search
Back to results

A Randomized Comparative Study Evaluating the Tolerability and Efficacy of Two Topical Therapies for the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars

Primary Purpose

Keloid, Hypertrophic Scar, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion
Onion extract gel
Cetearyl alcohol lotion
Sponsored by
University of Miami
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Keloid focused on measuring Keloid, Hypertrophic scar, Hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion, HSE, Onion extract gel, OE, Cetearyl alcohol lotion, CEA

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for enrollment into the study:

  1. Male or female, at least 18 years old in good general health, that have a hypertrophic and keloid scar. The length of the scar should be between 1-4 cm. Individuals who are willing and able to follow the requirements for study participation
  2. The investigator believes that the scar could benefit from the study medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria should be excluded from the study:

  1. Individuals with target scar that is not amenable to the randomized treatment
  2. Individuals who are planning pregnancy, or pregnant as determined by urine pregnancy test during the duration of the study, or breast-feeding an infant
  3. Individuals with uncontrolled diabetes or autoimmune disorders
  4. Individuals who have received scar treatment within one month of the first day of study treatment
  5. Individuals who plan to receive scar treatment(s) other than study treatment during the trial
  6. Individuals with a known sensitivity to any ingredients in the test products
  7. Individuals with any skin conditions or taking any medications that may interfere with the study medication.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Miami Skin Research Group Office

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Regimen A

Regimen B

Regimen C

Arm Description

0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion

Onion extract gel

Cetearyl alcohol lotion

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Lesion Volume
Blinded investigator assessed the scar volume by using an alginate impression.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Lesion Length
Blinded investigator assessed the scar length. Measured with ruler, from scar tip to tip.
Change in Lesion Width
Blinded investigator assessed the scar width. Measured with a ruler at the visually largest width.
Change in Lesion Induration
Blinded investigator assessed the scar induration. Measured with a ruler at deepest point.
Change in Lesion Erythema
Blinded investigator assessed the scar erythema. Measured with a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).
Change in Lesion Pigmentary Alteration
Blinded investigator assessed the scar pigmentation alteration using a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).
Change in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance
Blinded investigator assessed the scar cosmetic appearance using a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).
Change in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance
Subjects assessed the scar cosmetic appearance with a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).

Full Information

First Posted
September 15, 2008
Last Updated
June 17, 2019
Sponsor
University of Miami
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00754247
Brief Title
A Randomized Comparative Study Evaluating the Tolerability and Efficacy of Two Topical Therapies for the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars
Official Title
A Prospective, Randomized, Investigator-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Comparative Study Evaluating the Tolerability and Efficacy of Two Topical Therapies for the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2008 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Miami

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Keloids are thought to result from derailments in the typical wound healing process following cutaneous injury. Current treatment options for keloids include intralesional corticosteroids, silicone gel sheeting, compression, surgery and adjuvants to surgery, including radiation and cryotherapy. 0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion (HSE) and onion extract gel (OE) are widely used over-the-counter medications for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. However, their efficacy and safety have not been compared in a blinded, placebo-controlled, prospective fashion. This study is being undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of HSE versus OE versus placebo (Cetearyl alcohol; CEA) in subjects with hypertrophic scars and keloids. This is an investigator-blinded study, which means that the doctor evaluating you will not know if you are receiving the study medication or not. Another doctor will be supplying you with the medication and discussing any problems that you may have with the medication. You will be assigned to one of the three treatment groups: HSE, OE, or CEA. The group will be assigned by chance and you will have two in three chances of receiving treatment with a study medication, HSE or OE. The no treatment group will receive CEA, a bland lotion, containing no active ingredients such as steroids, silicone, vitamin E, or onion extract.
Detailed Description
This study will last up to 16 weeks, with a total of 5 visits to the clinic (Baseline visit, Week 4, 8, 12, and 16 ), excluding the Screening Visit. Screening Visit/Baseline Visit: Patients will read and be explained the informed consent. Patients who agree to participate will sign the informed consent and a copy will be given to them. Medical history and exclusion/inclusion criteria will be reviewed; if a patient qualifies he/she will be assigned a randomization number for the treatment. At the baseline visit, medical history and exclusion/inclusion criteria since the screening visit will be reviewed. Patients randomized to the HSE group will receive one tube and apply the first application to the keloid/hypertrophic scar during the baseline visit. Patients randomized to the OE group will be given a tube of OE gel and will apply the first application to the keloid/hypertrophic scar. Patients in the placebo group will be given a bottle of CEA lotion, the placebo medication, and will apply the first application to the keloid/hypertrophic scar. The medications will be given by the unblinded investigator and the blinded investigator will be evaluating the patients. Photographs of the patient's keloid/hypertrophic scar will be taken, and the keloid/hypertrophic scar will be measured/assessed according to Methods of Study Lesion Assessment (below). A urine pregnancy test will be obtained for all women of child-bearing potential. Week 4, 8, 12, and 16 Visit: Patients will be asked about side effects since last visit. Photographs of the patient's keloid/hypertrophic scar will be taken and the keloid/hypertrophic scar will be measured/assessed according to Methods of Study Lesion Assessment (below). A urine pregnancy test will be obtained at for all women of child-bearing potential. Methods of Study Lesion Assessment A. Volume B. Linear dimensions Investigator's Assessments w/ Visual Analog Scale (VAS): C. Cosmetic assessment D. Induration (hardness) [compared to standardized hard discs with numerical ranking of increased induration] E. Erythema (redness) F. Pigmentary alteration Patient's Assessments w/ VAS: G. Cosmetic assessment H. Pain I. Tenderness J. Pruritus (itching) K. Patient satisfaction L. Digital photographs

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Keloid, Hypertrophic Scar, Cicatrix, Hypertrophic
Keywords
Keloid, Hypertrophic scar, Hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion, HSE, Onion extract gel, OE, Cetearyl alcohol lotion, CEA

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Regimen A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion
Arm Title
Regimen B
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Onion extract gel
Arm Title
Regimen C
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Cetearyl alcohol lotion
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion
Other Intervention Name(s)
Scarguard
Intervention Description
0.5% hydrocortisone, silicone, vitamin E lotion will be applied topically to cover the selected scar twice daily for 16 weeks. The lesion will be cleansed with soap and water and dried thoroughly. The medication will be applied with a brush and allow it to dry for one minute before contact with clothing.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Onion extract gel
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mederma
Intervention Description
Onion extract gel is applied and massaged into the selected scar 3 to 4 times daily according to product instructions for 16 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cetearyl alcohol lotion
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cetaphil lotion
Intervention Description
Placebo is cetearyl alcohol lotion with no steroids, silicone, vitamin E, or onion extract and will be applied 2 times a day to the lesion.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Lesion Volume
Description
Blinded investigator assessed the scar volume by using an alginate impression.
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Lesion Length
Description
Blinded investigator assessed the scar length. Measured with ruler, from scar tip to tip.
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Title
Change in Lesion Width
Description
Blinded investigator assessed the scar width. Measured with a ruler at the visually largest width.
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Title
Change in Lesion Induration
Description
Blinded investigator assessed the scar induration. Measured with a ruler at deepest point.
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Title
Change in Lesion Erythema
Description
Blinded investigator assessed the scar erythema. Measured with a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Title
Change in Lesion Pigmentary Alteration
Description
Blinded investigator assessed the scar pigmentation alteration using a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Title
Change in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance
Description
Blinded investigator assessed the scar cosmetic appearance using a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16
Title
Change in Lesion Cosmetic Appearance
Description
Subjects assessed the scar cosmetic appearance with a visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0-100 (0=best and 100=worst).
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline visit (week 0) and week 16

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for enrollment into the study: Male or female, at least 18 years old in good general health, that have a hypertrophic and keloid scar. The length of the scar should be between 1-4 cm. Individuals who are willing and able to follow the requirements for study participation The investigator believes that the scar could benefit from the study medication. Exclusion Criteria: Subjects who meet any of the following criteria should be excluded from the study: Individuals with target scar that is not amenable to the randomized treatment Individuals who are planning pregnancy, or pregnant as determined by urine pregnancy test during the duration of the study, or breast-feeding an infant Individuals with uncontrolled diabetes or autoimmune disorders Individuals who have received scar treatment within one month of the first day of study treatment Individuals who plan to receive scar treatment(s) other than study treatment during the trial Individuals with a known sensitivity to any ingredients in the test products Individuals with any skin conditions or taking any medications that may interfere with the study medication.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brian Berman, M.D., Ph.D
Organizational Affiliation
University of Miami, Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Miami Skin Research Group Office
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
8979497
Citation
Augusti KT. Therapeutic values of onion (Allium cepa L.) and garlic (Allium sativum L.). Indian J Exp Biol. 1996 Jul;34(7):634-40.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12087249
Citation
Saulis AS, Mogford JH, Mustoe TA. Effect of Mederma on hypertrophic scarring in the rabbit ear model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jul;110(1):177-83; discussion 184-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200207000-00029.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12032371
Citation
Musgrave MA, Umraw N, Fish JS, Gomez M, Cartotto RC. The effect of silicone gel sheets on perfusion of hypertrophic burn scars. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002 May-Jun;23(3):208-14. doi: 10.1097/00004630-200205000-00010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8874525
Citation
Phillips TJ, Gerstein AD, Lordan V. A randomized controlled trial of hydrocolloid dressing in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Dermatol Surg. 1996 Sep;22(9):775-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1996.tb00728.x.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Eisen D. A pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of scarguard in the prevention of scars. Internet J Dermatol. 2004;5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12753606
Citation
Gilman TH. Silicone sheet for treatment and prevention of hypertrophic scar: a new proposal for the mechanism of efficacy. Wound Repair Regen. 2003 May-Jun;11(3):235-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2003.11313.x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10417579
Citation
Jackson BA, Shelton AJ. Pilot study evaluating topical onion extract as treatment for postsurgical scars. Dermatol Surg. 1999 Apr;25(4):267-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.1999.08240.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16442038
Citation
Chung VQ, Kelley L, Marra D, Jiang SB. Onion extract gel versus petrolatum emollient on new surgical scars: prospective double-blinded study. Dermatol Surg. 2006 Feb;32(2):193-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32045.x.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.skininvestigation.com
Description
Skin Research Group Website

Learn more about this trial

A Randomized Comparative Study Evaluating the Tolerability and Efficacy of Two Topical Therapies for the Treatment of Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs