A Study That Evaluates the Decrease in Irritation When Using Additional Acne Treatment Products
Primary Purpose
Acne Vulgaris
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dapsone plus Tretinoin Gel
Tretinoin Gel
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Acne Vulgaris focused on measuring Acne, Irritation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fitzpatrick Skin Type I, II or III with healthy skin as judged by the investigator
- Bilateral skin is clear of any confounding irritation, rashes, acne, rosacea, etc., prior to study start
- Subjects are willing to avoid applying emollients or cosmetics to the face 24 hours before they start, and during the study
- If subject is of childbearing potential, subject has been using a protocol-approved method of birth control for a certain amount of time, and is willing to continue using it throughout the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who are pregnant or nursing, or intend to be during the study
- Subjects with any condition or medical history, or using any drug or medication, that might negatively affect the subject's safety or the validity of study results, either as listed in the protocol or in the opinion of the investigator
- Subjects who have facial hair that may obstruct or hinder the evaluation of any reactions
- Subjects who use any known photosensitizing agents
Sites / Locations
- Skin Study Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Dapsone plus Tretinoin Gel
Tretinoin Gel Alone
Arm Description
Dapsone gel, followed by tretinoin gel one hour later, applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks - all subjects participate in both arms in a split-face model
Tretinoin gel applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks - all subjects participate in both arms in a split-face model
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Expert Grader Assessment - Erythema
Ordinal erythema scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=severe scaling and fissuring) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Expert Grader Assessment - Dryness
Ordinal dryness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=deep) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Subject Assessment - Burning/Stinging
Ordinal burning/stinging scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Subject Assessment - Itching
Ordinal itching scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Subject Assessment - Tightness
Ordinal tightness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Facial Tolerance
All interval measurements were combined for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Facial tolerance is the sum of scores from Erythema, Dryness, Burning/Stinging, Itching, and Tightness assessments, reported in Outcome Measures 1-5. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 6250 (highest possible combined score of 25, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01313728
First Posted
March 10, 2011
Last Updated
February 14, 2012
Sponsor
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01313728
Brief Title
A Study That Evaluates the Decrease in Irritation When Using Additional Acne Treatment Products
Official Title
An Investigator-Blind, Phase 4 Study Assessing Mitigation of Facial Irritation When Comparing the Use of Two Acne Treatment Products (Retin-A Micro® 0.1 % Pump and Aczone®) With One Treatment Product (Retin-A Micro® 0.1 % Pump) Using a Split-Face Model
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2011 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is to see if there's any difference in the amount of facial irritation when two acne products are used together on one side of the face, compared to one acne treatment product used alone on the other side of the face. All people participating in this trial will be required to return to the same study center every weekday for two weeks for the investigator to check for irritation on the face and to have the products applied - on weekends they will have to put them on at home. If one side of the face is more irritated than the other side, a picture will be taken as well.
Detailed Description
This is an investigator-blind, randomized, balanced study comparing two treatment regimens in a split-face model. All subjects will apply Retin-A Micro Gel (tretinoin) 0.1 % Pump, and Aczone Gel (dapsone) 5% daily to one side of the face (with 1 hour between applications, applying Aczone Gel first) and Retin-A Micro Gel 0.1 % Pump to the other side of the face in a randomized scheme for two consecutive weeks. Subjects will return to the study center daily for evaluation and for application of both products (weekend applications will be done at home). At each visit the subject will be evaluated and scored for irritation and cutaneous treatment effects. Subjects presenting with differences in irritation between one side of the face and the other will be photographed and have chromometer readings taken. A single treatment center is expected to enroll at least 24 subjects.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acne Vulgaris
Keywords
Acne, Irritation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
Investigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
26 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Dapsone plus Tretinoin Gel
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Dapsone gel, followed by tretinoin gel one hour later, applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks - all subjects participate in both arms in a split-face model
Arm Title
Tretinoin Gel Alone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Tretinoin gel applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks - all subjects participate in both arms in a split-face model
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dapsone plus Tretinoin Gel
Other Intervention Name(s)
Aczone Gel 5% plus Retin-A Micro Gel 0.1% Pump
Intervention Description
Dapsone gel, followed by tretinoin gel one hour later, applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tretinoin Gel
Other Intervention Name(s)
Retin-A Micro Gel 0.1% Pump
Intervention Description
Tretinoin gel applied once daily to the assigned side of the face for 2 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Expert Grader Assessment - Erythema
Description
Ordinal erythema scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=severe scaling and fissuring) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Title
Expert Grader Assessment - Dryness
Description
Ordinal dryness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 8=deep) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 2000 (highest possible score of 8, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subject Assessment - Burning/Stinging
Description
Ordinal burning/stinging scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Title
Subject Assessment - Itching
Description
Ordinal itching scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Title
Subject Assessment - Tightness
Description
Ordinal tightness scores (on a scale of 0=none to 3=severe) were collected on weekdays for two weeks and the total daily score (for all subjects) was treated as a single interval measurement for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 750 (highest possible score of 3, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 Weeks
Title
Facial Tolerance
Description
All interval measurements were combined for comparative assessment between treatment regimens. Facial tolerance is the sum of scores from Erythema, Dryness, Burning/Stinging, Itching, and Tightness assessments, reported in Outcome Measures 1-5. Thus, for the total for the 25 Participants measured, minimum possible score reported below is 0 and maximum is 6250 (highest possible combined score of 25, times 10 days, times 25 subjects).
Time Frame
Baseline to 2 Weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Fitzpatrick Skin Type I, II or III with healthy skin as judged by the investigator
Bilateral skin is clear of any confounding irritation, rashes, acne, rosacea, etc., prior to study start
Subjects are willing to avoid applying emollients or cosmetics to the face 24 hours before they start, and during the study
If subject is of childbearing potential, subject has been using a protocol-approved method of birth control for a certain amount of time, and is willing to continue using it throughout the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects who are pregnant or nursing, or intend to be during the study
Subjects with any condition or medical history, or using any drug or medication, that might negatively affect the subject's safety or the validity of study results, either as listed in the protocol or in the opinion of the investigator
Subjects who have facial hair that may obstruct or hinder the evaluation of any reactions
Subjects who use any known photosensitizing agents
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Lineberry
Organizational Affiliation
Bausch Health Americas, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Skin Study Center
City
Broomall
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19008
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Links:
URL
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm
Description
FDA's Drug Finder
Learn more about this trial
A Study That Evaluates the Decrease in Irritation When Using Additional Acne Treatment Products
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs