search
Back to results

A Split Mouth Trial to Compare Microneedles vs. Standard Needles in Dental Anaesthetic Delivery

Primary Purpose

Dental Pain, Anesthesia, Local

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Ireland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Microneedle Device (Experimental)
30-gauge Short Hypodermic Needle
Sponsored by
University of Dublin, Trinity College
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Dental Pain focused on measuring Microneedles, Dental Anaesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

•Individuals are considered eligible for the study if they are not taking any medications and are deemed competent to complete the McGill pain questionnaire short-form (MPQ-SF) and visual analogue scale (VAS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals will be excluded from the study if they suffer from the following conditions:

    • Hypersensitivity to anaesthetics of the amide type
    • Epilepsy
    • Hypertension, impaired cardiac conduction
    • Impaired respiratory function
    • Impaired hepatic function
    • Cerebrovascular insufficiency
    • Thyrotoxicosis
  • Interventions not permitted during the study include the use of steroids, analgesics or other non-steroidal inflammatory drugs and smoking.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Dublin, Trinity College

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Microneedle Device

30-gauge Short Hypodermic Needle

Arm Description

Local Dental Anaesthetic Solution Delivery System: Microneedle device with an array of 2x3 pyramidal wet-etch silicone microneedles of 280µm height to inject anaesthetic solution.

Local Dental Anaesthetic Solution Delivery System: Standard thirty-gauge short hypodermic needle to inject anaesthetic solution.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain Evaluation
Discomfort / pain intensity rating will be recorded by using a visual analogue scale (VAS)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain Experience
Discomfort / pain experience will be recorded by using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire
Electronic Pulp Test
An electric pulp tester will be used to determine onset and duration of pulpal anaesthesia
Thermal Pulp Test
Dental refrigerant spray will be sprayed on a cotton pellet and then applied to determine onset and duration of pulpal anaesthesia
Pin-Prick Test
Sensitivity of the buccal mucosa will be assessed with a spring algesimeter
Fine Touch Test
Von Frey hair fibres will be used to evaluate the soft tissue sensitivity to touch

Full Information

First Posted
November 4, 2016
Last Updated
January 23, 2018
Sponsor
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Collaborators
Tyndall National Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02966067
Brief Title
A Split Mouth Trial to Compare Microneedles vs. Standard Needles in Dental Anaesthetic Delivery
Official Title
A Split Mouth, Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of an Array of 2x3 Pyramidal Microneedles of 280µm Height Versus a Standard 30-gauge Dental Needle in the Delivery of Local Anaesthetic Solution for Dental Procedures
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 8, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Collaborators
Tyndall National Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study will be completed as a two part, prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Five volunteers (dentists) will be recruited in the first part of the study to evaluate and examine the microneedle device and its use. Based on those qualitative findings (individual interviews and focus group) modifications to the microneedle device will be implemented before part two of the study commences. Twenty volunteers will be enrolled in the second part of the study. A split mouth design will be used to compare the efficacy of an array of 2x3 pyramidal wet-etch silicone microneedles of 280µm height with a standard 30-gauge short hypodermic needle in the delivery of local dental anaesthetic solution. Quantitative and qualitative measurements of the pain experienced and the depth of anaesthesia achieved will be recorded and compared.
Detailed Description
The study will be completed as a two part, prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Five volunteers (dentists) will be recruited in the first part of the study in order to evaluate and examine the microneedle device and its use. Based on those qualitative findings (individual interviews and focus group) modifications to the microneedle device will be implemented before part two of the study commences. Twenty healthy male volunteers will be invited to participate in the second part of the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive a dental anaesthetic solution injection with a microneedle device (Group I) or with a standard thirty-gauge short hypodermic needles (Group II) in the first week of the second part of the study. Group I: The microneedle device will be applied randomly to the left or right buccal mucosa of the first premolar tooth in the maxilla in order to inject slowly a standard local dental anaesthetic solution. Group II: A standard thirty-gauge short hypodermic needles will be used for insertion and injection of the same standard local dental anaesthetic solution randomly to the left or right buccal mucosa of the first premolar tooth in the maxilla. Quantitative and qualitative measurements of the pain experienced and the depth of anaesthesia achieved will be recorded for both groups and compared. In order to eliminate any carryover effects, a washout period of one week between receiving a second, opposite injection will be applied (i.e. Group I will receive an injection with a standard thirty-gauge short hypodermic needles and Group II an injection with the microneedle device). The buccal mucosa of the first premolar tooth in the untreated, opposite maxilla side will receive an injection with the remaining injection method following the same procedure as described for the first week.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dental Pain, Anesthesia, Local
Keywords
Microneedles, Dental Anaesthesia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
5 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Microneedle Device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Local Dental Anaesthetic Solution Delivery System: Microneedle device with an array of 2x3 pyramidal wet-etch silicone microneedles of 280µm height to inject anaesthetic solution.
Arm Title
30-gauge Short Hypodermic Needle
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Local Dental Anaesthetic Solution Delivery System: Standard thirty-gauge short hypodermic needle to inject anaesthetic solution.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Microneedle Device (Experimental)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Local Dental Anaesthetic Solution Delivery System
Intervention Description
Injection of 1.2ml of a standard local dental anaesthetic solution [1.2ml of 2% lidocaine and 1:80,000 epinephrine (lidocaine 20 mg/ml, epinephrine 12.5 mμ/ml)] at a rate of 1 mL/min.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
30-gauge Short Hypodermic Needle
Other Intervention Name(s)
Local Dental Anaesthetic Solution Delivery System
Intervention Description
Injection of 1.2ml of a standard local dental anaesthetic solution [1.2ml of 2% lidocaine and 1:80,000 epinephrine (lidocaine 20 mg/ml, epinephrine 12.5 mμ/ml)] at a rate of 1 mL/min.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Evaluation
Description
Discomfort / pain intensity rating will be recorded by using a visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame
Immediately after injection of the anaesthetic
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Experience
Description
Discomfort / pain experience will be recorded by using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire
Time Frame
Immediately after injection of the anaesthetic
Title
Electronic Pulp Test
Description
An electric pulp tester will be used to determine onset and duration of pulpal anaesthesia
Time Frame
15 minutes after injection
Title
Thermal Pulp Test
Description
Dental refrigerant spray will be sprayed on a cotton pellet and then applied to determine onset and duration of pulpal anaesthesia
Time Frame
10 minutes after injection
Title
Pin-Prick Test
Description
Sensitivity of the buccal mucosa will be assessed with a spring algesimeter
Time Frame
2 minute intervals alternating with fine touch test until onset of soft tissue anaesthesia
Title
Fine Touch Test
Description
Von Frey hair fibres will be used to evaluate the soft tissue sensitivity to touch
Time Frame
2 minute intervals alternating with pin-prick test until onset of soft tissue anaesthesia

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: •Individuals are considered eligible for the study if they are not taking any medications and are deemed competent to complete the McGill pain questionnaire short-form (MPQ-SF) and visual analogue scale (VAS). Exclusion Criteria: Individuals will be excluded from the study if they suffer from the following conditions: Hypersensitivity to anaesthetics of the amide type Epilepsy Hypertension, impaired cardiac conduction Impaired respiratory function Impaired hepatic function Cerebrovascular insufficiency Thyrotoxicosis Interventions not permitted during the study include the use of steroids, analgesics or other non-steroidal inflammatory drugs and smoking.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Darius Sagheri
Organizational Affiliation
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ciarán P Devine
Organizational Affiliation
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
June H Nunn
Organizational Affiliation
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erica Donnelly-Swift
Organizational Affiliation
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Dublin, Trinity College
City
Dublin
Country
Ireland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

A Split Mouth Trial to Compare Microneedles vs. Standard Needles in Dental Anaesthetic Delivery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs