A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement
Primary Purpose
Knee Osteoarthritis
Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cemented Fixation
High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cementless Fixation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Knee Osteoarthritis focused on measuring total knee arthroplasty, total knee replacement, cementless TKA, high flexion, trabecular metal
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee
- Patients undergoing primary total knee replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age over 75 years old
- Prior unicondylar knee arthroplasty
- Grossly porotic bone or bone defects requiring bone grafting
- Bone cuts not sufficiently accurate for cementless fixation
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Other
Other
Arm Label
Cemented fixation
Cementless fixation
Arm Description
Nexgen High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cemented Fixation
Nexgen High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cementless Fixation
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Radiographic analysis
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Radiographic analysis
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Radiographic analysis
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Radiographic analysis
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Radiographic analysis
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Radiographic analysis
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Complications
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Complications
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Complications
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Complications
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Complications
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Complications
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Complications
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Complications
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Radiographic analysis
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Knee Society Score
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Knee Society Score
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Knee Society Score
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Knee Society Score
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Knee Society Score
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Knee Society Score
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Oxford Knee Score
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Oxford Knee Score
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Oxford Knee Score
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Oxford Knee Score
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Oxford Knee Score
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Oxford Knee Score
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Visual analog pain score
Pain score will be measured from a patient-assessed visual analog pain scale.
Visual analog pain score
Pain score will be measured from a patient-assessed visual analog pain scale.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01194817
First Posted
September 2, 2010
Last Updated
July 20, 2023
Sponsor
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Collaborators
Zimmer Biomet
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01194817
Brief Title
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement
Official Title
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement: Results of a New Modular Trabecular Metal Tibial Component Using the NexGen System
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
April 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2026 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Collaborators
Zimmer Biomet
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the the Nexgen knee replacement system using cementless fixation with the same system using cemented fixation. At minimum 2-year follow-up, the hypothesis is that NexGen total knee arthroplasties using cementless and cemented fixation will demonstrate no differences in clinical outcome based on Oxford and Knee Society scores, patient-assessed visual analog pain, clinical complications, radiographic fixation and implant survivorship.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Knee Osteoarthritis
Keywords
total knee arthroplasty, total knee replacement, cementless TKA, high flexion, trabecular metal
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cemented fixation
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Nexgen High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cemented Fixation
Arm Title
Cementless fixation
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Nexgen High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cementless Fixation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cemented Fixation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
High-Flexion Knee Replacement System using Cementless Fixation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radiographic analysis
Description
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Time Frame
4 week
Title
Radiographic analysis
Description
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Radiographic analysis
Description
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Time Frame
2 year
Title
Radiographic analysis
Description
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Time Frame
5 year
Title
Radiographic analysis
Description
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Time Frame
10 year
Title
Radiographic analysis
Description
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Time Frame
15 year
Title
Complications
Description
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Time Frame
Date of surgery
Title
Complications
Description
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Time Frame
4 week
Title
Complications
Description
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Time Frame
4 month
Title
Complications
Description
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Complications
Description
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Time Frame
2 year
Title
Complications
Description
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Time Frame
5 year
Title
Complications
Description
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Time Frame
10 year
Title
Complications
Description
The number and type of adverse events will be monitored to assess safety.
Time Frame
15 year
Title
Radiographic analysis
Description
Radiographic analysis will include evaluation of component and limb alignment, evidence of component subsidence or migration, and the presence and progression of radiolucent lines between the prosthesis, bone and cement.
Time Frame
4 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Knee Society Score
Description
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Time Frame
4 week
Title
Knee Society Score
Description
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Knee Society Score
Description
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Time Frame
2 year
Title
Knee Society Score
Description
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Time Frame
5 year
Title
Knee Society Score
Description
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Time Frame
10 year
Title
Knee Society Score
Description
A standard clinical evaluation system for reporting results for patients undergoing total knee replacement.
Time Frame
15 year
Title
Oxford Knee Score
Description
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Time Frame
4 week
Title
Oxford Knee Score
Description
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Oxford Knee Score
Description
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Time Frame
2 year
Title
Oxford Knee Score
Description
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Time Frame
5 year
Title
Oxford Knee Score
Description
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Time Frame
10 year
Title
Oxford Knee Score
Description
A patient reported questionnaire for assessing the outcome of knee surgery.
Time Frame
15 year
Title
Visual analog pain score
Description
Pain score will be measured from a patient-assessed visual analog pain scale.
Time Frame
4 week
Title
Visual analog pain score
Description
Pain score will be measured from a patient-assessed visual analog pain scale.
Time Frame
4 month
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee
Patients undergoing primary total knee replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
Age over 75 years old
Prior unicondylar knee arthroplasty
Grossly porotic bone or bone defects requiring bone grafting
Bone cuts not sufficiently accurate for cementless fixation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kevin B Fricka, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs