A Study Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Observation for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy Treatment.
Primary Purpose
Rectal Cancer
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
5-FU, Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin.
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rectal Cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma rectal stages T3 - 4, N0-1 and M0 - according to TNM staging system (primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis), previously treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy according to institutional routine.
- Tumor with clinical end radiological incomplete response after neoadjuvant therapy, according to institutional routine, and completely resection by mesorectal excision with clear margins technique.
- No more than 8 weeks after the surgery.
- Normal result of CEA in compared to the pre randomization results (28 days of window)
- Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1.
Adequate organ function during screening (28 days of window)
, defined as:
- Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and amino alanine transferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 × Upper Limit of Normal(ULN)
- Serum total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 × ULN
- Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1500 /mm3
- Platelet count ≥ 100000 /mm3
- Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL
- Serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 × ULN
- Signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who presented unacceptable toxicity or intolerance to neoadjuvant combination therapy.
- Patients with surgical complications that prevent them from receiving adjuvant therapy for up to 8 weeks after surgery;
- Compromised surgical margins.
- Confirmation or strong suspicion of Lynch syndrome.
- History of serious illness or psychiatric clinic.
- Patients who participate in other protocols with experimental drugs.
- For female patients, current pregnancy and/or lactation.
Sites / Locations
- ICESPRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Adjuvant therapy
Observation
Arm Description
5-FU, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatine (FLOX) OR Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX) NOTE: If the patient was randomized for the arm experimental, the investigator can choose between intravenous (IV) treatment or oral treatment (PO). Both are considered equal by the principal investigator.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Disease free survival
Secondary Outcome Measures
Overall survival
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01941979
First Posted
September 4, 2013
Last Updated
October 29, 2014
Sponsor
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01941979
Brief Title
A Study Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Observation for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy Treatment.
Official Title
A Phase III, Randomized Study of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma Who Achieved Suboptimal Response After Neoadjuvant Chemo-radiotherapy.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2015 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2016 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Surgery is the most indicated curative treatment for rectal cancer when disease is diagnosed early, however local recurrence risk increases when the disease is diagnosed at advanced stage.T1-2 tumors have a recurrence rate lower than 10%, while T3N0 tumors have 15% - 35% and positive lymph nodes T3-4 45% to 67% of recurrence rate within 5 years. These data indicate that patient who have a high risk of tumor recurrence should receive an adjuvant therapy treatment.
It is possible that adjuvant chemotherapy has a positive impact on survival of patients already treated with neoadjuvant combination therapy. However it is necessary to identify those patients that might have this benefit.
An exploratory analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 22921 study showed that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy has benefited only the group of patients who had a reduction of tumor stage to ypT0-2. In the group who had no reduction (ypT3-4), there was no benefit. Retrospective analyzes suggest that the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a predictor of prognosis and even benefit to adjuvant chemotherapy. However the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with rectal cancer remains controversial. Therefore, a randomized trial is needed to answer this question.
Based on these data the investigators proposed a phase III study, randomized, unblinded, adjuvant chemotherapy based on Fluorouracil(5-FU) and Oxaliplatin versus observation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma T3-4, N0-1, M0 previously treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and who did not presented complete response. The investigator believes that this subgroup of patients, who have not achieved complete response, will be benefit from adjuvant therapy.
Study objective:
The main objective of this study is verify if adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU and oxaliplatin, for 4 months, increases recurrence-free survival versus the observation. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of toxicity, overall survival and assessment of biomarkers (study protocol separately).
The study's primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS) to be defined as time from randomization to radiological detection of distant disease and / or locoregional recurrence. Isolate carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) increase will not be consider as recurrence until a new measurable lesion be found.
NOTE: The TNM system is based on the size and/or extent (reach) of the primary tumor (T), the amount of spread to nearby lymph nodes (N), and the presence of metastasis (M) or secondary tumors formed by the spread of cancer cells to other parts of the body.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rectal Cancer
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
309 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Adjuvant therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
5-FU, Leucovorin and Oxaliplatine (FLOX) OR Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin (CAPOX)
NOTE: If the patient was randomized for the arm experimental, the investigator can choose between intravenous (IV) treatment or oral treatment (PO). Both are considered equal by the principal investigator.
Arm Title
Observation
Arm Type
No Intervention
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
5-FU, Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, Leucovorin.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disease free survival
Time Frame
Thorax, abdome, and pelvis tomography Every 6 month up to 3 years and anualy up to 5 years.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival
Time Frame
36 month
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Incidence of Adverse Event
Description
To evaluate the toxicity of treatment.
Time Frame
36 month
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma rectal stages T3 - 4, N0-1 and M0 - according to TNM staging system (primary tumor, regional nodes, metastasis), previously treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy according to institutional routine.
Tumor with clinical end radiological incomplete response after neoadjuvant therapy, according to institutional routine, and completely resection by mesorectal excision with clear margins technique.
No more than 8 weeks after the surgery.
Normal result of CEA in compared to the pre randomization results (28 days of window)
Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 75 years.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1.
Adequate organ function during screening (28 days of window)
, defined as:
Serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and amino alanine transferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 × Upper Limit of Normal(ULN)
Serum total bilirubin ≤ 2.0 × ULN
Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1500 /mm3
Platelet count ≥ 100000 /mm3
Hemoglobin ≥ 8.0 g/dL
Serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 × ULN
Signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who presented unacceptable toxicity or intolerance to neoadjuvant combination therapy.
Patients with surgical complications that prevent them from receiving adjuvant therapy for up to 8 weeks after surgery;
Compromised surgical margins.
Confirmation or strong suspicion of Lynch syndrome.
History of serious illness or psychiatric clinic.
Patients who participate in other protocols with experimental drugs.
For female patients, current pregnancy and/or lactation.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Rachel S.P. Riechelmann, MD
Phone
55 11 38932000
Email
pesquisa.clinica@icesp.org.br
Facility Information:
Facility Name
ICESP
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
01246000
Country
Brazil
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachel SP Riechelmann, MD
Phone
55 11 38932000
Email
pesquisa.clinica@icesp.org.br
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rachel SP Riechemann, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Links:
URL
http://www.icesp.org.br/
Description
Related Info
Learn more about this trial
A Study Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Observation for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Radiotherapy Treatment.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs