A Study Of Sertraline Compared With Paroxetine In The Treatment Of Panic Disorder
Primary Purpose
Panic Disorder
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
sertraline
Paroxetine
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Panic Disorder focused on measuring Panic Disorder
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient who meets diagnosis of Panic Disorder (with or without Agoraphobia) according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM IV).
- Patients must have experienced at least 4 panic attacks within 4 weeks before screening.
- At baseline patients with Panic Disorder of total score of 18 or higher on the Panic and Agoraphobia scale (clinician rated version).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who concurrently have bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, delusional disorder, epilepsy, Major Depression Disorder (MDD), Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) or General Anxiety Disorder (GAD) according to the DSM-IV criteria.
- Patients who concurrently have depression/depressive state, anxiety disorder and generalized anxiety disorder may be included in the study if the primary diagnosis is identified to be panic disorder
- Patients with the total score of at least 18 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) (Items 1 to 17) at the start of Screening (Visit 1)
- Patients who require concomitant drug therapy with psychotropic agents (including benzodiazepines) and monoamine oxidase inhibitor during the period of the study.
Sites / Locations
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
1
2
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Mean Change From Baseline in Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) Total Score at the End of Treatment Phase
Panic and Agoraphobia Scale has 13 items with a 5-point scale (range: 0 to 4). The total possible score is ranged from 0 to 52. The increasing value are considered worse outcome. The scale is grouped into 5 subscores (not including item U in total score): panic attacks ; agoraphobia/avoidance behavior ; anticipatory anxiety; disability; and health worries. Four point difference in reduction of the PAS total score has been identified as not clinically meaningful in the assessment of Panic Disorder symptomatology.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants of Responder in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Improvement
The ratings were rated to compare with baseline by 7-point " 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse".
Responder was defined as number of participants who were assessed as "very much improved" or " much improved".
Mean Change From Baseline in Panic Attack at the End of Treatment Phase
Panic attacks were defined as having four or more of the following Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders symptoms. Palpitations or increased heart rate, Sweating, Trembling or shaking, Shortness of breath or smothering sensations, Choking, Chest pain or discomfort, Nausea or upset stomach, Dizziness, unsteady feelings or faintness, Feeling unlike yourself, or detached from a situation and/or like things happening around you are strange and unreal, Fear of going crazy or doing something uncontrolled, Fear of dying, Abnormal sense, Hot flashes or chills.
Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score at the End of Treatment Phase
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale provided a 5-point intensity rating (0=None to 4=Very severe) of anxiety symptoms in 14 items.
The increasing values are considered worse outcome. The total possible score is ranged from 0 to 52.
Number of Participants With Summary of Adverse Events in Treatment Phase
Number of sparticipants with all causality adverse events, serious adverse events, severe adverse events, adverse events resulted in discontinuation, dose reduced or temporary discontinuation. Participants were counted only once per treatment in each row.
Summary of Adverse Events in Tapering Phase
Number of subjects with all causality adverse events, serious adverse events, severe adverse events, adverse events resulted in discontinuation, dose reduced or temporary discontinuation. Subjects were counted only once per treatment in each row.
Percentage of Participants With Deterioration in Antidepressant Discontinuation Scale During Tapering Phase
The percentage of participants divided was calcurated as follows: Devide the number of participants who had experienced new symptoms in Week 16, regardless of causal relationship with the study drug, or worsening of the severity in Week 16 compared with Week 12, by total number of participants in each treatment group.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00677352
First Posted
May 9, 2008
Last Updated
January 25, 2021
Sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00677352
Brief Title
A Study Of Sertraline Compared With Paroxetine In The Treatment Of Panic Disorder
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Of Sertraline Compared With Paroxetine In The Treatment Of Panic Disorder
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2010 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sertraline compared to paroxetine in patients with panic disorder.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Panic Disorder
Keywords
Panic Disorder
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
321 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
sertraline
Other Intervention Name(s)
Zoloft, JZoloft
Intervention Description
dosage : 25mg , 50mg , placebo; dosage form : tablet; frequency : once daily after dinner; duration : 14 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Paroxetine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Paxil
Intervention Description
dosage : 10mg, placebo; dosage form : capsule; frequency : once daily after dinner; duration : 14 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) Total Score at the End of Treatment Phase
Description
Panic and Agoraphobia Scale has 13 items with a 5-point scale (range: 0 to 4). The total possible score is ranged from 0 to 52. The increasing value are considered worse outcome. The scale is grouped into 5 subscores (not including item U in total score): panic attacks ; agoraphobia/avoidance behavior ; anticipatory anxiety; disability; and health worries. Four point difference in reduction of the PAS total score has been identified as not clinically meaningful in the assessment of Panic Disorder symptomatology.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants of Responder in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) - Improvement
Description
The ratings were rated to compare with baseline by 7-point " 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, 7 = very much worse".
Responder was defined as number of participants who were assessed as "very much improved" or " much improved".
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Panic Attack at the End of Treatment Phase
Description
Panic attacks were defined as having four or more of the following Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders symptoms. Palpitations or increased heart rate, Sweating, Trembling or shaking, Shortness of breath or smothering sensations, Choking, Chest pain or discomfort, Nausea or upset stomach, Dizziness, unsteady feelings or faintness, Feeling unlike yourself, or detached from a situation and/or like things happening around you are strange and unreal, Fear of going crazy or doing something uncontrolled, Fear of dying, Abnormal sense, Hot flashes or chills.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score at the End of Treatment Phase
Description
The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale provided a 5-point intensity rating (0=None to 4=Very severe) of anxiety symptoms in 14 items.
The increasing values are considered worse outcome. The total possible score is ranged from 0 to 52.
Time Frame
Baseline and 12 weeks
Title
Number of Participants With Summary of Adverse Events in Treatment Phase
Description
Number of sparticipants with all causality adverse events, serious adverse events, severe adverse events, adverse events resulted in discontinuation, dose reduced or temporary discontinuation. Participants were counted only once per treatment in each row.
Time Frame
1, 2, 4, 6, 8 10 and 12 weeks (or study discontinuation) after administration of study drug
Title
Summary of Adverse Events in Tapering Phase
Description
Number of subjects with all causality adverse events, serious adverse events, severe adverse events, adverse events resulted in discontinuation, dose reduced or temporary discontinuation. Subjects were counted only once per treatment in each row.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants With Deterioration in Antidepressant Discontinuation Scale During Tapering Phase
Description
The percentage of participants divided was calcurated as follows: Devide the number of participants who had experienced new symptoms in Week 16, regardless of causal relationship with the study drug, or worsening of the severity in Week 16 compared with Week 12, by total number of participants in each treatment group.
Time Frame
4 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
64 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient who meets diagnosis of Panic Disorder (with or without Agoraphobia) according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM IV).
Patients must have experienced at least 4 panic attacks within 4 weeks before screening.
At baseline patients with Panic Disorder of total score of 18 or higher on the Panic and Agoraphobia scale (clinician rated version).
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who concurrently have bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, delusional disorder, epilepsy, Major Depression Disorder (MDD), Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) or General Anxiety Disorder (GAD) according to the DSM-IV criteria.
Patients who concurrently have depression/depressive state, anxiety disorder and generalized anxiety disorder may be included in the study if the primary diagnosis is identified to be panic disorder
Patients with the total score of at least 18 on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) (Items 1 to 17) at the start of Screening (Visit 1)
Patients who require concomitant drug therapy with psychotropic agents (including benzodiazepines) and monoamine oxidase inhibitor during the period of the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka-shi
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Kitakyushu-shi
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Kitakyusyu-shi
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Sapporo-Shi
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Higashiibaraki-gun
State/Province
Ibaraki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Fujisawa-city
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Sagamihara-Shi
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Yokohama-Shi
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Yokohama
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Kawaguchi-shi
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Saitama city
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Chiyoda-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Kita-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Minato-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Musashino
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Nakano-Ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Nakanoku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Setagaya-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Shinjuku-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Toshima-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Nakano-ku
State/Province
Yokohama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Minato-ku
Country
Japan
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=A0501088&StudyName=A%20Study%20Of%20Sertraline%20Compared%20With%20Paroxetine%20In%20The%20Treatment%20Of%20Panic%20Disorder
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.
Learn more about this trial
A Study Of Sertraline Compared With Paroxetine In The Treatment Of Panic Disorder
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs