search
Back to results

A Study of OROS Hydromorphone HCL vs Morphine in Cancer Pain Patients.

Primary Purpose

Pain, Analgesics, Opioid

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
OROS hydromorphone HCL ; Morphine sulfate
Sponsored by
Alza Corporation, DE, USA
About
Eligibility
Locations
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain focused on measuring Cancer pain, Oral analgesic, OROS hydromorphone HCL, Morphine sulfate

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cancer pain who are currently receiving strong oral or transdermal opioid analgesics or in whom strong opioid analgesics are appropriate
  • Patients who requires or are expected to require between 60 and 540 mg of oral morphine or morphine equivalents every 24 hours for the chronic management of cancer pain
  • Patients who have pain suitable for treatment with a once-daily formulation
  • Patients with concomitant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Exclusion Criteria:
  • Patient with gastrointestinal (GI) disease of sufficient severity to interfere with orally administered analgesia (eg dysphagia, vomiting, constipation, bowel obstruction, severe gut narrowing) were not permitted to enroll
  • Patient where the risks of treatment with morphine or hydromorphone outweighed the potential benefits such as raised intracranial pressure, hypotension, hypothyroidism, asthma, reduced respiratory reserve, prostatic hypertrophy, hepatic or renal impairment, convulsive disorders, and Addison's disease
  • Debilitated patients were excluded.

Sites / Locations

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    The primary efficacy : Patient's assessment of "worst pain in the past 24 hours" Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questions, scored daily in the patient's diary.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    December 12, 2006
    Last Updated
    April 26, 2010
    Sponsor
    Alza Corporation, DE, USA
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT00410540
    Brief Title
    A Study of OROS Hydromorphone HCL vs Morphine in Cancer Pain Patients.
    Official Title
    A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial of Hydromorphone (Immediate and Sustained- Release) vs Morphine (Immediate and Sustained-release) in Cancer Pain
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2010
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    undefined (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    undefined (undefined)
    Study Completion Date
    May 2001 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Name of the Sponsor
    Alza Corporation, DE, USA

    4. Oversight

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the clinical equivalence of hydromorphone and morphine (immediate-release [IR] and sustained-release [SR] formulations) using the "worst pain in the past 24 hours" item of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI). The secondary objective of this study was to compare hydromorphone and morphine in the following variables: other pain measures, various questionnaires, and safety and tolerability variables.
    Detailed Description
    This was a phase-3, multicenter, multinational, randomized (patients are assigned different treatments based on chance), active-controlled, double-blind, multiple-ascending-dose, parallel-group study in adult patients with cancer pain who receive and/or require strong oral or transdermal opioid analgesics (60-540 mg of oral morphine equivalents daily). This study consisted of 2 phases: an initial immediate release (IR) phase and a subsequent slow release (SR) phase. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either OROS hydromorphone HCl or morphine sulfate (immediate release formulation in the immediate release phase, slow release formulation in the slow release phase). In the immediate release phase (2-9 days), patients were started on the appropriate initial dose of immediate release medication every 4 hours (q4h), (6 doses/day) using a 5:1 conversion ratio (morphine equivalents:hydromorphone dosage). If the patient had greater than 3 breakthrough-pain episodes requiring additional pain medication in 24 hours, the study medication dosage was increased, at most once a day. When the patient had achieved dose-stable pain control (2 days with 3 or less than 3 breakthrough-pain episodes per day), the patient was permitted to continue into the slow release phase. The patient was given an equivalent dosage of a slow release formulation of the same drug (OROS® hydromorphone HCL each day or morphine sulfate slow release two times per day), administered using a double-dummy technique. Dosage increases were permitted every 2 days if the patient had more than 3 breakthrough-pain episodes in 24 hours. To complete the slow release phase, patients had to achieve dose-stable pain control for at least 2 days.Safety assessments of physical examination, labs and adverse event reporting were done. OROS hydromorphone HCL slow release 8, 16, 32, and 64mg tablets; Morphine sulfate immediate release10, 20, 50 mg capsules;Morphine sulfate slow release 5, 30, 60, 90, 120, 160, and 200mg capsules;hydromorphone immediate release 2, 4, 8 mg;The immediate release medications orally every 4 hours;The OROS hydromorphone slow release formulation orally every 24 hours and morphine slow release orally twice daily.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Pain, Analgesics, Opioid
    Keywords
    Cancer pain, Oral analgesic, OROS hydromorphone HCL, Morphine sulfate

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Double
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    202 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    OROS hydromorphone HCL ; Morphine sulfate
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    The primary efficacy : Patient's assessment of "worst pain in the past 24 hours" Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) questions, scored daily in the patient's diary.

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients with cancer pain who are currently receiving strong oral or transdermal opioid analgesics or in whom strong opioid analgesics are appropriate Patients who requires or are expected to require between 60 and 540 mg of oral morphine or morphine equivalents every 24 hours for the chronic management of cancer pain Patients who have pain suitable for treatment with a once-daily formulation Patients with concomitant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Exclusion Criteria: Patient with gastrointestinal (GI) disease of sufficient severity to interfere with orally administered analgesia (eg dysphagia, vomiting, constipation, bowel obstruction, severe gut narrowing) were not permitted to enroll Patient where the risks of treatment with morphine or hydromorphone outweighed the potential benefits such as raised intracranial pressure, hypotension, hypothyroidism, asthma, reduced respiratory reserve, prostatic hypertrophy, hepatic or renal impairment, convulsive disorders, and Addison's disease Debilitated patients were excluded.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Alza Corporation Clinical Trial
    Organizational Affiliation
    ALZA
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    A Study of OROS Hydromorphone HCL vs Morphine in Cancer Pain Patients.

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs