A Maintenance Study With Niraparib Versus Placebo in Patients With Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer
Primary Purpose
Ovarian Neoplasms, Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Active comparator: Niraparib
placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Ovarian Neoplasms focused on measuring ovarian cancer, platinum sensitive, gBRCAmut, BRCA, high-grade serous histology, PARP inhibitor
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older, female, any race
- Histologically diagnosed ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer or primary peritoneal cancer
- High grade (or grade 3) serous histology or known to have gBRCAmut
- Has received at least 2 previous courses of platinum-containing therapy, and has disease that was considered platinum sensitive following the penultimate (next to last) platinum course (more than 6 month period between penultimate platinum regimen and progression of disease)
- Has responded to last the platinum regimen, remains in response and is enrolled on study within 8 weeks of completion of the last platinum regimen
- ECOG 0-1
- Adequate bone marrow, kidney and liver function
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known hypersensitivity to the components of niraparib
- Invasive cancer other than ovarian cancer within 2 years (except basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been definitely treated)
- Symptomatic uncontrolled brain metastasis
- Is pregnant or breast feeding
- Immunocompromised patients
- Known active hepatic disease
- Prior treatment with a known PARP inhibitor
Sites / Locations
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
- GSK Investigational Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Niraparib
Placebo
Arm Description
2:1 Ratio administered once daily continuously during a 28 day cycle.
Administered once daily continuously over a 28 day cycle.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort With Germline BReast CAncer Gene (BRCA) Mutation (gBRCA)
PFS was defined as the time between randomization and disease progression or death from any cause. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to assess disease progression was performed at baseline, every 8 weeks through cycle 14, and then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation. The objective assessment of disease progression was determined by means of central radiologic and clinical review, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST),version 1.1, which was performed in a blinded fashion. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort With No Germline BCRA With Homologous Recombination Deficiency-positive (HRD+) Tumors (Non-gBRCAmut HRD+)
PFS was defined as the time between randomization and disease progression or death from any cause. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to assess disease progression was performed at baseline, every 8 weeks through cycle 14, and then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation. The objective assessment of disease progression was determined by means of central radiologic and clinical review, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST),version 1.1, which was performed in a blinded fashion. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
PFS was defined as the time between randomization and disease progression or death from any cause. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to assess disease progression was performed at baseline, every 8 weeks through cycle 14, and then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation. The objective assessment of disease progression was determined by means of central radiologic and clinical review, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST),version 1.1, which was performed in a blinded fashion.PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Time to First Subsequent Therapy in Cohort With Germline BRCA Mutation (gBRCA)
The TFST was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the start date of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy or death.
Time to First Subsequent Therapy in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
The TFST was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the start date of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy or death
Chemotherapy-Free Interval in Cohort With Germline BRCA Mutation (gBRCA)
Chemotherapy-Free Interval was defined as the time from the last platinum therapy prior to randomization to the initiation of the next anti-cancer therapy after maintenance treatment
Chemotherapy-Free Interval in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
Chemotherapy-Free Interval was defined as the time from the last platinum therapy prior to randomization to the initiation of the next anti-cancer therapy after maintenance treatment
Progression-Free Survival 2 in Cohort With Germline BRCA Mutation (gBRCA)
Progression-Free Survival 2 was defined as the date of randomization in the current study to the earlier date of assessment of progression on the next anti-cancer therapy following study treatment or death due to any cause. Progression was determined by the investigator via clinical and radiographic assessment using the same criteria as used in the current study.
Progression-Free Survival 2 in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
Progression-Free Survival 2 was defined as the date of randomization in the current study to the earlier date of assessment of progression on the next anti-cancer therapy following study treatment or death due to any cause. Progression was determined by the investigator via clinical and radiographic assessment using the same criteria as used in the current study.
Overall Survival in Cohort With Germline BRCA Mutation (gBRCA)
Overall survival was defined as the date of randomization to the date of death by any cause.
Overall Survival in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
Overall survival was defined as the date of randomization to the date of death by any cause.
Time to Second Subsequent Therapy in Cohort With Germline BRCA Mutation (gBRCA)
TSST was defined as the date of randomization to the earlier of the start date of second follow-up anti-cancer treatment or death.
Time to Second Subsequent Therapy in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
TSST was defined as the date of randomization to the earlier of the start date of second follow-up anti-cancer treatment or death.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Post-progression
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Post-progression
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Scale, 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Post-progression
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Post-progression
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Baseline
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit"). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date.
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Post-progression
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Baseline
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit"). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date.
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Post-progression
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Number of Participants With Concordance of a Candidate Companion BRAC Analysis Diagnostic Test Compared to the Centralized BRCA Mutation Test Used in This Study
This will never be analyzed since the data for the candidate companion BRAC analysis diagnostic test was not collected which was to be compared with centralized BRCA mutation test used in this study.
Number of Participants With Concordance of a Candidate Companion HRD Diagnostic Test Compared to the HRD Test Used in This Study
This will never be analyzed since the data for the candidate companion HRD diagnostic test was not collected which was to be compared with HRD test used in this study.
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence that occurs in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is an important medical event(s) as per medical and scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not serious adverse events were considered as non serious adverse events. Data presented for this outcome measure is based on the data cut-off date of 31-March-2021, which aligns with the time of the study unblinding.
Number of Participants With Non-serious AEs and SAEs (Post-study Unblinding)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence that occurs in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is an important medical event(s) as per medical and scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not serious adverse events were considered as non serious adverse events. The data is presented for post-study unblinding duration 01-Apr-2021 to 26-Dec-2021
Number of Participants With Non-serious AEs and SAEs in FE Sub-study
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence that occurs in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is an important medical event(s) as per medical and scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not serious adverse events were considered as non serious adverse events.
Number of Participants With Non-serious AEs and SAEs in QTc Sub-study
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence that occurs in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is an important medical event(s) as per medical and scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not serious adverse events were considered as non serious adverse events.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) Following Administration of Niraparib (FE Sub-study)
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze AUC(0-infinity) of niraparib.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-last]) Following Administration of Niraparib (FE Sub-study)
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze the AUC(0-last) of niraparib.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Following Administration of Niraparib (FE Sub-study)
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze the maximum observed plasma concentration of niraparib.
Time to Reach Maximum (Tmax) Following Administration of Niraparib (FE Sub-study)
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze the tmax of niraparib.
Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) Following Administration of Niraparib (FE Sub-study)
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze the t1/2 of niraparib.
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline QT Interval Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Greater Than Pre-specified Thresholds
12-lead electrocardiogram was obtained at indicated time points using an automated electrocardiogram machine that measured QTcF interval. The number of participants with maximum post-Baseline ECG value exceeding the following limits have been reported: QTcF interval >450 and <= 480 milliseconds (msec) and >500 msec.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01847274
First Posted
April 11, 2013
Last Updated
May 31, 2023
Sponsor
Tesaro, Inc.
Collaborators
European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups (ENGOT), Myriad Genetics, Inc., US Oncology Research, Sarah Cannon, Cooperative Ovarian Cancer Group (COGI), Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01847274
Brief Title
A Maintenance Study With Niraparib Versus Placebo in Patients With Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer
Official Title
A Phase 3 Randomized Double-blind Trial of Maintenance With Niraparib Versus Placebo in Patients With Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 21, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 22, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 26, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Tesaro, Inc.
Collaborators
European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial Groups (ENGOT), Myriad Genetics, Inc., US Oncology Research, Sarah Cannon, Cooperative Ovarian Cancer Group (COGI), Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of niraparib as maintenance in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer patients who have either gBRCAmut or a tumor with high-grade serous histology and who have responded to their most recent chemotherapy containing a platinum agent. Niraparib is an orally active PARP inhibitor. Niraparib or placebo (in a 2:1 ratio) will be administered once daily continuously during a 28-day cycle. Health-related quality of life will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Ovarian Symptom Index (FOSI), European Quality of Life scale, 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D), and a neuropathy questionnaire. Safety and tolerability will be assessed by clinical review of adverse events (AEs), physical examinations, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and safety laboratory values.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy of niraparib as maintenance therapy in patients who have platinum sensitive ovarian cancer as assessed by the prolongation of progression free survival (PFS).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ovarian Neoplasms, Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer
Keywords
ovarian cancer, platinum sensitive, gBRCAmut, BRCA, high-grade serous histology, PARP inhibitor
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
596 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Niraparib
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
2:1 Ratio administered once daily continuously during a 28 day cycle.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Administered once daily continuously over a 28 day cycle.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Active comparator: Niraparib
Other Intervention Name(s)
Niraparib
Intervention Description
Niraparib vs placebo 2:1 ratio
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort With Germline BReast CAncer Gene (BRCA) Mutation (gBRCA)
Description
PFS was defined as the time between randomization and disease progression or death from any cause. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to assess disease progression was performed at baseline, every 8 weeks through cycle 14, and then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation. The objective assessment of disease progression was determined by means of central radiologic and clinical review, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST),version 1.1, which was performed in a blinded fashion. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
Time Frame
From date of randomization to the earliest date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to 7 years 7 months and 4 days
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort With No Germline BCRA With Homologous Recombination Deficiency-positive (HRD+) Tumors (Non-gBRCAmut HRD+)
Description
PFS was defined as the time between randomization and disease progression or death from any cause. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to assess disease progression was performed at baseline, every 8 weeks through cycle 14, and then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation. The objective assessment of disease progression was determined by means of central radiologic and clinical review, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST),version 1.1, which was performed in a blinded fashion. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
Time Frame
From date of randomization to the earliest date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
Description
PFS was defined as the time between randomization and disease progression or death from any cause. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging to assess disease progression was performed at baseline, every 8 weeks through cycle 14, and then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation. The objective assessment of disease progression was determined by means of central radiologic and clinical review, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST),version 1.1, which was performed in a blinded fashion.PD is defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study.
Time Frame
From date of randomization to the earliest date of disease progression or death from any cause, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to First Subsequent Therapy in Cohort With Germline BRCA Mutation (gBRCA)
Description
The TFST was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the start date of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy or death.
Time Frame
From date of randomization to the earliest date of first subsequent therapy or death, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Time to First Subsequent Therapy in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
Description
The TFST was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the start date of the first subsequent anti-cancer therapy or death
Time Frame
From date of randomization to the earliest date of first subsequent therapy or death, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Chemotherapy-Free Interval in Cohort With Germline BRCA Mutation (gBRCA)
Description
Chemotherapy-Free Interval was defined as the time from the last platinum therapy prior to randomization to the initiation of the next anti-cancer therapy after maintenance treatment
Time Frame
From date of last platinum therapy prior to randomization to the initiation of the next anti-cancer therapy after maintenance treatment, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Chemotherapy-Free Interval in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
Description
Chemotherapy-Free Interval was defined as the time from the last platinum therapy prior to randomization to the initiation of the next anti-cancer therapy after maintenance treatment
Time Frame
From date of last platinum therapy prior to randomization to the initiation of the next anti-cancer therapy after maintenance treatment, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Progression-Free Survival 2 in Cohort With Germline BRCA Mutation (gBRCA)
Description
Progression-Free Survival 2 was defined as the date of randomization in the current study to the earlier date of assessment of progression on the next anti-cancer therapy following study treatment or death due to any cause. Progression was determined by the investigator via clinical and radiographic assessment using the same criteria as used in the current study.
Time Frame
From treatment randomization to the earlier of the date of disease progression on the next anti-cancer therapy following study treatment or death due to any cause, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Progression-Free Survival 2 in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
Description
Progression-Free Survival 2 was defined as the date of randomization in the current study to the earlier date of assessment of progression on the next anti-cancer therapy following study treatment or death due to any cause. Progression was determined by the investigator via clinical and radiographic assessment using the same criteria as used in the current study.
Time Frame
From treatment randomization to the earlier of the date of disease progression on the next anti-cancer therapy following study treatment or death due to any cause, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Overall Survival in Cohort With Germline BRCA Mutation (gBRCA)
Description
Overall survival was defined as the date of randomization to the date of death by any cause.
Time Frame
From treatment randomization to date of death by any cause, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Overall Survival in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
Description
Overall survival was defined as the date of randomization to the date of death by any cause.
Time Frame
From treatment randomization to date of death by any cause, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Time to Second Subsequent Therapy in Cohort With Germline BRCA Mutation (gBRCA)
Description
TSST was defined as the date of randomization to the earlier of the start date of second follow-up anti-cancer treatment or death.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the start date of the second subsequent anti-cancer therapy, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Time to Second Subsequent Therapy in Cohort With No Germline BRCA Mutation
Description
TSST was defined as the date of randomization to the earlier of the start date of second follow-up anti-cancer treatment or death.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the start date of the second subsequent anti-cancer therapy, up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
Description
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 2 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
Description
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 4 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
Description
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 6 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Post-progression
Description
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Each cycle was of 28 days) and up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
Description
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 2 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
Description
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 4 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
Description
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 6 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Post-progression
Description
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Symptom Index is a validated, 8-item measure of symptom response to treatment for ovarian cancer. Participants respond to their symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale score from "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). The total score was calculated by multiplying the sum of all items scored by 8 and dividing the result by the number of responses. The total symptom index was calculated as the total of the 8 scores, ranging from 0 ("severely symptomatic") to 32 ("asymptomatic"). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life Scale, 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
Description
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 2 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
Description
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 4 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
Description
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 6 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Post-progression
Description
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
Description
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 2 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
Description
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 4 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
Description
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and at Cycle 6 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Post-progression
Description
EQ-5D-5L is a well-validated, general preference-based, health-related Quality of Life (QoL) instrument. The EQ-5D-5L encompasses 5 domains, asking participants to rate their perceived health state today on the following dimensions: Mobility, Self-Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each domain has 5 possible levels: "no problems" (Level 1), "slight problems" (Level 2), "moderate problems" (Level 3), "severe problems" (Level 4), and "extreme problems" (Level 5). Responses for 5 dimensions together formed a 5-figure description of health state (e.g.11111 indicates no problems in all 5 dimensions). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the Baseline value from the post-dose visit value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Baseline
Description
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit"). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date.
Time Frame
At Baseline
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
Description
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Time Frame
At Cycle 2 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
Description
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Time Frame
At Cycle 4 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
Description
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Time Frame
At Cycle 6 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With Germline BRCA at Post-progression
Description
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Time Frame
Up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Baseline
Description
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit"). Baseline was latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before randomization date.
Time Frame
At Baseline
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 2
Description
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Time Frame
At Cycle 2 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 4
Description
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Time Frame
At Cycle 4 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Cycle 6
Description
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Time Frame
At Cycle 6 (Each cycle was of 28 days)
Title
Number of Participants With Response to Neuropathy Questionnaire in Cohort With no Germline BRCA at Post-progression
Description
A Neuropathy Questionnaire measures the participant's symptom experience over the past 7 days using a 5-point Likert scale of "not at all" (0) to "very much" (4). There are 2 items that ask if the participant's feet (item 1) or hands (item 2) feel numb or have prickling/tingling feelings. The Neuropathy Questionnaire was used to determine the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) status of each participant as well as provide an anchor for interpreting the impact of CIPN on participant's QoL. Two thresholds were used. For the first, a participant was determined to have CIPN if a score greater than 0 ("not at all") was recorded for either item. For the second, CIPN was assigned if a participant recorded a score greater than 1 ("a little bit").
Time Frame
Up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Number of Participants With Concordance of a Candidate Companion BRAC Analysis Diagnostic Test Compared to the Centralized BRCA Mutation Test Used in This Study
Description
This will never be analyzed since the data for the candidate companion BRAC analysis diagnostic test was not collected which was to be compared with centralized BRCA mutation test used in this study.
Time Frame
Up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Number of Participants With Concordance of a Candidate Companion HRD Diagnostic Test Compared to the HRD Test Used in This Study
Description
This will never be analyzed since the data for the candidate companion HRD diagnostic test was not collected which was to be compared with HRD test used in this study.
Time Frame
Up to 7 years, 7 months and 4 days
Title
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious AEs (SAEs)
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence that occurs in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is an important medical event(s) as per medical and scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not serious adverse events were considered as non serious adverse events. Data presented for this outcome measure is based on the data cut-off date of 31-March-2021, which aligns with the time of the study unblinding.
Time Frame
Up to 7 years, 7 months and 6 days
Title
Number of Participants With Non-serious AEs and SAEs (Post-study Unblinding)
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence that occurs in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is an important medical event(s) as per medical and scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not serious adverse events were considered as non serious adverse events. The data is presented for post-study unblinding duration 01-Apr-2021 to 26-Dec-2021
Time Frame
Up to 8 months, 26 days
Title
Number of Participants With Non-serious AEs and SAEs in FE Sub-study
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence that occurs in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is an important medical event(s) as per medical and scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not serious adverse events were considered as non serious adverse events.
Time Frame
Up to 2 years, 3 months and 11 days
Title
Number of Participants With Non-serious AEs and SAEs in QTc Sub-study
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence that occurs in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose which results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly or birth defect, is an important medical event(s) as per medical and scientific judgment. Adverse events which were not serious adverse events were considered as non serious adverse events.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years 10 months and 22 days
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC[0-infinity]) Following Administration of Niraparib (FE Sub-study)
Description
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze AUC(0-infinity) of niraparib.
Time Frame
Pre-dose and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours post dose
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-last]) Following Administration of Niraparib (FE Sub-study)
Description
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze the AUC(0-last) of niraparib.
Time Frame
Pre-dose (Day -1) and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours post dose
Title
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Following Administration of Niraparib (FE Sub-study)
Description
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze the maximum observed plasma concentration of niraparib.
Time Frame
Pre-dose (Day -1) and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours post dose
Title
Time to Reach Maximum (Tmax) Following Administration of Niraparib (FE Sub-study)
Description
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze the tmax of niraparib.
Time Frame
Pre-dose (Day -1) and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours post dose
Title
Terminal Elimination Half-life (t1/2) Following Administration of Niraparib (FE Sub-study)
Description
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze the t1/2 of niraparib.
Time Frame
Pre-dose (Day -1) and at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120 hours post dose
Title
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline QT Interval Corrected by Fridericia's Formula (QTcF) Greater Than Pre-specified Thresholds
Description
12-lead electrocardiogram was obtained at indicated time points using an automated electrocardiogram machine that measured QTcF interval. The number of participants with maximum post-Baseline ECG value exceeding the following limits have been reported: QTcF interval >450 and <= 480 milliseconds (msec) and >500 msec.
Time Frame
At Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1, each cycle was of 28 days)
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years of age or older, female, any race
Histologically diagnosed ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer or primary peritoneal cancer
High grade (or grade 3) serous histology or known to have gBRCAmut
Has received at least 2 previous courses of platinum-containing therapy, and has disease that was considered platinum sensitive following the penultimate (next to last) platinum course (more than 6 month period between penultimate platinum regimen and progression of disease)
Has responded to last the platinum regimen, remains in response and is enrolled on study within 8 weeks of completion of the last platinum regimen
ECOG 0-1
Adequate bone marrow, kidney and liver function
Exclusion Criteria:
Known hypersensitivity to the components of niraparib
Invasive cancer other than ovarian cancer within 2 years (except basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been definitely treated)
Symptomatic uncontrolled brain metastasis
Is pregnant or breast feeding
Immunocompromised patients
Known active hepatic disease
Prior treatment with a known PARP inhibitor
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Studies
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85013
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85704
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90027
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94304
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94109
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06510
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34232
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33612
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46260
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Burlington
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01805
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55404
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Morristown
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07962-1956
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Farmington
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87401
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lake Success
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11042
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73104
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vancouver
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
98684
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Abington
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19001-3788
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19111
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02905
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78731
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75390
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
The Woodlands
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77380
Country
United States
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Graz
ZIP/Postal Code
A-8036
Country
Austria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Innsbruck
ZIP/Postal Code
A-6020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Edegem
ZIP/Postal Code
2650
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kortrijk
ZIP/Postal Code
8500
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Liège
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N 4N2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kelowna
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V1Y 5L3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 4E6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2L 4M1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1E2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4A 3J1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1H 5N4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aalborg
ZIP/Postal Code
9100
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Copenhagen
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-2100
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Herlev
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-2730
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Odense
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Besançon Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
25030
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59000
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Montpellier Cedex 5
ZIP/Postal Code
34298
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06189
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint Brieuc
ZIP/Postal Code
22015 cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saint-Herblain cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
44805
Country
France
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Heidelberg
State/Province
Baden-Wuerttemberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Muenchen
State/Province
Bayern
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Goettingen
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
37075
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hannover
State/Province
Niedersachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
30177
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Duesseldorf
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
40217
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Essen
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
45122
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Essen
State/Province
Nordrhein-Westfalen
ZIP/Postal Code
45136
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Dresden
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kiel
State/Province
Schleswig-Holstein
ZIP/Postal Code
24105
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13353
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Szolnok
ZIP/Postal Code
5004
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Haifa
ZIP/Postal Code
3109601
Country
Israel
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Holon
ZIP/Postal Code
58100
Country
Israel
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jerusalem
ZIP/Postal Code
91031
Country
Israel
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Jerusalem
ZIP/Postal Code
91120
Country
Israel
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kfar-Saba
ZIP/Postal Code
44281
Country
Israel
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rehovot
ZIP/Postal Code
76100
Country
Israel
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tel Aviv
ZIP/Postal Code
64239
Country
Israel
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tel Hashomer
ZIP/Postal Code
52621
Country
Israel
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00168
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Brescia
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
25123
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20141
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Catania
State/Province
Sicilia
ZIP/Postal Code
95126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
MIlano
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bergen
ZIP/Postal Code
5021
Country
Norway
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oslo
ZIP/Postal Code
0379
Country
Norway
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-207
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-219
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
94-029
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60-569
Country
Poland
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oviedo
State/Province
Asturias
ZIP/Postal Code
33011
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
8035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28033
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28040
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28046
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Palma de Mallorca
ZIP/Postal Code
07198
Country
Spain
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Linköping
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-581 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Lund
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-221 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-171 76
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nottingham
State/Province
Nottinghamshire
ZIP/Postal Code
NG5 1PB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yeovil
State/Province
Somerset
ZIP/Postal Code
BA21 4AT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Birmingham
State/Province
West Midlands
ZIP/Postal Code
B18 7QH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Bebington, Wirral
ZIP/Postal Code
CH63 4JY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
NW1 2PG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SE1 9RT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW3 6JJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
SW36JJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Maidstone
ZIP/Postal Code
ME16 9QQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Rhyl
ZIP/Postal Code
LL18 5UJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Taunton
ZIP/Postal Code
TA1 5DA
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27717299
Citation
Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Herrstedt J, Oza AM, Mahner S, Redondo A, Fabbro M, Ledermann JA, Lorusso D, Vergote I, Ben-Baruch NE, Marth C, Madry R, Christensen RD, Berek JS, Dorum A, Tinker AV, du Bois A, Gonzalez-Martin A, Follana P, Benigno B, Rosenberg P, Gilbert L, Rimel BJ, Buscema J, Balser JP, Agarwal S, Matulonis UA; ENGOT-OV16/NOVA Investigators. Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 1;375(22):2154-2164. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611310. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
36970052
Citation
Mirza MR, Lindahl G, Mahner S, Redondo A, Fabbro M, Rimel BJ, Herrstedt J, Oza AM, Canzler U, Berek JS, Gonzalez-Martin A, Follana P, Lord R, Azodi M, Estenson K, Wang Z, Li Y, Gupta D, Matulonis U, Feng B. Ad hoc Analysis of the Phase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA Study: Niraparib Efficacy in Germline BRCA Wild-type Recurrent Ovarian Cancer with Homologous Recombination Repair Defects. Cancer Res Commun. 2022 Nov 15;2(11):1436-1444. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0240. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35170751
Citation
Tattersall A, Ryan N, Wiggans AJ, Rogozinska E, Morrison J. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 16;2(2):CD007929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007929.pub4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32981695
Citation
Mirza MR, Benigno B, Dorum A, Mahner S, Bessette P, Barcelo IB, Berton-Rigaud D, Ledermann JA, Rimel BJ, Herrstedt J, Lau S, du Bois A, Herraez AC, Kalbacher E, Buscema J, Lorusso D, Vergote I, Levy T, Wang P, de Jong FA, Gupta D, Matulonis UA. Long-term safety in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with niraparib versus placebo: Results from the phase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Nov;159(2):442-448. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.006. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31518175
Citation
Matulonis UA, Walder L, Nottrup TJ, Bessette P, Mahner S, Gil-Martin M, Kalbacher E, Ledermann JA, Wenham RM, Woie K, Lau S, Marme F, Casado Herraez A, Hardy-Bessard AC, Banerjee S, Lindahl G, Benigno B, Buscema J, Travers K, Guy H, Mirza MR. Niraparib Maintenance Treatment Improves Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (TWiST) Versus Routine Surveillance in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A TWiST Analysis of the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;37(34):3183-3191. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00917. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31173551
Citation
Del Campo JM, Matulonis UA, Malander S, Provencher D, Mahner S, Follana P, Waters J, Berek JS, Woie K, Oza AM, Canzler U, Gil-Martin M, Lesoin A, Monk BJ, Lund B, Gilbert L, Wenham RM, Benigno B, Arora S, Hazard SJ, Mirza MR. Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer After a Partial Response to the Last Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 10;37(32):2968-2973. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02238. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30026000
Citation
Oza AM, Matulonis UA, Malander S, Hudgens S, Sehouli J, Del Campo JM, Berton-Rigaud D, Banerjee S, Scambia G, Berek JS, Lund B, Tinker AV, Hilpert F, Vazquez IP, D'Hondt V, Benigno B, Provencher D, Buscema J, Agarwal S, Mirza MR. Quality of life in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with niraparib versus placebo (ENGOT-OV16/NOVA): results from a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1117-1125. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30333-4. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29767688
Citation
Berek JS, Matulonis UA, Peen U, Ghatage P, Mahner S, Redondo A, Lesoin A, Colombo N, Vergote I, Rosengarten O, Ledermann J, Pineda M, Ellard S, Sehouli J, Gonzalez-Martin A, Berton-Rigaud D, Madry R, Reinthaller A, Hazard S, Guo W, Mirza MR. Safety and dose modification for patients receiving niraparib. Ann Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;29(8):1784-1792. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy181. Erratum In: Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):859.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.facingourrisk.org
Description
Facing our risk of cancer empowered website
Learn more about this trial
A Maintenance Study With Niraparib Versus Placebo in Patients With Platinum Sensitive Ovarian Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs