search
Back to results

A Multinational Study Comparing the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Two Medicines, Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Taken Together, or Separately, in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder (SYNERGY II)

Primary Purpose

Urinary Bladder Overactive, Overactive Bladder, Urgency Incontinence

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Solifenacin succinate
Mirabegron
Placebo to match solifenacin
Placebo to match mirabegron
Sponsored by
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Urinary Bladder Overactive focused on measuring Solifenacin Succinate, Mirabegron, Urinary Incontinence, Combination Therapy, Urgency, Nocturia, Overactive Bladder

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Main Inclusion at Screening (Visit 1):

  • Subject had completed study 178-CL-101 or study 905-EC-012 (This inclusion criterion would no longer apply once the recruitment for study 178-CL-101 and study 905-EC-012 had been completed. In that case the subject had to have symptoms of "wet" OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for at least 3 months);
  • Subject was willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly and able to measure his/her vital signs at home at stipulated time points, using the device provided by the study personnel, and to adequately record the readings;

Main Inclusion at Randomization (Visit 2):

  • Subject had a micturition frequency of on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the last 7 days of the micturition diary period (incontinence episode should not be counted as a micturition).
  • Subject had experienced at least 3 incontinence episodes during the last 7 days of the micturition diary period.
  • Subject had experienced on average at least 1 urgency episode (grade 3 or 4 on Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale [PPIUS]) per 24-hour period during the 7-day micturition diary period.

Exclusion Criteria:

Main Exclusion at Screening (Visit 1):

  • Subject had clinically significant bladder outflow obstruction at risk of urinary retention;
  • Subject had significant PVR volume (> 150 mL);
  • Subject had significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urgency incontinence where stress is the predominant factor;
  • Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization;
  • Subject had evidence of a UTI (urine culture containing > 100,000 cfu/mL), chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs;
  • Subject had intravesical treatment in the past 12 months with e.g., botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, capsaicin;

Main Exclusion at Randomization (Visit 2):

  • Subject had evidence of a urinary tract infection (UTI) (urine culture containing > 100,000 cfu/mL) as assessed in the Screening visit (V1) samples. The subject could be rescreened after successful treatment of the UTI (confirmed by a dipstick negative for nitrite).
  • Subject had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL as recorded in the micturition diary period.

Sites / Locations

  • Site US10049
  • Site US10112
  • Site US10104
  • Site US10021
  • Site US10122
  • Site US10082
  • Site US10132
  • Site US10133
  • Site US10149
  • Site US10003
  • Site US10106
  • Site US10595
  • Site US10053
  • Site US10060
  • Site US10097
  • Site US10148
  • Site US10153
  • Site US10091
  • Site US10150
  • Site US10124
  • Site US10134
  • Site US10009
  • Site US10554
  • Site US10037
  • Site US10127
  • Site US10120
  • Site US10078
  • Site US10088
  • Site US10025
  • Site US10558
  • Site US10282
  • Site US10114
  • Site US10110
  • Site US10154
  • Site US10553
  • Site US10002
  • Site US10047
  • Site US10011
  • Site US10015
  • Site US10026
  • Site US10040
  • Site US10168
  • Site US10126
  • Site US10028
  • Site US10076
  • Site US10129
  • Site US10062
  • Site US10050
  • Site US10067
  • Site US10109
  • Site US10541
  • Site US10008
  • Site US10017
  • Site US10167
  • Site US10250
  • Site US10248
  • Site US10063
  • Site US10012
  • Site US10166
  • Site US10079
  • Site US10023
  • Site US10101
  • Site US10006
  • Site US10065
  • Site US10085
  • Site US10219
  • Site US10093
  • Site US10090
  • Site US10105
  • Site US10111
  • Site US10083
  • Site US10013
  • Site US10004
  • Site US10155
  • Site US10135
  • Site AU61005
  • Site AU61007
  • Site AU61021
  • Site AU61011
  • Site AU61022
  • Site AU61010
  • Site AU61019
  • Site AU61015
  • Site AU61025
  • Site AU61002
  • Site AU61004
  • Site BE32004
  • Site BE32014
  • Site BE32012
  • Site BG35908
  • Site BG35902
  • Site BG35905
  • Site BG35903
  • Site CA15035
  • Site CA15033
  • Site CA15008
  • Site CA15001
  • Site CA15006
  • Site CA15003
  • Site CA15007
  • Site CA15013
  • Site CA15004
  • Site CA15026
  • Site CA15039
  • Site CA15020
  • Site CA15027
  • Site CA15040
  • Site CA15025
  • Site CZ42015
  • Site CZ42003
  • Site CZ42001
  • Site CZ42010
  • Site CZ42014
  • Site CZ42005
  • Site CZ42008
  • Site CZ42007
  • Site CZ42013
  • Site CZ42009
  • Site CZ42006
  • Site DK45013
  • Site EE37201
  • Site FI35801
  • Site DE49034
  • Site DE49031
  • Site DE49032
  • Site DE49003
  • Site DE49013
  • Site DE49008
  • Site DE49002
  • Site DE49010
  • Site DE49011
  • Site DE49001
  • Site DE49026
  • Site DE49014
  • Site HU36007
  • Site HU36005
  • Site HU36003
  • Site HU36001
  • Site HU36013
  • Site HU36012
  • Site IT39022
  • Site IT39007
  • Site IT39001
  • Site IT39020
  • Site KR82004
  • Site KR82014
  • Site KR82012
  • Site KR82010
  • Site KR82006
  • Site KR82016
  • Site KR82005
  • Site KR82029
  • Site KR82019
  • Site KR82023
  • Site KR82003
  • Site KR82021
  • Site KR82020
  • Site KR82030
  • Site KR82013
  • Site KR82017
  • Site KR82002
  • Site KR82008
  • Site KR82015
  • Site KR82001
  • Site LV37102
  • Site LV37103
  • Site LV37105
  • Site LT37008
  • Site LT37004
  • Site LT37011
  • Site LT37012
  • Site LT37010
  • Site LT37003
  • Site LT37007
  • Site LT37009
  • Site MY60002
  • Site MX52003
  • Site NL31006
  • Site NL31002
  • Site NL31005
  • Site NL31010
  • Site NZ64001
  • Site NZ64002
  • Site NZ64003
  • Site NZ64006
  • Site NO47007
  • Site NO47006
  • Site NO47008
  • Site PL48018
  • Site PL48013
  • Site PL48014
  • Site PL48004
  • Site PL48010
  • Site PL48011
  • Site PL48016
  • Site PL48005
  • Site PL48012
  • Site PL48003
  • Site PL48001
  • Site PL48019
  • Site RO40014
  • Site RO40004
  • Site RO40001
  • Site RO40005
  • Site RO40010
  • Site RO40002
  • Site RU70015
  • Site RU70023
  • Site RU70019
  • Site RU70002
  • Site RU70022
  • Site RU70014
  • Site RU70018
  • Site SG65002
  • Site SG65003
  • Site SK42105
  • Site SK42107
  • Site SK42101
  • Site SK42103
  • Site SK42108
  • Site SK42104
  • Site SK42102
  • Site SK42106
  • Site SI38604
  • Site ZA27001
  • Site ZA27002
  • Site ZA27006
  • Site ZA27013
  • Site ZA27007
  • Site ES34004
  • Site ES34015
  • Site ES34009
  • Site ES34002
  • Site SE46007
  • Site SE46005
  • Site SE46016
  • Site SE46012
  • Site SE46003
  • Site SE46009
  • Site TH66008
  • Site TH66009
  • Site UA38002
  • Site UA38015
  • Site UA38013
  • Site UA38007
  • Site UA38003
  • Site UA38010
  • Site UA38008
  • Site GB44001
  • Site GB44006
  • Site GB44009

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Mirabegron 50 mg

Solifenacin 5 mg

Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg

Arm Description

Participants received mirabegron 50 mg once a day for 52 weeks.

Participants received solifenacin 5 mg once a day for 52 weeks.

Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 50 mg once a day for 52 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) observed after taking the first dose of double-blind treatment until 14 days after taking the last dose of double-blind treatment for non-serious AEs and until 30 days after taking the last dose of double-blind treatment for serious adverse events (SAEs). This included abnormal laboratory tests, vital signs or electrocardiogram data that were defined as AEs if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, required active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study drug or was clinically significant in the investigator's opinion. The severity of each AE was defined according to the following: Mild (No disruption of normal daily activities); Moderate (Affected normal daily activities) and Severe (Inability to perform daily activities).
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to the baseline and week 52 clinic visits.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
A micturition was defined as any voluntary urination (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7-days before the baseline and week 52 clinic visits.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from the data recorded by the participant during 3 consecutive days with volume measurements during the 7-day micturition diary period.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consists of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to EoT in the Patient's Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)
The TS-VAS is a visual analogue scale which asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to the baseline and prior to each visit.
Number of Incontinence Episodes During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The number of incontinence episodes was the total number of times a participant records an incontinence episode during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence Episodes During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The number of incontinence episodes was the total number of times a participant records an incontinence episode during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Number of Incontinence-Free Days During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
The number of incontinence-free days was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit with no incontinence episodes recorded.
Number of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions Per Day During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
The number of incontinence-free days with < 8 micturitions per day was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with no incontinence episodes recorded and with < 8 micturitions per day.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
An urgency incontinence episode was defined as the involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit.
Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
An urgency incontinence episode was defined as the involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceeded by urgency. The number of urgency incontinence episodes was the total number of urgency incontinence episodes recorded by the participant during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
An urgency incontinence episode was defined as the involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. The number of urgency incontinence episodes was the total number of urgency incontinence episodes recorded by the participant during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
A micturition was defined as any voluntary urination (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7-days before the baseline and prior to each visit.
Number of Days With < 8 Micturitions Per Day During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit (at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT)
The number of days with < 8 micturitions was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with with less than 8 micturitions per day.
Change From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency
Corrected micturition frequency was defined as the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours that participants had at end of treatment if their fluid intake had remained unchanged since baseline. Corrected micturition frequency was calculated as the baseline mean volume voided per micturition multiplied by the baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours divided by the mean volume voided per micturition at EoT.
Change From Baseline to Months 3, 6 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from the data recorded by the participant during 3 consecutive days with volume measurements during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Urgency was defined as a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. An urgency episode was defined as any micturition or incontinence episode recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS), where 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the participant gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The mean number of nocturia episodes was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit."
Number of Nocturia Episodes Reported During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the participant gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The number of nocturia episodes was the number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia Episodes During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the participant gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The number of nocturia episodes was the number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
The mean number of pads used per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit.
Number of Pads Used During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
The number of pads used was the number of times a participant recorded a new pad used during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads Used During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
The number of pads used was the number of times a participant recorded a new pad used during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consists of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQoL): Total Score
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in HRQoL Subscale Score: Coping
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. HRQoL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score were transformed to range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in HRQoL Subscale Score: Concern
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. HRQoL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score were transformed to range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in HRQoL Subscale Score: Sleep
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consisted of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each time was scored 1-6. HRQoL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score were transformed to range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in HRQL Subscale Score: Social
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. HRQoL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score were transformed to range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 in the Patient's Assessment of TS-VAS
The TS-VAS is a visual analogue scale which asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Percentage of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Month 12 and EoT
The PGIC is a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).
Percentage of Participants in Each Category of PGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Month 12 and EoT
The PGIC is a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Llife in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: Mobility
The EQ-5D questionnaire is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-care
The EQ-5D questionnaire is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual Activities
The EQ-5D questionnaire is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/Discomfort
The EQ-5D questionnaire is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and had 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/Depression
The EQ-5D questionnaire is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and had 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Change From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time Missed
The WPAI:SHP is a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While Working
The WPAI:SHP is a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 6, 12 in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work Impairment
The WPAI:SHP is a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes arre expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Months 6, 12 in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity Impairment
The WPAI:SHP is a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes recorded during the last 3 days of the 7-day micturition diary is reported.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The symptom bother portion consists of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQoL Total Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit.
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes recorded during the 7-day micturition diary is reported.
Percentage of Participants With Micturition Frequency Normalization at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
The percentage of participants with micturition frequency normalization was defined as participants who had ≥ 8 micturitions/24 hours at baseline and < 8 micturitions/24 hours postbaseline at months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT.
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Percentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (≥ 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit. The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The symptom bother portion consists of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (≥ 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit. The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (≥ 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit. The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (≥ 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, ≥ 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and ≥1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit. The symptom bother portion of the OAB-q consists of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Participants Who Were Triple Responders (≥ 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, ≥ 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and ≥ 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit. The HRQoL portion of the OAB-q consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales, each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
PVR volume was assessed by ultrasonography or a bladder scanner.

Full Information

First Posted
January 23, 2014
Last Updated
August 16, 2018
Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02045862
Brief Title
A Multinational Study Comparing the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Two Medicines, Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Taken Together, or Separately, in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder
Acronym
SYNERGY II
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Active-Controlled, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Combination of Solifenacin Succinate With Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Monotherapy in Subjects With Overactive Bladder
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 17, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 8, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 8, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to examine how well the combination of two medicines (solifenacin succinate and mirabegron) worked compared to each medicine alone in the treatment of bladder problems, and how safe they were for long term use.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Urinary Bladder Overactive, Overactive Bladder, Urgency Incontinence, Urinary Bladder Diseases\Urologic Diseases
Keywords
Solifenacin Succinate, Mirabegron, Urinary Incontinence, Combination Therapy, Urgency, Nocturia, Overactive Bladder

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1829 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Mirabegron 50 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg once a day for 52 weeks.
Arm Title
Solifenacin 5 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg once a day for 52 weeks.
Arm Title
Solifenacin 5 mg + Mirabegron 50 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 50 mg once a day for 52 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Solifenacin succinate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Vesicare, Vesitrim, YM905, Vesikur
Intervention Description
Participants received solifenacin 5 mg orally once a day at the same time each day.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Mirabegron
Other Intervention Name(s)
Myrbetriq, YM178, Betmiga, Betanis
Intervention Description
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg orally once a day at the same time each day.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo to match solifenacin
Intervention Description
Participants received placebo to match solifenacin 5 mg orally once a day at the same time each day. This intervention was given to maintain the blind during the study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo to match mirabegron
Intervention Description
Participants received placebo to match mirabegron 50 mg orally once a day at the same time each day. This intervention was given to maintain the blind during the study.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description
A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) observed after taking the first dose of double-blind treatment until 14 days after taking the last dose of double-blind treatment for non-serious AEs and until 30 days after taking the last dose of double-blind treatment for serious adverse events (SAEs). This included abnormal laboratory tests, vital signs or electrocardiogram data that were defined as AEs if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, required active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study drug or was clinically significant in the investigator's opinion. The severity of each AE was defined according to the following: Mild (No disruption of normal daily activities); Moderate (Affected normal daily activities) and Severe (Inability to perform daily activities).
Time Frame
From first dose of double-blind study drug up to 30 days after last dose of double-blind study drug (up to 56 weeks)
Title
Change From Baseline to End of Treatment (EoT) in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to the baseline and week 52 clinic visits.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Description
A micturition was defined as any voluntary urination (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7-days before the baseline and week 52 clinic visits.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Description
The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from the data recorded by the participant during 3 consecutive days with volume measurements during the 7-day micturition diary period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consists of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in the Patient's Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction-Visual Analogue Scale (TS-VAS)
Description
The TS-VAS is a visual analogue scale which asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to the baseline and prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Number of Incontinence Episodes During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The number of incontinence episodes was the total number of times a participant records an incontinence episode during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Number of Incontinence Episodes During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The number of incontinence episodes was the total number of times a participant records an incontinence episode during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Number of Incontinence-Free Days During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
Description
The number of incontinence-free days was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit with no incontinence episodes recorded.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Number of Incontinence-Free Days With < 8 Micturitions Per Day During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
Description
The number of incontinence-free days with < 8 micturitions per day was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with no incontinence episodes recorded and with < 8 micturitions per day.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
An urgency incontinence episode was defined as the involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
Description
An urgency incontinence episode was defined as the involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceeded by urgency. The number of urgency incontinence episodes was the total number of urgency incontinence episodes recorded by the participant during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
Description
An urgency incontinence episode was defined as the involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately preceded by urgency. The number of urgency incontinence episodes was the total number of urgency incontinence episodes recorded by the participant during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Description
A micturition was defined as any voluntary urination (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7-days before the baseline and prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Number of Days With < 8 Micturitions Per Day During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit (at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT)
Description
The number of days with < 8 micturitions was the number of valid diary days during the 7-day micturition diary period with with less than 8 micturitions per day.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to EoT in Corrected Micturition Frequency
Description
Corrected micturition frequency was defined as the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours that participants had at end of treatment if their fluid intake had remained unchanged since baseline. Corrected micturition frequency was calculated as the baseline mean volume voided per micturition multiplied by the baseline mean number of micturitions per 24 hours divided by the mean volume voided per micturition at EoT.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 3, 6 and 12 in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Description
The mean volume voided per micturition was calculated from the data recorded by the participant during 3 consecutive days with volume measurements during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 3, 6, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Description
Urgency was defined as a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. An urgency episode was defined as any micturition or incontinence episode recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS), where 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Description
A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the participant gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The mean number of nocturia episodes was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit."
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Number of Nocturia Episodes Reported During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
Description
A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the participant gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The number of nocturia episodes was the number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Number of Nocturia Episodes During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
Description
A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the participant goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the participant gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The number of nocturia episodes was the number of times a participant recorded a nocturia episode during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Description
The mean number of pads used per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in the micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Number of Pads Used During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
Description
The number of pads used was the number of times a participant recorded a new pad used during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Number of Pads Used During the 7-Day Micturition Diary Period Prior to Each Visit
Description
The number of pads used was the number of times a participant recorded a new pad used during the 7-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consists of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQoL): Total Score
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in HRQoL Subscale Score: Coping
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. HRQoL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score were transformed to range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in HRQoL Subscale Score: Concern
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. HRQoL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score were transformed to range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in HRQoL Subscale Score: Sleep
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consisted of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each time was scored 1-6. HRQoL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score were transformed to range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in HRQL Subscale Score: Social
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. HRQoL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social) and total score were transformed to range from 0 (worst quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 in the Patient's Assessment of TS-VAS
Description
The TS-VAS is a visual analogue scale which asks participants to rate their satisfaction with the treatment by placing a vertical mark on a line that runs from 0 (No, not at all) on the left to 10 (Yes, completely) on the right. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Description
The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants in Each Category of Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale: Impression in Bladder Symptoms at Month 12 and EoT
Description
The PGIC is a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Percentage of Participants in Each Category of PGIC Scale: Impression in General Health at Month 12 and EoT
Description
The PGIC is a 2-part questionnaire, assessing both the change in the patient's overall condition and change in bladder condition since the start of the study (from very much worse to very much improved).
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in European Quality of Llife in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Questionnaire Subscale Score: Mobility
Description
The EQ-5D questionnaire is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 Months
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Self-care
Description
The EQ-5D questionnaire is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 12
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Usual Activities
Description
The EQ-5D questionnaire is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and has 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 12
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Pain/Discomfort
Description
The EQ-5D questionnaire is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and had 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 12
Title
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline to EoT in EQ-5D Questionnaire Subscale Score: Anxiety/Depression
Description
The EQ-5D questionnaire is an international, standardized, nondisease specific instrument for describing and valuing health status, and had 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self-care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels ranging from level 1 (no problem or none) to level 5 (unable to perform activity).
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and EoT in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem Questionnaire (WPAI:SHP) Score: Percent Work Time Missed
Description
The WPAI:SHP is a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 6,12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and EoT in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Impairment While Working
Description
The WPAI:SHP is a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 6, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 6, 12 in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Overall Work Impairment
Description
The WPAI:SHP is a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes arre expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 6, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 6, 12 in WPAI:SHP Score: Percent Activity Impairment
Description
The WPAI:SHP is a self-administered questionnaire with 6 questions (Q1=Employment status; Q2=Hours absent from work due to the bladder condition; Q3=Hours absent from work due to other reasons; Q4=Hours actually worked; Q5=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while working; Q6=Impact of the bladder condition on productivity while doing regular daily activities other than work) and a 1-week recall period. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity, i.e., worse outcomes. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 6, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 3 Diary Days at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes recorded during the last 3 days of the 7-day micturition diary is reported.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in the OAB-q Symptom Bother Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The symptom bother portion consists of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 10 Points Improvement From Baseline in HRQoL Total Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours Using the Last 7 Diary Days at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes recorded during the 7-day micturition diary is reported.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Micturition Frequency Normalization at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
The percentage of participants with micturition frequency normalization was defined as participants who had ≥ 8 micturitions/24 hours at baseline and < 8 micturitions/24 hours postbaseline at months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1 Point Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Major (≥ 2 Points) Improvement From Baseline in PPBC at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (≥ 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit. The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The symptom bother portion consists of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (≥ 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit. The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and HRQoL. The HRQoL portion consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales (Coping, Concern, Sleep, and Social Interaction), each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Were Double Responders (≥ 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours and at Least 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit. The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Were Triple Responders (≥ 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, ≥ 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q Symptom Bother Scale and ≥1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit. The symptom bother portion of the OAB-q consists of 8 items, rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1 through 6). The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement.The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Participants Who Were Triple Responders (≥ 50% Reduction in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours, ≥ 10 Points Improvement on OAB-q HRQL Total Score and ≥ 1 Point Improvement on PPBC) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT
Description
The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated from data recorded by the participant in a micturition diary for 7 days prior to each visit. The HRQoL portion of the OAB-q consists of 25 HRQoL items comprising 4 HRQoL subscales, each item was scored 1-6. The total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicated an improvement.The PPBC is a validated, global assessment tool using a 6-point Likert scale on which participants rated their subjective impression of their current bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using this scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and EoT in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Description
PVR volume was assessed by ultrasonography or a bladder scanner.
Time Frame
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Main Inclusion at Screening (Visit 1): Subject had completed study 178-CL-101 or study 905-EC-012 (This inclusion criterion would no longer apply once the recruitment for study 178-CL-101 and study 905-EC-012 had been completed. In that case the subject had to have symptoms of "wet" OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for at least 3 months); Subject was willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly and able to measure his/her vital signs at home at stipulated time points, using the device provided by the study personnel, and to adequately record the readings; Main Inclusion at Randomization (Visit 2): Subject had a micturition frequency of on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the last 7 days of the micturition diary period (incontinence episode should not be counted as a micturition). Subject had experienced at least 3 incontinence episodes during the last 7 days of the micturition diary period. Subject had experienced on average at least 1 urgency episode (grade 3 or 4 on Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale [PPIUS]) per 24-hour period during the 7-day micturition diary period. Exclusion Criteria: Main Exclusion at Screening (Visit 1): Subject had clinically significant bladder outflow obstruction at risk of urinary retention; Subject had significant PVR volume (> 150 mL); Subject had significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urgency incontinence where stress is the predominant factor; Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization; Subject had evidence of a UTI (urine culture containing > 100,000 cfu/mL), chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs; Subject had intravesical treatment in the past 12 months with e.g., botulinum toxin, resiniferatoxin, capsaicin; Main Exclusion at Randomization (Visit 2): Subject had evidence of a urinary tract infection (UTI) (urine culture containing > 100,000 cfu/mL) as assessed in the Screening visit (V1) samples. The subject could be rescreened after successful treatment of the UTI (confirmed by a dipstick negative for nitrite). Subject had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL as recorded in the micturition diary period.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Site US10049
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10112
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10104
City
Chandler
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10021
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85051
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10122
City
Anaheim
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10082
City
Hawaiian Gardens
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90716
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10132
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10133
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90036
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10149
City
Paramount
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90723
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10003
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92120
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10106
City
Tarzana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91356
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10595
City
Valley Village
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10053
City
Wheat Ridge
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10060
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34208
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10097
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10148
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10153
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10091
City
Jupiter
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33458
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10150
City
New Port Richey
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34652
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10124
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32803
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10134
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10009
City
Pembroke Pines
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33027
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10554
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33317
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10037
City
Alpharetta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30005
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10127
City
Roswell
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30076
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10120
City
Sandy Springs
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30328
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10078
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10088
City
Lake Charles
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10025
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10558
City
Hanover
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21076
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10282
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02131
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10114
City
Watertown
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02472
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10110
City
Billings
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10154
City
Missoula
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10553
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68510
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10002
City
Englewood
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07631
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10047
City
Lawrenceville
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08648
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10011
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10015
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10026
City
Garden City
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11530
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10040
City
Kingston
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10168
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10126
City
Newburgh
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12550
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10028
City
Poughkeepsie
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10076
City
Concord
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28025
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10129
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27609
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10062
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10050
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10067
City
Wadsworth
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44281
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10109
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10541
City
Medford
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97504
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10008
City
Bala-Cynwyd
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19004
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10017
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10167
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10250
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15236
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10248
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15243
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10063
City
Uniontown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10012
City
West Reading
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10166
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10079
City
Mount Pleasant
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29464
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10023
City
Simpsonville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29681
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10101
City
Summerville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29485
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10006
City
Kingsport
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37660
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10065
City
Corpus Christi
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78414
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10085
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77058
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10219
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77094
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10093
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77099
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10090
City
Hurst
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76054
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10105
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10111
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10083
City
Virginia Beach
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23462
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10013
City
Burien
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98166
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10004
City
Mountlake Terrace
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10155
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site US10135
City
Walla Walla
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
99362
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site AU61005
City
Broadmeadow
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2292
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site AU61007
City
Randwick
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2031
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site AU61021
City
Randwick
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2031
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site AU61011
City
Wollongong
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2522
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site AU61022
City
Brisbane
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4152
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site AU61010
City
Nambour
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4560
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site AU61019
City
Sherwood
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4075
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site AU61015
City
Daw Park
State/Province
South Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
5041
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site AU61025
City
Footscray
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3011
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site AU61002
City
Parkville
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3052
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site AU61004
City
Perth
State/Province
Western Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
6009
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Site BE32004
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site BE32014
City
Roeselare
ZIP/Postal Code
8800
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site BE32012
City
Sint-Truiden
ZIP/Postal Code
3800
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Site BG35908
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4003
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Site BG35902
City
Ruse
ZIP/Postal Code
7000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Site BG35905
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1431
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Site BG35903
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1606
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Site CA15035
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T5G 0B7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15033
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 4E1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15008
City
Saint John
State/Province
New Brunswick
ZIP/Postal Code
E2L 3J8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15001
City
Barrie
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L4M 7G1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15006
City
Brampton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L6T 4S5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15003
City
Brantford
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N3S 6T6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15007
City
Kitchener
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N2N 2B9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15013
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15004
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4S 1Y2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15026
City
Drummondville
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J2B 7T1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15039
City
Levis
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G6W 5M6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15020
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4N 3C5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15027
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1H 1Z1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15040
City
Montreal
ZIP/Postal Code
H2R 1V6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CA15025
City
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1S 2L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Site CZ42015
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
602 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42003
City
Hradec Kralove
ZIP/Postal Code
500 02
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42001
City
Hradec Kralove
ZIP/Postal Code
50005
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42010
City
Olomouc
ZIP/Postal Code
772 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42014
City
Ostrava
ZIP/Postal Code
700 30
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42005
City
Plzen
ZIP/Postal Code
32600
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42008
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
12808
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42007
City
Praha 4
ZIP/Postal Code
140 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42013
City
Sternberk
ZIP/Postal Code
78501
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42009
City
Uherske Hradiste
ZIP/Postal Code
686 08
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site CZ42006
City
Usti nad Labem
ZIP/Postal Code
40001
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Site DK45013
City
Aarhus
ZIP/Postal Code
8200
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Site EE37201
City
Parnu
ZIP/Postal Code
80010
Country
Estonia
Facility Name
Site FI35801
City
Kouvola
ZIP/Postal Code
45200
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Site DE49034
City
Munich
State/Province
Bavaria
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49031
City
Bergisch Gladbach
State/Province
Northwest
ZIP/Postal Code
51427
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49032
City
Duisburg
State/Province
NRW
ZIP/Postal Code
47179
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49003
City
Lutherstadt Eisleben
State/Province
Sachsen Anhalt
ZIP/Postal Code
06295
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49013
City
Leipzig
State/Province
Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
04105
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49008
City
Bad Ems
ZIP/Postal Code
56130
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49002
City
Duisburg
ZIP/Postal Code
47051
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49010
City
Ganderkesee
ZIP/Postal Code
27777
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49011
City
Halle (Saale)
ZIP/Postal Code
06132
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49001
City
Neustadt I. Sachsen
ZIP/Postal Code
01844
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49026
City
Rostock
ZIP/Postal Code
18107
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site DE49014
City
Sangerhausen
ZIP/Postal Code
06526
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Site HU36007
City
Kecskemet
State/Province
Bacs-Kiskun Megye
ZIP/Postal Code
6000
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site HU36005
City
Pecs
State/Province
Baranya Megye
ZIP/Postal Code
7621
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site HU36003
City
Csongrad
State/Province
Csongrad Megye
ZIP/Postal Code
6640
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site HU36001
City
Szentes
State/Province
Csongrad Megye
ZIP/Postal Code
6600
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site HU36013
City
Sopron
State/Province
Gyor-Moson Sopron
ZIP/Postal Code
9400
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site HU36012
City
Veszprem
State/Province
Veszprem Megye
ZIP/Postal Code
8200
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Site IT39022
City
Ancona
ZIP/Postal Code
60126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site IT39007
City
Avellino
ZIP/Postal Code
83100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site IT39001
City
Latina
ZIP/Postal Code
04100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site IT39020
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Site KR82004
City
Suwon-si
State/Province
Gyeonggi-do
ZIP/Postal Code
443-721
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82014
City
Bucheon-Si
State/Province
Gyunggido
ZIP/Postal Code
420-767
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82012
City
Seoul
State/Province
Gyunggido
ZIP/Postal Code
143-729
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82010
City
Jeonju-si
State/Province
Jeollabuk-do South Korea
ZIP/Postal Code
561-712
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82006
City
Busan
ZIP/Postal Code
602-715
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82016
City
Busan
ZIP/Postal Code
602-739
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82005
City
Daegu
ZIP/Postal Code
705-717
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82029
City
Daegu
ZIP/Postal Code
705-718
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82019
City
Daejeon
ZIP/Postal Code
301-721
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82023
City
Incheon
ZIP/Postal Code
405760
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82003
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
05505
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82021
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
100-380
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82020
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
110-744
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82030
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
120-752
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82013
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
134-701
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82017
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
134-872
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82002
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
135-710
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82008
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
135-720
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82015
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
136-075
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site KR82001
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
137-701
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Site LV37102
City
Liepaja
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-3401
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Site LV37103
City
Olaine
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-2114
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Site LV37105
City
Riga
ZIP/Postal Code
LV-1002
Country
Latvia
Facility Name
Site LT37008
City
Kaunas
ZIP/Postal Code
47144
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Site LT37004
City
Kaunas
ZIP/Postal Code
50009
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Site LT37011
City
Kaunas
ZIP/Postal Code
LT49449
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Site LT37012
City
Klaipeda
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-92288
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Site LT37010
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
10207
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Site LT37003
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-01118
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Site LT37007
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-08661
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Site LT37009
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
LT-09108
Country
Lithuania
Facility Name
Site MY60002
City
Petaling Jaya
ZIP/Postal Code
47500
Country
Malaysia
Facility Name
Site MX52003
City
Mexico City
State/Province
DF
ZIP/Postal Code
06700
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Site NL31006
City
Enschede
State/Province
NL
ZIP/Postal Code
7513ER
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Site NL31002
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1105 AZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Site NL31005
City
Nijmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6532 SZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Site NL31010
City
Sneek
ZIP/Postal Code
8601 ZK
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Site NZ64001
City
Christchurch
State/Province
Canterbury
ZIP/Postal Code
8013
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Site NZ64002
City
Nelson
ZIP/Postal Code
7010
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Site NZ64003
City
Tauranga
ZIP/Postal Code
3140
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Site NZ64006
City
Whangarei
ZIP/Postal Code
0112
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Site NO47007
City
Alesund
ZIP/Postal Code
6003
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Site NO47006
City
Hamar
ZIP/Postal Code
2317
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Site NO47008
City
Lierskogen
ZIP/Postal Code
3420
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Site PL48018
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-351
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48013
City
Chorzow
ZIP/Postal Code
41-500
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48014
City
Gdynia
ZIP/Postal Code
81-384
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48004
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
90-302
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48010
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-632
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48011
City
Myslowice
ZIP/Postal Code
41-400
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48016
City
Opole
ZIP/Postal Code
45-086
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48005
City
Piaseczno
ZIP/Postal Code
05-500
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48012
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
00-909
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48003
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-507
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48001
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-929
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site PL48019
City
Wrocław
ZIP/Postal Code
50-088
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Site RO40014
City
Cluj-Napoca
State/Province
Cluj
ZIP/Postal Code
400046
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site RO40004
City
Bucuresti
ZIP/Postal Code
042122
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site RO40001
City
Bucuresti
ZIP/Postal Code
50659
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site RO40005
City
Bucuresti
ZIP/Postal Code
50659
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site RO40010
City
Sibiu
ZIP/Postal Code
550245
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site RO40002
City
Timisoara
ZIP/Postal Code
300736
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Site RU70015
City
Kazan
ZIP/Postal Code
420097
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site RU70023
City
Penza
ZIP/Postal Code
440026
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site RU70019
City
Saint Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
194354
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site RU70002
City
Saint Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
197089
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site RU70022
City
Saint Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
198103
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site RU70014
City
St. Petersburg
ZIP/Postal Code
199178
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site RU70018
City
Ufa
ZIP/Postal Code
450096
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Site SG65002
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
169608
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Site SG65003
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
229899
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Site SK42105
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
82101
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site SK42107
City
Kosice
ZIP/Postal Code
04001
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site SK42101
City
Kosice
ZIP/Postal Code
04013
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site SK42103
City
Nitra
ZIP/Postal Code
949 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site SK42108
City
Poprad
ZIP/Postal Code
05801
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site SK42104
City
Prešov
ZIP/Postal Code
080 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site SK42102
City
Trencin
ZIP/Postal Code
91101
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site SK42106
City
Trencin
ZIP/Postal Code
91101
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Site SI38604
City
Murska Sobota
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Slovenia
Facility Name
Site ZA27001
City
Centurion
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
0157
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Site ZA27002
City
Roodepoort
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
1709
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Site ZA27006
City
Durban
State/Province
Kwa Zulu Natal
ZIP/Postal Code
4001
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Site ZA27013
City
Meyerspark
State/Province
Pretoria
ZIP/Postal Code
0184
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Site ZA27007
City
Paarl
State/Province
Western Cape
ZIP/Postal Code
7646
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Site ES34004
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28031
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site ES34015
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28044
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site ES34009
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28046
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site ES34002
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46026
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Site SE46007
City
Boras
ZIP/Postal Code
506 30
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site SE46005
City
Malmo
ZIP/Postal Code
211 52
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site SE46016
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
111 57
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site SE46012
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
141 86
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site SE46003
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
182 88
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site SE46009
City
Uppsala
ZIP/Postal Code
753 19
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Site TH66008
City
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10400
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Site TH66009
City
Khon Kaen
ZIP/Postal Code
40002
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Site UA38002
City
Cherenigiv
ZIP/Postal Code
14034
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Site UA38015
City
Chernivtsi
ZIP/Postal Code
58002
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Site UA38013
City
Dnepropetrovsk
ZIP/Postal Code
49005
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Site UA38007
City
Kiev
ZIP/Postal Code
02232
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Site UA38003
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
02660
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Site UA38010
City
Kyiv
ZIP/Postal Code
04053
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Site UA38008
City
Zaporizhzhya
ZIP/Postal Code
69600
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Site GB44001
City
Sheffield
State/Province
South Yorkshire
ZIP/Postal Code
S10 2JF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site GB44006
City
Plymouth
ZIP/Postal Code
PL6 8DH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Site GB44009
City
Watford
ZIP/Postal Code
WD25 7NL
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the trial, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for trials conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as compounds terminated during development. Conditions and exceptions are described under the Sponsor Specific Details for Astellas on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29866467
Citation
Gratzke C, van Maanen R, Chapple C, Abrams P, Herschorn S, Robinson D, Ridder A, Stoelzel M, Paireddy A, Yoon SJ, Al-Shukri S, Rechberger T, Mueller ER. Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Mirabegron and Solifenacin in Combination Compared with Monotherapy in Patients with Overactive Bladder: A Randomised, Multicentre Phase 3 Study (SYNERGY II). Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/study.aspx?ID=246
Description
Link to results on the Astellas Clinical Study Results website

Learn more about this trial

A Multinational Study Comparing the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Two Medicines, Solifenacin Succinate and Mirabegron Taken Together, or Separately, in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs