicating worse knee condition). Total score was sum of the 3 subscale scores, giving a possible overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 96 (maximum). Higher score indicating the worse level of pain, stiffness and physical function.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The WOMAC pain subscale was comprised of 5 questions regarding the amount of pain experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC pain subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse pain. An overall subscale score range of 0 (minimum) to 20 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Pain Stiffness Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease in which the participant moved the knee with OA. The WOMAC stiffness subscale was comprised of 2 questions regarding the degree of stiffness experienced in the study knee. The WOMAC stiffness subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse stiffness. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 8 (maximum), with higher scores indicating more stiffness.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index Physical Function Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The WOMAC physical function subscale referred to the participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was comprised of 17 questions regarding the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in the study knee. The WOMAC physical function subscale score for each question ranged from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), higher scores signified worse physical function. An overall score range of 0 (minimum) to 68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating worse physical function.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Arthritic Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
Pain VAS was a self-administered instrument, a 100 millimeter (mm) line marked by participant. Intensity of pain range (over past week): 0 (mm) =no pain to 100 (mm) =worst possible pain. Higher score indicating severe pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using the scale ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), where 1 =very good, 2 =good, 3 =fair, 4 =poor and 5 =very poor. Higher scores indicating worse condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritic Condition Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
Physician assessed the overall impact of arthritis on the participant's daily life. Participant's condition was rated by the physician using the scale ranging from 1 (minimum) to 5 (maximum), where 1= very good, 2= good, 3= fair, 4= poor and 5= very poor. Higher scores indicating worse condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Pain After a 50-foot Walk Using Pain Visual Analog Scale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The pain VAS following a 50 foot walk was a single-item, self-administered instrument. Participants were asked to assess the pain due to OA in their study knee after a 50-foot walk. Participants responded on a VAS scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 100 (severe pain). Higher scores indicating more pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Total Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The OA pain and assessment tool-knee joint is also known as the intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP) scale. The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint was an 11-item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. The total score was calculated by adding the 11 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse health.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Constant Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint constant pain subscale was a 5 item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Overall subscale score was calculated by adding the 5 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse constant pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Pain Assessment Tool-Knee Joint Intermittent Pain Subscale Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The OA pain assessment tool-knee joint intermittent pain subscale score a 6 item scale, with each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Overall subscale score was calculated by adding the 6 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse intermittent pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Knee Function Survey Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The OARSI knee function survey was an 11-item scale with each item scored 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. The total score was the sum of the 11 items and ranged from 0 (minimum) to 44 (maximum), where higher scores indicating worse health condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS) Score at Month 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24
Description
The KOOS-PS was used to rate participant's opinions about the difficulties they experienced with activity due to problems with their knee. It was a 7-item scale, each item scored from 0 (minimum) to 4 (maximum), where 4 indicated worst health condition. Total score was calculated by adding the responses to 7 items and rescaled to a 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum) scale, where higher scores indicating worse health condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Functioning Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 16.18 (minimum) to 57.11 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better physical functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Role - Physical Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 18.45 (minimum) to 56.62 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better role-physical.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 19.23 (minimum) to 60.88 (maximum), with higher scores indicating lower bodily pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 General Health Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 16.75 (minimum) to 63.72 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better general health.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Vitality Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 22.02 (minimum) to 69.92 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better vitality.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Social Functioning Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 13.38 (minimum) to 56.40 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better social functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Role-Emotional Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 10.25 (minimum) to 55.68 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better role-emotional.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Mental Health Domain Score at Month 12 and 24
Description
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 8.02 (minimum) to 63.43 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better mental health.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Physical Health Component Score at Month 12 and 24
Description
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 22.88 (minimum) to 58.69 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better physical health.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 Mental Health Component Score at Month 12 and 24
Description
The SF-36 was a participant administered scale assessing general quality of life. It consisted of self-administered 36-item questionnaire that measured 8 health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. These 8 domains were also summarized as physical and mental component scores. The score for each domain and component score was the mean of the individual question scores, which were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher scores indicated highest level of health/functioning. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores and rescaled to a score range of 11.11 (minimum) to 61.67 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better mental health.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) Mobility Domain Score
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D mobility domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problem), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health (confined to bed). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D mobility domain score were reported in this measure.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Self-Care Domain Score
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D self-care domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problems with self-care), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health (unable to wash or dress). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D self-care domain score were reported in this measure.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Usual Activity Domain Score
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D usual activity domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no problems), 2 =moderate health (some problems) and 3 =worst health state (unable to perform usual activities). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D usual activity domain score were reported in this measure.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Number of Participants With EuroQo-5D Pain and Discomfort Domain Score
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, anxiety and depression. EQ-5D pain and discomfort domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (no pain and discomfort), 2 =moderate health (moderate pain and discomfort) and 3 =worst health state (extreme pain and discomfort). Higher scores indicated worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D pain and discomfort domain score were reported in this measure.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Number of Participants With EuroQoL-5D Anxiety and Depression Domain Score
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life. Health state profile component assessed level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. EQ-5D anxiety and depression domain score scale ranged from 1 (minimum) to 3 (maximum), where 1 =better health (not anxious, depressed), 2 =moderate health (moderately anxious, depressed) and 3 =worst health (extremely anxious, depressed). Higher scores indicating worse health condition. Participants with EQ-5D anxiety and depression domain score were reported in this measure.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
EuroQoL-5D Visual Analog Scale Score
Description
The EQ-5D VAS score was a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. It was a visual analogue scale that ranged from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), with higher scores indicating a better health condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12, 24
Title
Number of Participants With Increase in Total Analgesic Medication Use
Description
Increase in total analgesic medication use for OA in the study knee was a comparison back to baseline of an increased and sustained use of standard background and/or rescue medication for more than 28 days as measured at the Month 12 and 24 visits. Only medications for OA knee pain were considered.
Time Frame
Month 12, 24
Title
Number of Participants With Decrease in Total Analgesic Medication Use
Description
Decrease in total analgesic medication use for OA in the study knee was a comparison back to baseline of a decreased and irregular use of standard background and/or rescue medication for more than 28 days as measured at the Month 12 and 24 visits. Only medications for OA knee pain were considered.
Time Frame
Month 12, 24
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change Score
Description
Patient global impression of change was a participant-rated instrument that measured change in participant's overall status on a 7-point scale ranging from: 1 =very much improved, 2 =much improved, 3 =minimally improved, 4 =no change, 5 =minimally worse, 6 =much worse and 7 =very much worse. Higher scores indicating worse condition.
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index
Description
The OMERACT-OARSI responder index was used to determine whether participants may be considered responders to treatment. An OMERACT-OARSI responder was a participant who had a better response on the WOMAC pain subscale score, a better response on the WOMAC physical function subscale score or improvement on at least two of the three domains: WOMAC pain subscale score (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 20 [maximum], higher scores indicating more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale score (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 68 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse physical function) and patient global assessment of arthritic condition score (overall score range of 1 [minimum] to 5 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse condition). Number of participants who were OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this measure.
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
Number of Participants With Joint Space Narrowing Progression
Description
JSN progressor was defined as a participant with a decrease in joint space width that was greater in magnitude than the smallest detectable difference (0.199 mm).
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
Number of Participants Applicable for Virtual Joint Replacement
Description
A virtual joint replacement candidate was defined as a participant whose last two WOMAC pain subscale scores (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 20 [maximum], higher scores indicating more pain) were at least 8, last two WOMAC physical function subscale scores (overall score range of 0 [minimum] to 68 [maximum], higher scores indicating worse physical function) were at least 28 and was a joint space narrowing progressor (a participant with a decrease in JSW that was greater in magnitude than the smallest detectable difference =0.199 mm).
Time Frame
Month 24
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to 7-10 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Adverse events included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 7-10 days after last dose of study drug (Week 111)
Title
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
Description
Atrial (enlargement, fibrillation, premature beat), axis deviation, atrioventricular (accelerated conduction, first/second degree block), left anterior and posterior hemiblock, left atrial hypertrophy, left and right (complete/incomplete bundle branch block, ventricular hypertrophy), QRS (high/low voltage, nonspecific, prolongation greater than [>]140 milliseconds [msec]), junctional/paced rhythm, intraventricular conduction delay (>120 msec), early repolarization, ventricular premature contraction and beat, prolonged QTC, sinus (arrhythmia, bradycardia/tachycardia), supraventricular extra systole and premature beat, short PR syndrome. Abnormal Q-wave (>=30 msec), P-wave left/right atrial abnormality, T-wave flattened/inverted abnormality, U-wave abnormality, ST-T indeterminate abnormality, ST-T nonspecific changes, ST-T changes compatible with ischemia and pericarditis. ECG findings were judged by investigators for qualitative evaluation of abnormalities.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6, 12, 18, 24
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Description
Criteria for laboratory abnormalities: Hemoglobin (Hgb), hematocrit (hct), red blood cell(RBC) count: less than(<)0.8*lower limit of normal(LLN), platelet: <0.5*LLN or greater than (>)1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell (WBC): <0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN, lymphocyte, neutrophil:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN, basophil, eosinophil, monocyte:>1.2*ULN; total bilirubin >1.5*ULN, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gammaglutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase:> 3.0*ULN, total protein, albumin: <0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine:>1.3*ULN, uric acid >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate: <0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN, phosphate <0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN, lipase >1.5*ULN; urine (specific gravity <1.003 or >1.030, pH <4.5 or >8, glucose, ketones, protein, blood/Hgb greater than or equal to [>=]1); pancreatic amylase >1.5*ULN.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 111
Title
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96
Description
Blood pressure (BP) was measured by sphygmomanometer while participant was in supine position. Conditions were kept constant from visit to visit including observer, participant's same arm, cuff size, supine position, location, temperature, noise level. The same size BP cuff which was properly sized and calibrated, was used to measure BP each time.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96
Title
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96
Description
BP was measured by sphygmomanometer while participant was in supine position. Conditions were kept constant from visit to visit including observer, participant's same arm, cuff size, supine position, location, temperature, noise level. The same size BP cuff which was properly sized and calibrated, was used to measure BP each time.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96
Title
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects aged >= 40 years with a BMI >= 25 and <= 40 kg/m2
In the past, has been diagnosed with knee OA
Radiographic evidence of OA in the study knee
Exclusion Criteria:
A diagnosis of any other rheumatic disease
Current conditions in the study knee that would confound efficacy
Selected, traditional clinical safety and laboratory parameters
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Brookwood Internists, P.C.
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Greystone Medical Center
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35242
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pivotal Research Centers
City
Peoria
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85381
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Research Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85023
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pivotal Research Centers
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85027
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Arizona
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85724
Country
United States
Facility Name
Martin Bowen Hefley Orthopedics
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Teton Research, LLC
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Med Center
City
Carmichael
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95608
Country
United States
Facility Name
College Hospital Costa Mesa
City
Costa Mesa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92627
Country
United States
Facility Name
NeuroNetwork Trials
City
Costa Mesa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92627
Country
United States
Facility Name
Med Investigations, Inc.
City
Fair Oaks
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95628
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sierra Clinical Research
City
Roseville
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95661
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California Davis Health System
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California Davis
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Scripps Clinic-Clinical Research
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92128
Country
United States
Facility Name
Plaza Medical Imaging
City
Santa Ana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Denver Internal Medicine Group
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mountain View Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80209
Country
United States
Facility Name
New West Physicians Clinical Research
City
Golden
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Radiology Consultants
City
Fairfield
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06824
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Radiology Consultants
City
Stamford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06902
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
City
Stamford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06905
Country
United States
Facility Name
New England Research Associates, LLC
City
Trumbull
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeastern Arthritis Center
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeastern Imaging & Diagnostics
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeastern Integrated Medical, PL, d/b/a Florida Medical Research Institute
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jacksonville Center for Clincal Research
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Hospital Jacksonville
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gold Coast Research, LLC
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33317
Country
United States
Facility Name
Marin E. Hale, M.D., P.A.
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33317
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sabiha Khan, M.D.
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kanner, Mendelson, Shteinman, LLC
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33407
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33407
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology and Endocrinology Specialists of the Palm Beaches, P.A.
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33407
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Georgia Clinical Research
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Georgia Clinical Research
City
Woodstock
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30189
Country
United States
Facility Name
East-West Medical Research Institute
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96814
Country
United States
Facility Name
Preventive Medicine
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rehabilitation Institue of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
NorthShore University HealthSystem
City
Evanston
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60201
Country
United States
Facility Name
NorthShore University HealthSystem
City
Glenview
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Investigation Specialists, Inc.
City
Gurnee
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60031
Country
United States
Facility Name
Illinois Bone and Joint Institute, LLC
City
Morton Grove
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60053
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Arthritis Center
City
Springfield
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
62704
Country
United States
Facility Name
NorthShore University HealthSystem
City
Vernon Hills
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60061
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ronald Keith Stegemoller, American Health Network
City
Avon
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46123
Country
United States
Facility Name
Floyd Memorial Hospital
City
New Albany
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47150
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heartland Research Associates, LLC
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Family Medicine East, Chartered/Radiology
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heartland Research Associates, LLC
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Office of Manoj Kohli, M.D.
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40517
Country
United States
Facility Name
L-MARC Research Center
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Commonwealth Biomedical Research, LLC
City
Madisonville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
42431
Country
United States
Facility Name
TFD Research, LLC
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology Associates
City
Portland
State/Province
Maine
ZIP/Postal Code
04102
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Rheumatology and Bone Research
City
Rockville
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20850
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Rheumatology and Bone Research
City
Wheaton
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20902
Country
United States
Facility Name
Miray Medical Center
City
Brockton
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02301
Country
United States
Facility Name
Phase III Clinical Research
City
Fall River
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02720
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fall River Clinical Research
City
Fall River
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02721
Country
United States
Facility Name
HCI Metromedic Walk-In
City
New Bedford
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02740
Country
United States
Facility Name
MedVadis Research Corporation
City
Wellesley Hills
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02481-2106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fallon Clinic, Inc. (Drug Shipment)
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Fallon Clinic, Inc.
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cadillac Clinical Research, LLC, located at Great Lakes Family Care
City
Cadillac
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis and Osteoporosis Treatment and Research Center
City
Flowood
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Planters Clinic
City
Port Gibson
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39150
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc.
City
Tupelo
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
38801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mercy Medical Group/Woodlake Research
City
Clarkson Valley
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63011
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dynamic Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Joan Prouty Moore, MD
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopaedic and Occupational Medicine
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64114
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Pharmaceutical Research, P.C.
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Affiliated Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Office of Michael Mall, M.D.
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Nevada Imaging Centers
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89117
Country
United States
Facility Name
Nevada Imaging Centers
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89118
Country
United States
Facility Name
Office of Danka Michaels, MD
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89128
Country
United States
Facility Name
Office of Stephen H. Miller, MD
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89144
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regional Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Endwell
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13760
Country
United States
Facility Name
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10003
Country
United States
Facility Name
VirtualScopics, Inc.
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14625
Country
United States
Facility Name
Crouse Medical Practice, PLLC d/b/a Internist Associates of Central New York
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kernodle Clinic Inc.
City
Burlington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southeastern Radiology
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27407
Country
United States
Facility Name
PharmQuest
City
Greensboro
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27408
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Institute of the Carolinas, PLLC
City
Mooresville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28117
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Salisbury
City
Salisbury
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28144
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Healthcare/Research
City
Statesville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28625
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolina Arthritis Associates, PA
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28401
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Internal Medicine Associates
City
Fargo
State/Province
North Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
58103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lillestol Research, LLC
City
Fargo
State/Province
North Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
58103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advantage Diagnostics
City
Beachwood
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rapid Medical Research, Inc.
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbus Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Optimed Research, LLC
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lake Health Lyndhurst Clinic
City
Lyndhurst
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44124
Country
United States
Facility Name
East Penn Rheumatology Associates, PC
City
Bethlehem
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16635
Country
United States
Facility Name
BioImaging Technologies, Inc.
City
Newtown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18940
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island
City
Pawtucket
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02860
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology Associates
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29407
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc.
City
Greer
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29651
Country
United States
Facility Name
Parkway Medical Group
City
Fayetteville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37334
Country
United States
Facility Name
Holston Medical Group
City
Kingsport
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37660
Country
United States
Facility Name
D. Matthew Sellers MD PC
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37920
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southwind Medical Specialists
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38125
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor Research Institute
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Metroplex Clinical Research Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research San Antonio Northeast
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78217
Country
United States
Facility Name
South Texas Radiology Imaging Center
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78217
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oakwell Clinical Research, LLC
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78218
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pivotal Research Centers
City
Midvale
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84047
Country
United States
Facility Name
National Clinical Research - Norfolk, Inc.
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23502
Country
United States
Facility Name
National Clinical Research, Incorporated
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23294
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Pain Management
City
Virginia Beach
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23454
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tacoma Center for Arthritis Research, PS
City
Tacoma
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Investigation Specialists, Inc.
City
Kenosha
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53142
Country
United States
Facility Name
OMI - Organización Médica de Investigación
City
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1013AAR
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Saint Dennis Medical Group S.A.
City
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1034ACO
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Investigaciones Reumatológicas y Osteológicas S.R.L.
City
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1114AAH
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Instituto Médico Especializado (IME)
City
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1405BCH
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
IMAI Research
City
Buenos Aires
ZIP/Postal Code
C1425AWC
Country
Argentina
Facility Name
Menzies Research Institute
City
Hobart
State/Province
Tasmania
ZIP/Postal Code
7000
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Cliniques Universitaires St Luc
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg / Rheumatology
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Rheumatology Research Associates Ltd.
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T5M 0H4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Nexus Clinic Research
City
St. John's
State/Province
Newfoundland and Labrador
ZIP/Postal Code
A1A 5E8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
The Arthritis Program Research Group Inc.
City
Newmarket
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L3Y 3R7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Centre de Rhumatologie St-Louis
City
Sainte-Foy
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1W 4R4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Revmacentrum MUDr. Mostera, s.r.o.
City
Brno - Zidenice
ZIP/Postal Code
615 00
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Fakultni nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brne
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
656 91
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
MEDIPONT Plus, s.r.o.
City
Ceske Budejovice
ZIP/Postal Code
370 01
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
MEDIPONT, s.r.o.
City
Ceske Budejovice
ZIP/Postal Code
370 01
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
ARTMEDI UPD s r.o.
City
Hostivice
ZIP/Postal Code
253 01
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
DC Mediscan
City
Praha 11 - Chodov
ZIP/Postal Code
148 00
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
MediCentrum Praha, a.s.
City
Praha 11 - Chodov
ZIP/Postal Code
148 00
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Nemocnice Na Frantisku s poliklinikou
City
Praha 1
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Revmatologicky ustav
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Centrum pro zdravotnicke zabezpeceni sportovni reprezentace
City
Praha 6
ZIP/Postal Code
162 00
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Ustredni vojenska nemocnice Praha
City
Praha 6
ZIP/Postal Code
162 00
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
MSI - Muskuloskeletalni institut
City
Praha 6
ZIP/Postal Code
169 00
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Nemocnice Atlas, a.s.
City
Zlin
ZIP/Postal Code
760 01
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
PV-Medical s.r.o.
City
Zlin
ZIP/Postal Code
760 01
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Praxis fuer Orthopaedie, Chirotherapie und Akupunktur
City
Bad Hersfeld
ZIP/Postal Code
36251
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis fuer Orthopaedie
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12247
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinische Forschung Berlin-Buch
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13125
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis Dr. Thomas Jung
City
Deggingen
ZIP/Postal Code
73326
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinische Forschung Schwerin
City
Schwerin
ZIP/Postal Code
19055
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Orszagos Gerincgyogyaszati Kozpont
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1126
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Synexus Magyarorszag Kft.
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
H-1036
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Heves Megyei Onkormanyzat Markhot Ferenc Korhaz
City
Eger
ZIP/Postal Code
3300
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Bekes Megyei Kepviselo-testulet Pandy Kalman Korhaz, Reumatologia
City
Gyula
ZIP/Postal Code
5700
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Selye Janos Korhaz, Reumatologiai Szakrendelo
City
Komarom
ZIP/Postal Code
2900
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
MAV Korhaz es Rendelointezet
City
Szolnok
ZIP/Postal Code
H-5000
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Veszprem Megyei Onkormanyzat Csolnoky Ferenc Korhaz-Rendelointezet
City
Veszprem
ZIP/Postal Code
H-8200
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Azienda Sanitaria Genovese, Ospedale La Colletta, Dipartimento Apparato Locomotore
City
Arenzano
ZIP/Postal Code
16011
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Presidio Ospedaliero Augusto Murri, Reparto di Reumatologia
City
Jesi (Ancona)
ZIP/Postal Code
60035
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Luigi Sacco, Azienda Ospedaliera Polo Universitario Unita' Operativa di Reumatologia
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20157
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Centro Empresarial - Altavista Polo 4
City
Santiago de Surco
State/Province
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
Lima 33
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Instituto de Ginecologia y Reproducción & Cirugia Minimamente Invasiva
City
Santiago de Surco
State/Province
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
Lima 33
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Hospital Nacional "Alberto Sabogal Sologuren" - Essalud
City
Callao
ZIP/Postal Code
Callao-02
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Clínica San Felipe
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
L-11
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Hospital Nacional "Edgardo Rebagliati Martins" - Essalud
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
L-11
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Instituto Peruano del Hueso y la Articulación SAC.
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
L-27
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Hospital Maria Auxiliadora
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
L-29
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Centro Medico Corpac
City
Lima
ZIP/Postal Code
Lima-27
Country
Peru
Facility Name
NSZOZ "MEDICUS II" S.C. Irena Klimczak, Malgorzata Klimczak, Jerzy Klimczak
City
Cieszyn
ZIP/Postal Code
43-400
Country
Poland
Facility Name
"SYNEXUS SCM" Sp. z o.o.
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-088
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Katedra i Klinika Ortopedii i Traumatologii Narzadu Ruchu
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-556
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Russian State Medical University, Moscow Faculty, City Clinical Hospital #4
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115093
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Institute of Rheumatology
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
115522
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
City Alexandrovskaya Hospital
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
193312
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
L.G. Sokolov Clinical Hospital #122 of Federal Medical-Biology Agency of Russia, Central Polyclinic
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
194291
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedy Named After R. R. Vredena
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
195427
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
V. Interna klinika FN a LF UK
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
826 06
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Ivan Ujvari
City
Bratislava
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Narodny ustav reumatickych chorob
City
Piestany
ZIP/Postal Code
921 12
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Hospital Ntra. Sra. de La Esperanza
City
Santiago de Compostela
State/Province
A Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15705
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital General Universitario de Guadalajara
City
Guadalajara
ZIP/Postal Code
19002
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Nuestra Señora de Valme
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41014
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23144445
Citation
Hellio le Graverand MP, Clemmer RS, Redifer P, Brunell RM, Hayes CW, Brandt KD, Abramson SB, Manning PT, Miller CG, Vignon E. A 2-year randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study of oral selective iNOS inhibitor, cindunistat (SD-6010), in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Feb;72(2):187-95. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202239. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=A6171016&StudyName=A%20Long-Term%2C%20Placebo-Controlled%20X-Ray%20Study%20Investigating%20the%20Safety%20and%20Efficacy%20of%20SD-6010%20in%20Subjects%20with%20Osteoarthritis%20of%20the%20Knee
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.
Learn more about this trial
A Long-Term, Placebo-Controlled X-Ray Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of SD-6010 in Subjects With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs