A Study of Equivalence of Generic Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.05% and Picato Gel 0.05% in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
Primary Purpose
Actinic Keratosis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ingenol Mebutate (Picato®)
Generic Ingenol Mebutate
Vehicle Foam
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Actinic Keratosis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject was a male or non-pregnant female 18 years of age or older
- Subject provided written informed consent.
- Subject was willing and able to apply the test article as directed, comply with study instructions, and commit to all follow-up visits for the duration of the study.
- Subject had a clinical diagnosis of AK at Baseline with at least four (4), but no more than eight (8), visible and discrete non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic AK lesions, each at least 4 mm in diameter, within a contiguous 25 cm2 treatment area ("the Treatment Area") on the trunk or extremities.
- Subject was in good general health and free of any disease state or physical condition that might have impaired evaluation of AK lesions or which, in the investigator's opinion, exposed the subject to an unacceptable risk by study participation.
- Females must have been post-menopausal , surgically sterile , or have used an effective method of birth control , with a negative urine pregnancy test (UPT) at the Baseline Visit.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject was pregnant, lactating, or was planning to become pregnant during the study.
- Subject was currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device study.
- Subject used an investigational drug or investigational device treatment within 30 days prior to the Baseline Visit.
- Subject had hyperkeratotic, hypertrophic, or large mat-like AKs (e.g., AK >1 cm2 in size) within the contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area.
- Subject had more than eight (8) AKs, independent of size, within the contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area.
- Subject had the need or planned to be exposed to artificial tanning devices or excessive sunlight during the trial.
- Subject was immunosuppressed (e.g., HIV, systemic malignancy, graft host disease, etc.)
- Subject had experienced an unsuccessful outcome from previous ingenol mebutate therapy (an unsuccessful outcome was defined as after a reasonable therapeutic trial with no compliance issues and the topical drug did not work).
- Subject had a history of sensitivity to any of the ingredients in the test articles (see Section 9.4.2).
- Subject used topical creams, lotions, or gels of any kind within the selected Treatment Area within one (1) day prior to entry into the study.
- Subject used topical medications; corticosteroids, alpha hydroxy acids (e.g., glycolic acid, lactic acid etc. >5%), beta hydroxy acid (salicylic acid >2%), urea >5%, 5-fluorouracil, diclofenac, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, or prescription retinoids (e.g., tazarotene, adapalene, tretinoin) within the selected Treatment Area (trunk or extremities) within one (1) month prior to the Baseline Visit.
- Subject had cryodestruction, curettage, photodynamic therapy, surgical excision, or other treatments for AK within the selected Treatment Area (trunk or extremities) within one (1) month prior to the Baseline Visit.
- Subject used oral corticosteroid therapy, interferon, cytotoxic drugs, immunomodulators, immunosuppressive therapies, or retinoids within one (1) month prior to the Baseline Visit.
- Subject had dermatologic procedures or surgeries such as laser resurfacing, Psoralen + ultraviolet A (PUVA) therapy, ultraviolet B (UVB) therapy, chemical peels, or dermabrasion on the selected Treatment area (trunk or extremities) within six (6) months prior to the Baseline Visit.
- Subject had lesions suspicious for skin cancer (skin cancer not ruled out by biopsy) or untreated skin cancers within the selected Treatment Area (trunk or extremities).
- Subject had any skin pathology or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the evaluation of the test article or required the use of interfering topical, systemic, or surgical therapy.
- Subject had any condition which, in the investigator's opinion, would have made it unsafe or precluded the subject's ability to fully participate in this research study.
- Subject was unable to communicate or cooperate with the investigator due to language problems, poor mental development, impaired cerebral function, or physical limitations.
- Subject was known to be noncompliant or was unlikely to comply with the requirements of the study protocol (e.g., due to alcoholism, drug dependency, mental incapacity) in the opinion of the investigator.
- Subject had been previously enrolled in the same study.
Sites / Locations
- Center for Dermatology Clinical Research, Inc
- SD Sports Medicine & Family Health Center
- The Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research
- Savin Medical Group Research Center
- Tory P. Sullivan, M.D., P.A.
- Moore Clinical Research, Inc.
- Northwest Clinical Trials, Inc.
- Altman Dermatology Associates
- Christie Clinic, LLC
- Shideler Clinical Research Center
- Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
- The Indiana Clinical Trials Center
- Bettencourt Skin Center
- Union Square Dermatology
- Dermatology Consulting Services
- PMG Research of Winston-Salem, LLC
- Omega Medical Research, 400 Bald Hill Road, Warwick, RI 02886
- Greenville Dermatology, LLC
- Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, PC
- DermResearch, Inc.Austin
- The Center for Skin Research
- Virginia Clinical Research
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Active Comparator Picato®
Generic Ingenol Mebutate
Vehicle Foam
Arm Description
Picato® (ingenol mebutate) gel, 0.05% (Leo Pharma Inc.) [Reference Listed Drug (RLD)]
Generic ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05% [Test]
Vehicle gel of the test product
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure
Percentage of subjects in the PP population in each treatment group with complete clearance of AK lesions. Complete clearance was defined as having no (zero) clinically visible AK lesions in the Treatment Area at the Week 8 visit.
Secondary Outcome Measures
The Percentage of Subjects in the PP Population in Each Treatment Group With Partial Clearance (as Having at Least 75% Reduction in the Number of Clinically Visible AK Lesions) in theTreatment Area at the Week 8 Visit.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02654769
Brief Title
A Study of Equivalence of Generic Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.05% and Picato Gel 0.05% in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
Official Title
Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Vehicle-Controlled Parallel Group Study to Determine the Therapeutic Equivalence of Generic Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.05% and Picato® Gel 0.05% in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis on the Trunk or Extremities
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Actavis Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and therapeutic equivalence of generic ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05% to Picato gel, 0.05% and to establish the superiority of the efficacy of these two products over the vehicle gel in the treatment of Actinic Keratosis (AK) on the trunk or extremities.
Detailed Description
Picato® (ingenol mebutate) gel is the first and only ingenol mebutate product approved by the FDA in 2012 for the topical treatment of AK(s) on the face and scalp (0.015% formulation) and on the trunk and extremities (0.05% formulation). A generic ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05% has been developed for the topical treatment of clinically typical, visible, and discrete non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic AK lesions of the trunk or extremities.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Actinic Keratosis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
441 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Active Comparator Picato®
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Picato® (ingenol mebutate) gel, 0.05% (Leo Pharma Inc.) [Reference Listed Drug (RLD)]
Arm Title
Generic Ingenol Mebutate
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Generic ingenol mebutate gel, 0.05% [Test]
Arm Title
Vehicle Foam
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Vehicle gel of the test product
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ingenol Mebutate (Picato®)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Picato
Intervention Description
Brand product
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Generic Ingenol Mebutate
Intervention Description
Generic formulated to have the same therapeutic effect of the brand
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vehicle Foam
Other Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
It does not contain active ingredient. A placebo to test the sensitivity of the active treatments.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Primary Efficacy Outcome Measure
Description
Percentage of subjects in the PP population in each treatment group with complete clearance of AK lesions. Complete clearance was defined as having no (zero) clinically visible AK lesions in the Treatment Area at the Week 8 visit.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Percentage of Subjects in the PP Population in Each Treatment Group With Partial Clearance (as Having at Least 75% Reduction in the Number of Clinically Visible AK Lesions) in theTreatment Area at the Week 8 Visit.
Time Frame
8 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
95 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject was a male or non-pregnant female 18 years of age or older
Subject provided written informed consent.
Subject was willing and able to apply the test article as directed, comply with study instructions, and commit to all follow-up visits for the duration of the study.
Subject had a clinical diagnosis of AK at Baseline with at least four (4), but no more than eight (8), visible and discrete non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic AK lesions, each at least 4 mm in diameter, within a contiguous 25 cm2 treatment area ("the Treatment Area") on the trunk or extremities.
Subject was in good general health and free of any disease state or physical condition that might have impaired evaluation of AK lesions or which, in the investigator's opinion, exposed the subject to an unacceptable risk by study participation.
Females must have been post-menopausal , surgically sterile , or have used an effective method of birth control , with a negative urine pregnancy test (UPT) at the Baseline Visit.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject was pregnant, lactating, or was planning to become pregnant during the study.
Subject was currently enrolled in an investigational drug or device study.
Subject used an investigational drug or investigational device treatment within 30 days prior to the Baseline Visit.
Subject had hyperkeratotic, hypertrophic, or large mat-like AKs (e.g., AK >1 cm2 in size) within the contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area.
Subject had more than eight (8) AKs, independent of size, within the contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area.
Subject had the need or planned to be exposed to artificial tanning devices or excessive sunlight during the trial.
Subject was immunosuppressed (e.g., HIV, systemic malignancy, graft host disease, etc.)
Subject had experienced an unsuccessful outcome from previous ingenol mebutate therapy (an unsuccessful outcome was defined as after a reasonable therapeutic trial with no compliance issues and the topical drug did not work).
Subject had a history of sensitivity to any of the ingredients in the test articles (see Section 9.4.2).
Subject used topical creams, lotions, or gels of any kind within the selected Treatment Area within one (1) day prior to entry into the study.
Subject used topical medications; corticosteroids, alpha hydroxy acids (e.g., glycolic acid, lactic acid etc. >5%), beta hydroxy acid (salicylic acid >2%), urea >5%, 5-fluorouracil, diclofenac, imiquimod, ingenol mebutate, or prescription retinoids (e.g., tazarotene, adapalene, tretinoin) within the selected Treatment Area (trunk or extremities) within one (1) month prior to the Baseline Visit.
Subject had cryodestruction, curettage, photodynamic therapy, surgical excision, or other treatments for AK within the selected Treatment Area (trunk or extremities) within one (1) month prior to the Baseline Visit.
Subject used oral corticosteroid therapy, interferon, cytotoxic drugs, immunomodulators, immunosuppressive therapies, or retinoids within one (1) month prior to the Baseline Visit.
Subject had dermatologic procedures or surgeries such as laser resurfacing, Psoralen + ultraviolet A (PUVA) therapy, ultraviolet B (UVB) therapy, chemical peels, or dermabrasion on the selected Treatment area (trunk or extremities) within six (6) months prior to the Baseline Visit.
Subject had lesions suspicious for skin cancer (skin cancer not ruled out by biopsy) or untreated skin cancers within the selected Treatment Area (trunk or extremities).
Subject had any skin pathology or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could interfere with the evaluation of the test article or required the use of interfering topical, systemic, or surgical therapy.
Subject had any condition which, in the investigator's opinion, would have made it unsafe or precluded the subject's ability to fully participate in this research study.
Subject was unable to communicate or cooperate with the investigator due to language problems, poor mental development, impaired cerebral function, or physical limitations.
Subject was known to be noncompliant or was unlikely to comply with the requirements of the study protocol (e.g., due to alcoholism, drug dependency, mental incapacity) in the opinion of the investigator.
Subject had been previously enrolled in the same study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Oleg Khatsenko, Ph.D
Organizational Affiliation
Actavis Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Center for Dermatology Clinical Research, Inc
City
Fremont
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94538
Country
United States
Facility Name
SD Sports Medicine & Family Health Center
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92120
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research
City
Aventura
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33180
Country
United States
Facility Name
Savin Medical Group Research Center
City
Miami Lakes
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33014
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tory P. Sullivan, M.D., P.A.
City
North Miami Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33162
Country
United States
Facility Name
Moore Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33609
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwest Clinical Trials, Inc.
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Altman Dermatology Associates
City
Arlington Heights
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60005
Country
United States
Facility Name
Christie Clinic, LLC
City
Champaign
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61820
Country
United States
Facility Name
Shideler Clinical Research Center
City
Carmel
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46256
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Indiana Clinical Trials Center
City
Plainfield
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46168
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bettencourt Skin Center
City
Henderson
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89074
Country
United States
Facility Name
Union Square Dermatology
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10003
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dermatology Consulting Services
City
High Point
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27262
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Winston-Salem, LLC
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Omega Medical Research, 400 Bald Hill Road, Warwick, RI 02886
City
Warwick
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02886
Country
United States
Facility Name
Greenville Dermatology, LLC
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, PC
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37917
Country
United States
Facility Name
DermResearch, Inc.Austin
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78759
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Skin Research
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77056
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Clinical Research
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23507
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
A Study of Equivalence of Generic Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.05% and Picato Gel 0.05% in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs