Back to resultsA Study to Assess the Effect of Tocilizumab + Methotrexate on Prevention of Structural Joint Damage in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Primary Purpose
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
Placebo
Methotrexate
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: adult patients at least 18 years of age with moderate to severe active RA for at least 6 months; inadequate response to a stable dose of MTX; patients of reproductive potential must be using reliable methods of contraception. Exclusion Criteria: major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks before entering study, or planned surgery within 6 months after entering study; prior treatment failure with an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent; women who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg + Methotrexate
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg + Methotrexate
Placebo + Methotrexate
Arm Description
Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks plus MTX 10-25 mg (oral or parenteral) weekly for 52 weeks. From Week 16 participants with < 20% improvement in swollen and tender joints counts were eligible for escape therapy with tocilizumab. After Week 52 participants were able to switch to open label treatment with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks for 12 months in year 2 (except patients who had a >70% improvement in both swollen and tender joint counts who remained on blinded treatment). Participants who completed year 2 of the study were eligible to enter an optional open-label long-term extension period (Year 3 to 5) and received Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks.
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks plus MTX 10-25 mg (oral or parenteral) weekly for 52 weeks. From Week 16 participants with < 20% improvement in swollen and tender joints counts were eligible for escape therapy with tocilizumab. After Week 52 participants were able to switch to open label treatment with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks for 12 months in year 2 (except patients who had a >70% improvement in both swollen and tender joint counts who remained on blinded treatment). Participants who completed year 2 of the study were eligible to enter an optional open-label long-term extension period (Year 3 to 5) and received Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks.
Placebo intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks plus methotrexate (MTX) 10-25 mg (oral or parenteral) weekly for 52 weeks. From Week 16 participants with < 20% improvement in swollen and tender joints counts were eligible for escape therapy with tocilizumab. After Week 52 participants were able to switch to open label treatment with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks for 12 months in year 2 (except patients who had a >70% improvement in both swollen and tender joint counts who remained on blinded treatment). Participants who completed year 2 of the study were eligible to enter an optional open-label long-term extension period (Year 3 to 5) and received Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology-ACR20 Response
ACR20 response is defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp-Genant Score at Week 52
Radiographs were taken of each hand and foot at Baseline and Week 52 and evaluated at a central reading service by two independent radiologists using the Genant modified method according to Sharp. Erosion Score: A total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. Joint Narrowing Score: A total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). The maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 (normalized from 98) and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 (normalized from 104) and in the feet 48. The maximum modified Sharp score achievable is 290. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change in Physical Function as Measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index at Week 52
HAQ-DI consisted of 20 questions in 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities rated on a 4-point scale where 0=without any difficulty to 3=unable to do. The sum of scores was divided by the number of domains with a score for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst). Functional disability was determined as a cumulative measure of HAQ-DI over 1 year by using the AUC of the change from baseline in HAQ-DI score through week 52. Decreases in AUC of change from baseline in HAQ-DI indicate a greater average improvement in physical function over time and represent a decrease in sustained impairment. For patients with missing week 52 HAQ-DI score, the AUC of the change from baseline was standardized to 52 weeks using the latest timepoint available for calculation of the AUC. The mean was adjusted for region. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Modified Total Sharp-Genant Score at Week 104
Radiographs of each hand and foot were taken at Baseline and Week 104 and evaluated at a central reading service by two independent radiologists using the Genant modified method according to Sharp. Erosion Score: A total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. Joint Narrowing Score: A total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). The maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 and in the feet 48. The maximum modified Sharp score achievable is 290. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change in Physical Function as Measured by the Area Under the Curve for the Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 104
HAQ-DI consisted of 20 questions in 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities rated on a 4-point scale where 0=without any difficulty to 3=unable to do. The sum of scores was divided by the number of domains with a score for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst). Functional disability was determined as a cumulative measure of HAQ-DI over 2 years by using the AUC of the change from baseline in HAQ-DI score through week 104. Decreases in AUC of change from baseline in HAQ-DI indicated a gr eater average improvement in physical function over time and represent a decrease in sustained impairment. For patients with missing week 104 HAQ-DI score, the AUC of the change from baseline was standardized to 104 weeks using the latest timepoint available for calculation of the AUC. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants With ACR50 Response
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].
Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response
ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].
Swollen Joint Count (66 Joint Count): Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66.
Tender Joint Count (68 Joint Count): Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
68 joints are assessed for tenderness and joints are classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68.
Patient's Global Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Physician's Global VAS: Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
The physician's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).
Patient's Pain VAS: Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
The patient assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change indicated improvement.
C-Reactive Protein (CRP): Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
The serum concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is measured in mg/dL. A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate: Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
The Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was measured in mm/hr. A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
HAQ-DI is a self-completed patient questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) Response at Week 52
ACR20 response is defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response at Week 104
ACR20 response is defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Percentage of Participants With ACR50 Response at Week 52
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Percentage of Participants With ACR50 Response at Week 104
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response at Week 52
ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response at Week 104
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response Maintained for 6 Consecutive Months
ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 52
66 joints were assessed at Baseline and Week 52 for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen for a total possible swollen joint count of 0 (best) to 66 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 52
68 joints were assessed at Baseline and Week 52 for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender for a total possible tender joint count of 0 (best) to 68 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 52
The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed at Baseline and Week 52 using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 52
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Patient's Pain VAS at Week 52
The patient assessed their pain at Baseline and Week 52 using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52
Blood was collected for C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline and Week 52 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. The serum concentration of CRP was measured in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52
Blood was collected for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline and Week 52 and was analyzed at a local laboratory. ESR was measured in millimeters/hour (mm/hr). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 104
66 joints were assessed at Baseline and Week 104 for swelling and joints were classified as swollen/not swollen for a total possible swollen joint count of 0 (best) to 66 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 104
68 joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender for a total possible tender joint count of 0 (best) to 68 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 104
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was assessed at Baseline and Week 104 using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 104
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed at Baseline and Week 104 using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in the Patient's Pain VAS at Week 104
The patient assessed their pain at Baseline and Week 104 using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 104
Blood was collected for C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline and Week 104 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. The serum concentration of CRP was measured in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 104
Blood was collected for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline and Week 104 and was analyzed at a local laboratory. ESR was measured in millimeters/hour (mm/hr). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an Improvement of at Least 0.3 Units From Baseline in the HAQ Disability Index at Week 52
The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an Improvement of at Least 0.3 Units From Baseline in the HAQ Disability Index at Week 104
The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
.
Area Under Curve (AUC) of the ACRn to Week 24
The ACRn is defined as each patient's lowest percent improvement from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint count (68 joints), swollen joint count (66 joints), and the improved score achieved in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core components (physician global assessment, patient global assessment, pain, HAQ, and C-reactive protein or ESR, respectively). AUC of ACRn, a continuous variable, was calculated from Baseline to Week 24. A positive score change from Baseline indicated an improvement. The higher the ACRn score the better.
Area Under Curve (AUC) of the ACRn to Week 52
The ACRn is defined as each patient's lowest percent improvement from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint count (68 joints), swollen joint count (66 joints), and the improved score achieved in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core components (physician global assessment, patient global assessment, pain, HAQ, and C-reactive protein or ESR, respectively). AUC of ACRn, a continuous variable, was calculated from Baseline to Week 52. A positive score change from Baseline indicated an improvement. The higher the ACRn score the better.
Area Under Curve (AUC) of the ACRn Score at Week 104
The ACRn is defined as each patient's lowest percent improvement from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint count (68 joints), swollen joint count (66 joints), and the improved score achieved in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core components (physician global assessment, patient global assessment, pain, HAQ, and C-reactive protein or ESR, respectively). AUC of ACRn, a continuous variable, was calculated from Baseline to Week 104. A positive score change from Baseline indicated an improvement. The higher the ACRn score the better.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 52
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 104
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] , and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2.
EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2.
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 52
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm) [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] , and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2.
EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2.
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 104
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm) [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] , and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2.
EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2.
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Remission at Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Remission at Week 52
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control.DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Remission at Week 104
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Area Under Curve (AUC) of Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 24
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. Higher calculated AUC values are worse (indicate higher disease activity).
Area Under Curve (AUC) of Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 52
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. Higher calculated AUC values are worse (indicate higher disease activity).
Area Under Curve (AUC) of Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 104
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. Higher calculated AUC values are worse (indicate higher disease activity).
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp-Genant Score at Week 24
Radiographs were taken of each hand and foot at Baseline and Week 24 and evaluated at a central reading service by two independent radiologists using the Genant modified method according to Sharp. Erosion Score: A total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. Joint Narrowing Score: A total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). The maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 and in the feet 48. The maximum modified Sharp score achievable is 290. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp-Genant Score at Week 80
Radiographs were taken of each hand and foot at Baseline and Week 80 and evaluated at a central reading service by two independent radiologists using the Genant modified method according to Sharp. Erosion Score: A total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. Joint Narrowing Score: A total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). The maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 and in the feet 48. The maximum modified Sharp score achievable is 290. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 24
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 52
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 80
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 104
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score at Week 24
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). A lower change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score at Week 52
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score at Week 80
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score at Week 104
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Erosion at Week 24
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). No progression of Erosion score was defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Erosion at Week 52
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). No progression of Erosion score was defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Erosion at Week 104
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). No progression of Erosion score was defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Joint Space Narrowing at Week 24
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). No progression of Joint Space Narrowing score was defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Joint Space Narrowing at Week 52
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). No progression of Joint Space Narrowing score is defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Joint Space Narrowing at Week 104
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). No progression of Joint Space Narrowing score is defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Change From Baseline in HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52
HAQ-DI is a self-completed questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. To Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in HAQ Disability Index at Week 104
HAQ-DI is a self-completed questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. To Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8). Total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Quality Life Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Week 24
The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Score at Week 52
The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Score at Week 104
The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status.
Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score at Week 52
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status.
Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score at Week 104
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status.
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Week 24 in Those Patients With Positive RF
Blood was collected for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Baseline and Week 24 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. RF level was reported in international units/milliliter (IU/mL). A positive RF= >15 IU/mL. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better result.
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Week 52 in Those Patients With Positive RF
Blood was collected for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Baseline and Week 52 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. RF level was reported in international units/milliliter (IU/mL). A positive RF= >15 IU/mL. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better result.
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Week 104 in Those Patients With Positive RF
Blood was collected for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Baseline and Week 104 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. RF level was reported in international units/milliliter (IU/mL). A positive RF= >15 IU/mL. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better result.
Time to Onset of ACR20 by Treatment Group
Time in days until ACR20 response. ACR20 response was defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time to Onset of ACR50 by Treatment Group
Time in days until ACR50 response. ACR50 response was defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time to Onset of ACR70 by Treatment Group
Time in days until ACR70 response. ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Percentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response
Insufficient therapeutic response (patient not responding to the drug as assessed by the physician) was selected by the investigator as a reason that the patient withdrew from the study.
Percentage of Participants in Each Treatment Group Who Receive Escape Therapy
In Escape 1, participants in the Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg + Methotrexate and Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg + Methotrexate groups received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg as escape therapy. Participants in the Placebo + Methotrexate group received tocilizumab 4 mg/kg as escape therapy.
In Escape 2, all participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission According to the ACR Remission Criteria by Week 24
The percentage of participants, who achieved ACR remission at any study visit up to Week 24. ACR remission required that all five of the following criteria were met for at least two consecutive months: morning stiffness < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain, no joint tenderness or pain on motion, no soft tissue swelling in joints or tendon sheaths, and ESR < 30 mm/hr for a female or 20 mm/hr for a male.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission According to the ACR Remission Criteria by Week 52
The percentage of participants, who achieved ACR remission at any study visit up to Week 52. ACR remission required that all five of the following criteria were met for at least two consecutive months: morning stiffness < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain, no joint tenderness or pain on motion, no soft tissue swelling in joints or tendon sheaths, and ESR < 30 mm/hr for a female or 20 mm/hr for a male.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission According to the ACR Remission Criteria by Week 104
The percentage of participants who achieved ACR remission at any study visit up to Week 104. ACR remission required that all five of the following criteria were met for at least two consecutive months: morning stiffness < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain, no joint tenderness or pain on motion, no soft tissue swelling in joints or tendon sheaths, and ESR < 30 mm/hr for a female or 20 mm/hr for a male.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Clinical Response at Week 52
Complete clinical response is defined as a continuous 6-month period of remission by ACR criteria [defined as five of the following criteria are met for at least two consecutive months: morning stiffness < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain, no joint tenderness or swelling, and ESR < 30 mm/hr for a female or 20 mm/hr for a male] and no radiographic progression [defined as change from baseline ≤ 0 in the total Sharp-Genant score, erosion score, and JSN score]. Patients who achieve a complete clinical response at any time in the study are counted as responders, even if the response is not maintained.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Clinical Response at Week 104
Complete clinical response is defined as a continuous 6-month period of remission by ACR criteria [defined as five of the following criteria are met for at least two consecutive months: morning stiffness < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain, no joint tenderness or swelling, and ESR < 30 mm/hr for a female or 20 mm/hr for a male] and no radiographic progression [defined as change from baseline ≤ 0 in the total Sharp-Genant score, erosion score, and JSN score].
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With ACR Response at Week 260
ACR20/50/70/90 response is defined as a ≥ 20/50/70/90% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Remission at Week 260
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Week 260
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. LDA is defined as DAS28 ≤3.2.
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With DAS28 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good or Moderate Response at Week 260
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. EULAR Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2.
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 260
66 joints were assessed at Baseline and Week 260 for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen for a total possible swollen joint count of 0 (best) to 66 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 260
68 joints were assessed at Baseline and Week 260 for tenderness and joints are classified as tender/not tender for a total possible swollen joint count of 0 (best) to 68 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 260
HAQ-DI is a self-completed questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. To Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
End of Study: Change From Baseline in the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 260
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was assessed at Baseline and Week 104 using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
End of Study: Change From Baseline in the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS at Week 260
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
End of Study: Change From Baseline in the Patient's Pain VAS at Week 260
The patient assessed their pain at Baseline and Week 260 using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement in the FACIT-Fatigue Score at Week 260
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). Clinically relevant improvement is defined as a ≥5 change from Baseline.
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Relevant Improvement in the SF-36 Score at Week 260
The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Clinically relevant improvement is defined as a ≥5 change from Baseline.
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Total Sharp-Genant Score at Week 260
Radiographs were taken of each hand and foot at Baseline and Week 260 and evaluated at a central reading service by two independent radiologists using the Genant modified method according to Sharp. Erosion Score: A total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. Joint Narrowing Score: A total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint).The maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 and in the feet 48. The maximum modified Sharp score achievable is 290. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score. The results were reported based on the treatment the patient was originally randomized to.
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 260
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot and were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best ) to 142 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score at Week 260
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00106535
Brief Title
A Study to Assess the Effect of Tocilizumab + Methotrexate on Prevention of Structural Joint Damage in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-blind Study of Safety and Prevention of Structural Joint Damage During Treatment With Tocilizumab Versus Placebo, in Combination With Methotrexate, in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This 3 arm study will compare the safety and efficacy, with respect to a reduction in signs and symptoms and prevention of joint damage, of tocilizumab versus placebo, both in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Patients will be randomized to receive tocilizumab 4 mg/kg IV, tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV or placebo IV, every 4 weeks. All patients will also receive methotrexate, 10-25 mg/week. The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years and the target sample size is 500+ individuals. After completion of the 2 year study participants could participate in the optional 3 year open label extension phase (year 3 to 5).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1196 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg + Methotrexate
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks plus MTX 10-25 mg (oral or parenteral) weekly for 52 weeks. From Week 16 participants with < 20% improvement in swollen and tender joints counts were eligible for escape therapy with tocilizumab. After Week 52 participants were able to switch to open label treatment with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks for 12 months in year 2 (except patients who had a >70% improvement in both swollen and tender joint counts who remained on blinded treatment). Participants who completed year 2 of the study were eligible to enter an optional open-label long-term extension period (Year 3 to 5) and received Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks.
Arm Title
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg + Methotrexate
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks plus MTX 10-25 mg (oral or parenteral) weekly for 52 weeks. From Week 16 participants with < 20% improvement in swollen and tender joints counts were eligible for escape therapy with tocilizumab. After Week 52 participants were able to switch to open label treatment with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks for 12 months in year 2 (except patients who had a >70% improvement in both swollen and tender joint counts who remained on blinded treatment). Participants who completed year 2 of the study were eligible to enter an optional open-label long-term extension period (Year 3 to 5) and received Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks.
Arm Title
Placebo + Methotrexate
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks plus methotrexate (MTX) 10-25 mg (oral or parenteral) weekly for 52 weeks. From Week 16 participants with < 20% improvement in swollen and tender joints counts were eligible for escape therapy with tocilizumab. After Week 52 participants were able to switch to open label treatment with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks for 12 months in year 2 (except patients who had a >70% improvement in both swollen and tender joint counts who remained on blinded treatment). Participants who completed year 2 of the study were eligible to enter an optional open-label long-term extension period (Year 3 to 5) and received Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]
Other Intervention Name(s)
RoActemra, Actemra
Intervention Description
4 mg/kg or 8 mg/kg IV/month every 4 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
IV/month
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Methotrexate
Intervention Description
10-25 mg/week
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology-ACR20 Response
Description
ACR20 response is defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp-Genant Score at Week 52
Description
Radiographs were taken of each hand and foot at Baseline and Week 52 and evaluated at a central reading service by two independent radiologists using the Genant modified method according to Sharp. Erosion Score: A total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. Joint Narrowing Score: A total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). The maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 (normalized from 98) and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 (normalized from 104) and in the feet 48. The maximum modified Sharp score achievable is 290. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change in Physical Function as Measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index at Week 52
Description
HAQ-DI consisted of 20 questions in 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities rated on a 4-point scale where 0=without any difficulty to 3=unable to do. The sum of scores was divided by the number of domains with a score for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst). Functional disability was determined as a cumulative measure of HAQ-DI over 1 year by using the AUC of the change from baseline in HAQ-DI score through week 52. Decreases in AUC of change from baseline in HAQ-DI indicate a greater average improvement in physical function over time and represent a decrease in sustained impairment. For patients with missing week 52 HAQ-DI score, the AUC of the change from baseline was standardized to 52 weeks using the latest timepoint available for calculation of the AUC. The mean was adjusted for region. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in the Modified Total Sharp-Genant Score at Week 104
Description
Radiographs of each hand and foot were taken at Baseline and Week 104 and evaluated at a central reading service by two independent radiologists using the Genant modified method according to Sharp. Erosion Score: A total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. Joint Narrowing Score: A total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). The maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 and in the feet 48. The maximum modified Sharp score achievable is 290. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change in Physical Function as Measured by the Area Under the Curve for the Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire- Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 104
Description
HAQ-DI consisted of 20 questions in 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities rated on a 4-point scale where 0=without any difficulty to 3=unable to do. The sum of scores was divided by the number of domains with a score for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst). Functional disability was determined as a cumulative measure of HAQ-DI over 2 years by using the AUC of the change from baseline in HAQ-DI score through week 104. Decreases in AUC of change from baseline in HAQ-DI indicated a gr eater average improvement in physical function over time and represent a decrease in sustained impairment. For patients with missing week 104 HAQ-DI score, the AUC of the change from baseline was standardized to 104 weeks using the latest timepoint available for calculation of the AUC. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 104
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With ACR50 Response
Description
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response
Description
ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant [either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate].
Time Frame
Baseline,Week 24
Title
Swollen Joint Count (66 Joint Count): Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
Description
66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Tender Joint Count (68 Joint Count): Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
Description
68 joints are assessed for tenderness and joints are classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Patient's Global Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
Description
The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Physician's Global VAS: Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
Description
The physician's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Patient's Pain VAS: Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
Description
The patient assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 24
Title
C-Reactive Protein (CRP): Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
Description
The serum concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is measured in mg/dL. A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate: Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
Description
The Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was measured in mm/hr. A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI): Mean Change From Baseline at Week 24
Description
HAQ-DI is a self-completed patient questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) Response at Week 52
Description
ACR20 response is defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With ACR20 Response at Week 104
Description
ACR20 response is defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Percentage of Participants With ACR50 Response at Week 52
Description
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With ACR50 Response at Week 104
Description
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response at Week 52
Description
ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response at Week 104
Description
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response Maintained for 6 Consecutive Months
Description
ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
104 Weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 52
Description
66 joints were assessed at Baseline and Week 52 for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen for a total possible swollen joint count of 0 (best) to 66 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 52
Description
68 joints were assessed at Baseline and Week 52 for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender for a total possible tender joint count of 0 (best) to 68 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 52
Description
The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed at Baseline and Week 52 using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 52
Description
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in the Patient's Pain VAS at Week 52
Description
The patient assessed their pain at Baseline and Week 52 using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 52
Description
Blood was collected for C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline and Week 52 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. The serum concentration of CRP was measured in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 52
Description
Blood was collected for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline and Week 52 and was analyzed at a local laboratory. ESR was measured in millimeters/hour (mm/hr). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 104
Description
66 joints were assessed at Baseline and Week 104 for swelling and joints were classified as swollen/not swollen for a total possible swollen joint count of 0 (best) to 66 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 104
Description
68 joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender for a total possible tender joint count of 0 (best) to 68 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 104
Description
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was assessed at Baseline and Week 104 using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in Physicians Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 104
Description
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed at Baseline and Week 104 using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in the Patient's Pain VAS at Week 104
Description
The patient assessed their pain at Baseline and Week 104 using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Week 104
Description
Blood was collected for C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline and Week 104 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. The serum concentration of CRP was measured in milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 104
Description
Blood was collected for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline and Week 104 and was analyzed at a local laboratory. ESR was measured in millimeters/hour (mm/hr). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an Improvement of at Least 0.3 Units From Baseline in the HAQ Disability Index at Week 52
Description
The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve an Improvement of at Least 0.3 Units From Baseline in the HAQ Disability Index at Week 104
Description
The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do).HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Area Under Curve (AUC) of the ACRn to Week 24
Description
The ACRn is defined as each patient's lowest percent improvement from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint count (68 joints), swollen joint count (66 joints), and the improved score achieved in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core components (physician global assessment, patient global assessment, pain, HAQ, and C-reactive protein or ESR, respectively). AUC of ACRn, a continuous variable, was calculated from Baseline to Week 24. A positive score change from Baseline indicated an improvement. The higher the ACRn score the better.
Time Frame
24 Weeks
Title
Area Under Curve (AUC) of the ACRn to Week 52
Description
The ACRn is defined as each patient's lowest percent improvement from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint count (68 joints), swollen joint count (66 joints), and the improved score achieved in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core components (physician global assessment, patient global assessment, pain, HAQ, and C-reactive protein or ESR, respectively). AUC of ACRn, a continuous variable, was calculated from Baseline to Week 52. A positive score change from Baseline indicated an improvement. The higher the ACRn score the better.
Time Frame
52 Weeks
Title
Area Under Curve (AUC) of the ACRn Score at Week 104
Description
The ACRn is defined as each patient's lowest percent improvement from Baseline of 3 measures: tender joint count (68 joints), swollen joint count (66 joints), and the improved score achieved in at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core components (physician global assessment, patient global assessment, pain, HAQ, and C-reactive protein or ESR, respectively). AUC of ACRn, a continuous variable, was calculated from Baseline to Week 104. A positive score change from Baseline indicated an improvement. The higher the ACRn score the better.
Time Frame
104 Weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 24
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 52
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 104
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity], and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 24
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] , and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2.
EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 52
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm) [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] , and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2.
EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Good or Moderate EULAR Response at Week 104
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm) [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] , and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2.
EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Remission at Week 24
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Time Frame
Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Remission at Week 52
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control.DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Time Frame
Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Remission at Week 104
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Time Frame
Week 104
Title
Area Under Curve (AUC) of Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 24
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. Higher calculated AUC values are worse (indicate higher disease activity).
Time Frame
24 Weeks
Title
Area Under Curve (AUC) of Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 52
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. Higher calculated AUC values are worse (indicate higher disease activity).
Time Frame
52 Weeks
Title
Area Under Curve (AUC) of Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at Week 104
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. Higher calculated AUC values are worse (indicate higher disease activity).
Time Frame
104 Weeks
Title
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp-Genant Score at Week 24
Description
Radiographs were taken of each hand and foot at Baseline and Week 24 and evaluated at a central reading service by two independent radiologists using the Genant modified method according to Sharp. Erosion Score: A total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. Joint Narrowing Score: A total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). The maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 and in the feet 48. The maximum modified Sharp score achievable is 290. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Modified Total Sharp-Genant Score at Week 80
Description
Radiographs were taken of each hand and foot at Baseline and Week 80 and evaluated at a central reading service by two independent radiologists using the Genant modified method according to Sharp. Erosion Score: A total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. Joint Narrowing Score: A total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). The maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 and in the feet 48. The maximum modified Sharp score achievable is 290. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 80
Title
Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 24
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 52
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 80
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 80
Title
Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 104
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score at Week 24
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). A lower change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score at Week 52
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score at Week 80
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 80
Title
Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score at Week 104
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Erosion at Week 24
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). No progression of Erosion score was defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Erosion at Week 52
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). No progression of Erosion score was defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Erosion at Week 104
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 142 (worst). No progression of Erosion score was defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Joint Space Narrowing at Week 24
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). No progression of Joint Space Narrowing score was defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Joint Space Narrowing at Week 52
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). No progression of Joint Space Narrowing score is defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Percentage of Participants With no Progression of Joint Space Narrowing at Week 104
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). No progression of Joint Space Narrowing score is defined as a change from Baseline of less than or equal to zero.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 52
Description
HAQ-DI is a self-completed questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. To Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in HAQ Disability Index at Week 104
Description
HAQ-DI is a self-completed questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. To Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8). Total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in Quality Life Short Form-36 (SF-36) Score at Week 24
Description
The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Score at Week 52
Description
The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Score at Week 104
Description
The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score at Week 24
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score at Week 52
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in FACIT-F Score at Week 104
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Week 24 in Those Patients With Positive RF
Description
Blood was collected for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Baseline and Week 24 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. RF level was reported in international units/milliliter (IU/mL). A positive RF= >15 IU/mL. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better result.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Week 52 in Those Patients With Positive RF
Description
Blood was collected for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Baseline and Week 52 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. RF level was reported in international units/milliliter (IU/mL). A positive RF= >15 IU/mL. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better result.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 52
Title
Change From Baseline in Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Week 104 in Those Patients With Positive RF
Description
Blood was collected for Rheumatoid Factor (RF) at Baseline and Week 104 and was analyzed at a central laboratory. RF level was reported in international units/milliliter (IU/mL). A positive RF= >15 IU/mL. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better result.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 104
Title
Time to Onset of ACR20 by Treatment Group
Description
Time in days until ACR20 response. ACR20 response was defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Time to Onset of ACR50 by Treatment Group
Description
Time in days until ACR50 response. ACR50 response was defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Time to Onset of ACR70 by Treatment Group
Description
Time in days until ACR70 response. ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response
Description
Insufficient therapeutic response (patient not responding to the drug as assessed by the physician) was selected by the investigator as a reason that the patient withdrew from the study.
Time Frame
104 Weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants in Each Treatment Group Who Receive Escape Therapy
Description
In Escape 1, participants in the Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg + Methotrexate and Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg + Methotrexate groups received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg as escape therapy. Participants in the Placebo + Methotrexate group received tocilizumab 4 mg/kg as escape therapy.
In Escape 2, all participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg.
Time Frame
104 Weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission According to the ACR Remission Criteria by Week 24
Description
The percentage of participants, who achieved ACR remission at any study visit up to Week 24. ACR remission required that all five of the following criteria were met for at least two consecutive months: morning stiffness < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain, no joint tenderness or pain on motion, no soft tissue swelling in joints or tendon sheaths, and ESR < 30 mm/hr for a female or 20 mm/hr for a male.
Time Frame
24 Weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission According to the ACR Remission Criteria by Week 52
Description
The percentage of participants, who achieved ACR remission at any study visit up to Week 52. ACR remission required that all five of the following criteria were met for at least two consecutive months: morning stiffness < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain, no joint tenderness or pain on motion, no soft tissue swelling in joints or tendon sheaths, and ESR < 30 mm/hr for a female or 20 mm/hr for a male.
Time Frame
52 Weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission According to the ACR Remission Criteria by Week 104
Description
The percentage of participants who achieved ACR remission at any study visit up to Week 104. ACR remission required that all five of the following criteria were met for at least two consecutive months: morning stiffness < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain, no joint tenderness or pain on motion, no soft tissue swelling in joints or tendon sheaths, and ESR < 30 mm/hr for a female or 20 mm/hr for a male.
Time Frame
104 Weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Clinical Response at Week 52
Description
Complete clinical response is defined as a continuous 6-month period of remission by ACR criteria [defined as five of the following criteria are met for at least two consecutive months: morning stiffness < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain, no joint tenderness or swelling, and ESR < 30 mm/hr for a female or 20 mm/hr for a male] and no radiographic progression [defined as change from baseline ≤ 0 in the total Sharp-Genant score, erosion score, and JSN score]. Patients who achieve a complete clinical response at any time in the study are counted as responders, even if the response is not maintained.
Time Frame
52 Weeks
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Clinical Response at Week 104
Description
Complete clinical response is defined as a continuous 6-month period of remission by ACR criteria [defined as five of the following criteria are met for at least two consecutive months: morning stiffness < 15 minutes, no fatigue, no joint pain, no joint tenderness or swelling, and ESR < 30 mm/hr for a female or 20 mm/hr for a male] and no radiographic progression [defined as change from baseline ≤ 0 in the total Sharp-Genant score, erosion score, and JSN score].
Time Frame
104 Weeks
Title
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With ACR Response at Week 260
Description
ACR20/50/70/90 response is defined as a ≥ 20/50/70/90% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Remission at Week 260
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Time Frame
Week 260
Title
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity (LDA) at Week 260
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. LDA is defined as DAS28 ≤3.2.
Time Frame
Week 260
Title
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With DAS28 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good or Moderate Response at Week 260
Description
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. EULAR Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count at Week 260
Description
66 joints were assessed at Baseline and Week 260 for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen for a total possible swollen joint count of 0 (best) to 66 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count at Week 260
Description
68 joints were assessed at Baseline and Week 260 for tenderness and joints are classified as tender/not tender for a total possible swollen joint count of 0 (best) to 68 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 260
Description
HAQ-DI is a self-completed questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. To Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Change From Baseline in the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 260
Description
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was assessed at Baseline and Week 104 using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Change From Baseline in the Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS at Week 260
Description
The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Change From Baseline in the Patient's Pain VAS at Week 260
Description
The patient assessed their pain at Baseline and Week 260 using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement in the FACIT-Fatigue Score at Week 260
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). Clinically relevant improvement is defined as a ≥5 change from Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Relevant Improvement in the SF-36 Score at Week 260
Description
The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. Clinically relevant improvement is defined as a ≥5 change from Baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Total Sharp-Genant Score at Week 260
Description
Radiographs were taken of each hand and foot at Baseline and Week 260 and evaluated at a central reading service by two independent radiologists using the Genant modified method according to Sharp. Erosion Score: A total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. Joint Narrowing Score: A total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint).The maximum total erosion score in the hands is 100 and in the feet 42, the maximum scores for joint space narrowing in the hands is 100 and in the feet 48. The maximum modified Sharp score achievable is 290. A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score. The results were reported based on the treatment the patient was originally randomized to.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 260
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot and were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=Normal to 3.5=very severe erosion for a total possible score of 0 (best ) to 142 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
Title
End of Study: Change From Baseline in Joint Space Narrowing Score at Week 260
Description
Radiographs were taken of a total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=Normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint) for a total possible score of 0 (best) to 148 (worst). A lower number change from Baseline indicated a better score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 260
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
adult patients at least 18 years of age with moderate to severe active RA for at least 6 months;
inadequate response to a stable dose of MTX;
patients of reproductive potential must be using reliable methods of contraception.
Exclusion Criteria:
major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks before entering study, or planned surgery within 6 months after entering study;
prior treatment failure with an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent;
women who are pregnant or breast-feeding.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233-7333
Country
United States
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35801
Country
United States
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85251
Country
United States
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85724
Country
United States
City
Anaheim
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92801
Country
United States
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90806
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92108
Country
United States
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94118
Country
United States
City
Santa Maria
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93454
Country
United States
City
Torrance
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90505
Country
United States
City
Boulder
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80304
Country
United States
City
Colorado Springs
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80910
Country
United States
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80230
Country
United States
City
Aventura
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33180
Country
United States
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33334
Country
United States
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33614
Country
United States
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33407
Country
United States
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83702
Country
United States
City
Coeur D'alene
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83814
Country
United States
City
Idaho Falls
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83404
Country
United States
City
Meridan
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83642
Country
United States
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612-3824
Country
United States
City
Rockford
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61103
Country
United States
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202-5100
Country
United States
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40515
Country
United States
City
Frederick
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21702
Country
United States
City
Hagerstown
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21740
Country
United States
City
Wheaton
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20902
Country
United States
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63131
Country
United States
City
St Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63141
Country
United States
City
Billings
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59101
Country
United States
City
Missoula
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59802
Country
United States
City
Reno
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89502
Country
United States
City
Dover
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03820
Country
United States
City
Medford
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08055
Country
United States
City
Voorhees
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08043
Country
United States
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12206
Country
United States
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11201
Country
United States
City
Lake Success
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11042
Country
United States
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
City
Stony Brook
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11794-8161
Country
United States
City
Asheville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28801
Country
United States
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28211
Country
United States
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27609
Country
United States
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28401
Country
United States
City
Canton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44718
Country
United States
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73109
Country
United States
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
74135
Country
United States
City
Eugene
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97401
Country
United States
City
Bethlehem
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18015
Country
United States
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16635
Country
United States
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19140
Country
United States
City
Wyomissing
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19610
Country
United States
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29204
Country
United States
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78217
Country
United States
City
Olympia
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98502
Country
United States
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98104
Country
United States
City
Glendale
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53217
Country
United States
City
Adelaide
ZIP/Postal Code
5011
Country
Australia
City
Malvern
ZIP/Postal Code
3144
Country
Australia
City
Melbourne
ZIP/Postal Code
3168
Country
Australia
City
New Lambton
ZIP/Postal Code
2305
Country
Australia
City
Shenton Park
ZIP/Postal Code
6008
Country
Australia
City
St. Leonards
ZIP/Postal Code
2139
Country
Australia
City
Porto Alegre
ZIP/Postal Code
91350-200
Country
Brazil
City
Rio de Janeiro
ZIP/Postal Code
20551-030
Country
Brazil
City
Sao Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
01221-020
Country
Brazil
City
Sao Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
04026-000
Country
Brazil
City
Sao Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
5403900
Country
Brazil
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100032
Country
China
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100044
Country
China
City
Nanjing
ZIP/Postal Code
210008
Country
China
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200127
Country
China
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200433
Country
China
City
Hellerup
ZIP/Postal Code
2900
Country
Denmark
City
Odense
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Denmark
City
Heinola
ZIP/Postal Code
18120
Country
Finland
City
Helsinki
ZIP/Postal Code
00290
Country
Finland
City
Oulu
ZIP/Postal Code
90029
Country
Finland
City
Vantaa
ZIP/Postal Code
01400
Country
Finland
City
Amiens
ZIP/Postal Code
80054
Country
France
City
Bobigny
ZIP/Postal Code
93009
Country
France
City
Bois Guillaume
ZIP/Postal Code
76233
Country
France
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33076
Country
France
City
Le Kremlin Bicetre
ZIP/Postal Code
94270
Country
France
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06202
Country
France
City
Orleans
ZIP/Postal Code
45000
Country
France
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75651
Country
France
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75877
Country
France
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67098
Country
France
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
City
Vandoeuvre-les-nancy
ZIP/Postal Code
54511
Country
France
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
11527
Country
Greece
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
15121
Country
Greece
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
15127
Country
Greece
City
Heraklion
ZIP/Postal Code
71110
Country
Greece
City
Brescia
ZIP/Postal Code
25123
Country
Italy
City
Coppito
ZIP/Postal Code
67100
Country
Italy
City
Firenze
ZIP/Postal Code
50139
Country
Italy
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20122
Country
Italy
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20157
Country
Italy
City
Napoli
ZIP/Postal Code
80131
Country
Italy
City
Padova
ZIP/Postal Code
35128
Country
Italy
City
Pavia
ZIP/Postal Code
27100
Country
Italy
City
Pisa
ZIP/Postal Code
56100
Country
Italy
City
Reggio Emilia
ZIP/Postal Code
42100
Country
Italy
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00161
Country
Italy
City
Torino
ZIP/Postal Code
10128
Country
Italy
City
Udine
ZIP/Postal Code
33100
Country
Italy
City
Valeggio Sul Mincio
ZIP/Postal Code
37067
Country
Italy
City
Varese
ZIP/Postal Code
21100
Country
Italy
City
Verona
ZIP/Postal Code
37134
Country
Italy
City
Chihuahua
ZIP/Postal Code
31000
Country
Mexico
City
Mexico City
ZIP/Postal Code
03100
Country
Mexico
City
Mexico City
ZIP/Postal Code
06700
Country
Mexico
City
Mexico City
ZIP/Postal Code
06726
Country
Mexico
City
Mexico City
ZIP/Postal Code
07360
Country
Mexico
City
Monterrey
ZIP/Postal Code
64460
Country
Mexico
City
Obregon
ZIP/Postal Code
85000
Country
Mexico
City
Haugesund
ZIP/Postal Code
5528
Country
Norway
City
Lillehammer
ZIP/Postal Code
2609
Country
Norway
City
Tromsø
ZIP/Postal Code
9038
Country
Norway
City
Bydgoszcz
ZIP/Postal Code
85-168
Country
Poland
City
Dzialdowo
ZIP/Postal Code
13-200
Country
Poland
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
City
Kalisz
ZIP/Postal Code
62-800
Country
Poland
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
30-119
Country
Poland
City
Krakow
ZIP/Postal Code
30-510
Country
Poland
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
60-218
Country
Poland
City
Szczecin
ZIP/Postal Code
71-252
Country
Poland
City
Ustron
ZIP/Postal Code
43-450
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
00-909
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-637
Country
Poland
City
Ponce
ZIP/Postal Code
00716
Country
Puerto Rico
City
San Juan
ZIP/Postal Code
00936-5067
Country
Puerto Rico
City
Cape Town
ZIP/Postal Code
4001
Country
South Africa
City
Cape Town
ZIP/Postal Code
7405
Country
South Africa
City
Cape Town
ZIP/Postal Code
7500
Country
South Africa
City
Diepkloof
ZIP/Postal Code
1862
Country
South Africa
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08036
Country
Spain
City
Cádiz
ZIP/Postal Code
11009
Country
Spain
City
Merida
ZIP/Postal Code
97500
Country
Spain
City
Sabadell
ZIP/Postal Code
08208
Country
Spain
City
Santander
ZIP/Postal Code
39008
Country
Spain
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41009
Country
Spain
City
Lausanne
ZIP/Postal Code
1011
Country
Switzerland
City
St. Gallen
ZIP/Postal Code
9007
Country
Switzerland
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27564431
Citation
Khawaja MN, Bergman MJ, Yourish J, Pei J, Reiss W, Keystone E. Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 and the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism Provisional Remission Definitions as Predictors of Radiographic Outcome in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trial With Tocilizumab. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 May;69(5):609-615. doi: 10.1002/acr.23008. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27087059
Citation
Kremer JM, Blanco R, Halland AM, Brzosko M, Burgos-Vargas R, Mela CM, Rowell L, Fleischmann RM. Clinical efficacy and safety maintained up to 5 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab in a randomised trial. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Jul-Aug;34(4):625-33. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26787505
Citation
Bay-Jensen AC, Platt A, Siebuhr AS, Christiansen C, Byrjalsen I, Karsdal MA. Early changes in blood-based joint tissue destruction biomarkers are predictive of response to tocilizumab in the LITHE study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 Jan 20;18:13. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0913-x.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
24429164
Citation
Keystone EC, Anisfeld A, Ogale S, Devenport JN, Curtis JR. Continued benefit of tocilizumab plus disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate clinical responses by week 8 of treatment. J Rheumatol. 2014 Feb;41(2):216-26. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130489. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23945134
Citation
Siebuhr AS, Bay-Jensen AC, Leeming DJ, Plat A, Byrjalsen I, Christiansen C, van de Heijde D, Karsdal MA. Serological identification of fast progressors of structural damage with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013 Aug 14;15(4):R86. doi: 10.1186/ar4266.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23322466
Citation
Fleischmann RM, Halland AM, Brzosko M, Burgos-Vargas R, Mela C, Vernon E, Kremer JM. Tocilizumab inhibits structural joint damage and improves physical function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate responses to methotrexate: LITHE study 2-year results. J Rheumatol. 2013 Feb;40(2):113-26. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120447. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22491018
Citation
Wang J, Bansal AT, Martin M, Germer S, Benayed R, Essioux L, Lee JS, Begovich A, Hemmings A, Kenwright A, Taylor KE, Upmanyu R, Cutler P, Harari O, Marchini J, Criswell LA, Platt A. Genome-wide association analysis implicates the involvement of eight loci with response to tocilizumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013 Jun;13(3):235-41. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2012.8. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
21360490
Citation
Kremer JM, Blanco R, Brzosko M, Burgos-Vargas R, Halland AM, Vernon E, Ambs P, Fleischmann R. Tocilizumab inhibits structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate responses to methotrexate: results from the double-blind treatment phase of a randomized placebo-controlled trial of tocilizumab safety and prevention of structural joint damage at one year. Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Mar;63(3):609-21. doi: 10.1002/art.30158.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Study to Assess the Effect of Tocilizumab + Methotrexate on Prevention of Structural Joint Damage in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs