search
Back to results

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nusinersen (ISIS 396443) in Participants With Later-onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) (CHERISH)

Primary Purpose

Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nusinersen
Sham procedure
Sponsored by
Biogen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Spinal Muscular Atrophy focused on measuring Spinal Muscular Atrophy, SMA, SMN, SMNRx, ISIS-SMNRx, ISIS-SMN Rx, ISIS 396443, CHERISH, IONIS-SMNRx, IONIS-SMN Rx

Eligibility Criteria

2 Years - 12 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parent or guardian has signed informed consent and, if indicated per participant's age and institutional guidelines, participant has signed informed assent
  • Be medically diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
  • Have onset of clinical signs and symptoms consistent with SMA at greater than 6 months of age
  • Be able to sit independently, but has never had the ability to walk independently
  • Have Motor Function Score (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale - Expanded) greater than or equal to 10 and less than or equal to 54 at Screening
  • Be able to complete all study procedures, measurements and visits and parent or guardian and subject has adequately supportive psychosocial circumstances, in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Have an estimated life expectancy of greater than 2 years from Screening, in the opinion of the Investigator
  • Meet age-appropriate institutional criteria for use of anesthesia and sedation, if use is planned for study procedures
  • For subjects who have reached reproductive maturity, satisfy study contraceptive requirements

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Respiratory insufficiency, defined by the medical necessity for invasive or non-invasive ventilation for greater than 6 hours during a 24 hour period, at Screening
  • Medical necessity for a gastric feeding tube, where the majority of feeds are given by this route, as assessed by the Site Investigator
  • Severe contractures or severe scoliosis evident on X-ray examination at Screening
  • Hospitalization for surgery (i.e., scoliosis surgery, other surgery), pulmonary event, or nutritional support within 2 months of Screening or planned during the duration of the study
  • Presence of an untreated or inadequately treated active infection requiring systemic antiviral or antimicrobial therapy at any time during the screening period
  • History of brain or spinal cord disease, including tumors, or abnormalities by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) that would interfere with the LP procedures or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation
  • Presence of an implanted shunt for the drainage of CSF or an implanted central nervous system (CNS) catheter
  • History of bacterial meningitis
  • Dosing with IONIS-SMN Rx in any previous clinical study
  • Prior injury (e.g., upper or lower limb fracture) or surgical procedure which impacts the subject's ability to perform any of the outcome measure testing required in the protocol and from which the subject has not fully recovered or achieved a stable baseline
  • Clinically significant abnormalities in hematology or clinical chemistry parameters or electrocardiogram (ECG), as assessed by the Site Investigator, at the Screening visit that would render the subject unsuitable for inclusion
  • Treatment with another investigational drug (e.g., oral albuterol or salbutamol, riluzole, carnitine, creatine, sodium phenylbutyrate, et.c), biological agent, or device within 1-month of Screening or 5 half-lives of study agent, whichever is longer. Treatment with valproate or hydroxyurea within 3-months of Screening. Any history of gene therapy, antisense oligonucleotide therapy, or cell transplantation.
  • Ongoing medical condition that according to the Site Investigator would interfere with the conduct and assessments of the study. Examples are medical disability (e.g., wasting or cachexia, severe anemia, etc.) that would interfere with the assessment of safety or would compromise the ability of the subject to undergo study procedures.

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Sites / Locations

  • UCLA Clinical and Translational Research Center
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford
  • Children's Hospital Colorado
  • Nemours Children's Hospital
  • Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
  • Boston Children's Hospital
  • Washington University School of Medicine
  • Columbia University Medical Center
  • Oregon Health & Science University
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Neurology
  • Children's Medical Center
  • Children's Hospital - London Health Sciences Centre
  • McGill University Health Centre-Glen Site-CIM
  • Armand Trousseau Hospital, I-Motion, Clinical Trials Platform
  • Universitatsklinikum Essen
  • University Hospital Freiberg, Center for Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Neuropaediatrics and Muscular Disease
  • The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
  • AOU Policlinico G. Martino Dipartimento di Neuroscienze e Centro Clinico Nemo Sud
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli-Universita Cattolica de Sacro Cuore-UOC Neuropsichiatre Infantile
  • Hyogo College of Medicine
  • Tokyo Women's Medical University
  • Seoul National University Children's Hospital
  • Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
  • University of Gothenburg, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Nusinersen

Sham procedure

Arm Description

Nusinersen 12 mg solution via intrathecal (IT) injection on Days 1, 29, 85 and 274.

Sham comparator on Days 1, 29, 85 and 274.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale - Expanded (HFMSE) Score at Month 15
The HFMSE consists of 33 scored activities used to assess motor function in children with SMA. The scale was originally developed with 20 scored activities and was devised for use in children with SMA Type 2 and Type 3 with limited ambulation to give objective information on motor ability and clinical progression. The expanded scale includes an additional module of 13 items developed to allow for evaluation of ambulatory SMA patients. Participants were asked to do a specific activity (such as rolling) and they were then graded on the quality and execution of that movement on a scale of 0=being unable, 1=performed with some compensation, and 2=unaided. The overall score is the sum of the scores for all activities with a maximum achievable score of 66. Higher scores indicate increased motor function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a 3-Point Increase From Baseline in HFMSE Score at Month 15
The HFMSE consists of 33 scored activities used to assess motor function in children with SMA. The scale was originally developed with 20 scored activities and was devised for use in children with SMA Type 2 and Type 3 with limited ambulation to give objective information on motor ability and clinical progression. The expanded scale includes an additional module of 13 items developed to allow for evaluation of ambulatory SMA patients. Participants were asked to do a specific activity (such as rolling) and they were then graded on the quality and execution of that movement on a scale of 0=being unable, 1=performed with some compensation, and 2=unaided. The overall score is the sum of the scores for all activities with a maximum achievable score of 66. Higher scores indicate increased motor function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Proportion of Participants That Achieved Any New Motor Milestone at Month 15
New motor milestones are defined as sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone and walking alone.
Number of New Motor Milestones Achieved Per Participant
New motor milestones are defined as sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone and walking alone.
Change From Baseline in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) Test
The RULM Test is used in patients with SMA to assess upper limb functional ability items that are reflective of activities of daily living (i.e., raise a can to mouth as if drinking, take a coin and place it in a box, remove the lid of a container). The RULM test has a total of 20 items with an entry item that serves as functional class identification and does not contribute to the total score. The remaining 19 scorable items reflect different functional domains and are graded on a 3-point system with a score of 0 (unable), 1 (able, with modification), and a maximum of 2 (able, no difficulty). There is only 1 item (item I) that is scored as a can/cannot score, with 1 as the highest score. Scorable items are summed for a total score range of 0-37, with higher scores increased great upper limb function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Proportion of Participants That Achieved Standing Alone
If the participant was unable to achieve standing alone at Baseline but could achieve this at Month 15 then they were considered a responder. If they could not achieve this or if a participant terminated the study prior to the 15-month assessment due to treatment failure or death, then any imputed value was ignored and the participant was considered as a non-responder.
Proportion of Participants That Achieved Walking With Assistance
If the participant was unable to achieve walking with assistance at baseline but could achieve this at Month 15 then they were considered a responder. If they could not achieve this or if a participant terminated the study prior to the 15-month assessment due to treatment failure or death, then any imputed value was ignored and the participant was considered as a non-responder.
Number of Participants That Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs: any sign, symptom, or diagnosis/disease that is unfavorable or unintended, that is new, or if pre-existing, worsens in participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs: an event that results in death; an event that, in the view of the investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death; an outcome that results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect diagnosed in a child of a participant; an event that requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization; an event that results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. Any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Vital signs assessed for clinical significance include resting blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, and temperature.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Weight Abnormalities
Weight changes assessed from Baseline to Month 15.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination Abnormalities
Neurological changes assessed for clinical significance include assessment of mental status, level of consciousness, sensory function, motor function, cranial nerve function, and reflexes.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Abnormalities
Physical examination changes were assessed for clinical significance.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter Abnormalities
Laboratory parameter changes assessed for clinical significance include serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation and urinalysis.
Number of Participants With Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Post-Baseline Worsening in Electrocardiogram (ECG) in Results
The number of participants with abnormal, clinically relevant worsening, defined as participants with an ECG interpreted as abnormal and clinically relevant, with a comparison with Baseline value is reported.
Number of Participants Taking Any Concomitant Medication Related to Dosing Procedure or Sham Procedure
Concomitant medications include prescription and over-the-counter medications administered to participants on or after the first day of study treatment.

Full Information

First Posted
November 12, 2014
Last Updated
February 12, 2021
Sponsor
Biogen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02292537
Brief Title
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nusinersen (ISIS 396443) in Participants With Later-onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
Acronym
CHERISH
Official Title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-Procedure Controlled Study to Assess the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of ISIS 396443 Administered Intrathecally in Patients With Later-onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 24, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 20, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 20, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Biogen

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to examine the clinical efficacy of nusinersen (ISIS 396443) administered intrathecally to participants with later-onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). The secondary objective is to examine the safety and tolerability of nusinersen administered intrathecally to participants with later-onset SMA.
Detailed Description
This study was conducted and the protocol was registered by Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In August 2016, sponsorship of the trial was transferred to Biogen.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Muscular Atrophy
Keywords
Spinal Muscular Atrophy, SMA, SMN, SMNRx, ISIS-SMNRx, ISIS-SMN Rx, ISIS 396443, CHERISH, IONIS-SMNRx, IONIS-SMN Rx

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
126 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Nusinersen
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Nusinersen 12 mg solution via intrathecal (IT) injection on Days 1, 29, 85 and 274.
Arm Title
Sham procedure
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham comparator on Days 1, 29, 85 and 274.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Nusinersen
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sprinraza, ISIS 396443, IONIS-SMN Rx, BIIB058
Intervention Description
Administered by intrathecal (IT) lumbar puncture (LP) injection
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Sham procedure
Intervention Description
Small needle prick on the lower back at the location where the IT injection is normally made
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale - Expanded (HFMSE) Score at Month 15
Description
The HFMSE consists of 33 scored activities used to assess motor function in children with SMA. The scale was originally developed with 20 scored activities and was devised for use in children with SMA Type 2 and Type 3 with limited ambulation to give objective information on motor ability and clinical progression. The expanded scale includes an additional module of 13 items developed to allow for evaluation of ambulatory SMA patients. Participants were asked to do a specific activity (such as rolling) and they were then graded on the quality and execution of that movement on a scale of 0=being unable, 1=performed with some compensation, and 2=unaided. The overall score is the sum of the scores for all activities with a maximum achievable score of 66. Higher scores indicate increased motor function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 15
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Participants Who Achieved a 3-Point Increase From Baseline in HFMSE Score at Month 15
Description
The HFMSE consists of 33 scored activities used to assess motor function in children with SMA. The scale was originally developed with 20 scored activities and was devised for use in children with SMA Type 2 and Type 3 with limited ambulation to give objective information on motor ability and clinical progression. The expanded scale includes an additional module of 13 items developed to allow for evaluation of ambulatory SMA patients. Participants were asked to do a specific activity (such as rolling) and they were then graded on the quality and execution of that movement on a scale of 0=being unable, 1=performed with some compensation, and 2=unaided. The overall score is the sum of the scores for all activities with a maximum achievable score of 66. Higher scores indicate increased motor function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 15
Title
Proportion of Participants That Achieved Any New Motor Milestone at Month 15
Description
New motor milestones are defined as sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone and walking alone.
Time Frame
Month 15
Title
Number of New Motor Milestones Achieved Per Participant
Description
New motor milestones are defined as sitting without support, hands-and-knees crawling, standing with assistance, walking with assistance, standing alone and walking alone.
Time Frame
Month 15
Title
Change From Baseline in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) Test
Description
The RULM Test is used in patients with SMA to assess upper limb functional ability items that are reflective of activities of daily living (i.e., raise a can to mouth as if drinking, take a coin and place it in a box, remove the lid of a container). The RULM test has a total of 20 items with an entry item that serves as functional class identification and does not contribute to the total score. The remaining 19 scorable items reflect different functional domains and are graded on a 3-point system with a score of 0 (unable), 1 (able, with modification), and a maximum of 2 (able, no difficulty). There is only 1 item (item I) that is scored as a can/cannot score, with 1 as the highest score. Scorable items are summed for a total score range of 0-37, with higher scores increased great upper limb function. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 15
Title
Proportion of Participants That Achieved Standing Alone
Description
If the participant was unable to achieve standing alone at Baseline but could achieve this at Month 15 then they were considered a responder. If they could not achieve this or if a participant terminated the study prior to the 15-month assessment due to treatment failure or death, then any imputed value was ignored and the participant was considered as a non-responder.
Time Frame
Month 15
Title
Proportion of Participants That Achieved Walking With Assistance
Description
If the participant was unable to achieve walking with assistance at baseline but could achieve this at Month 15 then they were considered a responder. If they could not achieve this or if a participant terminated the study prior to the 15-month assessment due to treatment failure or death, then any imputed value was ignored and the participant was considered as a non-responder.
Time Frame
Month 15
Title
Number of Participants That Experienced Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
AEs: any sign, symptom, or diagnosis/disease that is unfavorable or unintended, that is new, or if pre-existing, worsens in participants administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAEs: an event that results in death; an event that, in the view of the investigator, places the participant at immediate risk of death; an outcome that results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect diagnosed in a child of a participant; an event that requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization; an event that results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity. Any other medically important event that, in the opinion of the investigator, may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in the definition above.
Time Frame
Baseline through Month 15
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Sign Abnormalities
Description
Vital signs assessed for clinical significance include resting blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, and temperature.
Time Frame
Baseline through Month 15
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Weight Abnormalities
Description
Weight changes assessed from Baseline to Month 15.
Time Frame
Baseline through Month 15
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Neurological Examination Abnormalities
Description
Neurological changes assessed for clinical significance include assessment of mental status, level of consciousness, sensory function, motor function, cranial nerve function, and reflexes.
Time Frame
Baseline through Month 15
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Abnormalities
Description
Physical examination changes were assessed for clinical significance.
Time Frame
Baseline through Month 15
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Parameter Abnormalities
Description
Laboratory parameter changes assessed for clinical significance include serum chemistry, hematology, coagulation and urinalysis.
Time Frame
Baseline through Month 15
Title
Number of Participants With Abnormal, Clinically Relevant Post-Baseline Worsening in Electrocardiogram (ECG) in Results
Description
The number of participants with abnormal, clinically relevant worsening, defined as participants with an ECG interpreted as abnormal and clinically relevant, with a comparison with Baseline value is reported.
Time Frame
Baseline through Month 15
Title
Number of Participants Taking Any Concomitant Medication Related to Dosing Procedure or Sham Procedure
Description
Concomitant medications include prescription and over-the-counter medications administered to participants on or after the first day of study treatment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Month 15

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
2 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria: Parent or guardian has signed informed consent and, if indicated per participant's age and institutional guidelines, participant has signed informed assent Be medically diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Have onset of clinical signs and symptoms consistent with SMA at greater than 6 months of age Be able to sit independently, but has never had the ability to walk independently Have Motor Function Score (Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale - Expanded) greater than or equal to 10 and less than or equal to 54 at Screening Be able to complete all study procedures, measurements and visits and parent or guardian and subject has adequately supportive psychosocial circumstances, in the opinion of the Investigator Have an estimated life expectancy of greater than 2 years from Screening, in the opinion of the Investigator Meet age-appropriate institutional criteria for use of anesthesia and sedation, if use is planned for study procedures For subjects who have reached reproductive maturity, satisfy study contraceptive requirements Key Exclusion Criteria: Respiratory insufficiency, defined by the medical necessity for invasive or non-invasive ventilation for greater than 6 hours during a 24 hour period, at Screening Medical necessity for a gastric feeding tube, where the majority of feeds are given by this route, as assessed by the Site Investigator Severe contractures or severe scoliosis evident on X-ray examination at Screening Hospitalization for surgery (i.e., scoliosis surgery, other surgery), pulmonary event, or nutritional support within 2 months of Screening or planned during the duration of the study Presence of an untreated or inadequately treated active infection requiring systemic antiviral or antimicrobial therapy at any time during the screening period History of brain or spinal cord disease, including tumors, or abnormalities by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) that would interfere with the LP procedures or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation Presence of an implanted shunt for the drainage of CSF or an implanted central nervous system (CNS) catheter History of bacterial meningitis Dosing with IONIS-SMN Rx in any previous clinical study Prior injury (e.g., upper or lower limb fracture) or surgical procedure which impacts the subject's ability to perform any of the outcome measure testing required in the protocol and from which the subject has not fully recovered or achieved a stable baseline Clinically significant abnormalities in hematology or clinical chemistry parameters or electrocardiogram (ECG), as assessed by the Site Investigator, at the Screening visit that would render the subject unsuitable for inclusion Treatment with another investigational drug (e.g., oral albuterol or salbutamol, riluzole, carnitine, creatine, sodium phenylbutyrate, et.c), biological agent, or device within 1-month of Screening or 5 half-lives of study agent, whichever is longer. Treatment with valproate or hydroxyurea within 3-months of Screening. Any history of gene therapy, antisense oligonucleotide therapy, or cell transplantation. Ongoing medical condition that according to the Site Investigator would interfere with the conduct and assessments of the study. Examples are medical disability (e.g., wasting or cachexia, severe anemia, etc.) that would interfere with the assessment of safety or would compromise the ability of the subject to undergo study procedures. NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Medical Director
Organizational Affiliation
Biogen
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UCLA Clinical and Translational Research Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94304
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Hospital Colorado
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Nemours Children's Hospital
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32827
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boston Children's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health & Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia - Neurology
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Medical Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Hospital - London Health Sciences Centre
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 5W9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
McGill University Health Centre-Glen Site-CIM
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H4A 3JI
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Armand Trousseau Hospital, I-Motion, Clinical Trials Platform
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Universitatsklinikum Essen
City
Essen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Hospital Freiberg, Center for Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Neuropaediatrics and Muscular Disease
City
Freiburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine
City
Hong Kong
State/Province
Hong Kong SAR
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
AOU Policlinico G. Martino Dipartimento di Neuroscienze e Centro Clinico Nemo Sud
City
Messina
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli-Universita Cattolica de Sacro Cuore-UOC Neuropsichiatre Infantile
City
Rome
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Hyogo College of Medicine
City
Nishinomya-shi
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Tokyo Women's Medical University
City
Shinjuku-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Seoul National University Children's Hospital
City
Seoul
State/Province
Korea
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
University of Gothenburg, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital
City
Gothenburg
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31420846
Citation
Darras BT, Farrar MA, Mercuri E, Finkel RS, Foster R, Hughes SG, Bhan I, Farwell W, Gheuens S. An Integrated Safety Analysis of Infants and Children with Symptomatic Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Treated with Nusinersen in Seven Clinical Trials. CNS Drugs. 2019 Sep;33(9):919-932. doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00656-w.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29443664
Citation
Mercuri E, Darras BT, Chiriboga CA, Day JW, Campbell C, Connolly AM, Iannaccone ST, Kirschner J, Kuntz NL, Saito K, Shieh PB, Tulinius M, Mazzone ES, Montes J, Bishop KM, Yang Q, Foster R, Gheuens S, Bennett CF, Farwell W, Schneider E, De Vivo DC, Finkel RS; CHERISH Study Group. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Later-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 15;378(7):625-635. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710504.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.curesma.org
Description
Cure SMA
URL
http://mda.org/disease/spinal-muscular-atrophy
Description
Muscular Dystrophy Association
URL
https://www.rarediseases.org
Description
National Organization for Rare Diseases

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nusinersen (ISIS 396443) in Participants With Later-onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs