search
Back to results

A Study Comparing the Efficacy of Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength to Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis

Primary Purpose

Allergic Conjunctivitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.7%
loratadine 10 mg
Tears Naturale
Placebo
Sponsored by
Andover Research Eye Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Allergic Conjunctivitis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Each subject must:

  1. Be at least 18 years of age at Visit 1 of either gender and any race;
  2. Provide written informed consent and sign the HIPAA form;
  3. Be willing and able to follow all instructions and attend all study visits;
  4. Have a history of ocular allergies and a positive skin test reaction to a seasonal (grass, ragweed, and/or tree pollen) or perennial (cat dander, dog dander, dust mites, cockroach) allergen as confirmed by an allergic skin test conducted at Visit 1 or within the last 24 months;
  5. Be able and willing to avoid all disallowed medications for the appropriate washout period and during the study (see exclusion 6);
  6. Be able and willing to discontinue wearing contact lenses for at least 72 hours prior to Visit 1 and during the study trial period;
  7. (for females capable of becoming pregnant) agree to have urine pregnancy testing performed at screening (must be negative) and exit visit; must not be lactating; and must agree to use a medically acceptable form of birth control throughout the study duration. Women considered capable of becoming pregnant include all females who have experienced menarche and have not experienced menopause (as defined by amenorrhea for greater than 12 consecutive months) or have not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy);
  8. Have a calculated best-corrected visual acuity of 0.7 logMAR or better in each eye as measured using an ETDRS chart;
  9. Have a positive bilateral post-CAC reaction (defined as having scores of ≥2 ocular itching and ≥2 conjunctival redness) within 10 (±2) minutes of instillation of the last titration of allergen at Visit 1;
  10. Have a positive bilateral post-CAC reaction (defined as having scores of ≥2 ocular itching and ≥2 conjunctival redness) for at least two out of the first three time points following the challenge at Visit 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

Each subject must not:

1. Have known contraindications or sensitivities to the use of the investigational product or any of its components; 2. Have any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subject's safety or trial parameters (including but not limited to narrow angle glaucoma, clinically significant blepharitis, follicular conjunctivitis, iritis, pterygium, history of corneal transplantation or a diagnosis of dry eye); 3. Have had ocular surgical intervention within three (3) months prior to Visit 1 or during the study and/or a history of refractive surgery within the past six (6) months; 4. Have a known history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, or active retinal disease; 5. Have the presence of an active ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal) or positive history of an ocular herpetic infection at any visit; 6. Use any of the following disallowed medications during the period indicated prior to Visit 1 and during the study: 7 Days

  • systemic or ocular H1-antihistamine, H1-antihistamine/mast cell stabilizers, H1-antihistamine-vasoconstrictor drug combinations;
  • decongestants;
  • monoamine oxidase inhibitors
  • all other topical ophthalmic preparations (including artificial tears)
  • lid scrubs;
  • topical prostaglandins or prostaglandin derivatives
  • ocular, topical, or systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, including baby aspirin (81 mg)) 14 Days
  • inhaled, ocular, topical, or systemic corticosteroids or mast cell stabilizers; 45 Days
  • depo-corticosteroids; Note: Currently marketed over-the-counter anti-allergy eye drops (i.e. anti-histamine/vasoconstrictor combination products such as Visine®-A®) may be administered to subjects by trained study personnel at the end of Visits 1, 2 and 4b after all evaluations are completed.

    7. Have any significant illness (e.g. any autoimmune disease requiring therapy, severe cardiovascular disease [including arrhythmias] the investigator feels could be expected to interfere with the subject's health or with the study parameters and/or put the subject at any unnecessary risk (includes but is not limited to: poorly controlled hypertension or poorly controlled diabetes, a history of status asthmaticus, organ transplants, a known history of persistent moderate or severe asthma, or a known history of moderate to severe allergic asthmatic reactions to any of the study allergens; 8. Have received allergy immunotherapy within the last 2 years; 9. Manifest signs or symptoms of clinically active allergic conjunctivitis in either eye at the start of Visits 1, 2, or 3 (defined as the presence of any itching or >1 [greater than 1] redness in any vessel bed); 10. Have a history of glaucoma; 11. Have planned surgery (ocular or systemic) during the trial period or within 30 days after; 12. Have used an investigational drug or medical device within 30 days of the study or be concurrently enrolled in another investigational product trial; 13. Be a female who is currently pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or lactating.

Sites / Locations

  • Andover Eye Associates

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength and Placebo tablet

Tears Naturale® II and Claritin® Tablet 24-Hour

Arm Description

Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.7%) will be administered bilaterally and Placebo tablet will be administered orally (within 5 minutes of eyedrop) at Visits 3 and 4a.

Tears Naturale® II will be administered bilaterally and Claritin® Tablet 24-Hour (loratadine 10 mg) will be administered orally (within 5 minutes of eyedrop) at Visits 3 and 4a.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Ocular itching 3(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 3(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Ocular itching 3(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 3(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Vi sit 4b.
Ocular itching 5(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 5(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Ocular itching 5(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 5(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Ocular itching 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 7(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Ocular itching 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 7(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Conjunctival Redness
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Conjunctival Redness
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Conjunctival Redness
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ciliary Redness
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ciliary Redness
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ciliary Redness
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Episcleral Redness
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Episcleral Redness
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Episcleral Redness
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Chemosis
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Chemosis
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Chemosis
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Eyelid Swelling
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Eyelid Swelling
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Eyelid Swelling
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Tearing
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Tearing
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Tearing
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Rhinorrhea
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Rhinorrhea
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Rhinorrhea
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Pruritis
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Pruritis
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Pruritis
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Congestion
Nasal congestion evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Congestion
Nasal congestion evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Congestion
Nasal congestion evaluated by the subject 0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Conjunctival Redness
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Conjunctival Redness
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Conjunctival Redness
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ciliary Redness
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ciliary Redness
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ciliary Redness
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Episcleral Redness
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Episcleral Redness
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Episcleral Redness
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Chemosis
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Chemosis
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Chemosis
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Eyelid Swelling
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Eyelid Swelling
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Eyelid Swelling
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Tearing
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Tearing
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Tearing
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Rhinorrhea
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Rhinorrhea
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Rhinorrhea
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Pruritis
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Pruritis
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Pruritis
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Congestion
Nasal congestion pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Congestion
Nasal congestion pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Congestion
Nasal congestion pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.

Full Information

First Posted
December 14, 2021
Last Updated
May 2, 2022
Sponsor
Andover Research Eye Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05265910
Brief Title
A Study Comparing the Efficacy of Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength to Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis
Official Title
A Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked, Parallel Study Comparing the Efficacy of Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength to Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour in Reducing Ocular Itching in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 14, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 23, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 23, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Andover Research Eye Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a single-center, randomized, double-masked, parallel study. In this clinical study, the efficacy comparison between Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength and Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour will be made using the Ora-CAC model, a validated clinical model accepted by regulatory agents for assessing the efficacy of products on the signs and symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Allergic Conjunctivitis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
double-masked
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
58 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength and Placebo tablet
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength (olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.7%) will be administered bilaterally and Placebo tablet will be administered orally (within 5 minutes of eyedrop) at Visits 3 and 4a.
Arm Title
Tears Naturale® II and Claritin® Tablet 24-Hour
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Tears Naturale® II will be administered bilaterally and Claritin® Tablet 24-Hour (loratadine 10 mg) will be administered orally (within 5 minutes of eyedrop) at Visits 3 and 4a.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
olopatadine hydrochloride ophthalmic solution 0.7%
Other Intervention Name(s)
Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength
Intervention Description
Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength (eyedrop)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
loratadine 10 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour
Intervention Description
Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour (tablet)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tears Naturale
Other Intervention Name(s)
Tears Naturale® II
Intervention Description
Tears Naturale® II (eyedrop)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Placebo tablet
Intervention Description
Placebo tablet (tablet)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ocular itching 3(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3
Description
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 3(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
3(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Ocular itching 3(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b
Description
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 3(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Vi sit 4b.
Time Frame
3(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Ocular itching 5(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3
Description
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 5(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
5(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Ocular itching 5(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b
Description
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 5(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
5(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Ocular itching 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3
Description
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 7(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Ocular itching 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b
Description
Ocular itching evaluated by the subject at 7(±1) minutes post-CAC (0-4 on the Ocular Itching scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Conjunctival Redness
Description
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Conjunctival Redness
Description
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Conjunctival Redness
Description
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ciliary Redness
Description
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ciliary Redness
Description
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ciliary Redness
Description
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Episcleral Redness
Description
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Episcleral Redness
Description
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Episcleral Redness
Description
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Chemosis
Description
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Chemosis
Description
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Chemosis
Description
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Eyelid Swelling
Description
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Eyelid Swelling
Description
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Eyelid Swelling
Description
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Tearing
Description
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Tearing
Description
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Tearing
Description
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Rhinorrhea
Description
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Rhinorrhea
Description
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Rhinorrhea
Description
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Pruritis
Description
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Pruritis
Description
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Pruritis
Description
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Description
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Description
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Description
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Congestion
Description
Nasal congestion evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Congestion
Description
Nasal congestion evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 3; Nasal Congestion
Description
Nasal congestion evaluated by the subject 0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 3.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC on Day 1 (Visit 3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Conjunctival Redness
Description
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Conjunctival Redness
Description
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Conjunctival Redness
Description
Conjunctival redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ciliary Redness
Description
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ciliary Redness
Description
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ciliary Redness
Description
Ciliary redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Episcleral Redness
Description
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Episcleral Redness
Description
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Episcleral Redness
Description
Episcleral redness evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Redness scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Chemosis
Description
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Chemosis
Description
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Chemosis
Description
Chemosis evaluated by the investigator (0-4 on the Ocular Chemosis scale with 4 being the worst, allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Eyelid Swelling
Description
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Eyelid Swelling
Description
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Eyelid Swelling
Description
Eyelid swelling evaluated by the subject (0-3 on the Eyelid Swelling scale with 3 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Tearing
Description
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Tearing
Description
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Tearing
Description
Tearing evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Tearing scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Rhinorrhea
Description
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Rhinorrhea
Description
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Rhinorrhea
Description
Rhinorrhea evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Rhinorrhea scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Pruritis
Description
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Pruritis
Description
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Pruritis
Description
Nasal pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Description
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Description
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Ear or Palate Pruritis
Description
Ear or palate pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Ear or Palate Pruritis scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Congestion
Description
Nasal congestion pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
7(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Congestion
Description
Nasal congestion pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
15(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)
Title
Secondary Efficacy Measures 20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b; Nasal Congestion
Description
Nasal congestion pruritis evaluated by the subject (0-4 on the Nasal Congestion scale with 4 being the worst, not allowing half unit increments) at Visit 4b.
Time Frame
20(±1) minutes post-CAC at Visit 4b (24 hours from Visit 4a; Day 15±3)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Each subject must: Be at least 18 years of age at Visit 1 of either gender and any race; Provide written informed consent and sign the HIPAA form; Be willing and able to follow all instructions and attend all study visits; Have a history of ocular allergies and a positive skin test reaction to a seasonal (grass, ragweed, and/or tree pollen) or perennial (cat dander, dog dander, dust mites, cockroach) allergen as confirmed by an allergic skin test conducted at Visit 1 or within the last 24 months; Be able and willing to avoid all disallowed medications for the appropriate washout period and during the study (see exclusion 6); Be able and willing to discontinue wearing contact lenses for at least 72 hours prior to Visit 1 and during the study trial period; (for females capable of becoming pregnant) agree to have urine pregnancy testing performed at screening (must be negative) and exit visit; must not be lactating; and must agree to use a medically acceptable form of birth control throughout the study duration. Women considered capable of becoming pregnant include all females who have experienced menarche and have not experienced menopause (as defined by amenorrhea for greater than 12 consecutive months) or have not undergone successful surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy); Have a calculated best-corrected visual acuity of 0.7 logMAR or better in each eye as measured using an ETDRS chart; Have a positive bilateral post-CAC reaction (defined as having scores of ≥2 ocular itching and ≥2 conjunctival redness) within 10 (±2) minutes of instillation of the last titration of allergen at Visit 1; Have a positive bilateral post-CAC reaction (defined as having scores of ≥2 ocular itching and ≥2 conjunctival redness) for at least two out of the first three time points following the challenge at Visit 2. Exclusion Criteria: Each subject must not: 1. Have known contraindications or sensitivities to the use of the investigational product or any of its components; 2. Have any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect the subject's safety or trial parameters (including but not limited to narrow angle glaucoma, clinically significant blepharitis, follicular conjunctivitis, iritis, pterygium, history of corneal transplantation or a diagnosis of dry eye); 3. Have had ocular surgical intervention within three (3) months prior to Visit 1 or during the study and/or a history of refractive surgery within the past six (6) months; 4. Have a known history of retinal detachment, diabetic retinopathy, or active retinal disease; 5. Have the presence of an active ocular infection (bacterial, viral, or fungal) or positive history of an ocular herpetic infection at any visit; 6. Use any of the following disallowed medications during the period indicated prior to Visit 1 and during the study: 7 Days systemic or ocular H1-antihistamine, H1-antihistamine/mast cell stabilizers, H1-antihistamine-vasoconstrictor drug combinations; decongestants; monoamine oxidase inhibitors all other topical ophthalmic preparations (including artificial tears) lid scrubs; topical prostaglandins or prostaglandin derivatives ocular, topical, or systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, including baby aspirin (81 mg)) 14 Days inhaled, ocular, topical, or systemic corticosteroids or mast cell stabilizers; 45 Days depo-corticosteroids; Note: Currently marketed over-the-counter anti-allergy eye drops (i.e. anti-histamine/vasoconstrictor combination products such as Visine®-A®) may be administered to subjects by trained study personnel at the end of Visits 1, 2 and 4b after all evaluations are completed. 7. Have any significant illness (e.g. any autoimmune disease requiring therapy, severe cardiovascular disease [including arrhythmias] the investigator feels could be expected to interfere with the subject's health or with the study parameters and/or put the subject at any unnecessary risk (includes but is not limited to: poorly controlled hypertension or poorly controlled diabetes, a history of status asthmaticus, organ transplants, a known history of persistent moderate or severe asthma, or a known history of moderate to severe allergic asthmatic reactions to any of the study allergens; 8. Have received allergy immunotherapy within the last 2 years; 9. Manifest signs or symptoms of clinically active allergic conjunctivitis in either eye at the start of Visits 1, 2, or 3 (defined as the presence of any itching or >1 [greater than 1] redness in any vessel bed); 10. Have a history of glaucoma; 11. Have planned surgery (ocular or systemic) during the trial period or within 30 days after; 12. Have used an investigational drug or medical device within 30 days of the study or be concurrently enrolled in another investigational product trial; 13. Be a female who is currently pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or lactating.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Andover Eye Associates
City
Andover
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01810
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

A Study Comparing the Efficacy of Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength to Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs