A New Operation for the Treatment for Long-standing Atrial Fibrillation (ANOLAF)

A New Operation (Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure) for the Treatment of Long Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) During Mitral Valve Surgery

Atrial fibrillation(AF) often occurs in patients with mitral valve disease. Both mitral replacement and mitral valve plasty are the effective methods to the mitral valve disease. How to cure atrial fibrillation is the key to full recovery. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in surgery is an effective treatment for those patients. But there are some recurrence rate after RFA, particularly in patients with enlarged left atrium. So the investigators design a new procedure(Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure) during mitral surgery and study the outcomes to evaluate this new operation.

From September 2017, 20 selective patients, and then 120 consecutive patients with valvular atrial fibrillation were treated with our new operation. If the clinical results from the first 20 patients with restrict selection criteria are unsatisfied, that is, the restoration rate of the sinus rhythm was less than 50% at 1-year follow up, the study will be stopped. Otherwise, another single arm with 120 consecutive patients with valvular AF will be recruited for next phase. Procedure details: All patients will have their left atrial geometric volume reduced, pulmonary vein island isolated and left appendage ligated or suture closed. After the superior vena cava was transected, two circular incisions were usually made in the left atrial wall between the pulmonary veins and the mitral annulus for circumferential atrial strip resection and pulmonary vein island isolation. The first circular incision was performed around the pulmonary veins. With this incision, pulmonary vein island was isolated and the left atrium was opened. The second one was performed in the interatrial groove and extended around the mitral annulus, leaving a 2 cm inferior wall margin from the annulus and the appendage in situ. With those two incisions, a circumferential strip of the left atrium was excised. Then the base of the left atrial appendage was ligated or excised and sutured. After the mitral manipulations, the center of the pulmonary vein island was longitudinally reef-imbricated with a 3-0 polypropylene continuous running suture to exclude toward the outside of the left atrial cavity. This plicated pulmonary vein island was directly anastomosed to the resected margin around the mitral annulus and the intraatrial septum instead of the interatrial groove. Finally, caval continuity was restored after aortic cross-clamp removal using a running 4-0 polypropylene suture. Telephone contact was maintained with the patients after discharge.The use of antiarrhythmic medications will be allowed during the first 3 months(blanking period). Transthoracic 2-dimensional echocardiography and Holter monitoring will be obtained at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial operation. Whenever the participants have symptoms such as palpitation, dizziness, or shortness of breath, they could telephone the doctors. The primary efficacy endpoint is freedom from AF at both 6 months and 12 months after surgery, assessed by 7-days continuous Holter monitoring. The primary safety are cardiopulmonary bypass time; and a composite of death, stroke, serious cardiac events (heart failure, myocardial infarction), cardiac re-hospitalizations, transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism, peripheral embolism, coronary artery injury, anatomical excessive bleeding, deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis, damage to specialized conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker, and superior vena cava stenosis, within 30 days after the procedure or hospital discharge (whichever was later) The secondary efficacy endpoint are the left atrial linear dimensions and A wave reappearance measured by transthoracic echocardiography at 3 time points (before surgery, 6 and 12 months after surgery). The secondary safety endpoint are Major adverse cardiac events, which were defined as a non-weighted composite score of: death, stroke, worsening heart failure (+1 NYHA Class), hospitalization for heart failure, and mitral valve re-intervention within 12 months after surgery; and incidence of protocol-defined serious adverse events (especially thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events) within 12 months after surgery. Statistical analysis were performed with statistic package for social science( SPSS) 11.5 software. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure

Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure

Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure(selected patients)

Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure

Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure

Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure

Freedom from AF in patients with longstanding persistent AF undergoing MVS at 6 months and 12 months. AF will be measured by 7 days continuous Holter monitoring at 6 months and 12 months post-surgery; and freedom of AF will be defined by absence of AF lasting > 30 seconds at 12 months

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) technology is used in most cardiovascular surgeries. These surgeries utilize CPB, which has been associated with some adverse effects. This is most likely due to exposure of blood to abnormal surfaces and conditions leading to systemic inflammatory responses. Prolonged CPB duration is associated with worse clinical outcomes.

The adverse events within 30 days after surgery, including: death, stroke, serious cardiac events (heart failure, myocardial infarction), cardiac re-hospitalizations, transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism, peripheral embolism, coronary artery injury, anatomical excessive bleeding, deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis, damage to specialized conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker, and superior vena cava stenosis.

The Number of Participants Who Will be Detected the Peak Late Trans-mitral Flow Velocity (A Wave) Reappearance

The peak late trans-mitral flow velocity (A wave) reappearance means recover of efficient left atrial contraction which indicates lower rate of thrombosis. Usually these is no A wave for AF patients. The peak late trans-mitral flow velocity 6 months and 12 months post-surgery, which will be measured by transthoracic echocardiography.

MACEs within 12 months after surgery: defined as a non-weighted composite score of: death, stroke, worsening heart failure (+1 NYHA Class), CHF hospitalization, and mitral valve [MV] re-intervention.

Phase I Inclusion Criteria Able to sign Informed Consent and Release of Medical Information forms Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 60 years old Clinical indications for only mitral valve surgery for the following: Organic mitral valve disease without other cardiac disorders (functional or structural). Longstanding persistent AF is defined as continuous AF of greater than one year duration. Duration of AF must be documented by medical history and Presence of AF must be documented by a direct electrocardiographic assessment upon arrival in the clinic. Able to use heart rhythm monitor Anteroposterior diameter of left atrial between 45mm and 60mm Without history of stroke. Exclusion Criteria 1. AF without indication for mitral valve surgery; or 2. Ischemic mitral regurgitation with evidence of concomitant structural mitral valve disease; or 3. Functional tricuspid regurgitation; or 4. AF is only or paroxysmal persistent; or 5. Evidence of active infection; or 6. Mental impairment or other conditions that may not allow patient to understand the nature, significance, and scope of study; or 7. Surgical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; or 8. Previous catheter ablation for AF; or 9. Life expectancy of less than one year; or 10. Absolute contraindications for anticoagulation therapy; or 11. Enrollment in concomitant drug or device trials; or 12. Uncontrolled hypo- or hyperthyroidism; or 13. FEV1 < 30% of predicted value; or 14. Women who are pregnant as evidenced by positive pregnancy test; or 15. Women of childbearing age who do not agree to be on adequate birth control throughout the period of the trial; or 16. Diagnosed with infective endocarditis; or 17. Need emergency surgery. Phase II Inclusion Criteria Able to sign Informed Consent and Release of Medical Information forms Age ≥ 18 years Clinical indications for mitral valve surgery for the following: Organic mitral valve disease; or Functional non-ischemic mitral regurgitation; or Ischemic mitral regurgitation with evidence of concomitant structural mitral valve disease. Note: May include need for surgical management of functional tricuspid regurgitation or patent foramen ovale. May also include concomitant CABG, aortic arch or aortic valve procedure. Surgical intervention may be performed via sternotomy or minimally invasive procedure. Longstanding persistent AF is defined as continuous AF of greater than one year duration. Duration of AF must be documented by medical history and Presence of AF must be documented by a direct electrocardiographic assessment upon arrival in the clinic. Able to use heart rhythm monitor Exclusion Criteria AF without indication for mitral valve surgery; or AF is only or paroxysmal persistent; or Evidence of active infection; or Mental impairment or other conditions that may not allow patient to understand the nature, significance, and scope of study; or Surgical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; or Previous catheter ablation for AF; or Life expectancy of less than one year; or Absolute contraindications for anticoagulation therapy; or Enrollment in concomitant drug or device trials; or Uncontrolled hypo- or hyperthyroidism; or Women who are pregnant as evidenced by positive pregnancy test; or Women of childbearing age who do not agree to be on adequate birth control throughout the period of the trial; or Diagnosed with infective endocarditis; or Need emergency surgery.

Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, Elvan A, Arentz T, Bestehorn K, Pocock SJ, Albenque JP, Tondo C; FIRE AND ICE Investigators. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 9;374(23):2235-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, Macle L, Morillo CA, Haverkamp W, Weerasooriya R, Albenque JP, Nardi S, Menardi E, Novak P, Sanders P; STAR AF II Investigators. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1812-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408288.

Kim JH, Na CY, Lee SJ, Oh SS. Circumferential left atrium resection for treating a giant left atrium. J Card Surg. 2013 Mar;28(2):102-8. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12061. Epub 2013 Jan 29.

Shi J, Bai ZX, Zhang BG, Ren WJ, Guo YQ. A modified Cox maze IV procedure: a simpler technique for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Dec;23(6):856-860. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw256. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

Zheng S, Zhang H, Li Y, Han J, Jia Y, Meng X. Comparison of Left Atrial and Biatrial Maze Procedure in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec;64(8):661-671. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554941. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

Kong MH, Lopes RD, Piccini JP, Hasselblad V, Bahnson TD, Al-Khatib SM. Surgical Maze procedure as a treatment for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Oct;28(5):311-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00139.x.

Baek MJ, Na CY, Oh SS, Lee CH, Kim JH, Seo HJ, Park SW, Kim WS. Surgical treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation combined with rheumatic mitral valve disease: Effects of the cryo-maze procedure and predictors for late recurrence. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Nov;30(5):728-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Sep 26.

Kumar P, Athanasiou T, De L Stanbridge R. Treatment of long-duration atrial fibrillation by modified maze procedure. J R Soc Med. 2002 Nov;95(11):552-3. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.95.11.552. No abstract available.