search
Back to results

A Phase 3, International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Efficacy and Safety Trial of Linaclotide Administered Orally for 12 Weeks to Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C) (D5630C00001)

Primary Purpose

Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Placebo
Linaclotide
Sponsored by
AstraZeneca
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has signed an Informed Consent Form(ICF).
  2. Patient Must not be pregnant or breastfeeding and agree to use birth control
  3. Patient meets the colonoscopy requirements defined by the American Gastroenterological Association guidelines and no clinically-significant laboratory or physical examination findings;
  4. Patient meets protocol-defined criteria for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation(IBS-C), including stool frequency, straining, stool consistency, abdominal pain, and abdominal discomfort criteria
  5. Patient meets protocol-defined eDiary completion Compliance and agrees to refrain from making any new, major life-style changes that may affect IBS-C symptoms

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recent history of mushy or watery stools
  2. Various medical conditions, medical histories, or family medical histories that would not make the patient a good candidate for the study
  3. Patient currently has both unexplained and clinically significant alarm symptoms or systemic signs of infection or colitis.
  4. Surgery to the gastrointestinal tract
  5. Usage of prohibited medications

Sites / Locations

  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

controlled arm

treatment arm

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

12-week Abdominal Pain/Abdominal Discomfort Weekly Responder
A 12-week Abdominal Pain/Abdominal Discomfort Responder is a patient who meets the Abdominal Pain/Abdominal Discomfort Weekly Responder criteria (i.e., an improvement of ≥30% from baseline in either the mean abdominal pain score or mean abdominal discomfort score for that week, with neither score worsening from baseline for that week) for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. Abdominal pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) was assessed daily by patients on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. Abdominal discomfort (in the last 24 hours) was assessed daily by patients on an 11-point NRS where 0 represents no abdominal discomfort and 10 represents very severe abdominal discomfort.
12-week Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Degree of Relief Responder
A 12-week IBS Degree of Relief Responder is a patient who meets the IBS Degree of Relief Weekly Responder criteria (i.e., response to the degree of relief of IBS symptoms question for that week was "Considerably relieved" or "Completely relieved") for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. Degree of relief of IBS symptoms (in the last 7 days) was assessed weekly by patients on a 7-point balanced ordinal scale where 1 = Completely relieved, 4 = Unchanged, and 7 = As bad as I can imagine.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in 12-week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement Frequency Rate
The change from baseline in 12-week CSBM frequency (i.e., average weekly CSBM frequency over the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period). A spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) is defined as a bowel movement without laxative use in the preceding 24 hours. A CSBM is defined as an SBM that is associated with a sense of complete evacuation.
Change From Baseline in 12-week Spontaneous Bowel Movement Frequency Rate
The change from baseline in 12-week SBM frequency (i.e., average weekly SBM frequency over the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period). SBM is defined as a bowel movement without laxative use in the preceding 24 hours.
Change From Baseline in 12-week Stool Consistency
The change from baseline in 12-week stool consistency (i.e., the average of the non-missing Bristol Stool Form Scale [BSFS] score from the SBMs occurring during the 12-week Treatment Period). Consistency of each bowel movement was assessed daily by patients using the 7-point BSFS (1=Separate hard lumps like nuts [difficult to pass] to 7=Watery, no solid pieces [entirely liquid]).
Change From Baseline in 12-week Severity of Straining
The change from baseline in 12-week severity of straining (i.e., the average of the non-missing straining scores from the SBMs occurring during the 12-week Treatment Period). Severity of straining was assessed daily by patients on a 5-point ordinal scale (1=Not at all to 5=An extreme amount).
Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Bloating
The change from baseline in 12-week abdominal bloating (i.e., the average of the non-missing daily abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12-week Treatment Period). Abdominal bloating (in the last 24 hours) was assessed daily by patients on an 11-point NRS where 0 represents no abdominal bloating and 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating.
Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Pain
The change from baseline in 12-week abdominal pain (i.e., the average of the non-missing daily abdominal pain scores reported during the 12-week Treatment Period). Abdominal pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) was assessed daily by patients on an 11-point NRS where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain.
Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Discomfort
The change from baseline in 12-week abdominal discomfort (i.e., the average of the non-missing daily abdominal discomfort scores reported during the 12-week Treatment Period). Abdominal discomfort (in the last 24 hours) was assessed daily by patients on an 11-point NRS where 0 represents no abdominal discomfort and 10 represents very severe abdominal discomfort.

Full Information

First Posted
June 12, 2013
Last Updated
August 4, 2016
Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Collaborators
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01880424
Brief Title
A Phase 3, International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Efficacy and Safety Trial of Linaclotide Administered Orally for 12 Weeks to Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)
Acronym
D5630C00001
Official Title
A Phase 3, International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Efficacy and Safety Trial of Linaclotide Administered Orally for 12 Weeks to Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
AstraZeneca
Collaborators
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This clinical trial is an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial comparing one dose of linaclotide to placebo. Approximately 800 patients with a diagnosis of IBS-C (modified Rome III criteria) will be randomized at up to 60 trial centers in China, Australia, and New Zealand. The trial will consist of up to 21 days of screening, 14 to 21 days of pre-treatment, 12 weeks of double-blind treatment, and 2 weeks of follow-up. At the end of the Pre-treatment Period, patients meeting the entry criteria for this trial will be randomized to one of two double-blind treatment groups: 290 ug linaclotide, or placebo (1:1).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1722 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
controlled arm
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
treatment arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
matching Placebo Capsules, Oral, once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Linaclotide
Intervention Description
Linaclotide 290 ug Capsules, Oral, once daily
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
12-week Abdominal Pain/Abdominal Discomfort Weekly Responder
Description
A 12-week Abdominal Pain/Abdominal Discomfort Responder is a patient who meets the Abdominal Pain/Abdominal Discomfort Weekly Responder criteria (i.e., an improvement of ≥30% from baseline in either the mean abdominal pain score or mean abdominal discomfort score for that week, with neither score worsening from baseline for that week) for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. Abdominal pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) was assessed daily by patients on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. Abdominal discomfort (in the last 24 hours) was assessed daily by patients on an 11-point NRS where 0 represents no abdominal discomfort and 10 represents very severe abdominal discomfort.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 1-12 during the Treatment Period
Title
12-week Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Degree of Relief Responder
Description
A 12-week IBS Degree of Relief Responder is a patient who meets the IBS Degree of Relief Weekly Responder criteria (i.e., response to the degree of relief of IBS symptoms question for that week was "Considerably relieved" or "Completely relieved") for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. Degree of relief of IBS symptoms (in the last 7 days) was assessed weekly by patients on a 7-point balanced ordinal scale where 1 = Completely relieved, 4 = Unchanged, and 7 = As bad as I can imagine.
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 1-12 during the Treatment Period
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in 12-week Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement Frequency Rate
Description
The change from baseline in 12-week CSBM frequency (i.e., average weekly CSBM frequency over the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period). A spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) is defined as a bowel movement without laxative use in the preceding 24 hours. A CSBM is defined as an SBM that is associated with a sense of complete evacuation.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12-week Treatment Period
Title
Change From Baseline in 12-week Spontaneous Bowel Movement Frequency Rate
Description
The change from baseline in 12-week SBM frequency (i.e., average weekly SBM frequency over the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period). SBM is defined as a bowel movement without laxative use in the preceding 24 hours.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12-week Treatment Period
Title
Change From Baseline in 12-week Stool Consistency
Description
The change from baseline in 12-week stool consistency (i.e., the average of the non-missing Bristol Stool Form Scale [BSFS] score from the SBMs occurring during the 12-week Treatment Period). Consistency of each bowel movement was assessed daily by patients using the 7-point BSFS (1=Separate hard lumps like nuts [difficult to pass] to 7=Watery, no solid pieces [entirely liquid]).
Time Frame
Baseline and 12-week Treatment Period
Title
Change From Baseline in 12-week Severity of Straining
Description
The change from baseline in 12-week severity of straining (i.e., the average of the non-missing straining scores from the SBMs occurring during the 12-week Treatment Period). Severity of straining was assessed daily by patients on a 5-point ordinal scale (1=Not at all to 5=An extreme amount).
Time Frame
Baseline and 12-week Treatment Period
Title
Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Bloating
Description
The change from baseline in 12-week abdominal bloating (i.e., the average of the non-missing daily abdominal bloating scores reported during the 12-week Treatment Period). Abdominal bloating (in the last 24 hours) was assessed daily by patients on an 11-point NRS where 0 represents no abdominal bloating and 10 represents very severe abdominal bloating.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12-week Treatment Period
Title
Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Pain
Description
The change from baseline in 12-week abdominal pain (i.e., the average of the non-missing daily abdominal pain scores reported during the 12-week Treatment Period). Abdominal pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) was assessed daily by patients on an 11-point NRS where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12-week Treatment Period
Title
Change From Baseline in 12-week Abdominal Discomfort
Description
The change from baseline in 12-week abdominal discomfort (i.e., the average of the non-missing daily abdominal discomfort scores reported during the 12-week Treatment Period). Abdominal discomfort (in the last 24 hours) was assessed daily by patients on an 11-point NRS where 0 represents no abdominal discomfort and 10 represents very severe abdominal discomfort.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12-week Treatment Period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient has signed an Informed Consent Form(ICF). Patient Must not be pregnant or breastfeeding and agree to use birth control Patient meets the colonoscopy requirements defined by the American Gastroenterological Association guidelines and no clinically-significant laboratory or physical examination findings; Patient meets protocol-defined criteria for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Constipation(IBS-C), including stool frequency, straining, stool consistency, abdominal pain, and abdominal discomfort criteria Patient meets protocol-defined eDiary completion Compliance and agrees to refrain from making any new, major life-style changes that may affect IBS-C symptoms Exclusion Criteria: Recent history of mushy or watery stools Various medical conditions, medical histories, or family medical histories that would not make the patient a good candidate for the study Patient currently has both unexplained and clinically significant alarm symptoms or systemic signs of infection or colitis. Surgery to the gastrointestinal tract Usage of prohibited medications
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yunsheng Yang
Organizational Affiliation
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shutian Zhang
Organizational Affiliation
Beijing Friendship Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zhaoshen Li
Organizational Affiliation
Changhai Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Mecical University of Chinese PLA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Weifen Xie
Organizational Affiliation
Changzheng Hospital Affiliated to Second Military Mecical University of Chinese PLA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yaozong Yuan
Organizational Affiliation
Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Medical College of Shanghai Jiaotong University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Youqing Xu
Organizational Affiliation
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dongfeng Chen
Organizational Affiliation
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Mecical University of Chinese PLA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Minhu Chen
Organizational Affiliation
The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhongshan (Sun Yat-sen) University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yanqing Li
Organizational Affiliation
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiaozhong Guo
Organizational Affiliation
General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region of Chinese PLA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Youlin Yang
Organizational Affiliation
First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rongquan Wang
Organizational Affiliation
The First Affiliated Hospital of Third Military Mecical University of Chinese PLA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xiaohua Hou
Organizational Affiliation
Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Liangping Li
Organizational Affiliation
Sichuang Provincial People's Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chengwei Tang
Organizational Affiliation
West China Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jianlin Ren
Organizational Affiliation
Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Xizhong Shen
Organizational Affiliation
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yulan Liu
Organizational Affiliation
Peking University People's Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dongmei Qian
Organizational Affiliation
Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Huahong Wang
Organizational Affiliation
Peking University First Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
North Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arkansas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Artesia
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chula Vista
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Encino
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
North Hollywood
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Orange
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Riverside
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Boynton Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brandon
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brooksville
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Doral
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kissimmee
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lauderdale Lakes
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Miami Lakes
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Addison
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Evansville
State/Province
Indiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Crowley
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Monroe
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chesterfield
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Wyoming
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Billings
State/Province
Montana
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Great Neck
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Salisbury
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Franklin
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mentor
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Greer
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chattanooga
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kingsport
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Smyrna
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Webster
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ogden
State/Province
Utah
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lynchburg
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Morgantown
State/Province
West Virginia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Adelaide
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brisbane
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Five Dock
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Malvern
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Maroubra
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Melbourne
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Parkville
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Vaughan
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Beijing
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Changsha
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chengdu
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chongqing
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Guangzhou
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hangzhou
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Harerbin
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hefei
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Jinan
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nanchang
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Qingdao
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Shanghai
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Shenyang
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Shijiazhuang
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Wuhan
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Xi An
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Xiamen
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Auckland
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Christchurch
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dunedin
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tauranga
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Wellington
Country
New Zealand

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35019221
Citation
Peng LH, Fang JY, Dai N, Shen XZ, Yang YL, Sun J, Yang YS. Efficacy and safety of linaclotide in patients with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation: Chinese sub-cohort analysis of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Dig Dis. 2022 Feb;23(2):99-110. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13081.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Phase 3, International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Efficacy and Safety Trial of Linaclotide Administered Orally for 12 Weeks to Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs