search
Back to results

A Study to Compare Patient-controlled Pain Medications Delivered Either Through the Skin or Intravenously (EuroTrans)

Primary Purpose

Pain, Analgesia, Patient-Controlled, Pain, Postoperative

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem
IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)
Sponsored by
Janssen-Cilag International NV
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain focused on measuring Pain, Patient-controlled analgesia, Postoperative pain, Transdermal fentanyl, Surgical pain, Opioid analgesics

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who meet the criteria of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) pre-operative physical status I, II, or III
  • Patients expected to have moderate or severe pain after a major abdominal or orthopedic procedure
  • Patients expected to remain hospitalized for at least 24 hours postoperatively

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to fentanyl, morphine, or to skin adhesives
  • Known or suspected to be dependent on strong opioids or to have abused any drug substance or alcohol
  • Severe respiratory symptoms
  • Chronic pain disorder
  • Pregnant or nursing women, or those lacking adequate contraception

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

IONSYS

Patient-Controlled Analgesia

Arm Description

IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem

IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Patient's global assessment of pain control (poor, fair, good, excellent) 24 hours after start of study treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Assessment of pain control by patient and doctor
Pain Intensity, vital signs, and oxygen level in the blood
Incidence of adverse events

Full Information

First Posted
September 28, 2009
Last Updated
January 28, 2014
Sponsor
Janssen-Cilag International NV
Collaborators
Alza Corporation, DE, USA
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00996177
Brief Title
A Study to Compare Patient-controlled Pain Medications Delivered Either Through the Skin or Intravenously
Acronym
EuroTrans
Official Title
Comparison of Transdermal Fentanyl PCA and IV Morphine PCA in the Management of Postoperative Pain Control
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2005 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2005 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Janssen-Cilag International NV
Collaborators
Alza Corporation, DE, USA

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a patient-controlled system to deliver fentanyl compared with a patient-controlled intravenous system to deliver morphine in the management of postoperative pain.
Detailed Description
This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), open-label (all people involved know the identity of the intervention) study to evaluate the clinical use, safety and ease of care of two patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) systems to deliver pain medication either through the skin or intravenously. The fentanyl hydrochloride PCA system, which delivers the medication through the skin, and morphine intravenous (IV)- PCA, which requires injection into a vein, are used for management of moderate to severe acute pain in postoperative patients who have undergone elective major abdominal or orthopedic surgery. These patients, who are expected to require postoperative pain relief with strong opioids for at least 24 hours, will control the delivery of medication for up to 3 days. Assessment of effectiveness include: patient's global assessment of pain control (poor, fair, good, excellent); Pain Intensity, measured on a visual numerical rating scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst possible pain; Ease-of-Care questionnaires including Patient Ease-of-Care questionnaire, Nurse Ease-of-Care questionnaire, and Physical Therapist Ease-of-Care questionnaire; and, total number of doses delivered by patients in the fentanyl transdermal PCA or morphine IV PCA treatment groups. Safety evaluations include vital signs (pulse, blood pressure) and oxygen saturation, respiratory function, and the incidence of adverse events. The study hypothesis is that fentanyl transdermal PCA is not inferior to morphine IV PCA treatment in patient's global assessment of method of pain control during the first 24 hours after surgery. Transdermal PCA: 40 micrograms fentanyl per on-demand dose, each delivered over 10 minutes for a maximum of 6 doses/hr for 24 hours (maximum of 80 doses, 3.2milligrams). Morphine IV PCA: morphine doses with a maximum of 20 milligrams per 2 hours for 24 hours (maximum 12 doses, 240 milligrams).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Analgesia, Patient-Controlled, Pain, Postoperative
Keywords
Pain, Patient-controlled analgesia, Postoperative pain, Transdermal fentanyl, Surgical pain, Opioid analgesics

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
657 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
IONSYS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem
Arm Title
Patient-Controlled Analgesia
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem
Intervention Description
40 µg fentanyl on-demand (240µg/hr) or a maximum of 80 doses (3.2 mg) per day
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)
Intervention Description
20mg/2hr (240 mg during 24 hours)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient's global assessment of pain control (poor, fair, good, excellent) 24 hours after start of study treatment
Time Frame
24 hours after randomization (24 hours after either the first transdermal iontorphoretic system was applied or 24 hours after the intravenous access for the morphine solution was applied).
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of pain control by patient and doctor
Time Frame
At 24, 48, and 72 hours after randomization
Title
Pain Intensity, vital signs, and oxygen level in the blood
Time Frame
Hourly through 8 hours and then every 4 hours after randomization
Title
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame
Throughout study

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who meet the criteria of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) pre-operative physical status I, II, or III Patients expected to have moderate or severe pain after a major abdominal or orthopedic procedure Patients expected to remain hospitalized for at least 24 hours postoperatively Exclusion Criteria: Known allergy or hypersensitivity to fentanyl, morphine, or to skin adhesives Known or suspected to be dependent on strong opioids or to have abused any drug substance or alcohol Severe respiratory symptoms Chronic pain disorder Pregnant or nursing women, or those lacking adequate contraception
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janssen-Cilag International NV Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Janssen-Cilag International NV
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Wien
Country
Austria
City
Brussel
Country
Belgium
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
City
Leuven
Country
Belgium
City
Aalborg
Country
Denmark
City
Kÿbenhavn Nv N/A
Country
Denmark
City
Kÿbenhavn Ÿ
Country
Denmark
City
Odense C
Country
Denmark
City
Ÿrhus C
Country
Denmark
City
Boulogne Billancourt Cedex
Country
France
City
Le Kremlin Bicetre
Country
France
City
Lille Cedex
Country
France
City
Montpellier Cedex 5
Country
France
City
Nice
Country
France
City
Paris
Country
France
City
Rennes Cedex 2
Country
France
City
Suresnes
Country
France
City
Aachen
Country
Germany
City
Bochum
Country
Germany
City
Bonn
Country
Germany
City
Frankfurt / Main
Country
Germany
City
Halle
Country
Germany
City
Hamburg N/A
Country
Germany
City
Jena
Country
Germany
City
Kiel
Country
Germany
City
Kÿln
Country
Germany
City
Mainz
Country
Germany
City
Marburg
Country
Germany
City
Ulm
Country
Germany
City
Cork
Country
Ireland
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
City
Göteborg
Country
Sweden
City
Huddinge N/A
Country
Sweden
City
Linköpng N/A
Country
Sweden
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden
City
Örebro
Country
Sweden
City
Genève
Country
Switzerland
City
Luzern
Country
Switzerland
City
St Gallen
Country
Switzerland
City
Zuerich
Country
Switzerland
City
Zurich
Country
Switzerland
City
Edinburgh
Country
United Kingdom
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
City
N/a N/a
Country
United Kingdom
City
Salford
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17519263
Citation
Grond S, Hall J, Spacek A, Hoppenbrouwers M, Richarz U, Bonnet F. Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):806-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem102. Erratum In: Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):146.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Compare Patient-controlled Pain Medications Delivered Either Through the Skin or Intravenously

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs