A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Regimens of Mipomersen in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Inadequately Controlled Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (FOCUS FH)
Primary Purpose
Hypercholesterolemia, Heterozygous Familial
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
mipomersen sodium 200 mg
Placebo
mipomersen sodium 70 mg
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hypercholesterolemia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of severe hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥300 mg/dL (7.77 mmol/L) or LDL-C ≥200 mg/dL (5.18 mmol/L) with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents, or diagnosis of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia and LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL (4.14 mmol/L) and <200 mg/dL (5.18 mmol/L))
- On stable, maximally tolerated, statin therapy for at least 12 weeks or if statin intolerant, on at least 1 medication from another class of hypolipidemic agents (i.e., bile acid sequestrants, niacin/nicotinic acid, cholesterol absorption inhibitors, fibrates).
- On stable, low fat diet for 12 weeks
- Body mass index (BMI) ≤40 kg/m2 and stable weight for > 6 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant health problems in the recent past including heart attack, stroke, coronary syndrome, unstable angina, heart failure, significant arrhythmia, hypertension, blood disorders, liver disease, cancer, digestive disorders, Type I diabetes, or uncontrolled Type II diabetes
- Apheresis within 3 months prior to Screening or expected to start apheresis during the treatment phase
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Regimen A: Mipomersen
Regimen A: Placebo
Regimen B: Mipomersen
Regimen B: Placebo
Arm Description
Subcutaneous injection of mipomersen 200 mg once weekly
Placebo matching subcutaneous injection once weekly.
Subcutaneous injection of mipomersen 70 mg thrice weekly.
Placebo matching subcutaneous injection thrice weekly.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percent Change From Baseline To Primary Endpoint Visit (PET) In LDL-C In Cohort 1
The percent change from baseline to PET in LDL-C was measured in Cohort 1, which included participants with severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Severe HeFH was defined as LDL-C levels ≥200 mg/deciliter (dL) plus the presence of coronary heart disease (CHD)/risk equivalents or LDL-C levels ≥300 mg/dL regardless of the presence of CHD/risk equivalents.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In LDL-C In Cohort 2
The percent change from baseline to PET in LDL-C was measured in Cohort 2, which included participants with HeFH with LDL-C levels ≥160 mg/dL and <200 mg/dL, plus the presence of CHD/risk equivalents.
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 1
The percent change from baseline to PET in Apo B was measured in participants in Cohort 1 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 2
The percent change from baseline to PET in Apo B was measured in participants in Cohort 2 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
Percent Change From Baseline To PET in Lipoprotein (a) In Cohort 1
The percent change from baseline to PET in Lipoprotein A1 was measured in participants in Cohort 1 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
Percent Change From Baseline To PET in Lipoprotein (a) In Cohort 2
The percent change from baseline to PET in Lipoprotein A1 was measured in participants in Cohort 2 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01475825
First Posted
November 17, 2011
Last Updated
March 13, 2019
Sponsor
Kastle Therapeutics, LLC
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01475825
Brief Title
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Regimens of Mipomersen in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Inadequately Controlled Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Acronym
FOCUS FH
Official Title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study Followed by an Open-Label Continuation Period to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Regimens of Mipomersen in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Inadequately Controlled Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 29, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 29, 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Kastle Therapeutics, LLC
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Primary objective:
Determine whether mipomersen (ISIS 301012) significantly reduces atherogenic lipid levels in patients with severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (severe HeFH), defined as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥200 mg/dL plus the presence of coronary heart disease (CHD)/risk equivalents or LDL-C levels ≥300 mg/dL regardless of the presence of CHD/risk equivalents (referred to as Cohort 1) compared to placebo. Two different mipomersen dosing regimens will be studied: subcutaneous (SC) mipomersen 200 mg once weekly versus placebo, and SC mipomersen 70 mg thrice weekly versus placebo.
Secondary Objectives:
Determine whether there are qualitative differences between the safety profiles of the 2 dosing regimens and placebo in Cohort 1, patients with HeFH with LDL-C levels ≥160 mg/dL and <200 mg/dL plus the presence of CHD/risk equivalents (referred to as Cohort 2), and the overall study population
Determine whether there are qualitative differences between the tolerability of the 2 dosing regimens and placebo in Cohort 1, Cohort 2, and the overall study population
Further characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the 2 dosing regimens in Cohort 1, Cohort 2, and the overall study population
Determine whether the 2 mipomersen dosing regimens significantly reduce atherogenic lipid levels in Cohort 2 compared to placebo
Obtain additional data regarding ongoing safety and efficacy of mipomersen in patients with FH and inadequately controlled LDL-C who complete the primary efficacy assessment visit (PET) in the Blinded Treatment Period and continue treatment in Open-Label Continuation Period
Detailed Description
The study consisted of a Screening period of up to 4 weeks, Blinded Treatment Phase of 60 weeks, Open-Label Continuation Period of 26 weeks, and Post-Treatment Phase of 24 weeks.
Study Design, masking - Study treatment was blinded (double-blinded) through the Primary Efficacy Assessment Visit in the Blinded Treatment Period. Study treatment was open-label in the Open-Label Continuation Period.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hypercholesterolemia, Heterozygous Familial
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
309 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Regimen A: Mipomersen
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subcutaneous injection of mipomersen 200 mg once weekly
Arm Title
Regimen A: Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo matching subcutaneous injection once weekly.
Arm Title
Regimen B: Mipomersen
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subcutaneous injection of mipomersen 70 mg thrice weekly.
Arm Title
Regimen B: Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo matching subcutaneous injection thrice weekly.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
mipomersen sodium 200 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Kynamro (ISIS 301012)
Intervention Description
Subcutaneous mipomersen 200 mg once weekly
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo vehicle for subcutaneous injection.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
mipomersen sodium 70 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Kynamro (ISIS 301012)
Intervention Description
Subcutaneous mipomersen 70 mg thrice weekly
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline To Primary Endpoint Visit (PET) In LDL-C In Cohort 1
Description
The percent change from baseline to PET in LDL-C was measured in Cohort 1, which included participants with severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). Severe HeFH was defined as LDL-C levels ≥200 mg/deciliter (dL) plus the presence of coronary heart disease (CHD)/risk equivalents or LDL-C levels ≥300 mg/dL regardless of the presence of CHD/risk equivalents.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 61
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In LDL-C In Cohort 2
Description
The percent change from baseline to PET in LDL-C was measured in Cohort 2, which included participants with HeFH with LDL-C levels ≥160 mg/dL and <200 mg/dL, plus the presence of CHD/risk equivalents.
Time Frame
Baseline, PET (up to 60 weeks)
Title
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 1
Description
The percent change from baseline to PET in Apo B was measured in participants in Cohort 1 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 61
Title
Percent Change From Baseline To PET In Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) In Cohort 2
Description
The percent change from baseline to PET in Apo B was measured in participants in Cohort 2 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 61
Title
Percent Change From Baseline To PET in Lipoprotein (a) In Cohort 1
Description
The percent change from baseline to PET in Lipoprotein A1 was measured in participants in Cohort 1 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 61
Title
Percent Change From Baseline To PET in Lipoprotein (a) In Cohort 2
Description
The percent change from baseline to PET in Lipoprotein A1 was measured in participants in Cohort 2 with HeFH during the Blinded Treatment Period.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 61
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of severe hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C ≥300 mg/dL (7.77 mmol/L) or LDL-C ≥200 mg/dL (5.18 mmol/L) with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents, or diagnosis of Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia and LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL (4.14 mmol/L) and <200 mg/dL (5.18 mmol/L))
On stable, maximally tolerated, statin therapy for at least 12 weeks or if statin intolerant, on at least 1 medication from another class of hypolipidemic agents (i.e., bile acid sequestrants, niacin/nicotinic acid, cholesterol absorption inhibitors, fibrates).
On stable, low fat diet for 12 weeks
Body mass index (BMI) ≤40 kg/m2 and stable weight for > 6 weeks
Exclusion Criteria:
Significant health problems in the recent past including heart attack, stroke, coronary syndrome, unstable angina, heart failure, significant arrhythmia, hypertension, blood disorders, liver disease, cancer, digestive disorders, Type I diabetes, or uncontrolled Type II diabetes
Apheresis within 3 months prior to Screening or expected to start apheresis during the treatment phase
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Monitor
Organizational Affiliation
Genzyme, a Sanofi Company
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Mission Viejo
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
City
Cooper City
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Winter Park
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
Country
United States
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Grandville
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
Country
United States
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
Country
United States
City
Summit
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
City
North Massapequa
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
Country
United States
City
Lancaster
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
Country
United States
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
City
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires
Country
Argentina
City
Cordoba
Country
Argentina
City
Perth
Country
Australia
City
South Brisbane
Country
Australia
City
Edegem
Country
Belgium
City
Haine St. Paul
Country
Belgium
City
Leuven
Country
Belgium
City
Rio de Janeiro
Country
Brazil
City
Sao Paulo
Country
Brazil
City
Chicoutimi
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Sainte-Foy
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Osijek
Country
Croatia
City
Zagreb
Country
Croatia
City
Hradec Kralove
Country
Czechia
City
Praha 1
Country
Czechia
City
Aarhus
Country
Denmark
City
Viborg
Country
Denmark
City
Aachen
Country
Germany
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
City
Freiburg
Country
Germany
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
City
Heidelberg
Country
Germany
City
Koeln
Country
Germany
City
Magdeburg
Country
Germany
City
Ioannina
Country
Greece
City
Kallithea
Country
Greece
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
City
Baja
Country
Hungary
City
Budapest
Country
Hungary
City
Debrecen
Country
Hungary
City
New Delhi
Country
India
City
Holon
Country
Israel
City
Kfar Saba
Country
Israel
City
Ofakim
Country
Israel
City
Bologna
Country
Italy
City
Napoli
Country
Italy
City
Padova
Country
Italy
City
Palermo
Country
Italy
City
Pisa
Country
Italy
City
Roma
Country
Italy
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Kuala Lumpur
Country
Malaysia
City
Kubang Kerian
Country
Malaysia
City
Alkmaar
Country
Netherlands
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
City
Maastricht
Country
Netherlands
City
Nijmegen
Country
Netherlands
City
Utrecht
Country
Netherlands
City
Waalwijk
Country
Netherlands
City
Christchurch
Country
New Zealand
City
Bodo
Country
Norway
City
Oslo
Country
Norway
City
Sandefjord
Country
Norway
City
Bialystok
Country
Poland
City
Gdansk
Country
Poland
City
Katowice
Country
Poland
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
City
Naleczow
Country
Poland
City
Poznan
Country
Poland
City
Sopot
Country
Poland
City
Szczecin
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
Country
Poland
City
Wroclaw
Country
Poland
City
Barnaul
Country
Russian Federation
City
Kemerovo
Country
Russian Federation
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
City
Novosibirsk
Country
Russian Federation
City
Petrozavodsk
Country
Russian Federation
City
Ryazan
Country
Russian Federation
City
Saint Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
City
St-Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
City
St. Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
City
Tomsk
Country
Russian Federation
City
Yaroslavl
Country
Russian Federation
City
Cape Town
Country
South Africa
City
Pretoria
Country
South Africa
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden
City
New Taipei City
Country
Taiwan
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
City
Ankara
Country
Turkey
City
Istanbul
Country
Turkey
City
Izmir
Country
Turkey
City
Sivas
Country
Turkey
City
Ivano-Frankivsk
Country
Ukraine
City
Kiev
Country
Ukraine
City
Kyiv
Country
Ukraine
City
Odesa
Country
Ukraine
City
Odessa
Country
Ukraine
City
Birmingham
Country
United Kingdom
City
Cardiff
Country
United Kingdom
City
Liverpool
Country
United Kingdom
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
City
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
City
Oldham
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26946290
Citation
Tragante V, Asselbergs FW, Swerdlow DI, Palmer TM, Moore JH, de Bakker PIW, Keating BJ, Holmes MV. Harnessing publicly available genetic data to prioritize lipid modifying therapeutic targets for prevention of coronary heart disease based on dysglycemic risk. Hum Genet. 2016 May;135(5):453-467. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1647-9. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Regimens of Mipomersen in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Inadequately Controlled Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs