A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With the Multi-Electrode OPTRELL™ Mapping Catheter (OPTIMUM)
Primary Purpose
Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with and candidate for clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation procedure for the management of ventricular tachycardia, atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation (participant having undergone a previous ablation procedure may be included)
- At least one episode of the targeted arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia, atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation) must have been documented by electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter, loop recorder, telemetry, implanted device, or transtelephonic monitoring within 12 months of enrollment
- Signed Participant Informed Consent Form (ICF).
- Able and willing to comply with all pre-, post-, and follow-up testing and requirements
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosed with an arrhythmia requiring epicardial mapping
- Study arrhythmia secondary to reversible cause, or secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or non-cardiac cause
- Atrial arrhythmias: participants with a left atrial size greater than (>) 55 millimeters (mm)
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) less than or equal to (<=) 25 percent (%) for Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) participants
- LVEF <= 40% for participants with atrial arrhythmia
- Documented intracardiac thrombus as detected on imaging
- Contraindication to anticoagulation (that is heparin, warfarin, dabigatran)
- History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities (example hypercoagulable state)
- Myocardial infarction within the past 2 months (60 days)
- Documented thromboembolic event (including Transient Ischemic Attack [TIA]) within the past 12 months (365 days)
- Uncontrolled heart failure or New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class IV
- Implanted with a pacemaker or intracardiac cardiac defibrillator within the past 6 weeks (42 days)
- Implanted with a prosthetic valve
- Active illness or active systemic infection or sepsis
- Diagnosed atrial or ventricular myxoma, interatrial baffle or patch, tumor or other abnormality that precludes catheter introduction or manipulation
- Significant congenital anomaly or medical problem that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude enrollment in this study
- Participants that have ever undergone a percutaneous or surgical valvular cardiac procedure (that is, ventriculotomy, atriotomy, and valve repair or replacement and presence of a prosthetic valve)
- Any cardiac surgery within the past 60 days (2 months) (includes Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI])
- Atrial septal closure within the past 6 weeks (42 days)
- Presence of a condition that precludes vascular access
- Women who are pregnant (as evidenced by pregnancy test if pre-menopausal), lactating, or who are of childbearing age and plan on becoming pregnant during the course of the clinical investigation
- Categorized as vulnerable population and requires special treatment with respect to safeguards of well-being
- Concurrent enrollment in an investigational study evaluating another device or drug
Sites / Locations
- UZ Antwerpen
- Virga Jessa Ziekenhuis
- Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
Arm Description
Participants diagnosed with cardiac arrhythmias who are scheduled to have a clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation procedure of arrhythmia management for Atrial and ventricular procedures will be using multi-electrode OPTRELL mapping catheter.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Related to the OPTRELL Catheter
Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure related to the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Number of Participants With Pre-ablation Mapping and Clinically Indicated Mapping Performed With the OPTRELL Catheter Without Resort to Other Mapping Catheters
Number of participants with pre-ablation mapping and clinically indicated mapping performed with the OPTRELL catheter without resort to other mapping catheters were reported.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With SAEs Within 7 Days of Index Procedure
Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Associated With the Use of the OPTRELL Catheter
Number of participants with non-serious adverse events within 7 days of index procedure associated with the use of the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study.
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Maneuverability & Handling
Number of responders for physician assessment for maneuverability & handling were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for maneuverability & handling.
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Signal Collection and Quality
Number of responders for physician assessment for signal collection and quality were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for signal collection and quality
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Pacing
Number of responders for physician assessment for pacing (local pacing capture) were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for pacing.
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheter Design in OPTRELL Catheter for Mapping
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter design were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter design in OPTRELL catheter for mapping.
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Workflow
Number of responders for physician assessment for workflow were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for workflow.
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheter Visualization
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter visualization were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter visualization.
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheters Interactions
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheters interactions were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheters interactions.
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Arrhythmogenicity
Number of responders with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity.
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Design and Coverage for Confirming PVI
Number of responders for physician assessment for design and coverage for confirming PVI were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for design and coverage for confirming PVI.
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Ability to Characterize the Tissue
Number of responders for physician assessment for ability to characterize the tissue were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for ability to characterize the tissue.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04983797
Brief Title
A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With the Multi-Electrode OPTRELL™ Mapping Catheter
Acronym
OPTIMUM
Official Title
Clinical Evaluation of Arrhythmia Mapping With the Multi-Electrode OPTRELL™ Mapping Catheter
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 25, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 4, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 4, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Biosense Webster, Inc.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the performance and safety for the use of the OPTRELL Catheter for intracardiac mapping in the atria and ventricles.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Ventricular Premature Complexes
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
31 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants diagnosed with cardiac arrhythmias who are scheduled to have a clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation procedure of arrhythmia management for Atrial and ventricular procedures will be using multi-electrode OPTRELL mapping catheter.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
OPTRELL Mapping Catheter
Intervention Description
Participants scheduled to have a clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation using OPTRELL mapping catheter for the management of Atrial procedure (Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation) and Ventricular procedures (Ventricular Tachycardia, Premature Ventricular Complex).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Related to the OPTRELL Catheter
Description
Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure related to the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time Frame
Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Title
Number of Participants With Pre-ablation Mapping and Clinically Indicated Mapping Performed With the OPTRELL Catheter Without Resort to Other Mapping Catheters
Description
Number of participants with pre-ablation mapping and clinically indicated mapping performed with the OPTRELL catheter without resort to other mapping catheters were reported.
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With SAEs Within 7 Days of Index Procedure
Description
Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time Frame
Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Title
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Associated With the Use of the OPTRELL Catheter
Description
Number of participants with non-serious adverse events within 7 days of index procedure associated with the use of the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study.
Time Frame
Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Title
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Maneuverability & Handling
Description
Number of responders for physician assessment for maneuverability & handling were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for maneuverability & handling.
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
Title
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Signal Collection and Quality
Description
Number of responders for physician assessment for signal collection and quality were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for signal collection and quality
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
Title
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Pacing
Description
Number of responders for physician assessment for pacing (local pacing capture) were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for pacing.
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
Title
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheter Design in OPTRELL Catheter for Mapping
Description
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter design were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter design in OPTRELL catheter for mapping.
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
Title
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Workflow
Description
Number of responders for physician assessment for workflow were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for workflow.
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
Title
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheter Visualization
Description
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter visualization were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter visualization.
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
Title
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheters Interactions
Description
Number of responders for physician assessment for catheters interactions were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheters interactions.
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
Title
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Arrhythmogenicity
Description
Number of responders with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity.
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
Title
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Design and Coverage for Confirming PVI
Description
Number of responders for physician assessment for design and coverage for confirming PVI were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for design and coverage for confirming PVI.
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
Title
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Ability to Characterize the Tissue
Description
Number of responders for physician assessment for ability to characterize the tissue were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for ability to characterize the tissue.
Time Frame
Up to 72 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosed with and candidate for clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation procedure for the management of ventricular tachycardia, atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation (participant having undergone a previous ablation procedure may be included)
At least one episode of the targeted arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia, atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation) must have been documented by electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter, loop recorder, telemetry, implanted device, or transtelephonic monitoring within 12 months of enrollment
Signed Participant Informed Consent Form (ICF).
Able and willing to comply with all pre-, post-, and follow-up testing and requirements
Exclusion Criteria:
Diagnosed with an arrhythmia requiring epicardial mapping
Study arrhythmia secondary to reversible cause, or secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or non-cardiac cause
Atrial arrhythmias: participants with a left atrial size greater than (>) 55 millimeters (mm)
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) less than or equal to (<=) 25 percent (%) for Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) participants
LVEF <= 40% for participants with atrial arrhythmia
Documented intracardiac thrombus as detected on imaging
Contraindication to anticoagulation (that is heparin, warfarin, dabigatran)
History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities (example hypercoagulable state)
Myocardial infarction within the past 2 months (60 days)
Documented thromboembolic event (including Transient Ischemic Attack [TIA]) within the past 12 months (365 days)
Uncontrolled heart failure or New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class IV
Implanted with a pacemaker or intracardiac cardiac defibrillator within the past 6 weeks (42 days)
Implanted with a prosthetic valve
Active illness or active systemic infection or sepsis
Diagnosed atrial or ventricular myxoma, interatrial baffle or patch, tumor or other abnormality that precludes catheter introduction or manipulation
Significant congenital anomaly or medical problem that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude enrollment in this study
Participants that have ever undergone a percutaneous or surgical valvular cardiac procedure (that is, ventriculotomy, atriotomy, and valve repair or replacement and presence of a prosthetic valve)
Any cardiac surgery within the past 60 days (2 months) (includes Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI])
Atrial septal closure within the past 6 weeks (42 days)
Presence of a condition that precludes vascular access
Women who are pregnant (as evidenced by pregnancy test if pre-menopausal), lactating, or who are of childbearing age and plan on becoming pregnant during the course of the clinical investigation
Categorized as vulnerable population and requires special treatment with respect to safeguards of well-being
Concurrent enrollment in an investigational study evaluating another device or drug
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UZ Antwerpen
City
Antwerpen
ZIP/Postal Code
2650
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Virga Jessa Ziekenhuis
City
Hasselt
ZIP/Postal Code
3500
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics
City
Vilnius
ZIP/Postal Code
8661
Country
Lithuania
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. has an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.
IPD Sharing URL
http://yoda.yale.edu
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10726030
Citation
Bick RL, Frenkel EP. Clinical aspects of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis and other side effects of heparin therapy. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 1999 Oct;5 Suppl 1:S7-15. doi: 10.1177/10760296990050s103.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12751552
Citation
Cox B, Durieux ME, Marcus MA. Toxicity of local anaesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2003 Mar;17(1):111-36. doi: 10.1053/bean.2003.0275.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12592301
Citation
Gruchalla RS. 10. Drug allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Feb;111(2 Suppl):S548-59. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.93.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12074414
Citation
Mertes PM, Laxenaire MC. Allergic reactions occurring during anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Apr;19(4):240-62. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000418.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11511894
Citation
Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JA; Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Prevention of generalized reactions to contrast media: a consensus report and guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(9):1720-8. doi: 10.1007/s003300000778.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Lin, A.C. and D.J. Wilber, Complications Associated With Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation, in Radiofrequency catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: basic concepts and clinical applications, S.K. Huang and D.J. Wilber, Editors. 2000, Futura: Armonk, N.Y. p. 737-746.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10879389
Citation
Scheinman MM, Huang S. The 1998 NASPE prospective catheter ablation registry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jun;23(6):1020-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00891.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33476457
Citation
Mar PL, Chong L, Perez A, Lakkireddy D, Gopinathannair R. Entrapment of diagnostic catheter within Advisor HD grid mapping catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;32(3):860-861. doi: 10.1111/jce.14893. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29021841
Citation
Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d'Avila A, de Groot NMSN, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary. J Arrhythm. 2017 Oct;33(5):369-409. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19995881
Citation
Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, Kim YH, Klein G, Natale A, Packer D, Skanes A, Ambrogi F, Biganzoli E. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;3(1):32-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.859116. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11513440
Citation
Gerstenfeld EP, Guerra P, Sparks PB, Hattori K, Lesh MD. Clinical outcome after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation triggers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Aug;12(8):900-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00900.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9769307
Citation
Kovoor P, Ricciardello M, Collins L, Uther JB, Ross DL. Risk to patients from radiation associated with radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1998 Oct 13;98(15):1534-40. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.15.1534.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7611155
Citation
Nahass GT. Fluoroscopy and the skin: implications for radiofrequency catheter ablation. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Jul 15;76(3):174-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80053-8. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1959193
Citation
Calkins H, Niklason L, Sousa J, el-Atassi R, Langberg J, Morady F. Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections. Circulation. 1991 Dec;84(6):2376-82. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.6.2376.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With the Multi-Electrode OPTRELL™ Mapping Catheter
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs