A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRAVO) (BRAVO)
Primary Purpose
Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ranibizumab injection 0.3 mg
Ranibizumab injection 0.5 mg
Sham injection
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Macular Edema focused on measuring Lucentis, RVO, BRVO, Edema
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Willingness to provide signed Informed Consent Form
- Age ≥ 18 years
- For sexually active women of childbearing potential, use of an appropriate form of contraception (or abstinence) for the duration of the study
- Ability and willingness to return for all scheduled visits and assessments
Ocular Inclusion Criterion (Study Eye):
- Foveal center-involved macular edema secondary to BRVO
- BCVA using ETDRS charts of 20/40 to 20/400 (Snellen equivalent)
- Mean central subfield thickness ≥ 250 μm on two optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements (at screening [confirmed by the central reading center] and Day 0 [confirmed by the evaluating physician])
- Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and participant cooperation sufficient to obtain adequate fundus photographs
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of cerebral vascular accident or myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to Day 0
- History of any anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in fellow eye within 3 months prior to Day 0
- History of any systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within 6 months prior to Day 0
- History of allergy to fluorescein
- History of allergy to ranibizumab injection or related molecule
- Relevant systemic disease that may be associated with increased systemic VEGF levels (namely, all active malignancies); history of successfully treated malignancies is not an exclusion criterion
- Uncontrolled blood pressure
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., chronic alcoholism or drug abuse, personality disorder or use of major tranquilizers, indicated difficulty in long-term follow-up, and likelihood of survival of less than 1 year)
- Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days prior to Day 0 that involved treatment with any drug (excluding vitamins and minerals) or device that has not received regulatory approval at time of study entry
Ocular Exclusion Criteria (Study Eye):
- Prior episode of retinal vein occlusion (RVO)
- Brisk afferent pupillary defect
- History of radial optic neurotomy or sheathotomy
- History or presence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD; dry or wet form)
- History of any anti-VEGF treatment in the study eye within 3 months prior to Day 0
- History of laser photocoagulation for macular edema within 4 months prior to Day 0
- History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation or sector laser photocoagulation within 3 months prior to randomization or anticipated within the next 4 months following randomization
- History of intraocular corticosteroid use within 3 months prior to Day 0
- History of pars plana vitrectomy
- History of intraocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, etc.) within 2 months prior to Day 0 or anticipated within the next 7 months following Day 0
- History of yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to Day 0
- Previous filtration surgery in the study eye
- History of herpetic ocular infection
- History of ocular toxoplasmosis
- History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
- History of idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy
- Evidence upon examination of vitreoretinal interface disease (e.g., vitreomacular traction, epiretinal membrane), either on clinical examination or OCT, thought to be contributing to macular edema
- An eye that, in the investigator's opinion, would not benefit from resolution of macular edema, such as eyes with foveal atrophy, dense pigmentary changes, or dense subfoveal hard exudates
- Presence of an ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the study (e.g., uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass syndrome, or prior macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment)
- Visually significant hemorrhage obscuring the fovea and felt to be a major contributor to reduced visual acuity
- Presence of a substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., a 20/40 cataract)
- Aphakia
- Relevant ocular disease that may be associated with increased intraocular VEGF levels (namely, uveitis, neovascular glaucoma, neovascular AMD, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic maculopathy, or ocular ischemic syndrome)
- Improvement of > 10 letters on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between screening and Day 0
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Sham injection
Ranibizumab injection 0.3 mg
Ranibizumab injection 0.5 mg
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score at 6 Months
BCVA score in the study eye was based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity charts (number of correct letters) and assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants Who Gained ≥ 15 Letters in BCVA Score at Month 6 Compared With Baseline
BCVA score based on the ETDRS visual acuity charts (number of correct letters) and assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters.
Percentage of Participants Who Lost < 15 Letters in BCVA Score at Month 6 Compared With Baseline
BCVA score based on the ETDRS visual acuity charts (number of correct letters) and assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. The percentage of subjects who lost <15 letters will be greater than the percentage of subjects who "gained >=15 letters" as "losing <15 letters" includes both those who gained >=15 letters and those who were "stable" (i.e. lost between 1 and 14 letters, had no change, or gained between 1 and 14 letters).
Percentage of Participants With a Central Foveal Thickness of ≤ 250 μm at Month 6
A central reading center assessed all optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Central foveal thickness was defined as the center point thickness.
Mean Absolute Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness at Month 6
A central reading center assessed all OCT images. Central foveal thickness was defined as the center point thickness.
Mean Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Near Activities Subscale Score at Month 6
The NEI VFQ-25 (v. 2000; Interviewer Format) consisted of the base set of 25 questions, plus the optional additional questions (where questions A3, A4, and A5 pertained to the Near Activities Subscale). Scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score represented better functioning.
Mean Change From Baseline in the NEI VFQ-25 Distance Activities Subscale Score at Month 6
The NEI VFQ-25 (v. 2000; Interviewer Format) consisted of the base set of 25 questions, plus the optional additional questions (where questions A6, A7, and A8 pertained to the Distance Activities Subscale). Scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score represented better functioning.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00486018
Brief Title
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRAVO)
Acronym
BRAVO
Official Title
A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Sham Injection-Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection Compared With Sham in Subjects With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2007 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2009 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Genentech, Inc.
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham injection-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab compared with sham injections in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO); 397 patients with BRVO were enrolled at 93 investigational sites in the United States. The study included a treatment period (6 months) and an observation period (6 months).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion
Keywords
Lucentis, RVO, BRVO, Edema
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
397 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Sham injection
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Title
Ranibizumab injection 0.3 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Ranibizumab injection 0.5 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ranibizumab injection 0.3 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lucentis
Intervention Description
Ranibizumab injection 0.3 mg in a single-dose regimen given every month (Day 0 through the Month 5 visit), for a total of six injections.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ranibizumab injection 0.5 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lucentis
Intervention Description
Ranibizumab injection 0.5 mg in a single-dose regimen given every month (Day 0 through the Month 5 visit), for a total of six injections.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sham injection
Intervention Description
Sham injection in a single-dose regimen given every month (Day 0 through the Month 5 visit), for a total of six sham injections.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score at 6 Months
Description
BCVA score in the study eye was based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity charts (number of correct letters) and assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters.
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Gained ≥ 15 Letters in BCVA Score at Month 6 Compared With Baseline
Description
BCVA score based on the ETDRS visual acuity charts (number of correct letters) and assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters.
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Lost < 15 Letters in BCVA Score at Month 6 Compared With Baseline
Description
BCVA score based on the ETDRS visual acuity charts (number of correct letters) and assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. The percentage of subjects who lost <15 letters will be greater than the percentage of subjects who "gained >=15 letters" as "losing <15 letters" includes both those who gained >=15 letters and those who were "stable" (i.e. lost between 1 and 14 letters, had no change, or gained between 1 and 14 letters).
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Central Foveal Thickness of ≤ 250 μm at Month 6
Description
A central reading center assessed all optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Central foveal thickness was defined as the center point thickness.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Mean Absolute Change From Baseline in Central Foveal Thickness at Month 6
Description
A central reading center assessed all OCT images. Central foveal thickness was defined as the center point thickness.
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) Near Activities Subscale Score at Month 6
Description
The NEI VFQ-25 (v. 2000; Interviewer Format) consisted of the base set of 25 questions, plus the optional additional questions (where questions A3, A4, and A5 pertained to the Near Activities Subscale). Scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score represented better functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in the NEI VFQ-25 Distance Activities Subscale Score at Month 6
Description
The NEI VFQ-25 (v. 2000; Interviewer Format) consisted of the base set of 25 questions, plus the optional additional questions (where questions A6, A7, and A8 pertained to the Distance Activities Subscale). Scores ranged from 0 to 100; a higher score represented better functioning.
Time Frame
Baseline and 6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Willingness to provide signed Informed Consent Form
Age ≥ 18 years
For sexually active women of childbearing potential, use of an appropriate form of contraception (or abstinence) for the duration of the study
Ability and willingness to return for all scheduled visits and assessments
Ocular Inclusion Criterion (Study Eye):
Foveal center-involved macular edema secondary to BRVO
BCVA using ETDRS charts of 20/40 to 20/400 (Snellen equivalent)
Mean central subfield thickness ≥ 250 μm on two optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements (at screening [confirmed by the central reading center] and Day 0 [confirmed by the evaluating physician])
Media clarity, pupillary dilation, and participant cooperation sufficient to obtain adequate fundus photographs
Exclusion Criteria:
History of cerebral vascular accident or myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to Day 0
History of any anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in fellow eye within 3 months prior to Day 0
History of any systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within 6 months prior to Day 0
History of allergy to fluorescein
History of allergy to ranibizumab injection or related molecule
Relevant systemic disease that may be associated with increased systemic VEGF levels (namely, all active malignancies); history of successfully treated malignancies is not an exclusion criterion
Uncontrolled blood pressure
Pregnancy or lactation
Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g., chronic alcoholism or drug abuse, personality disorder or use of major tranquilizers, indicated difficulty in long-term follow-up, and likelihood of survival of less than 1 year)
Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days prior to Day 0 that involved treatment with any drug (excluding vitamins and minerals) or device that has not received regulatory approval at time of study entry
Ocular Exclusion Criteria (Study Eye):
Prior episode of retinal vein occlusion (RVO)
Brisk afferent pupillary defect
History of radial optic neurotomy or sheathotomy
History or presence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD; dry or wet form)
History of any anti-VEGF treatment in the study eye within 3 months prior to Day 0
History of laser photocoagulation for macular edema within 4 months prior to Day 0
History of panretinal scatter photocoagulation or sector laser photocoagulation within 3 months prior to randomization or anticipated within the next 4 months following randomization
History of intraocular corticosteroid use within 3 months prior to Day 0
History of pars plana vitrectomy
History of intraocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, etc.) within 2 months prior to Day 0 or anticipated within the next 7 months following Day 0
History of yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to Day 0
Previous filtration surgery in the study eye
History of herpetic ocular infection
History of ocular toxoplasmosis
History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
History of idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy
Evidence upon examination of vitreoretinal interface disease (e.g., vitreomacular traction, epiretinal membrane), either on clinical examination or OCT, thought to be contributing to macular edema
An eye that, in the investigator's opinion, would not benefit from resolution of macular edema, such as eyes with foveal atrophy, dense pigmentary changes, or dense subfoveal hard exudates
Presence of an ocular condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the study (e.g., uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass syndrome, or prior macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment)
Visually significant hemorrhage obscuring the fovea and felt to be a major contributor to reduced visual acuity
Presence of a substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more (i.e., a 20/40 cataract)
Aphakia
Relevant ocular disease that may be associated with increased intraocular VEGF levels (namely, uveitis, neovascular glaucoma, neovascular AMD, diabetic retinopathy, diabetic maculopathy, or ocular ischemic syndrome)
Improvement of > 10 letters on best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between screening and Day 0
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roman Rubio, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Genentech, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23699977
Citation
Suner IJ, Bressler NM, Varma R, Lee P, Dolan CM, Ward J, Colman S, Rubio RG. Reading speed improvements in retinal vein occlusion after ranibizumab treatment. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;131(7):851-6. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.114.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23415775
Citation
Bhisitkul RB, Campochiaro PA, Shapiro H, Rubio RG. Predictive value in retinal vein occlusions of early versus late or incomplete ranibizumab response defined by optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2013 May;120(5):1057-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.011. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab Injection in Patients With Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRAVO)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs