Phase 2: Number and Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Titer of ≥1:40
Serum specimens were tested for the presence of HAI antibodies to influenza. The HAI assay was conducted using serum samples from all the subjects in Phase 2 of the study and in a subset of approximately 270 subjects receiving the IVACFLU-A/H5N1 vaccine (vaccinees) and placebo from one study site in Phase 3 in order to have at least 200 evaluable subjects receiving IVACFLU-A/H5N1 and 40 evaluable subjects receiving placebo, at the end of study.
Phase 2: Number and Percentage of Subjects Achieving at Least a 4-fold Increase in Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Titer
Serum specimens were tested for the presence of HAI antibodies to influenza on day 1, day 22, and day 43 (day 1 and 22 prior to injection). The HAI assay was conducted using serum samples from all the subjects in Phase 2 of the study and in a subset of approximately 270 subjects receiving the IVACFLU-A/H5N1 vaccine (vaccinees) and placebo from one study site in Phase 3 in order to have at least 200 evaluable subjects receiving IVACFLU-A/H5N1 and 40 evaluable subjects receiving placebo, at the end of study.
Phase 3: Number and Percentage of Subjects Achieving at Least a 4-fold Increase in Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Titer
Serum specimens were tested for the presence of HAI antibodies to influenza. The HAI assay was conducted using serum samples from all the subjects in Phase 2 of the study and in a subset of approximately 270 subjects receiving the IVACFLU-A/H5N1 vaccine (vaccinees) and placebo from one study site in Phase 3 in order to have at least 200 evaluable subjects receiving IVACFLU-A/H5N1 and 40 evaluable subjects receiving placebo, at the end of study.
Phase 2: Geometric Mean Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Titer
Serum specimens were tested for the presence of HAI antibodies to influenza on day 1, day 22, and day 43 (day 1 and 22 prior to injection). The HAI assay was conducted using serum samples from all the subjects in Phase 2 of the study and in a subset of approximately 270 subjects receiving the IVACFLU-A/H5N1 vaccine (vaccinees) and placebo from one study site in Phase 3 in order to have at least 200 evaluable subjects receiving IVACFLU-A/H5N1 and 40 evaluable subjects receiving placebo, at the end of study.
Phase 3: Geometric Mean Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Titer
Serum specimens were tested for the presence of HAI antibodies to influenza. The HAI assay was conducted using serum samples from all the subjects in Phase 2 of the study and in a subset of approximately 270 subjects receiving the IVACFLU-A/H5N1 vaccine (vaccinees) and placebo from one study site in Phase 3 in order to have at least 200 evaluable subjects receiving IVACFLU-A/H5N1 and 40 evaluable subjects receiving placebo, at the end of study.
Phase 2: Geometric Mean Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Titer Ratio, With Respect to Day 1
Serum specimens were tested for the presence of HAI antibodies to influenza on day 1, day 22, and day 43 (day 1 and 22 prior to injection). The HAI assay was conducted using serum samples from all the subjects in Phase 2 of the study and in a subset of approximately 270 subjects receiving the IVACFLU-A/H5N1 vaccine (vaccinees) and placebo from one study site in Phase 3 in order to have at least 200 evaluable subjects receiving IVACFLU-A/H5N1 and 40 evaluable subjects receiving placebo, at the end of study.
Phase 3: Geometric Mean Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) Titer Ratio, With Respect to Day 1
Serum specimens were tested for the presence of HAI antibodies to influenza. The HAI assay was conducted using serum samples from all the subjects in Phase 2 of the study and in a subset of approximately 270 subjects receiving the IVACFLU-A/H5N1 vaccine (vaccinees) and placebo from one study site in Phase 3 in order to have at least 200 evaluable subjects receiving IVACFLU-A/H5N1 and 40 evaluable subjects receiving placebo, at the end of study.
Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Reactogenicity
Immediate reactogenicity (30 minutes post-injection) were evaluated on Day 1 and Day 22 and consisted of:
Inspection of the upper arms for the presence or absence of redness, swelling, hardness, pain, or tenderness; and
Documentation of the presence or absence of headache, fever, fatigue/malaise, muscle aches, joint aches, nausea, vomiting, or chills.
Immediate reactogenicity were assessed by a study physician or appropriately trained medical staff.
Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Reactogenicity
Reported solicited signs and symptoms were recorded by the subject on the Diary Card from Days 1-7 and Days 22-28 in the study, then evaluated by study physician on Days 8, 22, and 29.The evaluated solicited local reactogenicity events were as follows:
Size of redness (at site of injection) in centimeters (cm)
Size of swelling (at site of injection) in cm
Size of induration (hardness at site of injection) in cm
Pain (at site of injection)
Tenderness (at site of injection)
The evaluated solicited systemic reactogenicity events were as follows:
Fever/body temperature (and body location of measurement)
Fatigue/malaise
Generalized muscle aches
Joint aches/pains
Chills
Nausea
Vomiting
Headache
Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Unsolicited Adverse Events (AE)
Unsolicited AEs were any AEs that occurred any time after study product was given (temporally related to study product), whether or not deemed "related" to the product, and were not solicited. Unsolicited AEs were either observed by study staff while the subject was at a clinic for a study visit or reported by the subject at any time. Any solicited sign or symptom starting after 7 days post-study product injection was recorded as an "unsolicited AE".
For the Phase 2 study, laboratory results were considered AEs when the result was Grade 2 or above.
Any medical condition that was present at the time that the subject was enrolled was not reported as an AE, but was reported as a pre-existing condition on the Medical History Form. However, if this condition occurred with greater frequency or severity during the study, it was recorded as an AE.
Number and Percentage of Subjects Experiencing Unsolicited Serious Adverse Events (SAE)
Defined as an adverse event that led to death, was life-threatening (subject at immediate risk of death); required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; resulted in congenital anomaly/birth defect; resulted in a persistent or significant disability or incapacity.
Phase 2: Number and Percentage of Subjects Achieving at Least a 4-fold Increase in Neutralizing Antibody Titer
The microneutralization (MN) assay is an alternative assay for determining immunologic response to vaccination. It is a highly sensitive assay that can provide information on the ability of induced antibody to neutralize influenza virus. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as the amount of the greatest dilution of serum giving a neutralization of 50% of tissue cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture.
Phase 3: Number and Percentage of Subjects Achieving at Least a 4-fold Increase in Neutralizing Antibody Titer
The MN assay is an alternative assay for determining immunologic response to vaccination. It is a highly sensitive assay that can provide information on the ability of induced antibody to neutralize influenza virus. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as the amount of the greatest dilution of serum giving a neutralization of 50% of tissue cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture.
In Phase 3, MN assay was conducted in a subset of approximately 270 subjects receiving the IVACFLU-A/H5N1 vaccine (vaccinees) and placebo from one study site in order to have at least 200 evaluable subjects receiving IVACFLU A/H5N1 and 40 evaluable subjects receiving placebo.
Phase 2: Geometric Mean Neutralizing Antibody Titer
The microneutralization (MN) assay is an alternative assay for determining immunologic response to vaccination. It is a highly sensitive assay that can provide information on the ability of induced antibody to neutralize influenza virus. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as the amount of the greatest dilution of serum giving a neutralization of 50% of tissue cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture.
Phase 3: Geometric Mean Neutralizing Antibody Titer
Serum specimens were tested for the presence of HAI antibodies to influenza. The HAI assay was conducted using serum samples from all the subjects in Phase 2 of the study and in a subset of approximately 270 subjects receiving the IVACFLU-A/H5N1 vaccine (vaccinees) and placebo from one study site in Phase 3 in order to have at least 200 evaluable subjects receiving IVACFLU-A/H5N1 and 40 evaluable subjects receiving placebo, at the end of study.
Phase 2: Geometric Mean Neutralizing Antibody Titer Ratio, With Respect to Day 1
The microneutralization (MN) assay is an alternative assay for determining immunologic response to vaccination. It is a highly sensitive assay that can provide information on the ability of induced antibody to neutralize influenza virus. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as the amount of the greatest dilution of serum giving a neutralization of 50% of tissue cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture.
Phase 3: Geometric Mean Neutralizing Antibody Titer Ratio, With Respect to Day 1
The MN assay is an alternative assay for determining immunologic response to vaccination. It is a highly sensitive assay that can provide information on the ability of induced antibody to neutralize influenza virus. Titers of neutralizing antibodies were expressed as the amount of the greatest dilution of serum giving a neutralization of 50% of tissue cytopathic effects of the virus in the tissue culture.
In Phase 3, MN assay was conducted in a subset of approximately 270 subjects receiving the IVACFLU-A/H5N1 vaccine (vaccinees) and placebo from one study site in order to have at least 200 evaluable subjects receiving IVACFLU A/H5N1 and 40 evaluable subjects receiving placebo.