search
Back to results

A Phase 3 Study Comparing 2 Doses Of CP-690,550 And The Active Comparator, Humira (Adalimumab) Vs. Placebo For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CP 690,550
CP-690,550
Placebo
Placebo
Biologic TNFi
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis focused on measuring oral DMARD, JAK inhibitor, clinical trial

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has a diagnosis of RA based upon the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 Revised Criteria.
  • The patient must have had an inadequate response to methotrexate and have active disease, as defined by both: ≥6 joints tender or painful on motion; and ≥6 joints swollen; and fulfills 1 of the following 2 criteria at Screening: 1.ESR (Westergren method) >28 mm in the local laboratory. 2. CRP >7 mg/L in the central laboratory.
  • No evidence of active or latent or inadequately treated infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
  • The patient must have been on a stable dose of 7.5 mg to 25 mg weekly of methotrexate and washed out of all other DMARDs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Blood dyscrasias including confirmed: 1. Hemoglobin <9 g/dL or Hematocrit <30%; 2. White blood cell count <3,000 cu.mm. Absolute neutrophil count <1,200 cu.mm; 4. Platelet count <100,000/L
  • History of any other autoimmune rheumatic disease other than Sjogren's syndrome
  • No malignancy or history of malignancy.
  • History of infection requiring hospitalization, parenteral antimicrobial therapy, or as otherwise judged clinically significant by the investigator, within the 6 months prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Patients who have failed any TNFi for either lack of efficacy or a TNFi mechanism related adverse event.
  • Patients who have previously received adalimumab therapy for any reason.
  • Patients who are contraindicated for treatment with adalimumab in accordance with the approved local label.
  • Patients meeting the New York Heart Association Class III and Class IV Congestive Heart failure

Sites / Locations

  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
  • Pfizer Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

5mg

10 mg

Placebo Sequence 1

Placebo Sequence 2

adalimumab

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 6
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC); >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count (SJC); and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 3
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 6
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28-joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and > 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and < 2.6 = remission. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 1 and 3
ACR20 response: >=20% improvement in TJC; >= 20% improvement in SJC; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 9 and 12
ACR20 response: >=20% improvement in tender joint count; >=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 1, 3 and 6
ACR50 response: >=50% improvement in tender joint count; >=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 9 and 12
ACR50 response: >=50% improvement in tender joint count; >=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 1, 3 and 6
ACR70 response: >=70% improvement in tender joint count; >=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 9 and 12
ACR70 response: >=70% improvement in tender joint count; >=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (milligram per liter [mg/L]). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Month 9 and 12
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Month 9 and 12
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP])
DAS28-4 [CRP] calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, CRP (mg/L) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [ESR])
DAS28-3 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and ESR (mm/hour). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (ESR) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 1, 3 and 6
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 9 and 12
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Month 9 and 12
Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 9 and 12
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Physician global assessment of arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 9 and 12
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and was reported as 2 summary scores; Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100 where higher scores represented higher level of functioning.
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9 and 12
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and was reported as 2 summary scores; Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100 where higher scores represented higher level of functioning.
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item questionnaire. Participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Month 12
FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item questionnaire. Participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Participant-rated questionnaire to assess key constructs of sleep over the past week. Consists of a 12-item based on 7 sub scales: sleep disturbance (SD), snoring (Sno), awakened short of breath (ASOB) or with headache, sleep adequacy (Ade), and somnolence (Som) (range:0-100); sleep quantity (Qua)(range:0-24), and optimal (Opt) sleep (yes: 1, no: 0) and nine item index measures of sleep disturbance were constructed to provide composite scores: sleep problem summary (SPS) and overall sleep problems (OSP). Except sleep adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=greater impairment. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range* 100); total score range: 0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute.
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12
Participant-rated questionnaire to assess key constructs of sleep over the past week. Consists of a 12-item based on 7 sub scales: sleep disturbance (SD), snoring (Sno), awakened short of breath (ASOB) or with headache, sleep adequacy (Ade), and somnolence (Som) (range:0-100); sleep quantity (Qua)(range:0-24), and optimal (Opt) sleep (yes: 1, no: 0) and nine item index measures of sleep disturbance were constructed to provide composite scores: sleep problem summary (SPS) and overall sleep problems (OSP). Except sleep adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=greater impairment. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range* 100); total score range: 0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute.
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep are reported.
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12
MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep are reported.
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Utility Score at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Utility Score at Month 12
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 3 and 6
WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: 5-items Time Management scale (TMS); 6-items Physical Demands scale (PDS); 9-items Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (MIDS); 5-items Output Demands scale (ODS). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index (WLI), which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score: 0 [no loss] to 100 [complete loss of work]).
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline and Month 12
WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: 5-items Time Management scale (TMS); 6-items Physical Demands scale (PDS); 9-items Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (MIDS); 5-items Output Demands scale (ODS). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index (WLI), which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score: 0 [no loss] to 100 [complete loss of work]).
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost: any RA/non-RA related medical/non-medical (NM) practitioner visit, nursing home, hospital, surgery, emergency room (ER) treatment, diagnostic tests, over-night stay, home healthcare (HC) services, aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability: employment status, willingness to work, work disability due to RA, sick leave, part time work, ability to perform chores, chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale; higher score indicated higher medical cost.
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost: visit to doctor, NM practitioner, nursing home, hospital, surgery, ER treatment, diagnostic tests, over-night stay, home HC services, and aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability: employment status, willingness to work, work disability due to RA, sick leave, part time work, ability to perform chores, chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale; higher score indicated higher medical cost.
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends.
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends.
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, hours affected per day and average number of hours missed work per day were reported.
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 12
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, hours affected per day and average number of hours missed work per day were reported.
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12
Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.

Full Information

First Posted
February 27, 2009
Last Updated
January 10, 2013
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00853385
Brief Title
A Phase 3 Study Comparing 2 Doses Of CP-690,550 And The Active Comparator, Humira (Adalimumab) Vs. Placebo For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Official Title
Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Comparator, Placebo-Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Doses Of CP 690,550 In Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis On Background Methotrexate
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a comparative study of CP 690,550, Humira (adalimumab) and placebo on background methotrexate in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. The study is intended to provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of CP 690,550 when dosed 5 mg and 10 mg twice a day on background methotrexate in adult patients with moderate to severe Rheumatoid Arthritis. It is intended to confirm the benefits of CP-690,550 in improving signs and symptoms and physical function that were observed in Rheumatoid Arthritis. An active comparator, adalimumab, is also included.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Keywords
oral DMARD, JAK inhibitor, clinical trial

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
717 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
5mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
10 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Placebo Sequence 1
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
Placebo Sequence 2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
adalimumab
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
CP 690,550
Intervention Description
tablets 5 mg BID PO plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
CP-690,550
Intervention Description
tablets 10 mg BID PO plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
placebo tablets BID PO advance to 5mg CP 690,550 BID at Month 3 or 6 visit plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
tablets BID PO advance tablets to10mg CP 690,550 BID at Month 3 or 6 visit plus q2 week placebo SC injections for 12 months
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Biologic TNFi
Other Intervention Name(s)
Humira (Adalimumab)
Intervention Description
placebo tablets BID PO plus adalimumab 40 mg q2 week SC injections for 12 months
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 6
Description
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC); >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count (SJC); and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP). For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.
Time Frame
Month 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 3
Description
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 3 analysis.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3
Title
Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) Less Than 2.6 at Month 6
Description
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28-joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 implied low disease activity and > 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and < 2.6 = remission. For comparison of CP-690,550 with placebo, placebo sequences were combined into single reporting group for Month 6 analysis.
Time Frame
Month 6
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 1 and 3
Description
ACR20 response: >=20% improvement in TJC; >= 20% improvement in SJC; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Time Frame
Month 1, 3
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Month 9 and 12
Description
ACR20 response: >=20% improvement in tender joint count; >=20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >=20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Time Frame
Month 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
ACR50 response: >=50% improvement in tender joint count; >=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Time Frame
Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Month 9 and 12
Description
ACR50 response: >=50% improvement in tender joint count; >=50% improvement in swollen joint count; and 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Time Frame
Month 9, 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
ACR70 response: >=70% improvement in tender joint count; >=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Time Frame
Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Month 9 and 12
Description
ACR70 response: >=70% improvement in tender joint count; >=70% improvement in swollen joint count; and 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the HAQ); and CRP.
Time Frame
Month 9, 12
Title
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (milligram per liter [mg/L]). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [CRP]) at Month 9 and 12
Description
DAS28-3 (CRP) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and CRP (mg/L). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (CRP) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Time Frame
Month 9, 12
Title
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) at Month 9 and 12
Description
DAS28-4 (ESR) calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, ESR (mm/hour) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Time Frame
Month 9, 12
Title
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP])
Description
DAS28-4 [CRP] calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count, CRP (mg/L) and PGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed score ranging 0 to 10; higher score indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). Total score range:0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Disease Activity Score Using 28-Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (3 Variables) (DAS28-3 [ESR])
Description
DAS28-3 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joint count and ESR (mm/hour). Total score range: 0 to 9.4, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-3 (ESR) =<3.2 implied low disease activity, >3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity and <2.6 implied remission.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12
Title
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.
Time Frame
Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Month 9 and 12
Description
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0-3:0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3: 0=least difficulty and 3=extreme difficulty.
Time Frame
Month 9, 12
Title
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) visual analogue scale (VAS), where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain at Month 9 and 12
Description
Participants rated the severity of arthritis pain on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no pain and 100 mm = most severe pain.
Time Frame
Month 9, 12
Title
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 9 and 12
Description
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = very poorly.
Time Frame
Month 9, 12
Title
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis Pain at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
Physician global assessment of arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis Pain at Month 9 and 12
Description
Physician Global Assessment of Arthritis was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very good and 100 mm = very bad.
Time Frame
Month 9, 12
Title
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and was reported as 2 summary scores; Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100 where higher scores represented higher level of functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6
Title
36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Month 9 and 12
Description
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and was reported as 2 summary scores; Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0-100 where higher scores represented higher level of functioning.
Time Frame
Month 9, 12
Title
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item questionnaire. Participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT)-Fatigue Scale at Month 12
Description
FACIT-Fatigue scale is a 13-item questionnaire. Participant scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as 4 minus the participant's response. The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflected an improvement in the participant's health status.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
Participant-rated questionnaire to assess key constructs of sleep over the past week. Consists of a 12-item based on 7 sub scales: sleep disturbance (SD), snoring (Sno), awakened short of breath (ASOB) or with headache, sleep adequacy (Ade), and somnolence (Som) (range:0-100); sleep quantity (Qua)(range:0-24), and optimal (Opt) sleep (yes: 1, no: 0) and nine item index measures of sleep disturbance were constructed to provide composite scores: sleep problem summary (SPS) and overall sleep problems (OSP). Except sleep adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=greater impairment. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range* 100); total score range: 0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12
Description
Participant-rated questionnaire to assess key constructs of sleep over the past week. Consists of a 12-item based on 7 sub scales: sleep disturbance (SD), snoring (Sno), awakened short of breath (ASOB) or with headache, sleep adequacy (Ade), and somnolence (Som) (range:0-100); sleep quantity (Qua)(range:0-24), and optimal (Opt) sleep (yes: 1, no: 0) and nine item index measures of sleep disturbance were constructed to provide composite scores: sleep problem summary (SPS) and overall sleep problems (OSP). Except sleep adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=greater impairment. Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range* 100); total score range: 0 to 100; higher score = greater intensity of attribute.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep are reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Month 12
Description
MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity and optimal sleep. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not by choosing yes or no. Number of participants with optimal sleep are reported.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Utility Score at Baseline, Month 1, 3 and 6
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 1, 3, 6
Title
Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Utility Score at Month 12
Description
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Month 3 and 6
Description
WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: 5-items Time Management scale (TMS); 6-items Physical Demands scale (PDS); 9-items Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (MIDS); 5-items Output Demands scale (ODS). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index (WLI), which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score: 0 [no loss] to 100 [complete loss of work]).
Time Frame
Month 3, 6
Title
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) Score at Baseline and Month 12
Description
WLQ: participant-reported 25-item scale to evaluate degree to which health problems interfere with an ability to perform job roles along 4 dimensions: 5-items Time Management scale (TMS); 6-items Physical Demands scale (PDS); 9-items Mental-Interpersonal Demands Scale (MIDS); 5-items Output Demands scale (ODS). All the scales ranged from 0 (limited none of the time) to 100 (limited all of the time). Work Loss Index (WLI), which represented percentage of lost work over time period relative to a normative population, was derived (total score: 0 [no loss] to 100 [complete loss of work]).
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12
Title
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Description
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost: any RA/non-RA related medical/non-medical (NM) practitioner visit, nursing home, hospital, surgery, emergency room (ER) treatment, diagnostic tests, over-night stay, home healthcare (HC) services, aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability: employment status, willingness to work, work disability due to RA, sick leave, part time work, ability to perform chores, chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale; higher score indicated higher medical cost.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Title
Work Productivity and Healthcare Resource Utilization (HCRU) at Month 12
Description
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months for direct, indirect medical cost domains. Direct cost: visit to doctor, NM practitioner, nursing home, hospital, surgery, ER treatment, diagnostic tests, over-night stay, home HC services, and aids/devices used. Indirect costs associated with functional disability: employment status, willingness to work, work disability due to RA, sick leave, part time work, ability to perform chores, chores done by family/friends/housekeeper. Assessment was based on 0 to 2-point scale; higher score indicated higher medical cost.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Description
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Title
Number of Events Including Visits, Surgeries, Tests or Devices as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12
Description
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA/non-RA related number of events including visits to doctor, non-medical practitioner, hospital ER treatment, hospitalizations, number of surgeries, diagnostic tests, and devices/aids used were reported.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Description
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Title
Number of Days as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12
Description
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of days spent in hospital, nursing home, aids/devices used, on sick leave, work per week, performed part time work, performed paid work, chores done by housekeeper and chores done by family/friends.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Description
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, hours affected per day and average number of hours missed work per day were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Title
Number of Hours Per Day as Assessed RA-HCRU at Month 12
Description
RA-HCRU assessed healthcare usage during previous 3 months for direct or indirect medical cost domains. Any RA or non-RA related number of hours spent per day for home healthcare services, chores done by housekeeper, chores done by family or friends, hours affected per day and average number of hours missed work per day were reported.
Time Frame
Month 12
Title
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Baseline, Month 3 and 6
Description
Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 3, 6
Title
Work Performance in Past 3 Months on Days Bothered as Assessed Using RA-HCRU at Month 12
Description
Work performance of participants on number of days bothered was based on 10-point scale, where higher score indicated lower work performance.
Time Frame
Month 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The patient has a diagnosis of RA based upon the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 Revised Criteria. The patient must have had an inadequate response to methotrexate and have active disease, as defined by both: ≥6 joints tender or painful on motion; and ≥6 joints swollen; and fulfills 1 of the following 2 criteria at Screening: 1.ESR (Westergren method) >28 mm in the local laboratory. 2. CRP >7 mg/L in the central laboratory. No evidence of active or latent or inadequately treated infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The patient must have been on a stable dose of 7.5 mg to 25 mg weekly of methotrexate and washed out of all other DMARDs. Exclusion Criteria: Blood dyscrasias including confirmed: 1. Hemoglobin <9 g/dL or Hematocrit <30%; 2. White blood cell count <3,000 cu.mm. Absolute neutrophil count <1,200 cu.mm; 4. Platelet count <100,000/L History of any other autoimmune rheumatic disease other than Sjogren's syndrome No malignancy or history of malignancy. History of infection requiring hospitalization, parenteral antimicrobial therapy, or as otherwise judged clinically significant by the investigator, within the 6 months prior to the first dose of study drug Patients who have failed any TNFi for either lack of efficacy or a TNFi mechanism related adverse event. Patients who have previously received adalimumab therapy for any reason. Patients who are contraindicated for treatment with adalimumab in accordance with the approved local label. Patients meeting the New York Heart Association Class III and Class IV Congestive Heart failure
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Gilbert
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85234
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Glendale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85304
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Paradise Valley
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85253
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85037
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Jonesboro
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Fair Oaks
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95628
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92108
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Boulder
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80304
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Largo
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33777
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Naples
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Palm Harbor
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34684
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Pinellas Park
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33782
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
St. Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Decatur
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Rockford
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Evansville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47714
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40504
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40515
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70809
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Haverhill
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01830
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Grand Rapids
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49546
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77034
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79424
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Mesquite
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75150
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Clarksburg
State/Province
West Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
26301
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
St Leonards
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2065
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Cairns
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4870
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Maroochydore
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4558
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Malvern East
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3145
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Sarajevo
ZIP/Postal Code
71000
Country
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Pleven
ZIP/Postal Code
5800
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Plovdiv
ZIP/Postal Code
4002
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Sevlievo
ZIP/Postal Code
5400
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1606
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1709
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 1L7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Lunenburg
State/Province
Nova Scotia
ZIP/Postal Code
B0J 2C0
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 4V2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Mississauga
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L5M 2V8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5T 2S8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Trois-Rivieres
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G8Z 1Y2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Saskatoon
State/Province
Saskatchewan
ZIP/Postal Code
S7N 0W8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1W 4R4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Santiago
State/Province
RM
ZIP/Postal Code
7510186
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Santiago
State/Province
RM
ZIP/Postal Code
8360156
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Providencia
State/Province
Santiago, RM
ZIP/Postal Code
7530206
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Rancagua
State/Province
VI Region
ZIP/Postal Code
2841959
Country
Chile
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Cartago
Country
Costa Rica
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
San Jose
ZIP/Postal Code
00
Country
Costa Rica
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
San Jose
Country
Costa Rica
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Osijek
ZIP/Postal Code
31000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Split
ZIP/Postal Code
21000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Brno - Zidenice
ZIP/Postal Code
615 00
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
60200
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
656 91
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
65691
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Hlucin
ZIP/Postal Code
748 01
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Pardubice
ZIP/Postal Code
530 02
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Praha 11 - Chodov
ZIP/Postal Code
148 00
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Praha 11
ZIP/Postal Code
14800
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 50
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Praha 4
ZIP/Postal Code
140 00
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Zlin
ZIP/Postal Code
760 01
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Frederiksberg
ZIP/Postal Code
2000
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Randers NOE
ZIP/Postal Code
8930
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Santo Domingo
ZIP/Postal Code
00000
Country
Dominican Republic
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Hyvinkaa
ZIP/Postal Code
05800
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Aachen
ZIP/Postal Code
52064
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
14059
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Frankfurt am Main
ZIP/Postal Code
60590
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Halle
ZIP/Postal Code
06108
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Halle
ZIP/Postal Code
06128
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Herne
ZIP/Postal Code
44652
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Ratingen
ZIP/Postal Code
40882
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Wuerzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
97080
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Daegu
ZIP/Postal Code
705-718
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Gwangju
ZIP/Postal Code
501-757
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
110-744
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
133-792
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Mexico
State/Province
DF
ZIP/Postal Code
10700
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Guadalajara
State/Province
Jalisco
ZIP/Postal Code
44620
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Morelia
State/Province
Michoacan
ZIP/Postal Code
58249
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
San Luis Potosi
State/Province
SLP
ZIP/Postal Code
78240
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Lipa City
State/Province
Batangas
ZIP/Postal Code
4217
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Angeles City
State/Province
Pampanga
ZIP/Postal Code
2009
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Cebu City
ZIP/Postal Code
6000
Country
Philippines
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-337
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Cieszyn
ZIP/Postal Code
43-400
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Koscian
ZIP/Postal Code
64-000
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
31-501
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Sopot
ZIP/Postal Code
81-759
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Torun
ZIP/Postal Code
87-100
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-118
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
82606
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Dunajska Streda
ZIP/Postal Code
92901
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Kosice
ZIP/Postal Code
040 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Nove Zamky
ZIP/Postal Code
94001
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Povazska Dystrica
ZIP/Postal Code
017 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Zilina
ZIP/Postal Code
010 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Santiago de Compostela
State/Province
A Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15705
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Vigo
State/Province
Pontevedra
ZIP/Postal Code
36200
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
A Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28041
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46026
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Rajathevee
State/Province
Bangkok
ZIP/Postal Code
10400
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Amphoe Muang
State/Province
Chiang Mai
ZIP/Postal Code
50200
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Wirral
State/Province
Merseyside
ZIP/Postal Code
CH49 5PE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Cannock
State/Province
Staffs
ZIP/Postal Code
WS11 2XY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Dudley, West Midlands
ZIP/Postal Code
DY1 2HQ
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35577477
Citation
Dikranian AH, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Wellborne F, Alvaro-Gracia JM, Takiya L, Stockert L, Paulissen J, Shi H, Tatulych S, Curtis JR. Efficacy of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis stratified by baseline body mass index: an analysis of pooled data from phase 3 studies. RMD Open. 2022 May;8(1):e002103. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002103.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35382883
Citation
Bartlett SJ, Bingham CO, van Vollenhoven R, Murray C, Gruben D, Gold DA, Cella D. The impact of tofacitinib on fatigue, sleep, and health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of data from Phase 3 trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Apr 5;24(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02724-x.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34921355
Citation
Dikranian A, Gold D, Bessette L, Nash P, Azevedo VF, Wang L, Woolcott J, Shapiro AB, Szumski A, Fleishaker D, Wollenhaupt J. Frequency and Duration of Early Non-serious Adverse Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Tofacitinib. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Apr;9(2):411-433. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00405-w. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34870800
Citation
Winthrop KL, Curtis JR, Yamaoka K, Lee EB, Hirose T, Rivas JL, Kwok K, Burmester GR. Clinical Management of Herpes Zoster in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib Treatment. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Feb;9(1):243-263. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00390-0. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34636000
Citation
Bergman M, Tundia N, Yang M, Orvis E, Clewell J, Bensimon A. Economic Benefit from Improvements in Quality of Life with Upadacitinib: Comparisons with Tofacitinib and Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv Ther. 2021 Dec;38(12):5649-5661. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01930-4. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33127856
Citation
Cohen SB, Tanaka Y, Mariette X, Curtis JR, Lee EB, Nash P, Winthrop KL, Charles-Schoeman C, Wang L, Chen C, Kwok K, Biswas P, Shapiro A, Madsen A, Wollenhaupt J. Long-term safety of tofacitinib up to 9.5 years: a comprehensive integrated analysis of the rheumatoid arthritis clinical development programme. RMD Open. 2020 Oct;6(3):e001395. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001395.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33059710
Citation
Strand V, Kaine J, Alten R, Wallenstein G, Diehl A, Shi H, Germino R, Murray CW. Associations between Patient Global Assessment scores and pain, physical function, and fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of data from phase 3 trials of tofacitinib. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Oct 15;22(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02324-7.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32816215
Citation
Panaccione R, Isaacs JD, Chen LA, Wang W, Marren A, Kwok K, Wang L, Chan G, Su C. Characterization of Creatine Kinase Levels in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Clinical Trials. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2732-2743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06560-4. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Erratum In: Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Oct 10;:
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30177460
Citation
Kivitz AJ, Cohen S, Keystone E, van Vollenhoven RF, Haraoui B, Kaine J, Fan H, Connell CA, Bananis E, Takiya L, Fleischmann R. A pooled analysis of the safety of tofacitinib as monotherapy or in combination with background conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in a Phase 3 rheumatoid arthritis population. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018 Dec;48(3):406-415. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29949132
Citation
Hall S, Nash P, Rischmueller M, Bossingham D, Bird P, Cook N, Witcombe D, Soma K, Kwok K, Thirunavukkarasu K. Tofacitinib, an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor: Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analyses in an Australian Rheumatoid Arthritis Population. Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec;5(2):383-401. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0118-2. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29696833
Citation
van Vollenhoven RF, Lee EB, Fallon L, Zwillich SH, Wilkinson B, Chapman D, DeMasi R, Keystone E. Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Lack of Early Change in Disease Activity and the Probability of Achieving Low Disease Activity at Month 6. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Jan;71(1):71-79. doi: 10.1002/acr.23585.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28143815
Citation
Cohen SB, Tanaka Y, Mariette X, Curtis JR, Lee EB, Nash P, Winthrop KL, Charles-Schoeman C, Thirunavukkarasu K, DeMasi R, Geier J, Kwok K, Wang L, Riese R, Wollenhaupt J. Long-term safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis up to 8.5 years: integrated analysis of data from the global clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jul;76(7):1253-1262. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210457. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27334658
Citation
Genovese MC, van Vollenhoven RF, Wilkinson B, Wang L, Zwillich SH, Gruben D, Biswas P, Riese R, Takiya L, Jones TV. Switching from adalimumab to tofacitinib in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Jun 23;18:145. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1049-3.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26275429
Citation
Charles-Schoeman C, Burmester G, Nash P, Zerbini CA, Soma K, Kwok K, Hendrikx T, Bananis E, Fleischmann R. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib following inadequate response to conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jul;75(7):1293-301. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-207178. Epub 2015 Aug 14. Erratum In: Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Mar;76(3):611.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25047021
Citation
Cohen S, Radominski SC, Gomez-Reino JJ, Wang L, Krishnaswami S, Wood SP, Soma K, Nduaka CI, Kwok K, Valdez H, Benda B, Riese R. Analysis of infections and all-cause mortality in phase II, phase III, and long-term extension studies of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):2924-37. doi: 10.1002/art.38779.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22873531
Citation
van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, Lee EB, Garcia Meijide JA, Wagner S, Forejtova S, Zwillich SH, Gruben D, Koncz T, Wallenstein GV, Krishnaswami S, Bradley JD, Wilkinson B; ORAL Standard Investigators. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 9;367(6):508-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1112072. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 18;369(3):293.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=A3921064&StudyName=A%20Phase%203%20Study%20Comparing%202%20Doses%20Of%20CP-690%2C550%20And%20The%20Active%20Comparator%2C%20Humira%20%28adalimumab%29%20Vs.%20Placebo%20For%20Treatment%20Of%20Rh
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

A Phase 3 Study Comparing 2 Doses Of CP-690,550 And The Active Comparator, Humira (Adalimumab) Vs. Placebo For Treatment Of Rheumatoid Arthritis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs