search
Back to results

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Versus a Regimen Consisting of Darunavir/Cobicistat FDC With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate FDC in Treatment-naive HIV Type 1 Infected Subjects

Primary Purpose

Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1, Human

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide FDC
DRV/COBI FDC
FTC/TDF FDC
D/C/F/TAF FDC - Matching Placebo
FTC/TDF FDC Matching Placebo
DRV/COBI FDC Matching Placebo
Sponsored by
Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1, Human focused on measuring Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1, Human, Darunavir, Cobicistat, Tenofovir Alafenamide, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must be antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naive (never treated with an ARV including post-exposure prophylaxis and pre-exposure prophylaxis); no prior use of any approved or experimental anti- human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) drug for any length of time
  • Screening plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) level greater than or equal to >=1,000 copies per milliliter (copies/mL)
  • Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) cell count >50 cells/microliter (cells/mcL)
  • Screening HIV-1 genotype report must show full sensitivity to DRV, TDF and FTC
  • Screening eGFRcreatinine >=70 mL/min according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula for creatinine clearance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has been diagnosed with a new acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining condition within the 30 days prior to screening
  • Subject has proven or suspected acute hepatitis within 30 days prior to screening
  • Subject is hepatitis C or hepatitis B positive
  • Subject has a history of cirrhosis

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide

DRV/COBI fixed dose combination (FDC) and FTC/TDF FDC

Arm Description

Subject will receive a single oral tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF fixed dose combination [FDC]) once daily along with DRV/COBI FDC-matching and FTC/TDF FDC-matching placebo tablets once daily up to Week 48 analysis unblinding visit (i.e. after last subject has reached Week 48). After Week 48 analysis unblinding visit, subjects will receive a single tablet containing D/C/F/TAF FDC once daily up to Week 96.

Subject will receive DRV 800 mg/COBI 150 mg FDC and FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC along with D/C/F/TAF FDC-matching placebo tablet once daily up to Week 48 analysis unblinding (i.e. after last subject has reached Week 48). After Week 48 analysis unblinding, subjects will receive a single tablet containing D/C/F/TAF FDC once daily up to Week 96.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Less Than (<) 50 Copies Per Milliliter (Copies Per mL) (Virologic Response) at Week 48 Defined by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Approach
Percentage of participants with a HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies per mL were assessed using FDA snapshot approach which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. The snapshot approach classified participants into 3 outcome categories: 1) virologic success (HIV RNA < 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 48), 2) virologic failure (HIV RNA greater than or equal to [>=] 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 48), 3) no viral load data in the Week 48 visit window (discontinued due to adverse event/death/other reason). The missing HIV-1 RNA is considered as non-response.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <20 and 200 Copies Per mL at Weeks 48 and 96 Defined by FDA Snapshot Approach
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 20/200 copies per mL using FDA snapshot approach were reported. The snapshot approach classified participants into 3 outcome categories: 1) virologic success (HIV RNA < 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 48 and 96), 2) virologic failure (HIV RNA >= 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 48 and 96), 3) no viral load data in the Week 48 and 96 visit window (discontinued due to adverse event/death/other reason). The missing HIV-1 RNA is considered as non-response.
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 20, 50, and 200 Copies Per mL at Week 48 and 96 Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than (<) 20, 50, and 200 copies per mL at Weeks 48 and 96 based on TLOVR algorithm were assessed. TLOVR requires sustained HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies per mL; confirmed HIV-1 RNA >= 50 copies per mL is considered as non-response (rebound); participant is considered non-responder after permanent discontinuation.
Change From Baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA Levels at Week 48
Change from baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA levels were reported.
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation-4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 48
The immunologic change was determined by changes in Cluster of CD4+ cell count. Change from baseline in CD4+ cell count at Week 48 were assessed.
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 48
Change from baseline in serum creatinine at Week 48 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr) by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Formula at Week 48
Change from baseline in eGFRcr was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation as per which Stage 1 (normal or high GFR [>=90 mL/min]); Stage 2 (Mild CKD [60 to 90 mL/min]); Stage 3 (Moderate CKD [30 to 59mL/min]); Stage 4 (Severe CKD [15 to 29 mL/min]); Stage 5 (End Stage CKD [<15 mL/min]). The eGFRcr was assessed by calculating serum creatinine (Scr) using the equation: eGFRcr milliliter per minute per 1.72 meter square (mL/min/1.73m^2) = 144*(Scr/0.7)^-0.329*0.993^age (Scr =< 0.7 mg/dL) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 144*(Scr/0.7)^-1.209*0.993^age (Scr >0.7 mg/dL) for female participants and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 141*(Scr/0.9)^-0.411*0.993^age (Scr =<0.9 mg/dL) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 141*(Scr/0.9)^-1.209*0.993^age (Scr >0.9 mg/dL) for male participants.
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine by (Cockcroft-Gault Formula) at Week 48
Change from baseline in eGFRcr by cockcroft-gault formula at Week 48. The eGFRcr was assessed by calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and was assessed using CrCl [mL/min] = (140 - A) * W / (72 * C) * R. Where A is age at sample date [years], W is body weight at specific visit (kilogram [kg]), C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL], R = 1 if the participant is male and = 0.85 if female.
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C (eGFRcyst) by CKD-EPI Formula at Week 48
Change from baseline in eGFRcyst was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation as per which Stage 1 (normal or high GFR) >= 90 indicates normal kidney function; Stage 2 (Mild CKD): 60 to 89 mL/min indicates mildly reduced kidney function; Stage 3 (Moderate CKD): 30 to 59 mL/min indicates moderately reduced kidney function; Stage 4 (Severe CKD): 15 to 29 mL/min indicates severely reduced kidney function; Stage 5 (End Stage of CKD): <15 mL/min indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure. The eGFRcyst was assessed by calculated serum cystatin C (Scyst) using the equation: eGFRcyst mL/min/1.73m^2 = 133 * (Scyst/0,8)^-0.499 * 0.996^age [* 0.932 if female] (Scyst =<0.8 mg/L) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 133 * (Scyst/0,8)^-1.328 * 0.996^age [* 0.932 if male] (Scyst >0.8 mg/L).
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events Through Week 48
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Events with Grade 3 or higher (3=Severe; 4=life-threatening; 5=fatal) are events that significantly interrupt usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment and are, in many situations, considered unacceptable or intolerable events. SAE is any adverse event (AE) that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Change From Baseline in Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Week 48
Change from baseline in UPCR at Week 48 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) at Week 48
Change from baseline in UACR at Week 48 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein To Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) at Week 48
Change from baseline in URBPCR at Week 48 were reported.
Change From Baseline in Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Week 48
Change from baseline in UB2MGCR at Week 48 were reported.
Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Fractional Excretion of Phosphate (FEPO4) at Week 48
Percent change from baseline in FEPO4 at Week 48 was reported.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time of Administration to 24 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-24h) of Darunavir
AUC (0-24) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours post-dose.
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
C0h is defined as the predose (trough) plasma concentration or concentration just prior to study drug administration.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Across the Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Tenofovir Alafenamide
The AUCtau is the measure of the plasma drug concentration from time zero to end of dosing interval. It is used to characterize drug absorption.
Plasma Concentrations 2 Hours After Dosing (C0-2h) of Tenofovir Alafenamide
C0-2h is defined as the plasma concentrations 2 hours after dosing.
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip and Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
The BMD is the amount of mineral in gram per square centimeter of bone, which was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values" of change. Percent change from baseline in hip and spine BMD was assessed.
Change From Baseline in BMD T-score of Hip and Spine
BMD status was assessed using BMD T-scores; normal bone status was defined by a BMD T-score >= -1, osteopenia by a T-score >= -2.5 to <-1.0, and osteoporosis by a T-score <-2.5.
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
Change from baseline in ALP at Weeks 24 and 48 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Levels of Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change from baseline in serum P1NP at Weeks 24 and 48 were reported.
Change From Baseline in Levels of Serum Collagen Type 1 Beta Carboxy Telopeptide (CTX) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change from baseline in serum CTX at Weeks 24 and 48 were reported.
Change From Baseline in Levels of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change from baseline in PTH at Weeks 24 and 48 were reported.
Change From Baseline in Levels of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH Vitamin D), at Week 24 and 48
Change from baseline in 25-OH Vitamin D levels at Week 24 and 48 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies Per mL at Week 96 Defined by FDA Snapshot Approach
Percentage of participants with a HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies per mL were assessed using FDA snapshot approach which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. The snapshot approach classified participants into 3 outcome categories: 1) virologic success (HIV RNA < 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 96), 2) virologic failure (HIV RNA greater than or equal to [>=] 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 96), 3) no viral load data in the Week 96 visit window (discontinued due to adverse event/death/other reason). The missing HIV-1 RNA is considered as non-response.
Change From Reference in log10 HIV-1 RNA Levels at Week 96
Change from reference in log10 HIV-1 RNA levels were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for Test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 96
The immunologic change was determined by changes in cluster of differentiation (CD4+) cell count. Change from reference in CD4+ cell count at Week 96 was assessed. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Percentage of Participants With >95% Treatment Adherence Assessed by Drug Accountability
Treatment adherence assessed by drug accountability (based on pill count) from start of treatment/switch to last study drug intake by determination of the cumulative treatment adherence in participants who returned all dispensed bottles prior to or at the last visit in the study. Adherent participants were defined as having an adherence >95% as assessed by drug accountability.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events Through Week 96
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Events with Grade 3 or higher (3=Severe; 4=life-threatening; 5=fatal) are events that significantly interrupt usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment and are, in many situations, considered unacceptable or intolerable events. SAE is any adverse event (AE) that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Change From Reference in Serum Creatinine
Change from reference in serum creatinine was reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in eGFRcr by CKD-EPI Formula
Change from reference in eGFRcr was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation as per Stage 1 (normal or high GFR) to Stage 5 (End Stage of CKD). The eGFRcr was assessed by calculating serum creatinine (Scr) using the CKD-EPI equation: eGFRcr milliliter per minute per 1.72 meter square (mL/min/1.73m^2) = 144 * (Scr/0.7)^-0.329 * 0.993^age (Scr =< 0.7 mg/dL) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 144 * (Scr/0.7)^-1.209 * 0.993^age (Scr >0.7 mg/dL) for female participants and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 141 x (Scr/0.9)^-0.411 x 0.993^age (Scr =<0.9 mg/dL) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 141 * (Scr/0.9)^-1.209 x 0.993^age (Scr >0.9 mg/dL) for male participants. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine by Cockcroft-Gault Formula
Change from reference in eGFRcr by cockcroft-gault formula was reported. The eGFRcr was assessed by calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and was assessed using CrCl [mL/min] = (140 - A) * W / (72 * C) * R. Where A is age at sample date [years], W is body weight at specific visit (kilogram [kg]), C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL], R = 1 if the participant is male and = 0.85 if female. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C (eGFRcyst) by CKD-EPI Formula
Change from reference in eGFRcyst was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation as per Stage 1 (normal or high GFR) to Stage 5 (End Stage of CKD): <15 mL/min indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure. The eGFRcyst was assessed by calculated serum cystatin C (Scyst) using the CKD-EPI equation: eGFRcyst mL/min/1.73m^2 = 133 * (Scyst/0,8)^-0.499 * 0.996^age [x 0.932 if female] (Scyst =<0.8 mg/L) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 133 * (Scyst/0,8)^-1.328 * 0.996^age [* 0.932 if male] (Scyst >0.8 mg/L). Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in UPCR
Change from reference in UPCR was reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in UACR
Change from reference in UACR at Week 96 was reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in URBPCR
Change from reference in URBPCR at Week 96 were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in UB2MGCR
Change from reference in UB2MGCR was reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Percent Change From Reference in Urine FEPO4
Percent change from reference in FEPO4 at Week 96 were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Percent Change From Reference in Hip and Spine BMD
The BMD is the amount of mineral in gram per square centimeter of bone, which was assessed by DEXA scan. Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values" of change. Percent change from reference in hip and spine BMD was assessed. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in BMD T-score of Hip and Spine at Week 96
BMD status was assessed using BMD T-scores; normal bone status was defined by a BMD T-score >= -1, osteopenia by a T-score >= -2.5 to <-1.0, and osteoporosis by a T-score <-2.5. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in ALP Levels
Change from reference in ALP levels at Week 96 was reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in Levels of Serum P1NP
Change from reference in serum P1NP levels were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in Levels of Serum CTX
Change from reference in serum CTX levels were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in Levels of PTH
Change from reference in PTH levels were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Change From Reference in Levels of 25-OH Vitamin D
Change from reference in 25-OH Vitamin D were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, and <200 Copies/mL Post-week 96 to End of Extension
Percentage of participants with HIV RNA <50, <20, and <200 copies/mL post Week 96 to end of extension were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Protocol-defined Virologic Failure (PDVF)
Percentage of participants with PDVF were reported. Protocol-defined virologic failure was defined as having virologic non-response (HIV-1 RNA <1 log10 reduction from baseline and >=50 copies/mL at the Week 8 visit, confirmed at the next visit), virologic rebound (confirmed HIV-1 RNA >=50 copies/mL after confirmed consecutive HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL or confirmed >1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from nadir), or viremic at final time point (final available on treatment HIV-1 RNA >=400 copies/mL).
Percentage of Participants With PDVF Post-week 96 to End of Extension
Percentage of participants with PDVF were reported. Protocol-defined virologic failure was defined as having virologic non-response (HIV-1 RNA <1 log10 reduction from baseline and >=50 copies/mL at the Week 8 visit, confirmed at the next visit), virologic rebound (confirmed HIV-1 RNA >=50 copies/mL after confirmed consecutive HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL or confirmed >1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from nadir), or viremic at final time point (final available on treatment HIV-1 RNA >=400 copies/mL).
Percentage of Participants With Non-PDVF by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Percentage of participants with non-PDVF by Kaplan-Meier Estimates were reported. PDVF was defined as having virologic non-response (HIV-1 RNA <1 log10 reduction from baseline and >=50 copies/mL at the Week 8 visit, confirmed at the next visit), virologic rebound (confirmed HIV-1 RNA >=50 copies/mL after confirmed consecutive HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL or confirmed >1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from nadir), or viremic at final time point (final available on treatment HIV-1 RNA >=400 copies/mL).
Percentage of Participants With Time to Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Percentage of participants with time to treatment failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates were reported. Treatment failure was defined as having either protocol-defined virologic failure or having discontinued for reasons other than alternate access to D/C/F/TAF (or other ARVs).
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week From 96 to End of Extension
The immunologic change was determined by Cluster of CD4+ cell count. CD4+ cell count post-Week 96 to end of extension were assessed.
Number of Participants With ARV Resistance
Number of participants with DRV, FTC, TDF/TAF resistance were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 AEs, SAEs, and Premature Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Events with Grade 3 or higher (3=Severe; 4=life-threatening; 5=fatal) are events that significantly interrupt usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment and are, in many situations, considered unacceptable or intolerable events. SAE is any adverse event (AE) that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

Full Information

First Posted
April 27, 2015
Last Updated
September 27, 2022
Sponsor
Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02431247
Brief Title
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Versus a Regimen Consisting of Darunavir/Cobicistat FDC With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate FDC in Treatment-naive HIV Type 1 Infected Subjects
Official Title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Active-controlled, Double-blind Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) Once Daily Fixed Dose Combination Regimen Versus a Regimen Consisting of Darunavir/Cobicistat Fixed Dose Combination Coadministered With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Fixed Dose Combination in Antiretroviral Treatment-naive Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infected Subjects
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 6, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Janssen Sciences Ireland UC

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate non-inferiority in efficacy of a darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet versus Darunavir/Cobicistat (DRV/COBI) FDC coadministered with Emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) FDC in human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) infected, antiretroviral (ARV) treatment naive adult participants.
Detailed Description
This is a Phase 3, multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study), randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double-blind (a medical research study in which neither the researchers nor the participant know what treatment the participant is receiving), active-controlled (study in which the experimental treatment or procedure is compared to a standard [control] treatment or procedure) study. The study consists of 5 periods: a Screening period, Double-blind treatment period, Single-arm treatment period, Extension period and a Follow-up period. Participants will receive either darunavir (DRV)/ cobicistat (COBI)/emtricitabine (FTC) /tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) fixed dose combination (D/C/F/TAF FDC) or DRV/COBI FDC along with FTC/TDF FDC. Primarily percentage of participants with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) -1 Ribonucleic acid (RNA) less than (<) 50 copies per milliliter (copies/ml) defined by snapshot analysis will be evaluated. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1, Human
Keywords
Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1, Human, Darunavir, Cobicistat, Tenofovir Alafenamide, Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
725 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subject will receive a single oral tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF fixed dose combination [FDC]) once daily along with DRV/COBI FDC-matching and FTC/TDF FDC-matching placebo tablets once daily up to Week 48 analysis unblinding visit (i.e. after last subject has reached Week 48). After Week 48 analysis unblinding visit, subjects will receive a single tablet containing D/C/F/TAF FDC once daily up to Week 96.
Arm Title
DRV/COBI fixed dose combination (FDC) and FTC/TDF FDC
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subject will receive DRV 800 mg/COBI 150 mg FDC and FTC 200 mg/TDF 300 mg FDC along with D/C/F/TAF FDC-matching placebo tablet once daily up to Week 48 analysis unblinding (i.e. after last subject has reached Week 48). After Week 48 analysis unblinding, subjects will receive a single tablet containing D/C/F/TAF FDC once daily up to Week 96.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide FDC
Intervention Description
A tablet containing DRV 800 mg, COBI 150 mg, FTC 200 mg and TAF) 10 mg will be administered once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
DRV/COBI FDC
Intervention Description
A tablet containing DRV 800 mg and COBI 150 mg will be administered once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
FTC/TDF FDC
Intervention Description
A tablet containing FTC 200 mg and TDF 300 mg will be administered once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
D/C/F/TAF FDC - Matching Placebo
Intervention Description
Matching placebo of D/C/F/TAF FDC will be administered once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
FTC/TDF FDC Matching Placebo
Intervention Description
Matching placebo of FTC/TDF FDC will be administered once daily.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
DRV/COBI FDC Matching Placebo
Intervention Description
Matching placebo of DRV/COBI FDC will be administered once daily.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Less Than (<) 50 Copies Per Milliliter (Copies Per mL) (Virologic Response) at Week 48 Defined by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Approach
Description
Percentage of participants with a HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies per mL were assessed using FDA snapshot approach which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. The snapshot approach classified participants into 3 outcome categories: 1) virologic success (HIV RNA < 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 48), 2) virologic failure (HIV RNA greater than or equal to [>=] 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 48), 3) no viral load data in the Week 48 visit window (discontinued due to adverse event/death/other reason). The missing HIV-1 RNA is considered as non-response.
Time Frame
At Week 48
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <20 and 200 Copies Per mL at Weeks 48 and 96 Defined by FDA Snapshot Approach
Description
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA < 20/200 copies per mL using FDA snapshot approach were reported. The snapshot approach classified participants into 3 outcome categories: 1) virologic success (HIV RNA < 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 48 and 96), 2) virologic failure (HIV RNA >= 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 48 and 96), 3) no viral load data in the Week 48 and 96 visit window (discontinued due to adverse event/death/other reason). The missing HIV-1 RNA is considered as non-response.
Time Frame
At Weeks 48 and 96
Title
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 20, 50, and 200 Copies Per mL at Week 48 and 96 Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm
Description
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA less than (<) 20, 50, and 200 copies per mL at Weeks 48 and 96 based on TLOVR algorithm were assessed. TLOVR requires sustained HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies per mL; confirmed HIV-1 RNA >= 50 copies per mL is considered as non-response (rebound); participant is considered non-responder after permanent discontinuation.
Time Frame
At Week 48 and 96
Title
Change From Baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA Levels at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA levels were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation-4 (CD4+) Cell Count at Week 48
Description
The immunologic change was determined by changes in Cluster of CD4+ cell count. Change from baseline in CD4+ cell count at Week 48 were assessed.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline in serum creatinine at Week 48 was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr) by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Formula at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline in eGFRcr was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation as per which Stage 1 (normal or high GFR [>=90 mL/min]); Stage 2 (Mild CKD [60 to 90 mL/min]); Stage 3 (Moderate CKD [30 to 59mL/min]); Stage 4 (Severe CKD [15 to 29 mL/min]); Stage 5 (End Stage CKD [<15 mL/min]). The eGFRcr was assessed by calculating serum creatinine (Scr) using the equation: eGFRcr milliliter per minute per 1.72 meter square (mL/min/1.73m^2) = 144*(Scr/0.7)^-0.329*0.993^age (Scr =< 0.7 mg/dL) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 144*(Scr/0.7)^-1.209*0.993^age (Scr >0.7 mg/dL) for female participants and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 141*(Scr/0.9)^-0.411*0.993^age (Scr =<0.9 mg/dL) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 141*(Scr/0.9)^-1.209*0.993^age (Scr >0.9 mg/dL) for male participants.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine by (Cockcroft-Gault Formula) at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline in eGFRcr by cockcroft-gault formula at Week 48. The eGFRcr was assessed by calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and was assessed using CrCl [mL/min] = (140 - A) * W / (72 * C) * R. Where A is age at sample date [years], W is body weight at specific visit (kilogram [kg]), C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL], R = 1 if the participant is male and = 0.85 if female.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C (eGFRcyst) by CKD-EPI Formula at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline in eGFRcyst was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation as per which Stage 1 (normal or high GFR) >= 90 indicates normal kidney function; Stage 2 (Mild CKD): 60 to 89 mL/min indicates mildly reduced kidney function; Stage 3 (Moderate CKD): 30 to 59 mL/min indicates moderately reduced kidney function; Stage 4 (Severe CKD): 15 to 29 mL/min indicates severely reduced kidney function; Stage 5 (End Stage of CKD): <15 mL/min indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure. The eGFRcyst was assessed by calculated serum cystatin C (Scyst) using the equation: eGFRcyst mL/min/1.73m^2 = 133 * (Scyst/0,8)^-0.499 * 0.996^age [* 0.932 if female] (Scyst =<0.8 mg/L) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 133 * (Scyst/0,8)^-1.328 * 0.996^age [* 0.932 if male] (Scyst >0.8 mg/L).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events Through Week 48
Description
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Events with Grade 3 or higher (3=Severe; 4=life-threatening; 5=fatal) are events that significantly interrupt usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment and are, in many situations, considered unacceptable or intolerable events. SAE is any adverse event (AE) that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time Frame
Up to Weeks 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline in UPCR at Week 48 was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline in UACR at Week 48 was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein To Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline in URBPCR at Week 48 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Week 48
Description
Change from baseline in UB2MGCR at Week 48 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Fractional Excretion of Phosphate (FEPO4) at Week 48
Description
Percent change from baseline in FEPO4 at Week 48 was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 48
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time of Administration to 24 Hours Post-dose (AUC0-24h) of Darunavir
Description
AUC (0-24) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours post-dose.
Time Frame
0 to 24 hours post dose
Title
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Description
C0h is defined as the predose (trough) plasma concentration or concentration just prior to study drug administration.
Time Frame
30 minutes to 4 hours postdose at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24 and 48 and at 2 timepoints with at least 2.5 hours in between sampling at Week 8 and 36 (first sample between 1 and 4 hours postdose)
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve Across the Dosing Interval (AUCtau) of Tenofovir Alafenamide
Description
The AUCtau is the measure of the plasma drug concentration from time zero to end of dosing interval. It is used to characterize drug absorption.
Time Frame
30 minutes to 4 hours postdose at Weeks 2, 4, 12, 24 and 48 and at 2 timepoints with at least 2.5 hours in between sampling at Week 8 and 36 (first sample between 1 and 4 hours postdose)
Title
Plasma Concentrations 2 Hours After Dosing (C0-2h) of Tenofovir Alafenamide
Description
C0-2h is defined as the plasma concentrations 2 hours after dosing.
Time Frame
0 to 2 hours post dose
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip and Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Description
The BMD is the amount of mineral in gram per square centimeter of bone, which was assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values" of change. Percent change from baseline in hip and spine BMD was assessed.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Title
Change From Baseline in BMD T-score of Hip and Spine
Description
BMD status was assessed using BMD T-scores; normal bone status was defined by a BMD T-score >= -1, osteopenia by a T-score >= -2.5 to <-1.0, and osteoporosis by a T-score <-2.5.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
Description
Change from baseline in ALP at Weeks 24 and 48 was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Levels of Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Weeks 24 and 48
Description
Change from baseline in serum P1NP at Weeks 24 and 48 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Levels of Serum Collagen Type 1 Beta Carboxy Telopeptide (CTX) at Weeks 24 and 48
Description
Change from baseline in serum CTX at Weeks 24 and 48 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Levels of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) at Weeks 24 and 48
Description
Change from baseline in PTH at Weeks 24 and 48 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Levels of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH Vitamin D), at Week 24 and 48
Description
Change from baseline in 25-OH Vitamin D levels at Week 24 and 48 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48
Title
Percentage of Participants With HIV-1 RNA <50 Copies Per mL at Week 96 Defined by FDA Snapshot Approach
Description
Percentage of participants with a HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies per mL were assessed using FDA snapshot approach which defines a participant's virologic response status using only the viral load at the predefined time point within an allowed window of time, along with study drug discontinuation status. The snapshot approach classified participants into 3 outcome categories: 1) virologic success (HIV RNA < 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 96), 2) virologic failure (HIV RNA greater than or equal to [>=] 20/50/200 copies per mL at Week 96), 3) no viral load data in the Week 96 visit window (discontinued due to adverse event/death/other reason). The missing HIV-1 RNA is considered as non-response.
Time Frame
At Week 96
Title
Change From Reference in log10 HIV-1 RNA Levels at Week 96
Description
Change from reference in log10 HIV-1 RNA levels were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for Test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 96
Description
The immunologic change was determined by changes in cluster of differentiation (CD4+) cell count. Change from reference in CD4+ cell count at Week 96 was assessed. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Percentage of Participants With >95% Treatment Adherence Assessed by Drug Accountability
Description
Treatment adherence assessed by drug accountability (based on pill count) from start of treatment/switch to last study drug intake by determination of the cumulative treatment adherence in participants who returned all dispensed bottles prior to or at the last visit in the study. Adherent participants were defined as having an adherence >95% as assessed by drug accountability.
Time Frame
Baseline to Switch and switch to EOE to Open-Label D/C/F/TAF (Up to 3 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events Through Week 96
Description
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Events with Grade 3 or higher (3=Severe; 4=life-threatening; 5=fatal) are events that significantly interrupt usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment and are, in many situations, considered unacceptable or intolerable events. SAE is any adverse event (AE) that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time Frame
Up to Week 96
Title
Change From Reference in Serum Creatinine
Description
Change from reference in serum creatinine was reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in eGFRcr by CKD-EPI Formula
Description
Change from reference in eGFRcr was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation as per Stage 1 (normal or high GFR) to Stage 5 (End Stage of CKD). The eGFRcr was assessed by calculating serum creatinine (Scr) using the CKD-EPI equation: eGFRcr milliliter per minute per 1.72 meter square (mL/min/1.73m^2) = 144 * (Scr/0.7)^-0.329 * 0.993^age (Scr =< 0.7 mg/dL) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 144 * (Scr/0.7)^-1.209 * 0.993^age (Scr >0.7 mg/dL) for female participants and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 141 x (Scr/0.9)^-0.411 x 0.993^age (Scr =<0.9 mg/dL) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 141 * (Scr/0.9)^-1.209 x 0.993^age (Scr >0.9 mg/dL) for male participants. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine by Cockcroft-Gault Formula
Description
Change from reference in eGFRcr by cockcroft-gault formula was reported. The eGFRcr was assessed by calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl) using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and was assessed using CrCl [mL/min] = (140 - A) * W / (72 * C) * R. Where A is age at sample date [years], W is body weight at specific visit (kilogram [kg]), C is the serum concentration of creatinine [mg/dL], R = 1 if the participant is male and = 0.85 if female. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C (eGFRcyst) by CKD-EPI Formula
Description
Change from reference in eGFRcyst was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation as per Stage 1 (normal or high GFR) to Stage 5 (End Stage of CKD): <15 mL/min indicate very severe or end stage kidney failure. The eGFRcyst was assessed by calculated serum cystatin C (Scyst) using the CKD-EPI equation: eGFRcyst mL/min/1.73m^2 = 133 * (Scyst/0,8)^-0.499 * 0.996^age [x 0.932 if female] (Scyst =<0.8 mg/L) and eGFRcr mL/min/1.73m^2 = 133 * (Scyst/0,8)^-1.328 * 0.996^age [* 0.932 if male] (Scyst >0.8 mg/L). Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in UPCR
Description
Change from reference in UPCR was reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in UACR
Description
Change from reference in UACR at Week 96 was reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in URBPCR
Description
Change from reference in URBPCR at Week 96 were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in UB2MGCR
Description
Change from reference in UB2MGCR was reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Percent Change From Reference in Urine FEPO4
Description
Percent change from reference in FEPO4 at Week 96 were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Percent Change From Reference in Hip and Spine BMD
Description
The BMD is the amount of mineral in gram per square centimeter of bone, which was assessed by DEXA scan. Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values" of change. Percent change from reference in hip and spine BMD was assessed. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in BMD T-score of Hip and Spine at Week 96
Description
BMD status was assessed using BMD T-scores; normal bone status was defined by a BMD T-score >= -1, osteopenia by a T-score >= -2.5 to <-1.0, and osteoporosis by a T-score <-2.5. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in ALP Levels
Description
Change from reference in ALP levels at Week 96 was reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in Levels of Serum P1NP
Description
Change from reference in serum P1NP levels were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in Levels of Serum CTX
Description
Change from reference in serum CTX levels were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in Levels of PTH
Description
Change from reference in PTH levels were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Change From Reference in Levels of 25-OH Vitamin D
Description
Change from reference in 25-OH Vitamin D were reported. Here, reference 1 is the comparative phase baseline value in Week 48 analysis for test group and reference 2 is the last value prior to the switch for Control group.
Time Frame
From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF
Title
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, and <200 Copies/mL Post-week 96 to End of Extension
Description
Percentage of participants with HIV RNA <50, <20, and <200 copies/mL post Week 96 to end of extension were reported.
Time Frame
Week 96 to end of extension (up to 3 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Protocol-defined Virologic Failure (PDVF)
Description
Percentage of participants with PDVF were reported. Protocol-defined virologic failure was defined as having virologic non-response (HIV-1 RNA <1 log10 reduction from baseline and >=50 copies/mL at the Week 8 visit, confirmed at the next visit), virologic rebound (confirmed HIV-1 RNA >=50 copies/mL after confirmed consecutive HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL or confirmed >1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from nadir), or viremic at final time point (final available on treatment HIV-1 RNA >=400 copies/mL).
Time Frame
From Baseline up to Week 96
Title
Percentage of Participants With PDVF Post-week 96 to End of Extension
Description
Percentage of participants with PDVF were reported. Protocol-defined virologic failure was defined as having virologic non-response (HIV-1 RNA <1 log10 reduction from baseline and >=50 copies/mL at the Week 8 visit, confirmed at the next visit), virologic rebound (confirmed HIV-1 RNA >=50 copies/mL after confirmed consecutive HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL or confirmed >1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from nadir), or viremic at final time point (final available on treatment HIV-1 RNA >=400 copies/mL).
Time Frame
Week 96 to end of extension (up to 3 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Non-PDVF by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Description
Percentage of participants with non-PDVF by Kaplan-Meier Estimates were reported. PDVF was defined as having virologic non-response (HIV-1 RNA <1 log10 reduction from baseline and >=50 copies/mL at the Week 8 visit, confirmed at the next visit), virologic rebound (confirmed HIV-1 RNA >=50 copies/mL after confirmed consecutive HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL or confirmed >1 log10 increase in HIV-1 RNA from nadir), or viremic at final time point (final available on treatment HIV-1 RNA >=400 copies/mL).
Time Frame
From Week 96 to end of extension (up to 2 years and 6 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Time to Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Description
Percentage of participants with time to treatment failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates were reported. Treatment failure was defined as having either protocol-defined virologic failure or having discontinued for reasons other than alternate access to D/C/F/TAF (or other ARVs).
Time Frame
From Week 96 to end of extension (up to 3 years)
Title
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week From 96 to End of Extension
Description
The immunologic change was determined by Cluster of CD4+ cell count. CD4+ cell count post-Week 96 to end of extension were assessed.
Time Frame
Week 96 to end of extension (up to 3 years)
Title
Number of Participants With ARV Resistance
Description
Number of participants with DRV, FTC, TDF/TAF resistance were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline to end of extension (up to 4 years)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 and 4 AEs, SAEs, and Premature Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Description
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Events with Grade 3 or higher (3=Severe; 4=life-threatening; 5=fatal) are events that significantly interrupt usual daily activity, require systemic drug therapy/other treatment and are, in many situations, considered unacceptable or intolerable events. SAE is any adverse event (AE) that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Time Frame
From Week 96 to end of extension (up to 3 years)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject must be antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naive (never treated with an ARV including post-exposure prophylaxis and pre-exposure prophylaxis); no prior use of any approved or experimental anti- human immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) drug for any length of time Screening plasma HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) level greater than or equal to >=1,000 copies per milliliter (copies/mL) Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) cell count >50 cells/microliter (cells/mcL) Screening HIV-1 genotype report must show full sensitivity to DRV, TDF and FTC Screening eGFRcreatinine >=70 mL/min according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula for creatinine clearance Exclusion Criteria: Subject has been diagnosed with a new acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining condition within the 30 days prior to screening Subject has proven or suspected acute hepatitis within 30 days prior to screening Subject is hepatitis C or hepatitis B positive Subject has a history of cirrhosis
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janssen Sciences Ireland UC Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Janssen Sciences Ireland UC
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
City
Bakersfield
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
North Hollywood
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
Country
United States
City
Fort Pierce
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Savannah
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Springfield
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Berkley
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
Country
United States
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
City
Hillsborough
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
City
Newark
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
City
Somers Point
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
City
Santa Fe
State/Province
New Mexico
Country
United States
City
Manhasset
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
City
Antwerpen
Country
Belgium
City
Brussels
Country
Belgium
City
Brussel
Country
Belgium
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Clamart
Country
France
City
Le Kremlin Bicetre
Country
France
City
Lyon
Country
France
City
Marseille
Country
France
City
Montpellier
Country
France
City
Nantes
Country
France
City
Paris
Country
France
City
Strasbourg
Country
France
City
Tourcoing
Country
France
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
City
Bonn
Country
Germany
City
Essen
Country
Germany
City
Frankfurt
Country
Germany
City
Freiburg im Breisgau
Country
Germany
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
City
Hannover
Country
Germany
City
Köln
Country
Germany
City
München
Country
Germany
City
Bydgoszcz
Country
Poland
City
Chorzow
Country
Poland
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
City
Lodz
Country
Poland
City
Szczecin
Country
Poland
City
Warszawa
Country
Poland
City
Wroclaw
Country
Poland
City
San Juan
Country
Puerto Rico
City
Ekaterinburg
Country
Russian Federation
City
Krasnodar
Country
Russian Federation
City
Orel
Country
Russian Federation
City
Saint Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
City
Saratov
Country
Russian Federation
City
Smolensk
Country
Russian Federation
City
Tolyatti
Country
Russian Federation
City
Voronezh
Country
Russian Federation
City
Alicante
Country
Spain
City
Badalona
Country
Spain
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
City
Cordoba
Country
Spain
City
Elche
Country
Spain
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
City
Santiago de Compostela
Country
Spain
City
Sevilla
Country
Spain
City
Valencia
Country
Spain
City
Brighton
Country
United Kingdom
City
Bristol
Country
United Kingdom
City
London
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34100149
Citation
Ackaert O, McDougall D, Perez-Ruixo C, Perez-Ruixo JJ, Jezorwski J, Crauwels HM. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Darunavir and Tenofovir Alafenamide in HIV-1-Infected Patients on the Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Single-Tablet Regimen (AMBER and EMERALD Studies). AAPS J. 2021 Jun 7;23(4):82. doi: 10.1208/s12248-021-00607-8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31833849
Citation
Orkin C, Eron JJ, Rockstroh J, Podzamczer D, Esser S, Vandekerckhove L, Van Landuyt E, Lathouwers E, Hufkens V, Jezorwski J, Opsomer M; AMBER study group. Week 96 results of a phase 3 trial of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive HIV-1 patients. AIDS. 2020 Apr 1;34(5):707-718. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000002463.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31516033
Citation
Lathouwers E, Wong EY, Brown K, Baugh B, Ghys A, Jezorwski J, Mohsine EG, Van Landuyt E, Opsomer M, De Meyer S; AMBER and EMERALD Study Groups. Week 48 Resistance Analyses of the Once-Daily, Single-Tablet Regimen Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) in Adults Living with HIV-1 from the Phase III Randomized AMBER and EMERALD Trials. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2020 Jan;36(1):48-57. doi: 10.1089/AID.2019.0111. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31303147
Citation
Rashbaum B, Spinner CD, McDonald C, Mussini C, Jezorwski J, Luo D, Van Landuyt E, Brown K, Wong EY. Darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1: subgroup analyses of the phase 3 AMBER study. HIV Res Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;20(1):24-33. doi: 10.1080/15284336.2019.1608714. Epub 2019 May 29.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29683855
Citation
Eron JJ, Orkin C, Gallant J, Molina JM, Negredo E, Antinori A, Mills A, Reynes J, Van Landuyt E, Lathouwers E, Hufkens V, Jezorwski J, Vanveggel S, Opsomer M; AMBER study group. A week-48 randomized phase-3 trial of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive HIV-1 patients. AIDS. 2018 Jul 17;32(11):1431-1442. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001817.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) Fixed Dose Combination (FDC) Versus a Regimen Consisting of Darunavir/Cobicistat FDC With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate FDC in Treatment-naive HIV Type 1 Infected Subjects

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs