search
Back to results

A Randomised Controlled Trial of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Standard Oxygen Therapy in Critically Ill Immunocompromised Patients (HIGH)

Primary Purpose

Acute Respiratory Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
standard oxygen
HFNO
Sponsored by
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Respiratory Failure focused on measuring immunocompromized patients, critically ill patients

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Known immunosuppression defined as one or more of the following: (a) immunosuppressive drug or long-term [>3 months] or high-dose [>0.5 mg/kg/day] steroids; (b) solid organ transplantation; (c) solid tumour; (d) haematological malignancy.
  • ICU admission for any reason
  • Need for oxygen therapy ≥6 Liters/min defined as one or more of the following: (a) respiratory distress with a respiratory rate >30/min; (b) cyanosis; (c) laboured breathing; (d) SpO2<90%; and (e) expected respiratory deterioration during a procedure
  • Written informed consent from the patient or proxy (if present) before inclusion or once possible when patient has been included in a context of emergency.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient admitted to the ICU for end-of-life care. Do-not-intubate (DNI) patients can be included.
  • Refusal of study participation or to pursue the study by the patient
  • Hypercapnia with a formal indication for NIV [PaCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg, formal indication for NIV]
  • Isolated cardiogenic pulmonary oedema [formal indication for NIV]. Patients with pulmonary oedema associated with another ARF etiology can be included.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Anatomical factors precluding the use of a nasal cannula
  • Absence of coverage by the French statutory healthcare insurance system
  • Post surgical setting from D1 to D6

After discussion at the investigator meeting and based on comments from the Data and Safety Monitoring Board on May 12, 2016, as all included patients need to have an acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and at least 6l of oxygen per minute, patients admitted to the ICU to secure any procedure (bronchoscopy etc..) or those not admitted for acute respiratory failure and who undergo intubation, will NOT be included in this trial. Only patients meeting criteria of acute respiratory failure will be included in this trial.

Sites / Locations

  • Medical ICU

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

standard oxygen group

High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) group

Arm Description

Oxygen therapy will be delivered using any device or combination of devices that are part of usual care: nasal oxygen, and mask with or without a reservoir bag and with or without the Venturi system

Device that delivers humidified and warmed high-flow oxygen at flows greater than 15 L/min. HFNO will be initiated at a flow rate of 50 L/min and 100% FiO2. If the target SpO2 is not reached, the flow rate will be increased to 60 L/min. Then, FiO2 will be tapered to target an SpO2≥95. The minimal flow rate will be 45 L/min

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

All-cause day-28 mortality

Secondary Outcome Measures

Intubation or reintubation rate
proportion of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation
patient comfort
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score
Intensity of dyspnoea
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score
Perceived Exertion
Borg scale
Respiratory rate
Oxygenation
based on continuous saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2) monitoring, lowest SpO2 from D1 to D3 and PaO2/FiO2 on D1, D2, and D3
ICU length of stay
Incidence of ICU-acquired infections
Time to clear pulmonary infiltrates
Murray score
Oxygen-free and ventilation-free survivals
Re-intubation rate
Lowest median SpO2 during intubation
for patients who were intubated during the study period
Repartition of acute mild/moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) stages after intubation or reintubation as defined by the Berlin definition
Hypoxemic cardiac arrests
After discussion at the investigator meeting and based on comments from the Data and Safety Monitoring Board on May 12, 2016, all hypoxemic cardiac arrests will be considered as suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction

Full Information

First Posted
March 29, 2016
Last Updated
July 20, 2018
Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02739451
Brief Title
A Randomised Controlled Trial of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Standard Oxygen Therapy in Critically Ill Immunocompromised Patients
Acronym
HIGH
Official Title
A Randomised Controlled Trial of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Standard Oxygen Therapy in Critically Ill Immunocompromised Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading reason for ICU admission in immunocompromised patients. Usual oxygen therapy involves administering low-to-medium oxygen flows through a nasal cannula or mask [with or without a bag and with or without the Venturi system] to achieve SpO2≥95%. Oxygen therapy may be combined with non-invasive ventilation [NIV] providing both end-expiratory positive pressure and pressure support. However, in a recent trial by our group, non-invasive ventialtion [NIV] was not superior over oxygen without NIV. High-flow nasal oxygen [HFNO] therapy is a focus of growing attention as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy. By providing warmed and humidified gas, HFNO allows the delivery of higher flow rates [of up to 60 L/min] via nasal cannula devices, with Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) values of nearly 100%. Physiological benefits of HFNO consist of higher and constant FiO2 values, decreased work of breathing, nasopharyngeal washout leading to improved breathing-effort efficiency, and higher positive airway pressures associated with better lung recruitment. Clinical consequences of these physiological benefits include alleviation of dyspnoea and discomfort, decreases in tachypnoea and signs of respiratory distress, a diminished need for intubation in patients with severe hypoxemia, and decreased mortality in unselected patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure However, although preliminary data establish the feasibility and safety of this technique, HFNO has never been properly evaluated in immunocompromised patients. Thus, this project aims at demonstrating that HFNO is superior to low/medium-flow (standard) oxygen, minimising day-28 mortality
Detailed Description
After discussion at the investigator meeting and based on comments from the Data and Safety Monitoring Board on May 12, 2016, the DSMB has highlighted the need of the interim analysis (already planned) as benefits from high flow oxygen may be observed after 400 inclusions. Update on June 16, 2017: The number of patients enrolled is 488 and the inclusion rate is increasing steadily. The interim analysis has been performed as scheduled and the DSMB decided that nothing should be changed.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Respiratory Failure
Keywords
immunocompromized patients, critically ill patients

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
776 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
standard oxygen group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Oxygen therapy will be delivered using any device or combination of devices that are part of usual care: nasal oxygen, and mask with or without a reservoir bag and with or without the Venturi system
Arm Title
High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Device that delivers humidified and warmed high-flow oxygen at flows greater than 15 L/min. HFNO will be initiated at a flow rate of 50 L/min and 100% FiO2. If the target SpO2 is not reached, the flow rate will be increased to 60 L/min. Then, FiO2 will be tapered to target an SpO2≥95. The minimal flow rate will be 45 L/min
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
standard oxygen
Intervention Description
Devices used to treat spontaneously ventilating patients in the ICU who require supplemental oxygen. They deliver either low-flow oxygen [including nasal cannula, Ventimask® without Venturi effect, and non-rebreather mask] or medium-flow oxygen [Venturi masks and medium-flow facemasks]
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
HFNO
Intervention Description
The intervention is the use of a device that allows to deliver high flow humidified and warmed oxygen. The device used is the Optiflow™ (Fisher&Paykel, Courtaboeuf, France).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
All-cause day-28 mortality
Time Frame
28 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Intubation or reintubation rate
Description
proportion of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation
Time Frame
days 3 and 28
Title
patient comfort
Description
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame
28 days
Title
Intensity of dyspnoea
Description
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score
Time Frame
days 1-3
Title
Perceived Exertion
Description
Borg scale
Time Frame
days 1-3
Title
Respiratory rate
Time Frame
days 1-3
Title
Oxygenation
Description
based on continuous saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2) monitoring, lowest SpO2 from D1 to D3 and PaO2/FiO2 on D1, D2, and D3
Time Frame
days 1-3
Title
ICU length of stay
Time Frame
28 days
Title
Incidence of ICU-acquired infections
Time Frame
28 days
Title
Time to clear pulmonary infiltrates
Description
Murray score
Time Frame
28 days
Title
Oxygen-free and ventilation-free survivals
Time Frame
day 28
Title
Re-intubation rate
Time Frame
day 28
Title
Lowest median SpO2 during intubation
Description
for patients who were intubated during the study period
Time Frame
days 1-3
Title
Repartition of acute mild/moderate/severe respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) stages after intubation or reintubation as defined by the Berlin definition
Time Frame
day 28
Title
Hypoxemic cardiac arrests
Description
After discussion at the investigator meeting and based on comments from the Data and Safety Monitoring Board on May 12, 2016, all hypoxemic cardiac arrests will be considered as suspected unexpected serious adverse reaction
Time Frame
day 28

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Known immunosuppression defined as one or more of the following: (a) immunosuppressive drug or long-term [>3 months] or high-dose [>0.5 mg/kg/day] steroids; (b) solid organ transplantation; (c) solid tumour; (d) haematological malignancy. ICU admission for any reason Need for oxygen therapy ≥6 Liters/min defined as one or more of the following: (a) respiratory distress with a respiratory rate >30/min; (b) cyanosis; (c) laboured breathing; (d) SpO2<90%; and (e) expected respiratory deterioration during a procedure Written informed consent from the patient or proxy (if present) before inclusion or once possible when patient has been included in a context of emergency. Exclusion Criteria: Patient admitted to the ICU for end-of-life care. Do-not-intubate (DNI) patients can be included. Refusal of study participation or to pursue the study by the patient Hypercapnia with a formal indication for NIV [PaCO2 ≥ 50 mmHg, formal indication for NIV] Isolated cardiogenic pulmonary oedema [formal indication for NIV]. Patients with pulmonary oedema associated with another ARF etiology can be included. Pregnancy or breastfeeding Anatomical factors precluding the use of a nasal cannula Absence of coverage by the French statutory healthcare insurance system Post surgical setting from D1 to D6 After discussion at the investigator meeting and based on comments from the Data and Safety Monitoring Board on May 12, 2016, as all included patients need to have an acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and at least 6l of oxygen per minute, patients admitted to the ICU to secure any procedure (bronchoscopy etc..) or those not admitted for acute respiratory failure and who undergo intubation, will NOT be included in this trial. Only patients meeting criteria of acute respiratory failure will be included in this trial.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elie Azoulay, MDPhD
Organizational Affiliation
APHP
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medical ICU
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30357270
Citation
Azoulay E, Lemiale V, Mokart D, Nseir S, Argaud L, Pene F, Kontar L, Bruneel F, Klouche K, Barbier F, Reignier J, Berrahil-Meksen L, Louis G, Constantin JM, Mayaux J, Wallet F, Kouatchet A, Peigne V, Theodose I, Perez P, Girault C, Jaber S, Oziel J, Nyunga M, Terzi N, Bouadma L, Lebert C, Lautrette A, Bige N, Raphalen JH, Papazian L, Darmon M, Chevret S, Demoule A. Effect of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Standard Oxygen on 28-Day Mortality in Immunocompromised Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure: The HIGH Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Nov 27;320(20):2099-2107. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14282.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29506579
Citation
Azoulay E, Lemiale V, Mokart D, Nseir S, Argaud L, Pene F, Kontar L, Bruneel F, Klouche K, Barbier F, Reignier J, Stoclin A, Louis G, Constantin JM, Mayaux J, Wallet F, Kouatchet A, Peigne V, Perez P, Girault C, Jaber S, Oziel J, Nyunga M, Terzi N, Bouadma L, Lebert C, Lautrette A, Bige N, Raphalen JH, Papazian L, Rabbat A, Darmon M, Chevret S, Demoule A. High-flow nasal oxygen vs. standard oxygen therapy in immunocompromised patients with acute respiratory failure: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Mar 5;19(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2492-z.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Randomised Controlled Trial of High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Versus Standard Oxygen Therapy in Critically Ill Immunocompromised Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs