A Randomised, Controlled Comparison of Vitamin D Strategies is Acute Hip Fracture Patients
Primary Purpose
Hip Fracture
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vitamin D2
Vitamin D2
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hip Fracture focused on measuring Vitamin D, Hip fracture, Optimal level, Deficiency, Functional muscle strength
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fragility hip fracture patient
- Previous Vitamin D supplementation is okay.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with pathological fracture secondary to malignancy or intrinsic bone disease (eg. Paget's disease)
- Cancer in the past 10 years likely to metastasize to bone
- Renal insufficiency (creatinine <30 mls/min)
- Hypercalcemia (primary hyperparathyroidism; granulomatous diseases; drug-induced such as lithium, thiazides), hypocalcemia, hypercalciuria, fracture or stroke within the last 3 months
- Hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, fluoride, or bisphosphonates during the previous 24 months
- Pre-existing bone abnormality
- Renal stones in past 10 years
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
1
2
3
Arm Description
50 000 IU Vitamin D2
100 000 IU Vitamin D2
Placebo
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD)
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD) was measured at baseline, at discharge from hospital (approximately 4-weeks), and at a follow-up study visit at approximately 3-months.Baseline and 4-week blood samples were drawn in-hospital; venipunctures performed at 3-months were either in-hospital (if patient remained in acute care or rehabilitation) or at the out-patient clinic visit.Serum 25-OHD was analyzed with the DiaSorin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D radioimmunoassay (Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0285, U.S.A) at the central laboratory with the exception of 3 patients (data analyzed at other laboratories).
Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional PTH was accessed at baseline.
Calcium
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional Calcium was accessed at baseline and approximately 4 weeks.
Phosphate
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional phosphate was accessed at baseline.
Alkaline Phosphatase
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional Alkaline Phosphatase was accessed at baseline.
Hemoglobin
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional hemoglobin was accessed at baseline.
Creatinine
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional creatinine was accessed at baseline.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Functional Assessment Using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test After 3 Months
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) was collected for patients who attended the 3-month clinic appointment by study coordinators or for patients who attended the rehabilitation unit this is routinely collected and was abstracted from chart. The TUG was conducted using a standard armchair and a line marked 3-metres from the chair. Participants were given the following instructions (no physical assistance was given): "Rise from the chair, walk to the line on the floor, turn, return to the chair and sit down again". Scores are measured as time in seconds to complete the task.
Functional Assessment Using the Two Minute Walk Test (2MWT)After 3 Months
The 2MWT was collected for patients who attended the 3-month clinic appointment by study coordinators or for patients who attended rehabilitation, it was abstracted from their charts. The 2MWT test was given in a carpeted corridor and the subject was instructed to wear regular footwear and to use their customary walking aid. The distance the participant could comfortably walk in two-minutes (without physical assistance) was measured in metres.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00424619
First Posted
January 17, 2007
Last Updated
May 11, 2012
Sponsor
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Collaborators
Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00424619
Brief Title
A Randomised, Controlled Comparison of Vitamin D Strategies is Acute Hip Fracture Patients
Official Title
A Randomised, Controlled Comparison of Vitamin D Strategies is Acute Hip Fracture Patients
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2009 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Collaborators
Merck Frosst Canada Ltd.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine the best dose of Vitamin D to give to hip fracture patients to achieve the optimal therapeutic level.
Detailed Description
Low Vitamin D levels can cause faster bone loss and increase the risk of having a fracture. Patients who experience a hip fracture have low levels of Vitamin D. It is not clear how much Vitamin D must be taken in order to reach this optimal level.
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD) concentrations are the recognized functional status indicator for vitamin D. Although there is no clear consensus, vitamin D 'insufficiency' has been considered in the range of 25- 75/80 nmol/L. Patients with acute hip fracture are at high risk for a recurrent hip fracture or other fragility fractures (and falls) and are a group who should be targeted for osteoporosis treatment (i.e. Bisphosphonate or other antiresorptive). Before fracture patients start on a bisphosphonate, however, an important consideration is whether 25-OHD levels are at a therapeutic level (>75 nmol/l and less than 150-200 nmol/L). Case-control studies indicate that older people who experience a hip fracture have lower serum concentrations of 25-OHD than do those without a fracture. In cross-sectional studies, the majority of patients with hip fracture are considered to have insufficient vitamin D levels. Although the benefits of supplementing patients with at least 800 to 1000 IU/day Vitamin D3 may be recognized, there is little information available to guide physicians regarding the appropriate management of hip fracture patients who may be severely Vitamin D deficient, particularly in acute hip fracture patients. Few studies have examined whether high dose vitamin D (i.e. 50,000 IU or greater/week) offers an advantage over smaller, routinely prescribed doses (i.e. 800 or 1000 IU), particularly in hip fracture patients.
The purpose of this study is to determine the number of hip fracture patients reaching an optimal level of vitamin D comparing between three different Vitamin D dose strategies:
A. 50,000 D2 oral bolus followed by 800 IU D3 daily B. 100,000 D2 oral bolus followed by 800 IU D3 daily C. 800 IU D3 daily
The Vitamin D strategies will be administered over 3-months in acute hip fracture patients. The proportion of patients reaching an optimal level of 25-OHD (>75 nmol/L) will be determined.
Secondary measures include the Timed Up and Go test, and 2 Minute Walk Test to compare the effects of the Vitamin D supplementation strategies on functional and muscle strength scales.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hip Fracture
Keywords
Vitamin D, Hip fracture, Optimal level, Deficiency, Functional muscle strength
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
64 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
50 000 IU Vitamin D2
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
100 000 IU Vitamin D2
Arm Title
3
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vitamin D2
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ostoforte
Intervention Description
50 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vitamin D2
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ostoforte
Intervention Description
100 000 IU vitamin D2, one time bolus dose
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo, 1 time bolus dose
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD)
Description
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD) was measured at baseline, at discharge from hospital (approximately 4-weeks), and at a follow-up study visit at approximately 3-months.Baseline and 4-week blood samples were drawn in-hospital; venipunctures performed at 3-months were either in-hospital (if patient remained in acute care or rehabilitation) or at the out-patient clinic visit.Serum 25-OHD was analyzed with the DiaSorin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D radioimmunoassay (Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-0285, U.S.A) at the central laboratory with the exception of 3 patients (data analyzed at other laboratories).
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks and 3 months
Title
Parathyroid Hormone (PTH)
Description
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional PTH was accessed at baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Calcium
Description
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional Calcium was accessed at baseline and approximately 4 weeks.
Time Frame
Baseline, 4 weeks
Title
Phosphate
Description
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional phosphate was accessed at baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Alkaline Phosphatase
Description
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional Alkaline Phosphatase was accessed at baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Hemoglobin
Description
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional hemoglobin was accessed at baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Creatinine
Description
Baseline blood samples were drawn in-hospital. In additional creatinine was accessed at baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Functional Assessment Using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test After 3 Months
Description
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) was collected for patients who attended the 3-month clinic appointment by study coordinators or for patients who attended the rehabilitation unit this is routinely collected and was abstracted from chart. The TUG was conducted using a standard armchair and a line marked 3-metres from the chair. Participants were given the following instructions (no physical assistance was given): "Rise from the chair, walk to the line on the floor, turn, return to the chair and sit down again". Scores are measured as time in seconds to complete the task.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Functional Assessment Using the Two Minute Walk Test (2MWT)After 3 Months
Description
The 2MWT was collected for patients who attended the 3-month clinic appointment by study coordinators or for patients who attended rehabilitation, it was abstracted from their charts. The 2MWT test was given in a carpeted corridor and the subject was instructed to wear regular footwear and to use their customary walking aid. The distance the participant could comfortably walk in two-minutes (without physical assistance) was measured in metres.
Time Frame
3 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Fragility hip fracture patient
Previous Vitamin D supplementation is okay.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with pathological fracture secondary to malignancy or intrinsic bone disease (eg. Paget's disease)
Cancer in the past 10 years likely to metastasize to bone
Renal insufficiency (creatinine <30 mls/min)
Hypercalcemia (primary hyperparathyroidism; granulomatous diseases; drug-induced such as lithium, thiazides), hypocalcemia, hypercalciuria, fracture or stroke within the last 3 months
Hormone replacement therapy, calcitonin, fluoride, or bisphosphonates during the previous 24 months
Pre-existing bone abnormality
Renal stones in past 10 years
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexandra Papaioannou, M.D., M.Sc.
Organizational Affiliation
McMaster University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21689448
Citation
Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Giangregorio L, Ioannidis G, Pritchard J, Hanley DA, Farrauto L, DeBeer J, Adachi JD. A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D dosing strategies after acute hip fracture: no advantage of loading doses over daily supplementation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jun 20;12:135. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-135.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Randomised, Controlled Comparison of Vitamin D Strategies is Acute Hip Fracture Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs