search
Back to results

A Study of Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
5 FU
Leucovorin
Oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin
capecitabine [Xeloda]
Sponsored by
Hoffmann-La Roche
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Colorectal Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: adult patients >=18 years of age; metastatic colorectal cancer; >=1 target lesion; failed first-line chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan. Exclusion Criteria: previous treatment with oxaliplatin; progressive or recurrent disease during or within 6 months of completion of first-line chemotherapy; >=1 previous chemotherapeutic agent or systemic anticancer regimen for metastatic disease.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

XELOX

FOLFOX-4

Arm Description

Participants received XELOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine). Oxaliplatin was administered 130 mg/m^2 intravenous (IV) infusion over 2 hours (every 3 weeks [Day 1]) before the first dose of capecitabine. Capecitabine was administered orally within 30 minutes after the end of a meal (breakfast and dinner) at a dose of 1000 mg/m^2 twice-daily (equivalent to a total daily dose of 2000 mg/m^2), with first dose the evening of Day 1 and last dose the morning of Day 15, given as intermittent treatment (3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment) for up to 8 cycles (24-weeks).

Participants received FOLFOX-4 (combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin [LV] and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] combination). Oxaliplatin was administered as an 85 mg/m^2 IV infusion over 2 hours (on Day 1 only); with LV infusion as 200mg/m^2 over 2 hours followed by 5-FU, given as 400mg/m^2 bolus injection over 2-4 minutes, and then as a 600 mg/m^2 continuous infusion over 22 hours. On Day 2, Leucovorin 200 mg/m^2 (alone), followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m^2 bolus injection over 2-4 minutes, and 5-FU 600 mg/m^2 continuous infusion was repeated over 22 hours. It was (2-week cycles comprising 48 hours of infusion and 12 days of rest) for up to 12 cycles (24- weeks).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression Free Survival
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the day of documented disease progression or death from any cause. It was based on tumor assessments made according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, wherein progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment confirming that they had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cut-off were censored at date of randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee Assessment
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the day of documented disease progression or death from any cause. It was based on tumor assessments made according to the RECIST version 1.0, wherein PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of the TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment confirming that they had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cut-off were censored at date of randomization. This PFS evaluation was based on Independent Review Committee Assessment.
Progression Free Survival Based on Treatment Analysis- Intent To Treat Population
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to day of documented disease progression or death from any cause. It was based on tumor assessments made according to the RECIST version 1.0, wherein PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of the TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment confirming that they had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cut-off were censored at date of randomization. PFS was analyzed using an on-treatment approach included only disease progression and death that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of study medication in the primary study treatment phase.
Progression Free Survival Based on Treatment Analysis- Per Population
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the day of documented disease progression or death from any cause. It was based on tumor assessments made according to the RECIST version 1.0, wherein PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of the TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment confirming that they had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cut-off were censored at date of randomization
Best Overall Response, Investigators' Assessments
Best overall response is best response recorded from start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence where responses include complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs, non-TLs along with normalization of tumor marker level. PR is at least 30% decrease in sum of the LD of TLs, taking as reference baseline sum LD. SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking reference of smallest sum LD since treatment started. It was dependent on achievement of measurement and confirmation criteria. BOR .i.e. CR or PR was confirmed by repeat assessments performed within 4 weeks. For SD, follow-up assessments had to meet the SD criteria at least once after study entry within 6 to 8 weeks.
Best Overall Response, Independent Review Committee Assessment
Best overall response is best response recorded from start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence where responses include CR, PR, or SD. CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs, non-TLs along with normalization of tumor marker level. PR is at least 30% decrease in sum of the LD of TLs, taking as reference baseline sum LD. SD defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking reference of smallest sum LD since treatment started. It was dependent on achievement of measurement and confirmation criteria. BOR .i.e. CR or PR was confirmed by repeat assessments performed within 4 weeks, for SD, follow-up assessments had to meet the SD criteria at least once after study entry within 6 to 8 weeks. This PFS evaluation was based on Independent Review Committee Assessment.
Overall Survival
Overall survival was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participant who were not reported to have died at the time of the analysis were censored using the date they were last known to be alive.
Time To Response
Time to response (TOR) (best response of CR or PR) was measured as the time from randomization to the first date on which the measurement criteria for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) were met. CR for TLs was defined as disappearance of all TLs and for non-TLs as disappearance of all non-TLs and normalization of tumor marker level. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum LD.
Duration Of Response
Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time when CR or PR was first met up to first date that PD or death is documented. CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs and non TLs, PR is defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of the TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions for the TLs or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Time To Treatment Failure
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first occurrence of adverse event (AE), insufficient therapeutic response, death, failure to return, or refusing treatment/being uncooperative/withdrawing consent.
Number of Participants With Marked Post-baseline Laboratory Abnormalities by Trial Treatment
Laboratory abnormalities were defined as those values that were outside the Roche defined reference range and showed a clinically relevant change from baseline. All laboratory parameters were categorized according to the National Cancer Center Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) grading system. Incidence of Grade 1 to 4 laboratory abnormalities are presented in the table below.

Full Information

First Posted
September 15, 2003
Last Updated
March 3, 2016
Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00069108
Brief Title
A Study of Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Official Title
An Open-Label Randomized Phase III Study of Intermittent Oral Capecitabine in Combination With Intravenous Oxaliplatin (Q3W) ("XELOX") Versus Bolus and Continuous Infusion Fluorouracil/ Intravenous Leucovorin With Intravenous Oxaliplatin (Q2W) ("FOLFOX4") as Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Have Received Prior Treatment With CPT-11 in Combination With 5-FU/LV as First Line Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2003 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2006 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This 2 arm study will assess the efficacy and safety of intermittent oral Xeloda, or iv fluorouracil/leucovorin, in combination with intravenous Eloxatin (oxaliplatin) in patients previously treated for metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients will be randomized to receive either 1)XELOX (Xeloda 1000mg/m2 po bid on days 1-15 + oxaliplatin) in 3 week cycles or 2) FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin + leucovorin + 5-FU in 2 week cycles. The anticipated time on study treatment is until disease progression, and the target sample size is 500+ individuals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
627 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
XELOX
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received XELOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine). Oxaliplatin was administered 130 mg/m^2 intravenous (IV) infusion over 2 hours (every 3 weeks [Day 1]) before the first dose of capecitabine. Capecitabine was administered orally within 30 minutes after the end of a meal (breakfast and dinner) at a dose of 1000 mg/m^2 twice-daily (equivalent to a total daily dose of 2000 mg/m^2), with first dose the evening of Day 1 and last dose the morning of Day 15, given as intermittent treatment (3-week cycles consisting of 2 weeks of treatment followed by 1 week without treatment) for up to 8 cycles (24-weeks).
Arm Title
FOLFOX-4
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received FOLFOX-4 (combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin [LV] and 5-fluorouracil [5-FU] combination). Oxaliplatin was administered as an 85 mg/m^2 IV infusion over 2 hours (on Day 1 only); with LV infusion as 200mg/m^2 over 2 hours followed by 5-FU, given as 400mg/m^2 bolus injection over 2-4 minutes, and then as a 600 mg/m^2 continuous infusion over 22 hours. On Day 2, Leucovorin 200 mg/m^2 (alone), followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m^2 bolus injection over 2-4 minutes, and 5-FU 600 mg/m^2 continuous infusion was repeated over 22 hours. It was (2-week cycles comprising 48 hours of infusion and 12 days of rest) for up to 12 cycles (24- weeks).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
5 FU
Intervention Description
As prescribed, in 2 week cycles
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Leucovorin
Intervention Description
As prescribed, in 2 week cycles
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Oxaliplatin
Intervention Description
As prescribed, in 3 week cycles
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Oxaliplatin
Intervention Description
As prescribed, in 2 week cycles
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
capecitabine [Xeloda]
Intervention Description
1000mg/m2 po bid on days 1-15 of each 3 week cycle
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression Free Survival
Description
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the day of documented disease progression or death from any cause. It was based on tumor assessments made according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0, wherein progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesions (TLs), taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment confirming that they had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cut-off were censored at date of randomization
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression Free Survival Based on Independent Review Committee Assessment
Description
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the day of documented disease progression or death from any cause. It was based on tumor assessments made according to the RECIST version 1.0, wherein PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of the TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment confirming that they had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cut-off were censored at date of randomization. This PFS evaluation was based on Independent Review Committee Assessment.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Progression Free Survival Based on Treatment Analysis- Intent To Treat Population
Description
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to day of documented disease progression or death from any cause. It was based on tumor assessments made according to the RECIST version 1.0, wherein PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD of the TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment confirming that they had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cut-off were censored at date of randomization. PFS was analyzed using an on-treatment approach included only disease progression and death that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of study medication in the primary study treatment phase.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Progression Free Survival Based on Treatment Analysis- Per Population
Description
Progression free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the day of documented disease progression or death from any cause. It was based on tumor assessments made according to the RECIST version 1.0, wherein PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of the TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment confirming that they had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline but who were still alive at the time of the clinical cut-off were censored at date of randomization
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Best Overall Response, Investigators' Assessments
Description
Best overall response is best response recorded from start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence where responses include complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD). CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs, non-TLs along with normalization of tumor marker level. PR is at least 30% decrease in sum of the LD of TLs, taking as reference baseline sum LD. SD is defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking reference of smallest sum LD since treatment started. It was dependent on achievement of measurement and confirmation criteria. BOR .i.e. CR or PR was confirmed by repeat assessments performed within 4 weeks. For SD, follow-up assessments had to meet the SD criteria at least once after study entry within 6 to 8 weeks.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Best Overall Response, Independent Review Committee Assessment
Description
Best overall response is best response recorded from start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence where responses include CR, PR, or SD. CR was defined as disappearance of all TLs, non-TLs along with normalization of tumor marker level. PR is at least 30% decrease in sum of the LD of TLs, taking as reference baseline sum LD. SD defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking reference of smallest sum LD since treatment started. It was dependent on achievement of measurement and confirmation criteria. BOR .i.e. CR or PR was confirmed by repeat assessments performed within 4 weeks, for SD, follow-up assessments had to meet the SD criteria at least once after study entry within 6 to 8 weeks. This PFS evaluation was based on Independent Review Committee Assessment.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Overall Survival
Description
Overall survival was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participant who were not reported to have died at the time of the analysis were censored using the date they were last known to be alive.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Time To Response
Description
Time to response (TOR) (best response of CR or PR) was measured as the time from randomization to the first date on which the measurement criteria for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) were met. CR for TLs was defined as disappearance of all TLs and for non-TLs as disappearance of all non-TLs and normalization of tumor marker level. PR was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum LD.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Duration Of Response
Description
Duration of response (DOR) is defined as the time when CR or PR was first met up to first date that PD or death is documented. CR is defined as disappearance of all TLs and non TLs, PR is defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of TLs, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of the TLs, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions for the TLs or the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Time To Treatment Failure
Description
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first occurrence of adverse event (AE), insufficient therapeutic response, death, failure to return, or refusing treatment/being uncooperative/withdrawing consent.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years
Title
Number of Participants With Marked Post-baseline Laboratory Abnormalities by Trial Treatment
Description
Laboratory abnormalities were defined as those values that were outside the Roche defined reference range and showed a clinically relevant change from baseline. All laboratory parameters were categorized according to the National Cancer Center Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) grading system. Incidence of Grade 1 to 4 laboratory abnormalities are presented in the table below.
Time Frame
Up to 3 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: adult patients >=18 years of age; metastatic colorectal cancer; >=1 target lesion; failed first-line chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan. Exclusion Criteria: previous treatment with oxaliplatin; progressive or recurrent disease during or within 6 months of completion of first-line chemotherapy; >=1 previous chemotherapeutic agent or systemic anticancer regimen for metastatic disease.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Bakersfield
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93309
Country
United States
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80903
Country
United States
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20007-2197
Country
United States
City
Terre Haute
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47802
Country
United States
City
St Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63136
Country
United States
City
Billings
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59101
Country
United States
City
Nyack
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10960
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75204
Country
United States
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Belgium
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1070
Country
Belgium
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
City
Kortrijk
ZIP/Postal Code
8500
Country
Belgium
City
Mont-godinne
ZIP/Postal Code
5530
Country
Belgium
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 1Z2
Country
Canada
City
St. John's
State/Province
Newfoundland and Labrador
ZIP/Postal Code
A1B 3V6
Country
Canada
City
Halifax
State/Province
Nova Scotia
ZIP/Postal Code
B3H 1V7
Country
Canada
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 4L6
Country
Canada
City
Oshawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L1G 2B9
Country
Canada
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 1C4
Country
Canada
City
Saint Catherines
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L2R 2Z7
Country
Canada
City
Thunder Bay
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
P7A 7T1
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5G 2M9
Country
Canada
City
Weston
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M9N 1N8
Country
Canada
City
Laval
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H7M 3L9
Country
Canada
City
Levis
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G6V 3Z1
Country
Canada
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H1T 2M4
Country
Canada
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2W 1S6
Country
Canada
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4J 1C5
Country
Canada
City
Quebec City
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1R 2J6
Country
Canada
City
Regina
State/Province
Saskatchewan
ZIP/Postal Code
S4T 7T1
Country
Canada
City
Split
ZIP/Postal Code
21000
Country
Croatia
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
City
Tampere
ZIP/Postal Code
36280
Country
Finland
City
Turku
ZIP/Postal Code
20520
Country
Finland
City
Avignon
ZIP/Postal Code
84082
Country
France
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33075
Country
France
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33076
Country
France
City
Chambray-lès-tours
ZIP/Postal Code
37044
Country
France
City
Limoges
ZIP/Postal Code
87042
Country
France
City
Nimes
ZIP/Postal Code
30029
Country
France
City
Pessac
ZIP/Postal Code
33604
Country
France
City
Rouen
ZIP/Postal Code
76031
Country
France
City
Tübingen
ZIP/Postal Code
72076
Country
Germany
City
Heraklion
ZIP/Postal Code
71110
Country
Greece
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
56439
Country
Greece
City
Beer Sheva
ZIP/Postal Code
8410101
Country
Israel
City
Jerusalem
ZIP/Postal Code
91031
Country
Israel
City
Kfar Saba
ZIP/Postal Code
44281
Country
Israel
City
Petach Tikva
ZIP/Postal Code
49100
Country
Israel
City
Ramat-gan
ZIP/Postal Code
52621
Country
Israel
City
Rehovot
ZIP/Postal Code
76100
Country
Israel
City
Tel Aviv
ZIP/Postal Code
6423906
Country
Israel
City
Bergamo
ZIP/Postal Code
24128
Country
Italy
City
Cattolica
ZIP/Postal Code
47841
Country
Italy
City
Rimini
ZIP/Postal Code
47900
Country
Italy
City
Udine
ZIP/Postal Code
33100
Country
Italy
City
Buchun
ZIP/Postal Code
420-021
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
110-744
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
120-752
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
133-792
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
137-040
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
138-736
Country
Korea, Republic of
City
Bialystok
ZIP/Postal Code
15-073
Country
Poland
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
31-501
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-781
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
04-394
Country
Poland
City
San Juan
ZIP/Postal Code
00921-3201
Country
Puerto Rico
City
Belgrade
ZIP/Postal Code
11000
Country
Serbia
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
831 01
Country
Slovakia
City
Ljubljana
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Slovenia
City
Cape Town
ZIP/Postal Code
7500
Country
South Africa
City
Durban
ZIP/Postal Code
4001
Country
South Africa
City
Pietermaritzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
3201
Country
South Africa
City
Port Elizabeth
ZIP/Postal Code
6001
Country
South Africa
City
Pretoria
ZIP/Postal Code
0001
Country
South Africa
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
City
Leganes
ZIP/Postal Code
28911
Country
Spain
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28035
Country
Spain
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28041
Country
Spain
City
Palma de Mallorca
ZIP/Postal Code
07014
Country
Spain
City
Kueishan
Country
Taiwan
City
Tainan
ZIP/Postal Code
704
Country
Taiwan
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
104
Country
Taiwan
City
Denbigh
ZIP/Postal Code
LL18 5UJ
Country
United Kingdom
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M20 4BX
Country
United Kingdom
City
Merseyside
ZIP/Postal Code
CH63 45Y
Country
United Kingdom
City
Preston
ZIP/Postal Code
PR2 9HT
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Study of Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs