search
Back to results

A Randomised Comparison Between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Primary Purpose

Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Greece
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Sponsored by
University of Athens
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic focused on measuring cholecystectomy, laparoscopic, pain, single incision

Eligibility Criteria

15 Years - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with acute cholecystitis
  • Patients with extensive upper abdominal incisions
  • Patients with body mass index >30
  • Patients on regular analgesic medication

Sites / Locations

  • Academic Department of Surgery, Aretaieion HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Standard lap chole

Single incision lap chole

Arm Description

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using four entry sites to the abdominal cavity

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using one entry site to the abdominal cavity

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Postoperative pain
Postoperative pain will be assessed using a visual analogue pain score

Secondary Outcome Measures

operating time
nausea or vomiting
tissue damage
pulmonary function
cosmetic result
Quality of life questionnaire
Quality-of-life will be assessed using the EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire preoperatively and 1 week postoperatively. The EQ-5D questionnaire is a generic measure of the quality of life, in which health status is defined in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.

Full Information

First Posted
March 23, 2010
Last Updated
June 24, 2010
Sponsor
University of Athens
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01094379
Brief Title
A Randomised Comparison Between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Official Title
A Randomised Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Recovery Between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using One Port and Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Four Ports
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2011 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2011 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
University of Athens

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been established as the treatment of choice for symptomatic gallstone disease. The main advantages of laparoscopic surgery are the cosmetic result, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and rapid return to normal activity. Although reduced, however, pain is still substantial and constitutes the main clinical problem after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, especially for planned day case procedures. Recently, a new technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been developed, in which all instruments are inserted through the same umbilical incision. The single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) technique for cholecystectomy has been proved to be feasible and safe by several studies. The purpose of the study is to compare postoperative pain and operating time, nausea, vomiting, tissue damage, pulmonary function, cosmetic result, quality of life between SILS and standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Detailed Description
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been established as the treatment of choice for symptomatic gallstone disease. The main advantages of laparoscopic surgery are the cosmetic result, reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and rapid return to normal activity. Although reduced, however, pain is still substantial and constitutes the main clinical problem after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, especially for planned day case procedures. Recently, a new technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been developed, in which all instruments are inserted through the same umbilical incision. The single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) technique for cholecystectomy has been proved to be feasible and safe by several studies. However, there is not for the moment any randomized study between standard and SILS cholecystectomy published. The primary end point of the study is to compare postoperative pain and secondary end points operating time, nausea, vomiting, tissue damage, pulmonary function, cosmetic result and quality of life. Patients admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to Aretaieion Hospital, under the care of four surgeons, will be entered into the study after signed consent is obtained. Randomization will be carried out preoperatively using blocks of random numbers. Anaesthesia will be standardized. The same waterproof dressings, at the same sites, will be applied in all patients in order to prevent nursing and other staff from knowing what variant of operation has been carried out. Postoperatively, all patients will receive and identical protocol of care. Postoperative pain will be assessed using a visual analogue pain score. The same analgesia will be prescribed in all the patients, if required. Postoperative analgesia, nausea or vomiting will be recorded. Pulmonary function tests will be measured, in the sitting position, using a spirometer before and after the operation. Tissue damage will be assessed by measuring CRP and Interleukin-6 (IL-6). Injury or inflammation of the human body results in increased concentrations of the acute-phase reactant proteins. CRP is very consistent in response and is, therefore, the most satisfactory single screening test for an acute phase reactant. IL-6 is one of the most important mediators of the acute phase response. It is secreted by T cells and macrophages to stimulate immune response to trauma. The cosmetic result will be assessed by the patient. Quality-of-life will be assessed using the EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire preoperatively and at 1 week postoperatively. The EQ-5D questionnaire is a generic measure of the quality of life, in which health status is defined in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Reevaluation of the patients will take place 1 week and 4 weeks after the operation in the outpatient clinic. If we consider that we reduce postoperative pain at 35%, then with α: 0.05 and β: 0.20 we need 20 patients in each arm.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic
Keywords
cholecystectomy, laparoscopic, pain, single incision

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard lap chole
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using four entry sites to the abdominal cavity
Arm Title
Single incision lap chole
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using one entry site to the abdominal cavity
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Intervention Description
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using four entry sites to the abdominal cavity
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Other Intervention Name(s)
One port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Intervention Description
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using one entry site to the abdominal cavity
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Postoperative pain
Description
Postoperative pain will be assessed using a visual analogue pain score
Time Frame
24h
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
operating time
Time Frame
Duration of surgical procedure
Title
nausea or vomiting
Time Frame
24 h
Title
tissue damage
Time Frame
24h
Title
pulmonary function
Time Frame
24h
Title
cosmetic result
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Quality of life questionnaire
Description
Quality-of-life will be assessed using the EuroQoL EQ-5D questionnaire preoperatively and 1 week postoperatively. The EQ-5D questionnaire is a generic measure of the quality of life, in which health status is defined in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Time Frame
1 week

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
15 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis, admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy Exclusion Criteria: Patients with acute cholecystitis Patients with extensive upper abdominal incisions Patients with body mass index >30 Patients on regular analgesic medication
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Antonios Vezakis, Lecturer
Phone
00306977405605
Email
avezakis@hotmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
George Polymeneas, Professor
Phone
00306944738558
Email
gpolym@med.uoa.gr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Antonios Vezakis, lecturer
Organizational Affiliation
University of Athens
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Academic Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
11528
Country
Greece
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Antonios Vezakis, Lecturer
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
George Polymeneas, Professor

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18815836
Citation
Tacchino R, Greco F, Matera D. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar. Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):896-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0147-y. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19688389
Citation
Chow A, Purkayastha S, Aziz O, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique. Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):709-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0655-4. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21910897
Citation
Steinemann DC, Raptis DA, Lurje G, Oberkofler CE, Wyss R, Zehnder A, Lesurtel M, Vonlanthen R, Clavien PA, Breitenstein S. Cosmesis and body image after single-port laparoscopic or conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multicenter double blinded randomised controlled trial (SPOCC-trial). BMC Surg. 2011 Sep 12;11:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-24.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Randomised Comparison Between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs