search
Back to results

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide Radiochemistry in Patients With Glioblastoma

Primary Purpose

Glioblastoma Multiforme

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
bevacizumab [Avastin]
irinotecan
temozolomide
Sponsored by
Hoffmann-La Roche
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Glioblastoma Multiforme

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients, 18-70 years of age;
  • glioblastoma, confirmed histologically;
  • no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy for glioblastoma;
  • non-methylated MGMT promoter in the tumor.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prior systemic treatment for glioblastoma multiforme;
  • prior treatment with Avastin;
  • significant cardiovascular disease;
  • other active malignant disease.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Without Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25 percent (%) increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on gadolinium contrast agent magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI) scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. Percentage of participants achieving PFS without disease progression or death was reported.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25% increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on Gd-MRI scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued
Discontinuation was defined as the percentage of participants who permanently discontinued treatment in either treatment arm. Percentage of participant with individual discontinuation reason are reported. CNS: central nervous system; CTCAE: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events . Other reason refers to any other reason than the specified ones.
Number of Participants With A Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) and With A BOR of CR or Partial Response (PR)
BOR was defined as the best response observed for a participant during assessment. Number of participants who had BOR as CR and number of participants who had BOR as CR or PR were reported. Complete response was defined as disappearance of all enhancing tumor on consecutive Gd-MRI scans at least 1 month apart, off steroids, and neurologically stable or improved. Partial response was defined as 50% reduction in size of enhancing tumor on consecutive Gd-MRI scans at least 1 month apart, steroids stable or reduced, and neurologically stable or improved.
Percentage of Participants With Response on FLAIR Imaging
FLAIR lesions were determined as "stable", "progressive" or "decreased". FLAIR lesions was determined as "progressive" only if they were not be attributed to causes apart from tumor infiltration (sequelae of radiation therapy, demyelination, ischemia, infection, seizures, or other treatment effects). Percentage of participants are based on ITT population. Dis.=Discontinuation.
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for Global Qol/functional scales=better level of functioning or a higher score for symptom scale=greater degree of symptoms. The change in global health status was determined to be the difference in values at baseline and each specific visit. The term ''baseline'' refers to the time of randomization to the maintenance phase.
Change From Baseline for EORTC QLQ Brain Neoplasm 20 (BN20) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
EORTC QLQ-BN20 consisted of 20 items assessing visual disorders, motor dysfunction, communication deficit, various disease symptoms (e.g. headaches and seizures), treatment toxicities (e.g. hair loss) and future uncertainty. All of the 20 items are rated on a 4 point Likert scale from 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit and 4=very much, and were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Change From Baseline for Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
The MMSE briefly measures orientation to time and place, immediate recall, short-term verbal memory, calculation, language and construct ability. Each area tested had a designated point value, the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.
Change From Baseline for Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Score at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
KPS is an 11-level score (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100) which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Deterioration in KPS was defined as decrease of 20 or more points in KPS score.
Percentage of Participants Who Received Corticosteroid for Glioblastoma
Participants used corticosteroids for the glioblastoma condition. Corticosteroids included dexamethasone, methylprednisone, fortecortin, hydrocortisone, urbason, and prednisolone.
Time to Treatment Failure

Full Information

First Posted
June 16, 2009
Last Updated
October 20, 2015
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00967330
Brief Title
A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide Radiochemistry in Patients With Glioblastoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This 2 arm study will compare the effect of Avastin + irinotecan versus temozolomide, in combination with conventional involved field radiotherapy, in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a non-methylated MGMT promoter. Patients will be randomized 3:1 to receive Avastin 10mg/kg iv every 2 weeks + irinotecan 125mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks, or temozolomide 75mg/m2 po daily during radiotherapy followed by 6 cycles of temozolomide 150-200mg/m2 po daily on days 1-5 of each 4 week cycle. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 100-500 individuals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Glioblastoma Multiforme

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
182 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
bevacizumab [Avastin]
Intervention Description
10mg/kg iv every 2 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
irinotecan
Intervention Description
125mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
temozolomide
Intervention Description
75mg/m2 po daily during radiotherapy, followed by 150-200mg/m2/day po on days 1-5 of each 6x4 week cycle of adjuvant therapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Without Disease Progression or Death at 6 Months
Description
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25 percent (%) increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on gadolinium contrast agent magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-MRI) scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. Percentage of participants achieving PFS without disease progression or death was reported.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Description
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to objective tumor progression or death from any cause, whichever came first. Progression was defined as 25% increase in size of enhancing tumor or any new tumor on Gd-MRI scans, or neurologically worse, and steroids stable or increased. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
From baseline to the end of the study (up to 4.5 years)
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
From baseline until death (up to 4.5 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued
Description
Discontinuation was defined as the percentage of participants who permanently discontinued treatment in either treatment arm. Percentage of participant with individual discontinuation reason are reported. CNS: central nervous system; CTCAE: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events . Other reason refers to any other reason than the specified ones.
Time Frame
From baseline until death (up to 4.5 years)
Title
Number of Participants With A Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) and With A BOR of CR or Partial Response (PR)
Description
BOR was defined as the best response observed for a participant during assessment. Number of participants who had BOR as CR and number of participants who had BOR as CR or PR were reported. Complete response was defined as disappearance of all enhancing tumor on consecutive Gd-MRI scans at least 1 month apart, off steroids, and neurologically stable or improved. Partial response was defined as 50% reduction in size of enhancing tumor on consecutive Gd-MRI scans at least 1 month apart, steroids stable or reduced, and neurologically stable or improved.
Time Frame
4 week after radiotherapy (RT) (up to Week 4), >4 Week after RT (up to Week 8) and Month 6
Title
Percentage of Participants With Response on FLAIR Imaging
Description
FLAIR lesions were determined as "stable", "progressive" or "decreased". FLAIR lesions was determined as "progressive" only if they were not be attributed to causes apart from tumor infiltration (sequelae of radiation therapy, demyelination, ischemia, infection, seizures, or other treatment effects). Percentage of participants are based on ITT population. Dis.=Discontinuation.
Time Frame
At screening, Baseline, Month 6 and Therapy Discontinuation (Up to 4.5 years)
Title
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ - C30) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Description
The EORTC QLQ-C30 incorporates: 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); 9 symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Most questions used 4 point scale (1 'Not at all' to 4 'Very much'; 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'very poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score for Global Qol/functional scales=better level of functioning or a higher score for symptom scale=greater degree of symptoms. The change in global health status was determined to be the difference in values at baseline and each specific visit. The term ''baseline'' refers to the time of randomization to the maintenance phase.
Time Frame
Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Title
Change From Baseline for EORTC QLQ Brain Neoplasm 20 (BN20) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Description
EORTC QLQ-BN20 consisted of 20 items assessing visual disorders, motor dysfunction, communication deficit, various disease symptoms (e.g. headaches and seizures), treatment toxicities (e.g. hair loss) and future uncertainty. All of the 20 items are rated on a 4 point Likert scale from 1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit and 4=very much, and were linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Title
Change From Baseline for Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Description
The MMSE briefly measures orientation to time and place, immediate recall, short-term verbal memory, calculation, language and construct ability. Each area tested had a designated point value, the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function.
Time Frame
Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Title
Change From Baseline for Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Score at Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Description
KPS is an 11-level score (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100) which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Deterioration in KPS was defined as decrease of 20 or more points in KPS score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Post-Baseline (up to Month 30)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Received Corticosteroid for Glioblastoma
Description
Participants used corticosteroids for the glioblastoma condition. Corticosteroids included dexamethasone, methylprednisone, fortecortin, hydrocortisone, urbason, and prednisolone.
Time Frame
From baseline to Month 6
Title
Time to Treatment Failure
Time Frame
From baseline until end of study (up to 4.5 years)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: adult patients, 18-70 years of age; glioblastoma, confirmed histologically; no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy for glioblastoma; non-methylated MGMT promoter in the tumor. Exclusion Criteria: prior systemic treatment for glioblastoma multiforme; prior treatment with Avastin; significant cardiovascular disease; other active malignant disease.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Aachen
ZIP/Postal Code
52074
Country
Germany
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13353
Country
Germany
City
Bochum
ZIP/Postal Code
44892
Country
Germany
City
Bonn
ZIP/Postal Code
53127
Country
Germany
City
Chemnitz
ZIP/Postal Code
09113
Country
Germany
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
City
Düsseldorf
ZIP/Postal Code
40225
Country
Germany
City
Erfurt
ZIP/Postal Code
99089
Country
Germany
City
Erlangen
ZIP/Postal Code
91054
Country
Germany
City
Frankfurt am Main
ZIP/Postal Code
60528
Country
Germany
City
Freiburg
ZIP/Postal Code
79106
Country
Germany
City
Göttingen
ZIP/Postal Code
37075
Country
Germany
City
Idar-Oberstein
ZIP/Postal Code
55743
Country
Germany
City
Kiel
ZIP/Postal Code
24105
Country
Germany
City
Köln
ZIP/Postal Code
50937
Country
Germany
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
City
Mannheim
ZIP/Postal Code
68167
Country
Germany
City
Marburg
ZIP/Postal Code
35043
Country
Germany
City
Muenchen
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
81675
Country
Germany
City
Münster
ZIP/Postal Code
48149
Country
Germany
City
Regensburg
ZIP/Postal Code
93053
Country
Germany
City
Tübingen
ZIP/Postal Code
72076
Country
Germany
City
Ulm
ZIP/Postal Code
89081
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29121274
Citation
Schafer N, Proescholdt M, Steinbach JP, Weyerbrock A, Hau P, Grauer O, Goldbrunner R, Friedrich F, Rohde V, Ringel F, Schlegel U, Sabel M, Ronellenfitsch MW, Uhl M, Grau S, Hanel M, Schnell O, Krex D, Vajkoczy P, Tabatabai G, Mack F, Schaub C, Tzaridis T, Niessen M, Kebir S, Leutgeb B, Urbach H, Belka C, Stummer W, Glas M, Herrlinger U. Quality of life in the GLARIUS trial randomizing bevacizumab/irinotecan versus temozolomide in newly diagnosed, MGMT-nonmethylated glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2018 Jun 18;20(7):975-985. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox204.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26976423
Citation
Herrlinger U, Schafer N, Steinbach JP, Weyerbrock A, Hau P, Goldbrunner R, Friedrich F, Rohde V, Ringel F, Schlegel U, Sabel M, Ronellenfitsch MW, Uhl M, Maciaczyk J, Grau S, Schnell O, Hanel M, Krex D, Vajkoczy P, Gerlach R, Kortmann RD, Mehdorn M, Tuttenberg J, Mayer-Steinacker R, Fietkau R, Brehmer S, Mack F, Stuplich M, Kebir S, Kohnen R, Dunkl E, Leutgeb B, Proescholdt M, Pietsch T, Urbach H, Belka C, Stummer W, Glas M. Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide in Newly Diagnosed O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Nonmethylated Glioblastoma: The Randomized GLARIUS Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 10;34(14):1611-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.4691. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) and Irinotecan Versus Temozolomide Radiochemistry in Patients With Glioblastoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs