search
Back to results

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Application of Capsaicin 8%Transdermal Delivery System Compared to Placebo in Reducing Pain Intensity in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN) (STEP)

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Capsaicin 8%
Placebo
Sponsored by
Astellas Pharma Inc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy focused on measuring Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy,, Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of painful, distal, symmetrical, sensorimotor polyneuropathy which is due to diabetes, for at least 1 year prior to screening visit
  • Average Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score over the last 24 hours of ≥4 at the screening and the baseline visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary pain associated with PDPN (Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy) in the ankles or above
  • Pain that could not be clearly differentiated from, or conditions that might interfere with the assessment of PDPN (Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy), neurological disorders unrelated to diabetic neuropathy (e.g., phantom limb pain from amputation); skin condition in the area of the neuropathy that could alter sensation (e.g., plantar ulcer)
  • Current or previous foot ulcer as determined by medical history and medical examination
  • Any amputation of lower extremity
  • Severe renal disease as defined by a creatinine clearance of <30 ml/min calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to screening visit defined as cerebrovascular accident, unstable or poorly controlled hypertension, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, current arrhythmia, any heart surgery including coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary angioplasty/stent placement, or valvular heart disease
  • Significant peripheral vascular disease (intermittent claudication or lack of pulsation of either the dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial artery, or ankle-brachial systolic blood pressure index of <0.80)
  • Clinically significant foot deformities, including hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, or rigid toe as determined by physical examination as judged by the investigator
  • Clinically significant ongoing, uncontrolled or untreated abnormalities in cardiac, renal, hepatic, or pulmonary function that may interfere either with the ability to complete the study or the evaluation of adverse events
  • Diagnosis of any poorly controlled major psychiatric disorder
  • Active substance abuse or history of chronic substance abuse within 1 year prior to screening visit or any prior chronic substance abuse (including alcoholism) likely to re-occur during the study period as judged by the investigator
  • Hypersensitivity to capsaicin (i.e., chili peppers or over-the-counter [OTC] capsaicin products), any Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system excipients, Eutectic Mixture of Local Anaesthetics (EMLA) ingredients or adhesives
  • Use of any topical pain medication, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, menthol, methyl salicylate, local anesthetics, steroids or capsaicin products on the painful areas within 7 days preceding the first patch application at the baseline visit
  • Use of oral or transdermal opioids exceeding a total daily dose of morphine of 80 mg/day, or equivalent; or any parenteral opioids, regardless of dose, within 7 days preceding the first patch application at the baseline visit
  • Skin areas to be treated with Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system showing changes such as crusting or ulcers
  • Planned elective surgery during the trial

Sites / Locations

  • Site: 125
  • Site: 131
  • Site: 123
  • Site: 116
  • Site: 112
  • Site: 130
  • Site: 113
  • Site: 119
  • Site: 117
  • Site: 124
  • Site: 107
  • Site: 120
  • Site: 108
  • Site: 132
  • Site: 127
  • Site: 122
  • Site: 133
  • Site: 126
  • Site: 115
  • Site: 128
  • Site:111
  • Site: 110
  • Site: 121
  • Site:106
  • Site: 118
  • Site: 114
  • Site: 103
  • Site: 105
  • Site: 102

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Capsaicin 8%

Placebo

Arm Description

Capsaicin 8% patch was applied for 30 minutes to the painful area(s) on Day 1

Placebo patch was applied for 30 minutes to the painful area(s) on Day 1

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 8
Percent change in the average daily pain score from baseline to between Weeks 2 and 8, measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 12
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score from baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Weekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score
Weekly Percent Change from baseline in average daily pain score from baseline to Week 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain at Baseline and Every Week After Baseline
Weekly average of average daily pain score at Baseline and Weeks 2,4,8 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Percentage of Participants With 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.
Percentage of participants achieving 30% decrease in the average daily pain score in Weeks 2 and 8 and Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.
Percentage of participants achieving 50% decrease in the average daily pain score in Weeks 2 and 8 and Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 2
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 2
Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 8
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 8
Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 12
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 12
Change From Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) Questionnaire in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) With Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Change from Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) questionnaire in 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12. EQ-5D self-reported questionnaire is used to measure health-related quality of life by measuring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D questionnaire includes a visual analog scale (VAS) which records participants self-rated health status on a graduated (0-100) scale with higher scores indicating higher Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL).
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Scale From Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-report scale developed for the assessment of anxiety and depression, that contain 14 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale. There are 2 subscales,one assessing depression and the other anxiety. The 7-item depression and anxiety subscales yield scores of 0 to 21 that are interpreted with the following cut-off points: 0 to 7, normal; 8 to 10, mild mood disturbance; 11 to 14, moderate mood disturbance; and 15 to 21, severe mood disturbance.
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Scale From Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-report scale developed for the assessment of anxiety and depression, it contains 14 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale. There are 2 subscales,one assessing depression and the other anxiety. The 7-item depression and anxiety subscales yield scores of 0 to 21 that are interpreted with the following cut-off points: 0 to 7, normal; 8 to 10, mild mood disturbance; 11 to 14, moderate mood disturbance; and 15 to 21, severe mood disturbance.
Treatment Satisfaction Assessment Based on Self-Assessment of Treatment (SAT II) Questionnaire at Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12
Treatment satisfaction assessment based on Self-Assessment Treatment (SAT II) questionnaire and the question "Over the past 7 days, how much has the study treatment improved your pain level?"
Percent Change in Average Sleep Interference Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Percent change in average sleep interference was measured by Question 9F of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI DN) and was used to assess pain and sleep interference index. Daily sleep interference rating scale consists of an 11-point numerical scale with which the patient describes how pain related to diabetes has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours. On a scale 0 identifies "pain does not interfere with sleep" and 10 identifies "pain completely interferes with sleep". Average sleep interference score is assessed from baseline to Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12.
Tolerability of Patch Application Assessed by Dermal Assessment on Day 1, 15 Minutes and 60 Minutes After Patch Removal.
Tolerability of patch application was assessed by dermal assessment (0 to 7 point severity score on Dermal Assessment Scale). Data reported is based on the number of participants in the combined category with a score ≥ 4 (Definite edema or higher), 15 and 60 minutes after patch removal.
Change From Pre-application in"Pain Now" Score
Change from pre-application in"Pain Now" score was measured on a scale from 0-10 where 0 equates to "No Pain" and 10 to "Pain as bad as you can imagine". Participants were asked to provide pain ratings relative only to the area of pain undergoing treatment.
Number of Participants Who Used Rescue Pain Medication Days 1 Through 5
Summarized number of participants who used Rescue Pain Medications for Pain
Safety Assessed Through Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE), Vital Signs, and Laboratory Analyses From Baseline to Week 12
Number of patients assessed for Safety through Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE), vital signs, and laboratory analyses from baseline to week 12

Full Information

First Posted
February 12, 2012
Last Updated
October 12, 2015
Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01533428
Brief Title
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Application of Capsaicin 8%Transdermal Delivery System Compared to Placebo in Reducing Pain Intensity in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN)
Acronym
STEP
Official Title
A Phase III, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of QUTENZA® in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to assess efficacy and safety of a single treatment of Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system in reducing pain from damaged nerves (neuropathic pain) caused by diabetes.
Detailed Description
Participants were divided into 2 groups of approximately equal size. In the first group, participants received a Capsaicin 8% patch applied for 30 minutes to the feet; in the second group, participants received a placebo patch applied for 30 minutes to the feet. Participants were involved in the study for approximately 12 weeks and have visited the clinic approximately 6 times.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Pain
Keywords
Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy,, Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
369 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Capsaicin 8%
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Capsaicin 8% patch was applied for 30 minutes to the painful area(s) on Day 1
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo patch was applied for 30 minutes to the painful area(s) on Day 1
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Capsaicin 8%
Other Intervention Name(s)
Qutenza
Intervention Description
Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo Patch
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 8
Description
Percent change in the average daily pain score from baseline to between Weeks 2 and 8, measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Time Frame
Baseline to between Weeks 2 to 8
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2 and 12
Description
Percent Change in the Average Daily Pain Score from baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Time Frame
Baseline to between Weeks 2 and 12
Title
Weekly Percent Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score
Description
Weekly Percent Change from baseline in average daily pain score from baseline to Week 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Time Frame
Baseline to Weeks 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10, 11 and 12
Title
Weekly Average of Average Daily Pain at Baseline and Every Week After Baseline
Description
Weekly average of average daily pain score at Baseline and Weeks 2,4,8 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain due to diabetes in the last 24 hours on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Time Frame
Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With 30% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.
Description
Percentage of participants achieving 30% decrease in the average daily pain score in Weeks 2 and 8 and Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Title
Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Average Daily Pain Score.
Description
Percentage of participants achieving 50% decrease in the average daily pain score in Weeks 2 and 8 and Weeks 2 and 12 measured using Question 5 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI-DN). Participants assessed their pain on a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine).
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Title
Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 2
Description
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 2
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 2
Title
Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 8
Description
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 8
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 8
Title
Overall Participant Status Assessed Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Self-assessment Questionnaire in Week 12
Description
Overall participant status assessed using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) self-assessment questionnaire which was used by participants to report on 7 categories listed as follows; Very Much Improved, Much Improved, Minimally Improved, No Change, Minimally Worse, Much Worse and Very Much Worse in Week 12
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) Questionnaire in 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) With Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Description
Change from Baseline in the European Quality Of Life (QOL) questionnaire in 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) with Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to Weeks 2, 8 and 12. EQ-5D self-reported questionnaire is used to measure health-related quality of life by measuring 5 dimensions of health: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D questionnaire includes a visual analog scale (VAS) which records participants self-rated health status on a graduated (0-100) scale with higher scores indicating higher Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL).
Time Frame
Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Title
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Scale From Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-report scale developed for the assessment of anxiety and depression, that contain 14 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale. There are 2 subscales,one assessing depression and the other anxiety. The 7-item depression and anxiety subscales yield scores of 0 to 21 that are interpreted with the following cut-off points: 0 to 7, normal; 8 to 10, mild mood disturbance; 11 to 14, moderate mood disturbance; and 15 to 21, severe mood disturbance.
Time Frame
Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Title
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Scale From Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12.
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-report scale developed for the assessment of anxiety and depression, it contains 14 items rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale. There are 2 subscales,one assessing depression and the other anxiety. The 7-item depression and anxiety subscales yield scores of 0 to 21 that are interpreted with the following cut-off points: 0 to 7, normal; 8 to 10, mild mood disturbance; 11 to 14, moderate mood disturbance; and 15 to 21, severe mood disturbance.
Time Frame
Baseline to Weeks 2, 8 and 12
Title
Treatment Satisfaction Assessment Based on Self-Assessment of Treatment (SAT II) Questionnaire at Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12
Description
Treatment satisfaction assessment based on Self-Assessment Treatment (SAT II) questionnaire and the question "Over the past 7 days, how much has the study treatment improved your pain level?"
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 8 and 12
Title
Percent Change in Average Sleep Interference Score From Baseline to Between Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Description
Percent change in average sleep interference was measured by Question 9F of the Brief Pain Inventory-Diabetic Neuropathy (BPI DN) and was used to assess pain and sleep interference index. Daily sleep interference rating scale consists of an 11-point numerical scale with which the patient describes how pain related to diabetes has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours. On a scale 0 identifies "pain does not interfere with sleep" and 10 identifies "pain completely interferes with sleep". Average sleep interference score is assessed from baseline to Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2-8 and Weeks 2-12
Title
Tolerability of Patch Application Assessed by Dermal Assessment on Day 1, 15 Minutes and 60 Minutes After Patch Removal.
Description
Tolerability of patch application was assessed by dermal assessment (0 to 7 point severity score on Dermal Assessment Scale). Data reported is based on the number of participants in the combined category with a score ≥ 4 (Definite edema or higher), 15 and 60 minutes after patch removal.
Time Frame
Day 1, 15 minutes and 60 minutes after patch removal
Title
Change From Pre-application in"Pain Now" Score
Description
Change from pre-application in"Pain Now" score was measured on a scale from 0-10 where 0 equates to "No Pain" and 10 to "Pain as bad as you can imagine". Participants were asked to provide pain ratings relative only to the area of pain undergoing treatment.
Time Frame
Pre-application and 15 minutes and 60 minutes after patch removal
Title
Number of Participants Who Used Rescue Pain Medication Days 1 Through 5
Description
Summarized number of participants who used Rescue Pain Medications for Pain
Time Frame
Days 1 - 5
Title
Safety Assessed Through Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE), Vital Signs, and Laboratory Analyses From Baseline to Week 12
Description
Number of patients assessed for Safety through Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE), vital signs, and laboratory analyses from baseline to week 12
Time Frame
Baseline to Week 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of painful, distal, symmetrical, sensorimotor polyneuropathy which is due to diabetes, for at least 1 year prior to screening visit Average Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) score over the last 24 hours of ≥4 at the screening and the baseline visit Exclusion Criteria: Primary pain associated with PDPN (Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy) in the ankles or above Pain that could not be clearly differentiated from, or conditions that might interfere with the assessment of PDPN (Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy), neurological disorders unrelated to diabetic neuropathy (e.g., phantom limb pain from amputation); skin condition in the area of the neuropathy that could alter sensation (e.g., plantar ulcer) Current or previous foot ulcer as determined by medical history and medical examination Any amputation of lower extremity Severe renal disease as defined by a creatinine clearance of <30 ml/min calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula Clinically significant cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to screening visit defined as cerebrovascular accident, unstable or poorly controlled hypertension, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, current arrhythmia, any heart surgery including coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary angioplasty/stent placement, or valvular heart disease Significant peripheral vascular disease (intermittent claudication or lack of pulsation of either the dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial artery, or ankle-brachial systolic blood pressure index of <0.80) Clinically significant foot deformities, including hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, or rigid toe as determined by physical examination as judged by the investigator Clinically significant ongoing, uncontrolled or untreated abnormalities in cardiac, renal, hepatic, or pulmonary function that may interfere either with the ability to complete the study or the evaluation of adverse events Diagnosis of any poorly controlled major psychiatric disorder Active substance abuse or history of chronic substance abuse within 1 year prior to screening visit or any prior chronic substance abuse (including alcoholism) likely to re-occur during the study period as judged by the investigator Hypersensitivity to capsaicin (i.e., chili peppers or over-the-counter [OTC] capsaicin products), any Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system excipients, Eutectic Mixture of Local Anaesthetics (EMLA) ingredients or adhesives Use of any topical pain medication, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, menthol, methyl salicylate, local anesthetics, steroids or capsaicin products on the painful areas within 7 days preceding the first patch application at the baseline visit Use of oral or transdermal opioids exceeding a total daily dose of morphine of 80 mg/day, or equivalent; or any parenteral opioids, regardless of dose, within 7 days preceding the first patch application at the baseline visit Skin areas to be treated with Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system showing changes such as crusting or ulcers Planned elective surgery during the trial
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Study Manager
Organizational Affiliation
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Site: 125
City
Anniston
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 131
City
Fresno
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93720
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 123
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 116
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 112
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 130
City
Walnut Creek
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94597
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 113
City
Milford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06460
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 119
City
New London
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06320
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 117
City
Boynton Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33435
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 124
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 107
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33765
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 120
City
Jupiter
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33458
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 108
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 132
City
Oviedo
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32765
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 127
City
St. Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33709
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 122
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 133
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96814
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 126
City
New Bedford
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02740
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 115
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 128
City
Hazelwood
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63042
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site:111
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 110
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 121
City
Kettering
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45429
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site:106
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75230
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 118
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 114
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77098
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 103
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79410
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 105
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78228
Country
United States
Facility Name
Site: 102
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27746370
Citation
Simpson DM, Robinson-Papp J, Van J, Stoker M, Jacobs H, Snijder RJ, Schregardus DS, Long SK, Lambourg B, Katz N. Capsaicin 8% Patch in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. J Pain. 2017 Jan;18(1):42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://www.astellasclinicalstudyresults.com/study.aspx?ID=E05-CL-3004
Description
Link to results on Astellas Clinical Study Results Web site

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Application of Capsaicin 8%Transdermal Delivery System Compared to Placebo in Reducing Pain Intensity in Subjects With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs